On 11/15/2011 06:23 AM, Doyoun Kang wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I found a bug in e_config. The e didn't make the configuration backup files.
> It was because of my wrong patch (svn rev.64684). I fixed this bug.
> Please check the new patch file.
In.
S.
---
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 3:48 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 02:52:49 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> said:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Carsten Haitzler
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:26:51 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
>> > said:
>> >
>> >> On Mon, Nov 14,
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 02:52:49 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
said:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:26:51 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> > said:
> >
> >> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Carsten Haitzler
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 14 Nov
Dear all,
I found a bug in e_config. The e didn't make the configuration backup files.
It was because of my wrong patch (svn rev.64684). I fixed this bug.
Please check the new patch file.
e_config.diff
Description: Binary data
-
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:26:51 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> said:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Carsten Haitzler
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:08:55 +1000 David Seikel said:
>> >
>> >> On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:59:57 +09
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:47:08 +0900 Bluezery said:
considering the amount of refactoring.. this will have to wait until after 1.1.
we are in feature freeze. that means no refactoring. no new features. just bug
fixes.
> Oh, I see. That's better. :)
>
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Mike Blumen
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:26:51 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
said:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:08:55 +1000 David Seikel said:
> >
> >> On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:59:57 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Mon,
2011/11/14 Iván Briano (Sachiel) :
> 2011/11/14 Enlightenment SVN :
>> Log:
>> rel1.to: ""; fix build error.
>> Actually, if rel1.to_x is not used in the matched description of the parent
>> group, rel1.to_x: ""; doesn't need to be used in the description of the
>> child group.
>> Because its s
On 14/11/11 17:22, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote:
> No, but I still feel dirty inside.
> I'm going to take another shower.
Me too. :P
--
Tom.
--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu
2011/11/14 Tom Hacohen :
> On 14/11/11 17:17, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote:
>>
>> Oh god
>
> I think the same, that's part of why I sent this email and didn't let it
> silently slide in. Do you have any other idea? I don't think copying all the
> textblock functions to edje and elementary is
On 14/11/11 17:17, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote:
> Oh god
I think the same, that's part of why I sent this email and didn't let it
silently slide in. Do you have any other idea? I don't think copying all
the textblock functions to edje and elementary is the right way here...
--
Tom.
--
2011/11/14 Tom Hacohen :
> On 14/11/11 17:10, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote:
>>
>> Returning a textblock means you are returning the internal textblock
>> from the internal edje of the entry?
>
> Yes.
>
Oh god
> --
> Tom.
>
---
2011/11/14 Enlightenment SVN :
> Log:
> rel1.to: ""; fix build error.
> Actually, if rel1.to_x is not used in the matched description of the parent
> group, rel1.to_x: ""; doesn't need to be used in the description of the child
> group.
> Because its state is already default. But sometime we ma
On 14/11/11 17:10, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote:
> Returning a textblock means you are returning the internal textblock
> from the internal edje of the entry?
Yes.
--
Tom.
--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Re
2011/11/14 Tom Hacohen :
> On 14/11/11 16:46, ChunEon Park wrote:
>>
>> IMHO, if it allows the editing then no need 'const' anymore.
>
> Yeah, that's my problem, and why I sent this email... I'm not sure how
> to make an extra warning, as people don't always read the docs (usually
> don't).
>>
>> E
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:20:34 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri
said:
>
>
> On Mon, 14 Nov 2011, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
>
> > Log:
> > add NEWS for embryo
>
> just a question : is it necessary to release embryo as 1.1 ? To me it's a
> bug fix, with a dep on eina 1.1.
the fact it requires eina 1.1
On 14/11/11 16:46, ChunEon Park wrote:
>
> IMHO, if it allows the editing then no need 'const' anymore.
Yeah, that's my problem, and why I sent this email... I'm not sure how
to make an extra warning, as people don't always read the docs (usually
don't).
>
> Even I don't know about entry much be
IMHO, if it allows the editing then no need 'const' anymore.
