Am Mon, 31 Dec 2007 16:28:23 +0900 schrieb Daniel Stonier:
On 31/12/2007, Daniel Stonier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tyranny of the majority - I like that! Or like to fight against it
anyway!
I love E's philosophy in allowing the user to choose the style they
want. Too often 'hidden'
Am Sun, 30 Dec 2007 19:46:12 + schrieb Ethan Grammatikidis:
I'm sorry to say that my first response to this was Oh no, not
another blog to keep up with, or words to that effect. The content
of that post is clearly written and quite well thought out, but it
would be easier to discuss the
Mate, dont worry about it, wasn't offended in the slightest. Just
reiterating one of E17's strongest points. Didn't meant to cause any
angst either.
I actually think E's splitting of the configuration dialogs into
basic/advanced is fine, most of what a normal joe would use is hidden
from him
On Dec 30, 2007 2:55 AM, Vincent Torri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- if ((e_config-use_composite) (ecore_x_composite_query()))
+ if ((e_config-use_composite) (ecore_x_screen_is_composited(0)))
ecore_x_screen_is_composited does not check if the X server
supports the composite
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007, Nathan Ingersoll wrote:
Another possibility (raster's idea) for
ecore_x_drawable_geometry_get_async is to sent an event
ECORE_X_REPLY_GEOMETRY_GET just when the xcb_get_geometry_reply call has
returned. The event would contain (actually, would be) the structure
above.
