On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Lucas De Marchi
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 1:23 AM, André Dieb wrote:
>>>
Ressurecting this discussion... any new thoughts?
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 1:23 AM, André Dieb wrote:
>>
>>> Ressurecting this discussion... any new thoughts?
>>>
>>> Having a sane and consistent coding style is very importan
> > I hate it, always have. I actually really like the kernel's coding
> > conventions: http://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/CodingStyle
>
> Well, there is always a coding style one will hate, and another will
> love. As this is meritocracy and raster did most of the code, it's
> better to have
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Tom Haste wrote:
> http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/wiki/ECoding
>
> How about updating this page to show the correct code styling? And
> have it as a policy that all new contributors must read before gaining
> access? (And of course, strongly encouraging current contributors
http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/wiki/ECoding
How about updating this page to show the correct code styling? And
have it as a policy that all new contributors must read before gaining
access? (And of course, strongly encouraging current contributors to
read it)
Heres what the Gnomers have
http://d
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 1:23 AM, André Dieb wrote:
>
>> Ressurecting this discussion... any new thoughts?
>>
>> Having a sane and consistent coding style is very important, it annoyed me
> quite often when I worked with e's code.
> There are t
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 1:23 AM, André Dieb wrote:
> Ressurecting this discussion... any new thoughts?
>
> Having a sane and consistent coding style is very important, it annoyed me
quite often when I worked with e's code.
There are two important things needed to be done:
1. Having a simple and c
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:23:05 -0300 André Dieb said:
none - other than this actually being done. :)
> Ressurecting this discussion... any new thoughts?
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 18:54:40 -0300 Iván Briano (Sachiel) <
> > sachi...@gmail.
Ressurecting this discussion... any new thoughts?
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 18:54:40 -0300 Iván Briano (Sachiel) <
> sachi...@gmail.com>
> said:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 10:07:54 -03
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 18:54:40 -0300 Iván Briano (Sachiel)
said:
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 10:07:54 -0300 Iván Briano (Sachiel)
> > said:
> >
> >> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Carsten Haitzler
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 07:40:47
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 10:07:54 -0300 Iván Briano (Sachiel)
> said:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>> > On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 07:40:47 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
>> > said:
>> >
>> > hmm i disagree with some of the
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 10:07:54 -0300 Iván Briano (Sachiel)
said:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 07:40:47 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
> > said:
> >
> > hmm i disagree with some of the doc. specifically
> >
> > blah
> > {
> > xx;
> > }
> >
> > i hav
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 07:40:47 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
> said:
>
> hmm i disagree with some of the doc. specifically
>
> blah
> {
> xx;
> }
>
> i have always had/used:
> blah
> {
> xx;
> }
>
> ie {}'s are indented a bit.
>
> but... w
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 07:40:47 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
said:
hmm i disagree with some of the doc. specifically
blah
{
xx;
}
i have always had/used:
blah
{
xx;
}
ie {}'s are indented a bit.
but... we can argue over little things all day long. imho the ONLY way this
will work is if we
On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 18:47:45 -0500 Nick Hughart
wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 14:34:03 +1000
> David Seikel wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 23:19:37 -0400 Christopher Michael
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Nick Hughart wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 20:03:18 +0530
> > > > Noorul Islam wrote:
> > > >
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 14:34:03 +1000
David Seikel wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 23:19:37 -0400 Christopher Michael
> wrote:
>
> > Nick Hughart wrote:
> > > On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 20:03:18 +0530
> > > Noorul Islam wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Vincent
> > >> Torri wrote:
> > >>>
On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 23:19:37 -0400
Christopher Michael wrote:
> Nick Hughart wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 20:03:18 +0530
> > Noorul Islam wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Vincent Torri
> >> wrote:
> >>> ok, forget about that, core devs don't care at all about coding
> >>> style
On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 23:19:37 -0400 Christopher Michael
wrote:
> Nick Hughart wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 20:03:18 +0530
> > Noorul Islam wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Vincent Torri
> >> wrote:
> >>> ok, forget about that, core devs don't care at all about coding
> >>> style
Nick Hughart wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 20:03:18 +0530
> Noorul Islam wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Vincent Torri
>> wrote:
>>> ok, forget about that, core devs don't care at all about coding
>>> style
>>>
>>> thread closed
>>>
>> I think core developers are busy. I hope they will
On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 20:03:18 +0530
Noorul Islam wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Vincent Torri
> wrote:
> >
> > ok, forget about that, core devs don't care at all about coding
> > style
> >
> > thread closed
> >
>
> I think core developers are busy. I hope they will reply soon.
>
I wou
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
> ok, forget about that, core devs don't care at all about coding style
>
> thread closed
>
I think core developers are busy. I hope they will reply soon.
Thanks
Noorul
---
ok, forget about that, core devs don't care at all about coding style
thread closed
Vincent
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009, Nathan Ingersoll wrote:
Hi Vincent,
The Google C++ style guide has a requirement that I would suggest considering.
http://google-styleguide.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/cppguide.xm
Hi Vincent,
The Google C++ style guide has a requirement that I would suggest considering.
http://google-styleguide.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/cppguide.xml#Function_Calls
The specific suggestion is that we provide guidance on how to wrap
function definitions and calls that don't fit well on a sin
Hey,
I think that we all agree that the current mix of whitespace and
tabulation in most of the source code is not that very nice. Also, the
libraries are often using the coding style of the original author, hence
we have several different coding style in different libraries (eina being
even
24 matches
Mail list logo