Even I don't know about entry much better than u,
Still I'm wondering the return of the textblok is reasonable...
-Regards, Hermet-
-Original Message-
From: "Tom Hacohen"
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:08:55 +1000 David Seikel said:
>
>> On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:59:57 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
>> wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:31:01 +1000 David Seikel
>> > said:
>> >
>> > > I have this marked t
Hey all,
I added elm_entry_textblock_get so people will be able to do more
low-level manipulations on the textblock object of the entry.
I explained the implications in the doc and also explained there that it
should be use mostly for querying, but editing is also allowed as long
as a couple o
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
> Log:
> add NEWS for embryo
just a question : is it necessary to release embryo as 1.1 ? To me it's a
bug fix, with a dep on eina 1.1.
Vincent
>
>
>
> Author: raster
> Date: 2011-11-14 03:21:57 -0800 (Mon, 14 Nov 2011)
> New Revisi
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 01:30:09 -0500 Youness Alaoui
said:
> --- Resending from my server, it seems gmail's IP has been
> blocked by sourceforge because of abuse ...
>
> Thanks Stefan for another well written email, I guess that
> psychology minor is indeed useful :)
> Thanks Mike also for
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:49:22 +0100 Albin Tonnerre
said:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:22 AM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 19:25:48 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri
> > said:
> >
> > comparison of symbols of eina 1.0.0 and 1.0.99 shows no exported symbols
> > removed. only added.
>
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:27:31 +1000 David Seikel
wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:23:53 +0100 Cedric BAIL
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Enlightenment SVN
> > wrote:
> > > Log:
> > > Bare minimum changes to update to elementary API breakage so it
> > > compiles. Other things lik
Oh, I see. That's better. :)
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:08:09 +0100
> Cedric BAIL wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
>> > On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:48:07 +0100
>> > Sebastian Dransfeld wrote:
>> >> On 11/14
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:08:09 +0100
Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:48:07 +0100
> > Sebastian Dransfeld wrote:
> >> On 11/14/2011 01:47 AM, Bluezery wrote:
> >> > This patch is rejected?? or could be in ?? :-)
> >> >
> >>
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:48:07 +0100
> Sebastian Dransfeld wrote:
>> On 11/14/2011 01:47 AM, Bluezery wrote:
>> > This patch is rejected?? or could be in ?? :-)
>> >
>>
>> To me it seems fine, but I don't want to commit it now so close bef
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:48:07 +0100
Sebastian Dransfeld wrote:
> On 11/14/2011 01:47 AM, Bluezery wrote:
> > This patch is rejected?? or could be in ?? :-)
> >
>
> To me it seems fine, but I don't want to commit it now so close before
> release of 1.1. Either someone how knows ecore_con better t
On 11/14/2011 01:47 AM, Bluezery wrote:
> This patch is rejected?? or could be in ?? :-)
>
To me it seems fine, but I don't want to commit it now so close before
release of 1.1. Either someone how knows ecore_con better than me
(Cedric maybe?) can commit it, or I will do it after 1.1
S.
--
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 00:30:59 -0800
"Enlightenment SVN" wrote:
> Log:
> discomfitor - how is this now for a formatting script?
>
>
>
> Author: raster
> Date: 2011-11-14 00:30:59 -0800 (Mon, 14 Nov 2011)
> New Revision: 65155
> Trac: http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/chan
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:23:53 +0100 Cedric BAIL
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Enlightenment SVN
> wrote:
> > Log:
> > Bare minimum changes to update to elementary API breakage so it
> > compiles. Other things likely need to be changed to track depecated
> > APIs, etc.
>
> Don't forge
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Enlightenment SVN
wrote:
> Log:
> Bare minimum changes to update to elementary API breakage so it compiles.
> Other things likely need to be changed to track depecated APIs, etc.
Don't forget to update the .edc or nothing will be displayed (replaces
icons by cont
32 matches
Mail list logo