On 01/10/13 18:31, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> Okay, I haven't read most of these replies since I've been busy benchmarking
> the hell out of things, but I've had things semi-summarized for me by a
> number of people.
>
> I think it's important to keep in mind that FOSS is probably the hardest
On 01/10/13 18:31, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> Okay, I haven't read most of these replies since I've been busy benchmarking
> the hell out of things, but I've had things semi-summarized for me by a
> number of people.
>
> I think it's important to keep in mind that FOSS is probably the hardest
On Tue, 1 Oct 2013 18:31:50 +0100 Michael Blumenkrantz
said:
> Okay, I haven't read most of these replies since I've been busy benchmarking
> the hell out of things, but I've had things semi-summarized for me by a
> number of people.
>
> I think it's important to keep in mind that FOSS is probab
Okay, I haven't read most of these replies since I've been busy benchmarking
the hell out of things, but I've had things semi-summarized for me by a number
of people.
I think it's important to keep in mind that FOSS is probably the hardest type
of development to get into, and to remember that a
Good gracious, this is getting insane.
I agree with Tom on this one (good gracious, I agree with Tom!). What
your job is
or where you work has nothing to do with the community. Your work is
appreciated,
but commit access is not required for you to do your job, and since we
are not using
SVN anymor
On 01/10/13 15:55, Yossi Kantor wrote:
> Tom,
>
> Open source or not, there are normal human relations and you will comply
> to them (With me at least).
> (There are actually a lot of respectful ways you could have done the
> same thing it openly
> but its not my job to teach you how).
No, I will
On 10/01/2013 03:38 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 01/10/13 14:58, Yossi Kantor wrote:
>> On 10/01/2013 02:20 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>>> On 01/10/13 12:47, Tom Hacohen wrote:
On 01/10/13 12:06, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Tom Hacohen
> wrote:
>
On 01/10/13 14:58, Yossi Kantor wrote:
> On 10/01/2013 02:20 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> On 01/10/13 12:47, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>>> On 01/10/13 12:06, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Tom Hacohen
wrote:
> On 01/10/13 11:38, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
>>
On 10/01/2013 02:20 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 01/10/13 12:47, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> On 01/10/13 12:06, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>>>
On 01/10/13 11:38, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> is this a joke? I'm giving him access to work on
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 01/10/13 12:47, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> > On 01/10/13 12:06, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> >> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Tom Hacohen >wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 01/10/13 11:38, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> is this a joke? I'm giving him
On 01/10/13 12:47, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 01/10/13 12:06, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>>
>>> On 01/10/13 11:38, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
is this a joke? I'm giving him access to work on E, which he HAS been
>>> doing
publicly for
On 01/10/13 12:06, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>
>> On 01/10/13 11:38, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
>>> is this a joke? I'm giving him access to work on E, which he HAS been
>> doing
>>> publicly for months. He's been mentioned on the release blo
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 01/10/13 11:38, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > is this a joke? I'm giving him access to work on E, which he HAS been
> doing
> > publicly for months. He's been mentioned on the release blog and his
> > commits are easy enough to find; given
On 01/10/13 11:38, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> is this a joke? I'm giving him access to work on E, which he HAS been doing
> publicly for months. He's been mentioned on the release blog and his
> commits are easy enough to find; given that I'm the (only) maintainer for
> the project, that's more
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 01/10/13 09:44, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > feel free to forward all e bug reports directly to
> > yossik@enlightenment.orgfrom now on!
>
> Uncool dude. Just this month we said we wouldn't give Chris' proposed
> dev access because we don
is this a joke? I'm giving him access to work on E, which he HAS been doing
publicly for months. He's been mentioned on the release blog and his
commits are easy enough to find; given that I'm the (only) maintainer for
the project, that's more than enough justification. I guess I could discuss
it w
On 01/10/13 09:44, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> feel free to forward all e bug reports directly to
> yossik@enlightenment.orgfrom now on!
Uncool dude. Just this month we said we wouldn't give Chris' proposed
dev access because we don't know his work, and now you are doing the
same? What about d
Congratulations Yossi!
Great responsibility comes with great power.
Keep rocking.
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz <
michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> feel free to forward all e bug reports directly to
> yossik@enlightenment.orgfrom now on!
>
feel free to forward all e bug reports directly to
yossik@enlightenment.orgfrom now on!
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Mike Blumenkrantz
wrote:
> discomfitor pushed a commit to branch master.
>
>
> http://git.enlightenment.org/admin/devs.git/commit/?id=d63dc7a9234f58b2774bc9f1176a28f943f6331a
>
discomfitor pushed a commit to branch master.
http://git.enlightenment.org/admin/devs.git/commit/?id=d63dc7a9234f58b2774bc9f1176a28f943f6331a
commit d63dc7a9234f58b2774bc9f1176a28f943f6331a
Author: Mike Blumenkrantz
Date: Tue Oct 1 09:30:09 2013 +0100
newish dev: yossik!
if you'v
20 matches
Mail list logo
