On Mon, 21 Jul 2008, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
>
> Get-e *was* good, and useful. It could've done more in terms of this and
> that,
> but so could everything. But I don't see why everyone feels that 'there can be
> only one' of anything. I just don't understand this persistent idea that I've
> s
Brian wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> to make this clear, GET-E.org will be closed. Exchange is a good
> improvement and i like the idea to have everything under the e.org
> domain. Also i see no sense in having two sites, providing the same.
> The site will be up for a while until all the themes
Gustavo wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Peter Wehrfritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri schrieb:
>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 8:29 PM, Peter Wehrfritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
Jose Gonzalez schrieb:
>
Peter wrote:
> Jose Gonzalez schrieb:
>> (4) Extensions to the current rectangle obj api:
>> ***
>>
>> void evas_object_rectangle_corner_radius_set(obj, float r);
>> void evas_object_rectangle_corner_style_set(obj, int corner_style);
>>
>>
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Peter Wehrfritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri schrieb:
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 8:29 PM, Peter Wehrfritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Jose Gonzalez schrieb:
>>>
(4) Extensions to the current rectangle obj api:
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri schrieb:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 8:29 PM, Peter Wehrfritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Jose Gonzalez schrieb:
>>
>>> (4) Extensions to the current rectangle obj api:
>>> ***
>>>
>>> void evas_object_rectangle_corn
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 8:29 PM, Peter Wehrfritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jose Gonzalez schrieb:
>> (4) Extensions to the current rectangle obj api:
>> ***
>>
>> void evas_object_rectangle_corner_radius_set(obj, float r);
>> void evas_object_rec
I don't see any problem here, too.
As morlenxus said: exchange is intended to replace get-e.
e17-stuff.org is third party, doesn't have any quality standards and is
nothing more than a list with random themes, apps, and dozens of things that
have nothing to do with E at all - nothing to care about.
Jose Gonzalez schrieb:
> (4) Extensions to the current rectangle obj api:
> ***
>
> void evas_object_rectangle_corner_radius_set(obj, float r);
> void evas_object_rectangle_corner_style_set(obj, int corner_style);
>
> Where 'corner_style' can
Indeed, one of the main reasons for creating exchange was to make a
webapp that was a lot more tightly integrated with the efl.
Personally, I would like to see a ecore-style C library for exchange,
so that people can just plop it into their apps and get a full
repository of themes for their specifi
Build log for Enlightenment DR 0.17 on 2008-07-20 07:10:03 -0700
Build logs are available at http://download.enlightenment.org/tests/logs
Packages that failed to build:
enna http://download.enlightenment.org/tests/logs/enna.log
epdf http://download.enlightenment.org/tests/logs/epdf.log
Packages
Vincent wrote:
>
> On Sun, 20 Jul 2008, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
>
>> I agree that discussion on this important aspect of
>> "e-and-the-web" would
>> be excellent, and it's something I tried to mention several times.
>> But what's
>> better about this particular exchange thing is the potentia
morlenxus wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 04:01:11AM -0400, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
>
>>Vincent wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Sun, 20 Jul 2008, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
>>>
>>>
This is actually damn nice. It's a great example of having e
become more
"web-connected", and
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 04:01:11AM -0400, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
>Vincent wrote:
>
> >
> > On Sun, 20 Jul 2008, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
> >
> >> This is actually damn nice. It's a great example of having e
> >> become more
> >> "web-connected", and could yet become something bigger and better
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
> I agree that discussion on this important aspect of "e-and-the-web"
> would
> be excellent, and it's something I tried to mention several times. But what's
> better about this particular exchange thing is the potential for it to evolve
> into some
Hello everyone,
to make this clear, GET-E.org will be closed. Exchange is a good
improvement and i like the idea to have everything under the e.org
domain. Also i see no sense in having two sites, providing the same.
The site will be up for a while until all the themes are moved to the
new domain.
Vincent wrote:
>
> On Sun, 20 Jul 2008, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
>
>> This is actually damn nice. It's a great example of having e
>> become more
>> "web-connected", and could yet become something bigger and better. I
>> suppose
>> get-e could've done something similar, and perhaps it could
On the topic of e17-stuff, it is an unmoderated, poorly maintained
website. I think exchange is a much better place than e17-stuff for
submitting and browsing in general. Personally, ive taken all my
content of e17-stuff for various reasons. On the topic of get-e, i
like it. Its great, full of cool
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
> This is actually damn nice. It's a great example of having e become more
> "web-connected", and could yet become something bigger and better. I suppose
> get-e could've done something similar, and perhaps it could or maybe integrate
> better with t
19 matches
Mail list logo
