Re: [E-devel] [Patch] bug fix - e_config config save patch

2011-11-14 Thread Sebastian Dransfeld
On 11/15/2011 06:23 AM, Doyoun Kang wrote: > Dear all, > > I found a bug in e_config. The e didn't make the configuration backup files. > It was because of my wrong patch (svn rev.64684). I fixed this bug. > Please check the new patch file. In. S. ---

Re: [E-devel] sound api "plan"

2011-11-14 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 3:48 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 02:52:49 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > said: > >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Carsten Haitzler >> wrote: >> > On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:26:51 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri >> > said: >> > >> >> On Mon, Nov 14,

Re: [E-devel] sound api "plan"

2011-11-14 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 02:52:49 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri said: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Carsten Haitzler > wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:26:51 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > > said: > > > >> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Carsten Haitzler > >> wrote: > >> > On Mon, 14 Nov

[E-devel] [Patch] bug fix - e_config config save patch

2011-11-14 Thread Doyoun Kang
Dear all, I found a bug in e_config. The e didn't make the configuration backup files. It was because of my wrong patch (svn rev.64684). I fixed this bug. Please check the new patch file. e_config.diff Description: Binary data -

Re: [E-devel] sound api "plan"

2011-11-14 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:26:51 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > said: > >> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Carsten Haitzler >> wrote: >> > On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:08:55 +1000 David Seikel said: >> > >> >> On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:59:57 +09

Re: [E-devel] [Patch][ecore_con] Refactoring curl port

2011-11-14 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:47:08 +0900 Bluezery said: considering the amount of refactoring.. this will have to wait until after 1.1. we are in feature freeze. that means no refactoring. no new features. just bug fixes. > Oh, I see. That's better. :) > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Mike Blumen

Re: [E-devel] sound api "plan"

2011-11-14 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:26:51 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri said: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Carsten Haitzler > wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:08:55 +1000 David Seikel said: > > > >> On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:59:57 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) > >> wrote: > >> > >> > On Mon,

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: jaehwan trunk/edje/src/bin

2011-11-14 Thread Sachiel
2011/11/14 Iván Briano (Sachiel) : > 2011/11/14 Enlightenment SVN : >> Log: >> rel1.to: ""; fix build error. >>  Actually, if rel1.to_x is not used in the matched description of the parent >> group, rel1.to_x: ""; doesn't need to be used in the description of the >> child group. >>  Because its s

Re: [E-devel] RFC - New elm_entry function (rev: 65169)

2011-11-14 Thread Tom Hacohen
On 14/11/11 17:22, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote: > No, but I still feel dirty inside. > I'm going to take another shower. Me too. :P -- Tom. -- RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu

Re: [E-devel] RFC - New elm_entry function (rev: 65169)

2011-11-14 Thread Sachiel
2011/11/14 Tom Hacohen : > On 14/11/11 17:17, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote: >> >> Oh god > > I think the same, that's part of why I sent this email and didn't let it > silently slide in. Do you have any other idea? I don't think copying all the > textblock functions to edje and elementary is

Re: [E-devel] RFC - New elm_entry function (rev: 65169)

2011-11-14 Thread Tom Hacohen
On 14/11/11 17:17, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote: > Oh god I think the same, that's part of why I sent this email and didn't let it silently slide in. Do you have any other idea? I don't think copying all the textblock functions to edje and elementary is the right way here... -- Tom. --

Re: [E-devel] RFC - New elm_entry function (rev: 65169)

2011-11-14 Thread Sachiel
2011/11/14 Tom Hacohen : > On 14/11/11 17:10, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote: >> >> Returning a textblock means you are returning the internal textblock >> from the internal edje of the entry? > > Yes. > Oh god > -- > Tom. > ---

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: jaehwan trunk/edje/src/bin

2011-11-14 Thread Sachiel
2011/11/14 Enlightenment SVN : > Log: > rel1.to: ""; fix build error. >  Actually, if rel1.to_x is not used in the matched description of the parent > group, rel1.to_x: ""; doesn't need to be used in the description of the child > group. >  Because its state is already default. But sometime we ma

Re: [E-devel] RFC - New elm_entry function (rev: 65169)

2011-11-14 Thread Tom Hacohen
On 14/11/11 17:10, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote: > Returning a textblock means you are returning the internal textblock > from the internal edje of the entry? Yes. -- Tom. -- RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Re

Re: [E-devel] RFC - New elm_entry function (rev: 65169)

2011-11-14 Thread Sachiel
2011/11/14 Tom Hacohen : > On 14/11/11 16:46, ChunEon Park wrote: >> >> IMHO, if it allows the editing then no need 'const' anymore. > > Yeah, that's my problem, and why I sent this email... I'm not sure how > to make an extra warning, as people don't always read the docs (usually > don't). >> >> E

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: raster trunk/embryo

2011-11-14 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:20:34 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri said: > > > On Mon, 14 Nov 2011, Enlightenment SVN wrote: > > > Log: > > add NEWS for embryo > > just a question : is it necessary to release embryo as 1.1 ? To me it's a > bug fix, with a dep on eina 1.1. the fact it requires eina 1.1

Re: [E-devel] RFC - New elm_entry function (rev: 65169)

2011-11-14 Thread Tom Hacohen
On 14/11/11 16:46, ChunEon Park wrote: > > IMHO, if it allows the editing then no need 'const' anymore. Yeah, that's my problem, and why I sent this email... I'm not sure how to make an extra warning, as people don't always read the docs (usually don't). > > Even I don't know about entry much be

