On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 4:48 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 08:52:14 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> said:
>
>> On Tuesday, November 27, 2012, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:47:16 -0200 Bruno Dilly
>> > > said:
>> >
>> > > Hey folks,
>> > >
>> > > we're
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 08:52:14 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
said:
> On Tuesday, November 27, 2012, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:47:16 -0200 Bruno Dilly
> > > said:
> >
> > > Hey folks,
> > >
> > > we're are now making ephysics API more stable, almost all the features
> >
On Wed, 5 Dec 2012 10:36:54 +0900 Cedric BAIL
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Bruno Dilly
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 11:39 PM, David Seikel
> > wrote:
> >> On Sun, 2 Dec 2012 12:25:40 +1000 David Seikel
> >> wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 1 Dec 2012 18:19:52 -0200 Bruno Dilly
> >>> w
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Bruno Dilly wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 11:39 PM, David Seikel wrote:
>> On Sun, 2 Dec 2012 12:25:40 +1000 David Seikel
>> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 1 Dec 2012 18:19:52 -0200 Bruno Dilly
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 3:41 AM, David Seikel
>>> > wrote
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 11:39 PM, David Seikel wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Dec 2012 12:25:40 +1000 David Seikel
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 1 Dec 2012 18:19:52 -0200 Bruno Dilly
>> wrote:
>>
>> > On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 3:41 AM, David Seikel
>> > wrote:
>> > > On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 13:15:42 -0200 Bruno Dilly
>> >
On Sun, 2 Dec 2012 12:25:40 +1000 David Seikel
wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Dec 2012 18:19:52 -0200 Bruno Dilly
> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 3:41 AM, David Seikel
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 13:15:42 -0200 Bruno Dilly
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 11:30 AM, David S
On Sat, 1 Dec 2012 18:19:52 -0200 Bruno Dilly
wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 3:41 AM, David Seikel
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 13:15:42 -0200 Bruno Dilly
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 11:30 AM, David Seikel
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:46:00 -0200 Bruno Dilly
>
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 3:41 AM, David Seikel wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 13:15:42 -0200 Bruno Dilly
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 11:30 AM, David Seikel
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:46:00 -0200 Bruno Dilly
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:59 PM, David Seikel
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 13:15:42 -0200 Bruno Dilly
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 11:30 AM, David Seikel
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:46:00 -0200 Bruno Dilly
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:59 PM, David Seikel
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:55:26 -0200 Bruno Dill
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 11:30 AM, David Seikel wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:46:00 -0200 Bruno Dilly
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:59 PM, David Seikel
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:55:26 -0200 Bruno Dilly
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi David,
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:46:00 -0200 Bruno Dilly
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:59 PM, David Seikel
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:55:26 -0200 Bruno Dilly
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi David,
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 1:36 PM, David Seikel
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:47:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:59 PM, David Seikel wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:55:26 -0200 Bruno Dilly
> wrote:
>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 1:36 PM, David Seikel
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:47:16 -0200 Bruno Dilly
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> we're are now making ephysics A
On Tuesday, November 27, 2012, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:47:16 -0200 Bruno Dilly
> >
> said:
>
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > we're are now making ephysics API more stable, almost all the features
> > intended to go in are already implemented, so we are moving to the
> > next step:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:47:16 -0200 Bruno Dilly said:
> Hey folks,
>
> we're are now making ephysics API more stable, almost all the features
> intended to go in are already implemented, so we are moving to the
> next step:
> adding support to physics on Edje.
>
> There are many ways of doing th
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:55:26 -0200 Bruno Dilly
wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 1:36 PM, David Seikel
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:47:16 -0200 Bruno Dilly
> > wrote:
> >
> >> we're are now making ephysics API more stable, almost all the
> >> features intended to go in are
Hi David,
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 1:36 PM, David Seikel wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:47:16 -0200 Bruno Dilly
> wrote:
>
>> we're are now making ephysics API more stable, almost all the features
>> intended to go in are already implemented, so we are moving to the
>> next step:
>> adding suppo
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:47:16 -0200 Bruno Dilly
wrote:
> we're are now making ephysics API more stable, almost all the features
> intended to go in are already implemented, so we are moving to the
> next step:
> adding support to physics on Edje.
I'm gonna take a step back and consider the big pi
Hey folks,
we're are now making ephysics API more stable, almost all the features
intended to go in are already implemented, so we are moving to the
next step:
adding support to physics on Edje.
There are many ways of doing this, so I'm sending a proposal with some
possibilities so we could discu
18 matches
Mail list logo