On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 03:12:59PM +0100, Oliver Vogel wrote:
>
> Yeah, but it annoys me, with edge flip it happens that when I use the
> mouse, I move it to the border of the desktop, don't need it anymore
> and just leave it there - without wanting to switch desktops - after the
> edge flip time
Oliver Vogel wrote:
I'm used to Alt+Shift+Arrow, that's faster and more convenient for me.
and I'm used to Alt-Fn .. so much so that I even use the combo even when
in windows..
--
Morten
:wq
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk I
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 15:12:59 +0100 Oliver Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
> > no, but for someone who uses apps so large that they need the app and
> > collection of windows that drives it to span multiple screens, and
> > thus are forced to flip desktops to spread the windows across multipl
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 15:12:59 +0100 Oliver Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > no, but for someone who uses apps so large that they need the app
> > and collection of windows that drives it to span multiple screens,
> > and thus are forced to flip desktops to spread the windows across
> > multi
> no, but for someone who uses apps so large that they need the app and
> collection of windows that drives it to span multiple screens, and
> thus are forced to flip desktops to spread the windows across multiple
> desktops, then this would be a very fast and quick way to flip.
Yeah, but it anno
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 01:31:49 +0100 Oliver Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Hi again!
>
> > the onyl difference is that u dont SEE the
> > contents of a window that belongs to another desktop that is partly
> > overlapping this one.
>
> And exactly this is what I need.
>
> I can understand
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 01:35:26 +0100 Oliver Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Just one note here:
>
> > it already does that - try. drag tillthe mouse hits the edge, e flips
> > desktosp and the window follows. now u KNOW it has been moved to the
> > next desktop - very explicitly.
>
> Edge fli
On 1/15/06, Oliver Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi again!> the onyl difference is that u dont SEE the> contents of a window that belongs to another desktop that is partly> overlapping this one.And exactly this is what I need.
Do you really /need/ it?
I got used to this feature during my e16
On 14/01/06, Oliver Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Edge flip is the most annoying feature in E (well, not considering the
> tooltips in e16). It drives me mad.
Actually, I've got edge flip disabled, but it still works that way
when I'm dragging a window. I think that works out pretty well.
A
Just one note here:
> it already does that - try. drag tillthe mouse hits the edge, e flips
> desktosp and the window follows. now u KNOW it has been moved to the
> next desktop - very explicitly.
Edge flip is the most annoying feature in E (well, not considering the
tooltips in e16). It drives m
Hi again!
> the onyl difference is that u dont SEE the
> contents of a window that belongs to another desktop that is partly
> overlapping this one.
And exactly this is what I need.
I can understand your concerns you have about changing the behaviour in
e17, in fact, I don't want the behaviour
On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:28:40 +0900 Raphael Plasson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>
> >1. now u have to MOVE windows insdtead of show/hide - this is less efficient
> >and causes more exposes and excess draws. 2. because of icccm and reparenting
> >windows -
On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 02:09:41 -0500 Ildar Sagdejev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Raster,
>
> Thanks for the detailed reply and the intangibility of implementing
> such a virtual desktop model. I see the problem weird offscreen
> positions pose, but I don't see why that's necessary at all.
>
> Wh
On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:28:40 +0900 Raphael Plasson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And wouldn't it possible to just consider to have a larger virtual
> desktop, with windows in a fixed position, so that moving around the
> desktops would mean to move the coordinates of the on-screen real
> desktop (a
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>1. now u have to MOVE windows insdtead of show/hide - this is less efficient
>and causes more exposes and excess draws. 2. because of icccm and reparenting
>windows - moving a window with a desk switch creates lots of complications for
>apps that like to re
Raster,
Thanks for the detailed reply and the intangibility of implementing
such a virtual desktop model. I see the problem weird offscreen
positions pose, but I don't see why that's necessary at all.
What if you implement the logic in the screen change event? E.g.,
when moving to desktop2, chec
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:57:52 -0500 Ildar Sagdejev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm new to this list, but I'd like to say that I also would find this
> feature very useful. I've first installed E17 about a week ago, and
> been studying the code base. Maybe in the future I can
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:36:22 +0100 Oliver Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Hi everybody!
>
> I've got a small problem with the virtual desktops in e17.
>
> Say I have 5x5 virtual desktops. In the pager, they are shown in a
> rectangle, and I can switch between them, so far so good.
> Now I h
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:39:05 +0100 Oliver Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Hi again!
>
> > I asked the exact same thing a couple of months ago.
> > Take a look of what it was posted. I don't know if
> > anything more was said about it.
>
> I'll comment on a few things here and would appreci
Ben, Andrew,
Thanks for the replies. I just got home from work (I was on win xp
there), and played around some more with dragging windows, and they
can be dragged off a desktop just fine, so please disregard my
comments about that ;)
I'm going to get the newest version from CVS today and try to
This already happens, in the newest version of E17 you can set backgrounds for specific desktops, I know I have 8 desktops right now and about 5 different images. The only downside is that with 1600x1200 backgrounds, this feels a little laggy (though it might be the animation that changes the bac
Hi everyone,
I'm new to this list, but I'd like to say that I also would find this
feature very useful. I've first installed E17 about a week ago, and
been studying the code base. Maybe in the future I can also
contribute some features I miss from E16.
If it's true that the internal design real
Hi.. I just want to say that I understand you
completly.
If I had the time I'll gladly give you a hand coding
it, but for what I can tell, I'll be busy for some
time. If you start coding though, please keep in
touch, just in case I can do something to help.
Regards,
Alejandro
___
Hi again!
> I asked the exact same thing a couple of months ago.
> Take a look of what it was posted. I don't know if
> anything more was said about it.
I'll comment on a few things here and would appreciate an answer on my
question below.
> Follow up
> > I hate this "feature" of E16. I ever as
I asked the exact same thing a couple of months ago.
Take a look of what it was posted. I don't know if
anything more was said about it.
My original post
> Hello everyone,
> In e16 I could make a window big enough to see part
of
> the window in a desktop and the other part in
another
> desktop. I
Having a window split across two desktops was a feature of e16 that is not in e17. From the archives:http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=13654260
dougOn 1/13/06, Oliver Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi everybody!I've got a small problem with the virtual desktops in e17.Say I ha
Hi everybody!
I've got a small problem with the virtual desktops in e17.
Say I have 5x5 virtual desktops. In the pager, they are shown in a
rectangle, and I can switch between them, so far so good.
Now I have a window on one of the desktops, I'm moving this window to
the right border of the deskt
27 matches
Mail list logo
