2014-09-30 13:42 GMT+01:00 Chris Michael :
> Hi,
>
> This has been fixed now (for the moment) with a libudev version check
> during configure, and an #ifdef around the newer code. While it does fix
> compile for people with older versions of libudev, it does not address
> the larger issue of syste
Hi,
This has been fixed now (for the moment) with a libudev version check
during configure, and an #ifdef around the newer code. While it does fix
compile for people with older versions of libudev, it does not address
the larger issue of system/os compatibility. For that we will need some
time
ibeeze.so: undefined reference to
> >`udev_device_set_sysattr_value'
> >
> > On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 23:28:53 -0500 Doug Newgard
> > wrote:
> >
> > > > Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:07:52 +1000
> > > > From: onef...@gmail.com
> > > > To: enl
> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:08:04 +1000
> From: onef...@gmail.com
> To: enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [E-devel] libeeze.so: undefined reference to
>`udev_device_set_sysattr_value'
>
>
> On Mon, 29
On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 23:28:53 -0500 Doug Newgard
wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:07:52 +1000
> > From: onef...@gmail.com
> > To: enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [E-devel] libeeze.so: undefined reference to
> >`udev_device_set_sysattr_v
> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 13:19:20 +0930
> From: graham.go...@gmail.com
> To: enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [E-devel] libeeze.so: undefined reference to
> `udev_device_set_sysattr_value'
>
> On 30
> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:07:52 +1000
> From: onef...@gmail.com
> To: enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [E-devel] libeeze.so: undefined reference to
>`udev_device_set_sysattr_value'
>
>
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 13:19:20 +0930 Graham Gower
>
On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 13:19:20 +0930 Graham Gower
wrote:
> On 30 September 2014 11:37, Doug Newgard
> wrote:
> > If you're entire system is that old, I'm sure EFL from 2.5 years
> > ago will run just fine as well.
Actually, EFL from 2.5 years ago was just as bleeding edge at the time
as it is now
On 30 September 2014 11:37, Doug Newgard wrote:
> If you're entire system is that old, I'm sure EFL from 2.5 years ago will run
> just fine as well.
Slackware 14.1, released Nov 2013. This is not old unless you're
accustomed to releasing a new version of your software every 2-3
weeks.
Systemd f
gt;
>>>>
>>>>> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 00:50:23 +0930
>>>>> From: graham.go...@gmail.com
>>>>> To: enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>> Subject: Re: [E-devel] libeeze.so: un
> >> > > said:
> >> > >
> >> > > > On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 10:24:53 -0500 Doug Newgard
> >> > > > wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > --------
> >> > > >
gt; > > > >
>> > > > > --------
>> > > > > > Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 00:50:23 +0930
>> > > > > > From: graham.go...@gmail.com
>> > > > > > To: enlightenment-devel@lists.sourcefor
; > > > Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 00:50:23 +0930
> > > > > > From: graham.go...@gmail.com
> > > > > > To: enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [E-devel] libeeze.so: undefined reference to
> > > > > > `udev
Not part of the Debian-whatever spawns, but in Slackware universe the
last used udev version is also 182 ( for reasons sufficiently obvious
)
--
Regards,
Alex-P. Natsios
(a.k.a Drakevr)
--
Slashdot TV. Videos for Nerds
4:53 -0500 Doug Newgard
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 00:50:23 +0930
> > > > > From: graham.go...@gmail.com
>
> > > > Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 00:50:23 +0930
> > > > From: graham.go...@gmail.com
> > > > To: enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > > Subject: Re: [E-devel] libeeze.so: undefined reference to
> >
go...@gmail.com
> > > To: enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > Subject: Re: [E-devel] libeeze.so: undefined reference to
> > > `udev_device_set_sysattr_value'
> > >
> > > On 30 September 2014 00:42, Doug Newgard
> > > wrote:
> > >&g
On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 10:24:53 -0500 Doug Newgard
wrote:
>
>
>
> > Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 00:50:23 +0930
> > From: graham.go...@gmail.com
> > To: enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [E-devel] l
> Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 17:29:39 +0200
> From: adr...@notk.org
> To: enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [E-devel] libeeze.so: undefined reference to
> `udev_device_set_sysattr_value'
>
> On Mon, Sep 29
> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 00:50:23 +0930
> From: graham.go...@gmail.com
> To: enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [E-devel] libeeze.so: undefined reference to
> `udev_device_set_sysattr_value'
>
> On 30
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014, Doug Newgard wrote:
>
>
>
> > Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 15:54:44 +0100
> > From: tom.haco...@samsung.com
> > To: enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [E-devel] l
On 30 September 2014 00:42, Doug Newgard wrote:
>
> udev works fine without systemd. Those distros that are refusing to update
> past 184 are either ones that use ancient software anyway or they are just
> taking a very childish stance and refusing to even build it now.
