possibly your default theme is overriding the -b ?
ctrl+right mouse button in window.
Background -> Picmap -> none
And then "save theme settings" or "save user settings"
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 09:28:10 -0500, Geoffrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eterm 0.9 on Enlightenment 16.7.1. I'm trying to se
Ron Lau wrote:
Yes, SUSE does fuck up there package.
--nodeps works.
Worked here for me too. Yast then bitches about the dependencies
though. Tell it to forget about them and all is well.
Thanks folks.
--
Until later, Geoffrey
---
SF email is
Yes, SUSE does fuck up there package.
--nodeps works.
R.
On Wed, 2004-12-15 at 20:23 -0600, Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Wednesday, 15 December 2004, at 21:19:59 (-0500),
> Geoffrey wrote:
>
> >imlib2-loader_jpeg is needed by Eterm-0.9.3-1
> > imlib2-loader_png is needed by Eterm
On Wednesday, 15 December 2004, at 21:38:15 (-0500),
Geoffrey wrote:
> Installed okay and runs okay, but attempting to save user settings provides:
>
> Eterm: Warning: Config file is designed for a newer version of Eterm
>
> Config file is created, does retain font changes, but still does not
Figured it out. If I select save theme, it retains the background color
with no image.
Thanks muchly for your assistance.
--
Until later, Geoffrey
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of I
Michael Jennings wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 December 2004, at 21:19:59 (-0500),
Geoffrey wrote:
imlib2-loader_jpeg is needed by Eterm-0.9.3-1
imlib2-loader_png is needed by Eterm-0.9.3-1
yet I have imlib2-loaders rpm installed.
A quick clue would be nice, although I'm downloading source now.
Michael Jennings wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 December 2004, at 21:06:26 (-0500),
Geoffrey wrote:
Suggestions?? Eterm 0.9
Try a version that isn't older than dirt? ;-P
Built and installed libast, but ./configure for Eterm says:
checking for libast_set_program_name in -last... no
ERROR: You need Li
On Wednesday, 15 December 2004, at 21:19:59 (-0500),
Geoffrey wrote:
>imlib2-loader_jpeg is needed by Eterm-0.9.3-1
> imlib2-loader_png is needed by Eterm-0.9.3-1
>
> yet I have imlib2-loaders rpm installed.
>
> A quick clue would be nice, although I'm downloading source now.
The in
Michael Jennings wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 December 2004, at 21:06:26 (-0500),
Geoffrey wrote:
Suggestions?? Eterm 0.9
Try a version that isn't older than dirt? ;-P
Ouch, okay, dl Eterm 0.9.3, and libast-0.6.1 rpms. libast loads fine,
Eterm complains about:
imlib2-loader_jpeg is needed by
Jeffrey Kern wrote:
possibly your default theme is overriding the -b ?
ctrl+right mouse button in window.
Background -> Picmap -> none
And then "save theme settings" or "save user settings"
Tries to save the config to /usr/X11R6/share/Eterm/themes/Eterm/user.cfg
and fails.
If I pass a config file v
On Wednesday, 15 December 2004, at 21:06:26 (-0500),
Geoffrey wrote:
> Suggestions?? Eterm 0.9
Try a version that isn't older than dirt? ;-P
Michael
--
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/ Author, Eterm (www.et
On Monday, 13 December 2004, at 09:28:10 (-0500),
Geoffrey wrote:
> Eterm 0.9 on Enlightenment 16.7.1. I'm trying to set the background to
> black, yet my Eterms still come up with images in the background:
>
> Eterm -l -b black -f yellow -T lhotse
>
> How can I turn off the background images?
Eterm 0.9 on Enlightenment 16.7.1. I'm trying to set the background to
black, yet my Eterms still come up with images in the background:
Eterm -l -b black -f yellow -T lhotse
How can I turn off the background images?
--
Until later, Geoffrey
--
On Monday, 03 March 2003, at 23:57:20 (-0500),
gavron wrote:
> I'm pretty sure it was available with RH 6.2 without having to go
> through any additional contortions.
It wasn't.
Michael
--
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus
Michael Jennings wrote:
I'm not sure how you came to that conclusion based on what I said, but
that has nothing to do with anything.
RedHat has never shipped Eterm on anything but their Powertools CD.
Furthermore, they do NOT ship everything related to E besides Eterm.
For example, they do not sup
On Monday, 03 March 2003, at 21:58:46 (-0500),
gavron wrote:
> Thanks much. I suspected something since RH 7.2 comes w/ everything
> related to enlightenment except Eterm.. Sounded a bit fishy like
> they just did not have a clean Eterm available at the time or
> something..
I'm not sure how yo
Michael Jennings wrote:
On Monday, 03 March 2003, at 02:18:07 (-0500),
gavron wrote:
After some difficulties I managed to install what is advertised as a
binary rpm of Eterm-0.9.1-3.
Do not under any circumstances use Eterm 0.9.1.
Michael
Thanks much. I suspected something since RH 7
* Michael Jennings ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030303 20:50]:
> On Monday, 03 March 2003, at 02:18:07 (-0500),
> gavron wrote:
>
> > After some difficulties I managed to install what is advertised as a
> > binary rpm of Eterm-0.9.1-3.
>
> Do not under any circumstances use Eterm 0.9.1.
Safe to say he d
* gavron ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030303 02:26]:
> Hello,
>
> After some difficulties I managed to install what is advertised as a
> binary rpm of Eterm-0.9.1-3.
>
> I tried a couple of other rpm's as well as the install from source from
> the tarball available at www.eterm.org and the above rpm (f
On Monday, 03 March 2003, at 02:18:07 (-0500),
gavron wrote:
> After some difficulties I managed to install what is advertised as a
> binary rpm of Eterm-0.9.1-3.
Do not under any circumstances use Eterm 0.9.1.
Michael
--
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Hall Stevenson wrote:
Did the RPMs from www.eterm.org not work properly either ?? mej likely
won't "support" any binary packages other than the ones he rolls
himself... Actually, I'm confident he will NOT help... :)
Hall
Sounds fair to me.. Count ourselves lucky if he supports his OWN
stuff.
Hello,
After some difficulties I managed to install what is advertised as a
binary rpm of Eterm-0.9.1-3.
I tried a couple of other rpm's as well as the install from source from
the tarball available at www.eterm.org and the above rpm (from
rpmfind.net possibly..) is the only one that I managed
22 matches
Mail list logo
