Michael Jennings wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 March 2005, at 04:20:56 (+0100),
Morten Nilsen wrote:
no ideas?
I'm working on it, but as busy as I've been with work and the cAos
project, I'm behind. Sorry. :(
Good to hear :)
--
Morten
---
hey there
i compiled E17 from cvs.
everything was OK (except emotion), so i wanted to launch some
e17-application. Let say elicit.
but i cant:
WARNING: not a utf8 locale!
i can post some lines from strace...
but i dont know if this is the problem with my locale. im using iso8859-2...
robert
Hello!
I've been experimenting with some code.. I want to build a kind of
framework that allows me to be working more naturally with a computer.
Look at http://thies061.speed.planet.nl/libura/e/mockup/libura_Ecalc.png
You'll see their a spreadsheet. Look at it if it was just a piece of
paper
I love the concept. I think its very intuitive and help when you want
to do one thing at a time. I'm not sure as to how the menus can change
though, thats a bit tricky I suppose.
I'd really like to stay updated with all the details of all of this.
Best Regards,
hisham.
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 21:42:40 +, Andrew Elcock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jim lawrence wrote:
I Need help to help a few other people whom are getting a segmentation
fault when they try to run engage. They get all the required files
to run engage, but end up with this error. Anyone had
jim lawrence wrote:
I Need help to help a few other people whom are getting a segmentation
fault when they try to run engage. They get all the required files
to run engage, but end up with this error. Anyone had this problem?
Here is what they get from the terminal
am a system tray
jim lawrence wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 21:42:40 +, Andrew Elcock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jim lawrence wrote:
I Need help to help a few other people whom are getting a segmentation
fault when they try to run engage. They get all the required files
to run engage, but end up with this error.
Would it not be wise to have a new ... in the main menu (however you
wanna init it) and then just do the other stuff via a context menu
(right click on the paper)?
changing the menus seems a little cumbersome unless you have a real good
reason
Hisham Mardam Bey wrote:
I love the concept. I
On Tuesday, 01 March 2005, at 06:26:26 (+0100),
Morten Nilsen wrote:
One last thing... I'm having problems with some chars...
win-e-' should make an =E9 but only gets me e'
shift-66 should give me ^, but gives me nothing (by far the key I use
the most of these special chars, for obvious
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 18:38, Martin White wrote:
But, I'm not convinced that removing the application's frame complete with
it's one stop shop of toolbars would necessarily be productive. All of a
sudden you'd now have to go through several mouse clicks to bring up the
menu, invariably a sub
I was talking about this to Andy actually. This sort of follows the
concept the Apple people use for their menus. Except we're moving all
applications menus / buttons away from the application to a central
location. You could, I guess, have a special tool bar that appears
when a certain app is
That's pretty much what i was thinking although i wasn't thinking overwriting
the iconbar entirely...
BTW - I've never used a mac so i don't know what they're like :)
Still not convinced of the point though, it's not really removing any clutter,
just moving it to a different area of the
Hello all,
I hope I won't get flamed by the developers for having
done this ;-(:
A lot of people have told me that they wanted both E16 and E17 in
their box. And voilà! I've repackaged E16 (E-0.16.7.2) to install in
/usr/local/share/enlightenment/, and also changed it's name to
Didier Casse wrote:
Hello all,
I hope I won't get flamed by the developers for having
done this ;-(:
A lot of people have told me that they wanted both E16 and E17 in
their box. And voilà! I've repackaged E16 (E-0.16.7.2) to install in
/usr/local/share/enlightenment/, and
14 matches
Mail list logo