I think you'll find the
> Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 15:54:44 +0100
> From: tom.haco...@samsung.com
> To: enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [E-devel] libeeze.so: undefined reference to
> `udev_device_set_sysattr_value'
>
> On 29/
On 29/09/14 15:46, Chris Michael wrote:
> On 09/29/2014 10:42 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Chris Michael
>> wrote:
>>> On 09/29/2014 10:03 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Chris Michael
wrote:
> On 09/29/2014 09:17 AM, Carsten Ha
2014-09-29 15:43 GMT+01:00 Cedric BAIL :
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Daniel Kolesa wrote:
> > 2014-09-29 14:23 GMT+01:00 Chris Michael :
> >> On 09/29/2014 09:17 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:06:30 -0400 Chris Michael <
> devilho...@comcast.net>
On 09/29/2014 10:42 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Chris Michael wrote:
>> On 09/29/2014 10:03 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Chris Michael
>>> wrote:
On 09/29/2014 09:17 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Sep
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Daniel Kolesa wrote:
> 2014-09-29 14:23 GMT+01:00 Chris Michael :
>> On 09/29/2014 09:17 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>> > On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:06:30 -0400 Chris Michael
>> said:
>> >> On 09/29/2014 07:47 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Chris Michael wrote:
> On 09/29/2014 10:03 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Chris Michael
>> wrote:
>>> On 09/29/2014 09:17 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:06:30 -0400 Chris Michael
said:
On 29/09/14 15:03, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Chris Michael wrote:
>> On 09/29/2014 09:17 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>> On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:06:30 -0400 Chris Michael
>>> said:
On 09/29/2014 07:47 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
2014-09-29 14:23 GMT+01:00 Chris Michael :
> On 09/29/2014 09:17 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:06:30 -0400 Chris Michael
> said:
> >
> >> On 09/29/2014 07:47 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:52:23 +0200 Cedric BAIL
On 09/29/2014 10:03 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Chris Michael wrote:
>> On 09/29/2014 09:17 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>> On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:06:30 -0400 Chris Michael
>>> said:
On 09/29/2014 07:47 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Chris Michael wrote:
> On 09/29/2014 09:17 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:06:30 -0400 Chris Michael
>> said:
>>> On 09/29/2014 07:47 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:52:23 +0200 Cedric B
On 09/29/2014 09:17 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:06:30 -0400 Chris Michael
> said:
>
>> On 09/29/2014 07:47 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>> On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:52:23 +0200 Cedric BAIL said:
>>>
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:46 AM, Cars
On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:06:30 -0400 Chris Michael said:
> On 09/29/2014 07:47 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:52:23 +0200 Cedric BAIL said:
> >
> >> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:46 AM, Carsten Haitzler
> >> wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 28 Sep 2014 23:44:32 +0200 Cedr
On 09/29/2014 07:47 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:52:23 +0200 Cedric BAIL said:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:46 AM, Carsten Haitzler
>> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 28 Sep 2014 23:44:32 +0200 Cedric BAIL said:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Lucas De Marchi
On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:52:23 +0200 Cedric BAIL said:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:46 AM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 28 Sep 2014 23:44:32 +0200 Cedric BAIL said:
> >> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Lucas De Marchi
> >> wrote:
> >> > Em 28/09/2014 08:46, "Graham Gower" escreveu:
>
On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:30:57 +0100 Daniel Kolesa said:
> 2014-09-29 8:52 GMT+01:00 Cedric BAIL :
>
> > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:46 AM, Carsten Haitzler
> > wrote:
> > > On Sun, 28 Sep 2014 23:44:32 +0200 Cedric BAIL
> > said:
> > >> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Lucas De Marchi
> > >> wr
2014-09-29 8:52 GMT+01:00 Cedric BAIL :
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:46 AM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 28 Sep 2014 23:44:32 +0200 Cedric BAIL
> said:
> >> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Lucas De Marchi
> >> wrote:
> >> > Em 28/09/2014 08:46, "Graham Gower"
> escreveu:
> >> >> I've
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:46 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Sep 2014 23:44:32 +0200 Cedric BAIL said:
>> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Lucas De Marchi
>> wrote:
>> > Em 28/09/2014 08:46, "Graham Gower" escreveu:
>> >> I've attempted to build using the easy_efl.sh script and receiv
On Sun, 28 Sep 2014 23:44:32 +0200 Cedric BAIL said:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Lucas De Marchi
> wrote:
> > Em 28/09/2014 08:46, "Graham Gower" escreveu:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I've attempted to build using the easy_efl.sh script and received the
> >> build error referenced in the sub
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Lucas De Marchi
wrote:
> Em 28/09/2014 08:46, "Graham Gower" escreveu:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've attempted to build using the easy_efl.sh script and received the
>> build error referenced in the subject (full build log follows
>> message).
>>
>> Is there a particular v
Em 28/09/2014 08:46, "Graham Gower" escreveu:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've attempted to build using the easy_efl.sh script and received the
> build error referenced in the subject (full build log follows
> message).
>
> Is there a particular version of udev that is required now, but hasn't
> been put in the a
42 matches
Mail list logo
