On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:30:53 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri
said:
yes. NEWS would be a summary of the changelog for a quick 2 minute scan of
"whats the important stuff". changelog is for all the nitty details when you
get an updated release tarball.
> On Sat, 31 Jan 2009, Viktor Kojouharov wrote:
>
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 21:03:48 + Andrew Williams said:
> You can of course have both.
> Generate a ChangeLog file from the subversion logs and have a
> subversion hook update this everytime a change is made...
> Would that keep everyone happy?
i'd have no problem with this. as for 1.0 for st
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:29:12 +0300 sda said:
> On 09:04 Thu 29 Jan , Toma wrote:
>
> > As the top of the page says, we need to finalize the list of things
> > TODO.
>
> hi guys,
>
> i'm not the dev so beg your pardon if things below are "out of scope".
>
> 1) after the review of a mentio
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009, Viktor Kojouharov wrote:
from what I've seen in almost every other project, the ChangeLog is
being used a SVC log mirror. It's the NEWS file that actually reflects
meaningful changes between versions, not the ChangeLog.
My point of view (maybe i should have been clearer)
On Friday, 30 January 2009, at 15:41:35 (+0100),
Vincent Torri wrote:
> cedric just fixed a bug in eet, and he forgot to update the ChangeLog. I
> do not criticise, it can happen to everyone, including me (and it did
> happen to me).
>
> But, as we plan to do more releases, the ChangeLog will h
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009, Andrew Williams wrote:
You can of course have both.
Generate a ChangeLog file from the subversion logs and have a subversion
hook update this everytime a change is made...
Would that keep everyone happy?
not really (for me)
from what I've seen in almost every other project, the ChangeLog is
being used a SVC log mirror. It's the NEWS file that actually reflects
meaningful changes between versions, not the ChangeLog.
On Sat, 2009-01-31 at 22:16 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
> On Sat, 31 Jan 2009, Andrew Williams wrote
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009, Andrew Williams wrote:
You can of course have both.
Generate a ChangeLog file from the subversion logs and have a subversion hook
update this everytime a change is made...
Would that keep everyone happy?
not really (for me). The svn log would pollute the ChangeLog file
On Sat, 2009-01-31 at 21:03 +, Andrew Williams wrote:
> You can of course have both.
> Generate a ChangeLog file from the subversion logs and have a
> subversion hook update this everytime a change is made...
> Would that keep everyone happy?
>
> Andy
I believe this should be done for all p
You can of course have both.
Generate a ChangeLog file from the subversion logs and have a
subversion hook update this everytime a change is made...
Would that keep everyone happy?
Andy
On 30 Jan 2009, at 19:23, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 30 Jan 2009, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>
> There was a systray mention on there a while ago... maybe it was a
> different TODO list. Added in modules-extra for now.
>
ok. thx.
> > 3) annoying question related to the "color and font config modules". as
> > it was mentioned by Raster:
> >
> >>thats what i meant - just wouldn't compile t
On 09:04 Thu 29 Jan , Toma wrote:
> As the top of the page says, we need to finalize the list of things
> TODO.
hi guys,
i'm not the dev so beg your pardon if things below are "out of scope".
1) after the review of a mentioned page
(http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/wiki/Release)
i decide to
12 matches
Mail list logo