Re: [E-devel] RFC - New elm_entry function (rev: 65169)

2011-11-14 Thread ChunEon Park
IMHO, if it allows the editing then no need 'const' anymore. Even I don't know about entry much better than u, Still I'm wondering the return of the textblok is reasonable... -Regards, Hermet- -Original Message- From: "Tom Hacohen"

Re: [E-devel] sound api "plan"

2011-11-14 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:08:55 +1000 David Seikel said: > >> On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:59:57 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) >> wrote: >> >> > On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:31:01 +1000 David Seikel >> > said: >> > >> > > I have this marked t

[E-devel] RFC - New elm_entry function (rev: 65169)

2011-11-14 Thread Tom Hacohen
Hey all, I added elm_entry_textblock_get so people will be able to do more low-level manipulations on the textblock object of the entry. I explained the implications in the doc and also explained there that it should be use mostly for querying, but editing is also allowed as long as a couple o

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: raster trunk/embryo

2011-11-14 Thread Vincent Torri
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011, Enlightenment SVN wrote: > Log: > add NEWS for embryo just a question : is it necessary to release embryo as 1.1 ? To me it's a bug fix, with a dep on eina 1.1. Vincent > > > > Author: raster > Date: 2011-11-14 03:21:57 -0800 (Mon, 14 Nov 2011) > New Revisi

Re: [E-devel] Fwd: About release, snapshots and openBSD port

2011-11-14 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 01:30:09 -0500 Youness Alaoui said: > --- Resending from my server, it seems gmail's IP has been > blocked by sourceforge because of abuse ... > > Thanks Stefan for another well written email, I guess that > psychology minor is indeed useful :) > Thanks Mike also for

Re: [E-devel] ABI break in eina ?

2011-11-14 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:49:22 +0100 Albin Tonnerre said: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:22 AM, Carsten Haitzler > wrote: > > On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 19:25:48 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri > > said: > > > > comparison of symbols of eina 1.0.0 and 1.0.99 shows no exported symbols > > removed. only added. >

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: onefang trunk/edje_viewer/src/bin

2011-11-14 Thread David Seikel
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:27:31 +1000 David Seikel wrote: > On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:23:53 +0100 Cedric BAIL > wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Enlightenment SVN > > wrote: > > > Log: > > > Bare minimum changes to update to elementary API breakage so it > > > compiles. Other things lik

Re: [E-devel] [Patch][ecore_con] Refactoring curl port

2011-11-14 Thread Bluezery
Oh, I see. That's better. :) On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:08:09 +0100 > Cedric BAIL wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: >> > On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:48:07 +0100 >> > Sebastian Dransfeld wrote: >> >> On 11/14

Re: [E-devel] [Patch][ecore_con] Refactoring curl port

2011-11-14 Thread Mike Blumenkrantz
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:08:09 +0100 Cedric BAIL wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:48:07 +0100 > > Sebastian Dransfeld wrote: > >> On 11/14/2011 01:47 AM, Bluezery wrote: > >> > This patch is rejected?? or could be in ?? :-) > >> > > >>

Re: [E-devel] [Patch][ecore_con] Refactoring curl port

2011-11-14 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:48:07 +0100 > Sebastian Dransfeld wrote: >> On 11/14/2011 01:47 AM, Bluezery wrote: >> > This patch is rejected?? or could be in ?? :-) >> > >> >> To me it seems fine, but I don't want to commit it now so close bef

Re: [E-devel] [Patch][ecore_con] Refactoring curl port

2011-11-14 Thread Mike Blumenkrantz
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:48:07 +0100 Sebastian Dransfeld wrote: > On 11/14/2011 01:47 AM, Bluezery wrote: > > This patch is rejected?? or could be in ?? :-) > > > > To me it seems fine, but I don't want to commit it now so close before > release of 1.1. Either someone how knows ecore_con better t

Re: [E-devel] [Patch][ecore_con] Refactoring curl port

2011-11-14 Thread Sebastian Dransfeld
On 11/14/2011 01:47 AM, Bluezery wrote: > This patch is rejected?? or could be in ?? :-) > To me it seems fine, but I don't want to commit it now so close before release of 1.1. Either someone how knows ecore_con better than me (Cedric maybe?) can commit it, or I will do it after 1.1 S. --

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: raster trunk/FORMATTING

2011-11-14 Thread Mike Blumenkrantz
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 00:30:59 -0800 "Enlightenment SVN" wrote: > Log: > discomfitor - how is this now for a formatting script? > > > > Author: raster > Date: 2011-11-14 00:30:59 -0800 (Mon, 14 Nov 2011) > New Revision: 65155 > Trac: http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/chan

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: onefang trunk/edje_viewer/src/bin

2011-11-14 Thread David Seikel
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:23:53 +0100 Cedric BAIL wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Enlightenment SVN > wrote: > > Log: > > Bare minimum changes to update to elementary API breakage so it > > compiles. Other things likely need to be changed to track depecated > > APIs, etc. > > Don't forge

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: onefang trunk/edje_viewer/src/bin

2011-11-14 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Enlightenment SVN wrote: > Log: > Bare minimum changes to update to elementary API breakage so it compiles. >  Other things likely need to be changed to track depecated APIs, etc. Don't forget to update the .edc or nothing will be displayed (replaces icons by cont