On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:31:21 -0500 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Wednesday 14 February 2007, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > if it works for > > devs - then it's good. if it doesn't work for users because they updated > > their autofoo packages... TOO BAD. autofoo is for developers. using cvs > > basically gives you the > > responsibility of a developer when it comes to running autofoo tools. > > developers job it sot produce a source tarball - that is the final product > > for "consumers" (users). autofoo is used to create that tarball. it is not > > used again after that point. > > as already noted in previous threads, going from <automake-1.10 to > >=automake-1.10 changes the error from an ignored runtime one on the user's > system to a build time failure on the developer's system > > in other words, they're both wrong ... you're just choosing the one > that "seems to work" :P which then snowballs into having to use new tools that also require yet net tools themselves... :) -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 裸好多 Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
