On Fri, 6 Dec 2013 08:42:54 +0100 Stefan Schmidt ste...@datenfreihafen.org
said:
Hello.
On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 17:32, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 09:29:17 +0100 Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch said:
you are so right Stephan
- these are not offical files, but they look
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 18:54, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Fri, 6 Dec 2013 08:42:54 +0100 Stefan Schmidt ste...@datenfreihafen.org
said:
Hello.
On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 17:32, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 09:29:17 +0100 Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch said:
you are so
you are so right Stephan
- these are not offical files, but they look like
- they are not used by mainteners (they do their job in their distro repo)
they should go
maybe we could replace them with a list of urls like
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 09:29:17 +0100 Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch said:
you are so right Stephan
- these are not offical files, but they look like
why does it matter? has this ever caused an actual problem? has a user ever
been confused? the debian ones only caused a problem because of POLICY
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.comwrote:
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 09:29:17 +0100 Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch said:
you are so right Stephan
- these are not offical files, but they look like
why does it matter? has this ever caused an actual problem? has a
On 12/05/2013 08:30 PM, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.comwrote:
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 09:29:17 +0100 Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch said:
you are so right Stephan
- these are not offical files, but they look like
why does it
Hello.
On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 17:32, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 09:29:17 +0100 Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch said:
you are so right Stephan
- these are not offical files, but they look like
why does it matter? has this ever caused an actual problem? has a user ever
this seems to have snuck in to all the repos while I was away, and I strongly
disagree with the premise based on previous decisions.
if people remember, we previously removed debian/ directories from our
distribution directories for being too distro-specific. isn't adding the
arch-only
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 12:43:31 -0500
From: michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com
To: lists.sourceforge.net enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [E-devel] pkgbuild
this seems to have snuck in to all the repos while I was away, and I strongly
On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 11:54:07 -0600
Doug Newgard scimmi...@outlook.com wrote:
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 12:43:31 -0500
From: michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com
To: lists.sourceforge.net enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [E-devel] pkgbuild
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 12:56:04 -0500
From: michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com
To: enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
CC: scimmi...@outlook.com
Subject: Re: [E-devel] pkgbuild
On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 11:54:07 -0600
Doug Newgard scimmi...@outlook.com
On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 12:43:31 -0500 Michael Blumenkrantz
michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com said:
this seems to have snuck in to all the repos while I was away, and I strongly
disagree with the premise based on previous decisions.
if people remember, we previously removed debian/ directories from
To: lists.sourceforge.net enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [E-devel] pkgbuild
this seems to have snuck in to all the repos while I was away, and I
strongly disagree with the premise based on previous decisions.
if people remember, we previously removed debian
:
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 12:43:31 -0500
From: michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com
To: lists.sourceforge.net
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [E-devel]
pkgbuild
this seems to have snuck in to all the repos while I was away,
and I strongly
On 12/05/2013 10:22 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 12:43:31 -0500 Michael Blumenkrantz
michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com said:
this seems to have snuck in to all the repos while I was away, and I strongly
disagree with the premise based on previous decisions.
if
2013/12/5 Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com:
there's a big difference. debian has a POLICY of you are not allowed to have
debian build stuff in a source tree. they continually complain that we had
such stuff.
we have had .spec files for much longer than even debian build stuff. there's
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 08:12:54 +0400 Vasiliy Tolstov v.tols...@selfip.ru said:
2013/12/5 Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com:
there's a big difference. debian has a POLICY of you are not allowed to
have debian build stuff in a source tree. they continually complain that
we had such stuff.
2013/12/5 Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com:
why? that makes no sense. it just complicates things.
Why? Source code in master/devel branches. Spec in spec branch and
updated only then needed, debian dir in debian branch...
--
Vasiliy Tolstov,
e-mail: v.tols...@selfip.ru
jabber:
From: v.tols...@selfip.ru
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 09:21:26 +0400
To: ras...@rasterman.com
CC: enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [E-devel] pkgbuild
2013/12/5 Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com:
why? that makes no sense. it just
2013/12/5 Doug Newgard scimmi...@outlook.com:
Git doesn't work that way. Branches are for branching code, not totally
different files.
git checkout --orphan NEWBRANCH why git authors create this ability?
--
Vasiliy Tolstov,
e-mail: v.tols...@selfip.ru
jabber: v...@selfip.ru
From: v.tols...@selfip.ru
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 09:54:30 +0400
To: enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [E-devel] pkgbuild
2013/12/5 Doug Newgard scimmi...@outlook.com:
Git doesn't work that way. Branches are for branching code
2013/12/5 Doug Newgard scimmi...@outlook.com:
From the documentation:
This can be useful when you want to publish the tree from a commit without
exposing its full history. You might want to do this to publish an open
source branch of a project whose current tree is clean, but whose full
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 09:21:26 +0400 Vasiliy Tolstov v.tols...@selfip.ru said:
2013/12/5 Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com:
why? that makes no sense. it just complicates things.
Why? Source code in master/devel branches. Spec in spec branch and
updated only then needed, debian dir in
Hello.
On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 11:30, Simon wrote:
On 12/05/2013 10:22 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 12:43:31 -0500 Michael Blumenkrantz
michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com said:
this seems to have snuck in to all the repos while I was away, and I
strongly
24 matches
Mail list logo
