el Sun, 04 Sep 2005 14:38:04 -0500
David Tigue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribio:
> All you guys keep talking about distro's being better at running e17
> then the next, and the way I see it, if you compile from cvs it should
> run fine with any distro. I am using Mandriva LE2005 and I have NO
> pr
On Sunday 04 September 2005 04:27 pm, Philippe Landau wrote:
> is the reason why nobody talks about the e16/e17 specialised and
> slim elive linux that everybody is too polite or is it just too new ?
>
> kind regards philippe
>
It's fairly new and is just now getting some exposure. I'm planni
dienekes wrote:
> Well I know the effects of writing mail and drinking beer very well ;-)
thx for letting me know that i'm not alone *grin*
and also thx for not flaming me to death (to everybody involved). i'll take
care that it won't happen again, next beer time i'll play et instead
disturbing
Scott Fors wrote:
Well first of all I would like to thank all for their input on the various distros.
I've been using Linux off an on for years going back to Red Hat 3.3... back
when installing linux could be a weekend endeavor. After giving up on RH
back around 6 or so I started using Suse 4.xx
On Sunday 04 September 2005 12:27, Christian Pedaschus wrote:
Well first of all I would like to thank all for their input on the various
distros.
I've been using Linux off an on for years going back to Red Hat 3.3... back
when installing linux could be a weekend endeavor. After giving up on RH
Rich wrote:
>It's one of the best distros I've used to date and that says a lot. I started
>
>
Your ubuntu report sounds good. As I already mentioned I'm not sure
about suse's future.
>works like a charm. Add E17 to it and what a beautiful experience. I, for
>one, do not agree the E is "h
Christian Pedaschus wrote:
>
>
>never ment it this way.
>i am a less deep understanding user and thought he might be one too
>(shouldn't making assumptions, yes, but it sounded like...), and i
>wanted to help him gain more understanding, which was not possible for
>me using suse (which i don't c
Morten Nilsen wrote:
Philippe Landau wrote:
would someone be so kind and offer his archive of the
enlightenment-users mailinglist for download, as an .mbox file ?
the searchable archive does not seem to offer this:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=enlightenment-users
I hav
dienekes wrote:
>Christian Pedaschus wrote:
>
>
>
>>i'm using gentoo and i have absolutely no probs (sometimes i'm really
>>surprised what problems some users have...)
>>but i also read the docs and listen to the devs and so don't run
>>extra_modules and such things, perhaps this is a reason,
Philippe Landau wrote:
> Rich wrote:
>
>> On Sunday 04 September 2005 02:28 am, dienekes wrote:
>>
>>> Christian Pedaschus wrote:
>>>
i'm using gentoo and i have absolutely no probs (sometimes i'm really
surprised what problems some users have...)
but i also read the docs and list
Philippe Landau wrote:
would someone be so kind and offer his archive of the
enlightenment-users mailinglist for download, as an .mbox file ?
the searchable archive does not seem to offer this:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=enlightenment-users
I have enlightenment-users and
Rich wrote:
On Sunday 04 September 2005 02:28 am, dienekes wrote:
Christian Pedaschus wrote:
i'm using gentoo and i have absolutely no probs (sometimes i'm really
surprised what problems some users have...)
but i also read the docs and listen to the devs and so don't run
extra_modules and such
On Sunday 04 September 2005 02:28 am, dienekes wrote:
> Christian Pedaschus wrote:
> >i'm using gentoo and i have absolutely no probs (sometimes i'm really
> >surprised what problems some users have...)
> >but i also read the docs and listen to the devs and so don't run
> >extra_modules and such th
Christian Pedaschus wrote:
>i'm using gentoo and i have absolutely no probs (sometimes i'm really
>surprised what problems some users have...)
>but i also read the docs and listen to the devs and so don't run
>extra_modules and such things, perhaps this is a reason, too ;)
>
>but my advice would b
dienekes wrote:
Fernando Meira wrote:
I use Gentoo with e17.
Works like a charm.
Guess most e17 users also building most of the other packages by
themselves. In a certain sense they are distro independant. Therefore
the distro doesn't really matter.
I'm running Debian SID, works go
i'm using gentoo and i have absolutely no probs (sometimes i'm really
surprised what problems some users have...)
but i also read the docs and listen to the devs and so don't run
extra_modules and such things, perhaps this is a reason, too ;)
but my advice would be to check other distros, there ar
Fernando Meira wrote:
> I use Gentoo with e17.
> Works like a charm.
>
Guess most e17 users also building most of the other packages by
themselves. In a certain sense they are distro independant. Therefore
the distro doesn't really matter.
---
I use Gentoo with e17.
Works like a charm.On 9/3/05, dienekes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Scott Fors wrote:>>As Raster states this is definitly not a problem with e17 but rather KDE. In my case there was>>a setting in KDE under styles where I could force the fonts to apply to non-kde apps.
>>Recentl
Scott Fors wrote:
>>As Raster states this is definitly not a problem with e17 but rather KDE. In
>>my case there was
>>a setting in KDE under styles where I could force the fonts to apply to
>>non-kde apps.
>>Recently I did an up date through suse's yast and that update removed the
>>check bo
Scott Fors wrote:
> As Raster states this is definitly not a problem with e17 but rather KDE. In
> my case there was
> a setting in KDE under styles where I could force the fonts to apply to
> non-kde apps.
> Recently I did an up date through suse's yast and that update removed the
> check box
20 matches
Mail list logo
