On 3/30/2021, 10:59:49 PM, Paul Kosinski via Enterprise
wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 16:54:13 -0400
> Tanstaafl wrote:
>> That said - chromium is in no way 'Google', other than, yes, some
>> google engineers contribute to the codebase.
> Then why does Chromium&#
that FF is Open Source doesn't guarantee it's
> desirability: Chromium is Open Source, but it's too much tied into Google
> infrastructure to be totally trustworthy.
>
>
> On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 10:50:20 -0400
> Tanstaafl wrote:
>
>> On 2/28/2021 1:29 PM, Thane K. Sh
On 3/30/2021 10:50 AM, Tanstaafl wrote
> Most importantly, like Thane said, I won't be coming back... unless
> Mozilla does something spectacular to make me give it another look -
> like, opening up the UI to Addons at the same or similar level that
> XUL allowed.
Oh - and only i
On 2/28/2021 1:29 PM, Thane K. Sherrington wrote
> Mike, my complaint (and the complaint I get from my clients) is the
> lack of Simplify Printing. I get that it's "coming soon" but that's
> not the way to roll out a brand new printing system. Finish it, then
> roll it out. The regular complai
Just created one for Thunderbird too:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1593748
On Mon Nov 04 2019 12:09:41 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), Tanstaafl
wrote:
> I just did because this has been annoying me for a while too...
>
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?i
I just did because this has been annoying me for a while too...
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1593740
Is there a way to desigate this one to both Firefox and Thunderbird? Or
do I need to create one for Thunderbird too?
On Mon Nov 04 2019 09:39:49 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time),
On Mon Jul 29 2019 12:37:48 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Mike Kaply
wrote:
> I have an (very) old post that describes this:
>
> https://mike.kaply.com/2007/03/26/deploying-firefox-2-within-the-enterprise-part-5/
>
> I think some things have change slightly since then (particular the
> serve
On 7/15/2019, 3:30:13 PM, Eddie Rowe wrote:
> We also hardened our Adobe Reader setup using the DoD STIG so it nice
> to have one set of settings to manage in GPO on the Windows side (we
> don’t speak Mac or Linux).
Eddie, can you elaborate on this? IS this a GPO template or something
that provide
On Fri Jul 12 2019 16:00:17 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Paul
Kosinski wrote:
> No, they don't activate *your* camera (AFAIK). What can happen is that
> if a Facebook member posts your picture,
Ah, I forgot about pictures... crap... my sister posts a lot of pictures
on fb.
I hate social med
On Thu Jul 11 2019 21:06:01 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Paul
Kosinski wrote:
> They do face recognition (even of non-users),
How, exactly does that work? Are you implying that they somehow secretly
activate my camera, cause the physical slider switch that blocks it to
move to the unblocked
On Fri Jun 21 2019 03:59:33 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time),
< wrote:
> Is this new version as critical as ESR 60.7.1 ?
>
> We’re currently updating all our computers in urgency from ESR 60.6.3
> (or below) to ESR 60.7.1
>
> Do we need absolutely to do the same process to update urgently to 60.7
I'm on the list, please don't reply to me directly (it breaks Reply To
List for me).
On Thu May 17 2018 06:43:45 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), William
Spratt wrote:
>
>
> Not my call. Sometimes you’ve just got to play the cards your dealt.
> In this case I have no say in the security soft
I'd never heard of Avecto Defendpoint, and after investigating, I see why.
A tool apparently aimed at Admins/Entities that think they need to
provide Local Admin privileges to all users - that can't properly
interact with UAC?
Sorry, but my advice is dump the useless tool.
On Thu May 17 2018 05:
On 5/8/2018, 3:43:28 PM, Mike Kaply wrote:
> I can promise you that won't happen. The only place where we would have
> a domain joined requirement is on Rapid Release.
I'm curious - since ESR is more intended for organizations who want
something more stable - and are more likely to be running AD
On Fri Apr 20 2018 22:14:04 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), John R.
Sweet wrote:
> This conflict between "modern javascript" and legacy extensions --
> or whatever the heck is going on -- is a really bad situation. We
> need a couple of extensions that won't work past v 52esr and the
> later > v
This just happened again this morning for about 40 messages...
Only this (Enterprise) and the TB-Planning lists are affected, I haven't
noticed any from the regular Mozilla-Support list.
On 9/20/2016 10:46 PM, Andrew J. Buehler wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On
On 9/16/2016 8:41 AM, WIDELL-SC, Matthew
wrote:
> No duplicates through Gmail but I assume there is de-duplication .
Correct - this is actually why gmail users don't see their own list
posts (gmail considers the one from the list, and the one in the Sent
folder to be duplicates, which essentially
On 9/16/2016 7:08 AM, William Spratt wrote:
> For the record we have an exchange server and I'm only getting one copy of
> each e-mail.
Exchange can do de-duplication, which could explain why you aren't
seeing them...
___
Enterprise mailing list
Enterp
On 9/15/2016 11:19 PM, Andrew J. Buehler wrote:
> I also receive mail via IMAP, albeit through Thunderbird, so there's a
> chance it may be IMAP-related somehow; do any of the people who have
> reported (offlist, thus far) that they don't see the problem use IMAP?
I use IMAP and I've been seeing
On 2/2/2016 3:01 PM, Kev Needham wrote:
> On 2016-02-02 1:29 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
>> Interestingly, I don't even see the Enterprise list listed on Mozilla's
>> official page of all of their lists:
>>
>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo
> Mailman's
/2/2016 1:23 PM, Mike Connor wrote:
> If you're running ESR, you will continue to have that option for the
> foreseeable future. If you're not, I believe this thread is well off
> topic for this list.
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Tanstaafl <mailto:tansta
the developers of Firefox.
>
> Daniel Wolf
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Enterprise [mailto:enterprise-boun...@mozilla.org] On Behalf Of Timo
> Pietilä
> Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2016 12:04 AM
> To: enterprise@mozilla.org
> Subject: Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Add-on Si
On 2/2/2016 1:34 AM, Klaus Hartnegg wrote:
>> Am 01.02.2016 um 16:32 schrieb Tanstaafl :
>> The same argument can be made for support for Apple's walled garden
>> app-store.
> And by the way Apple DOES allow corporate users to self-sign apps,
> and deploy them direct
nfected with a malicious
Addon.
> This is why I tell people to use Chrome every chance I get.
Fine, so what are you doing here?
> Daniel Wolf
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Enterprise [mailto:enterprise-boun...@mozilla.org] On Behalf Of
> Tanstaafl
> Sent: Satu
On 1/28/2016 7:15 AM, stefan.sonnenberg-carst...@nrwbank.de wrote:
> I coudn't find a way to enforce the use of a master password.
> Is this possible at all?
Set the Master Password. From then on it is 'enforced'.
If that is not what you mean, then you need to be more clear about what
you want.
_
On 1/23/2016 12:35 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
> Thanks Kev...
>
> While this is a step in the right direction, this is indeed great news
> for those running the ESR version. But it doesn't help people like me
> who prefer the latest stable. I will still be relegated to running an
Thanks Kev...
While this is a step in the right direction, this is indeed great news
for those running the ESR version. But it doesn't help people like me
who prefer the latest stable. I will still be relegated to running an
unbranded version just so I can maintain full control of my browser
exper
On 1/15/2016 10:16 AM, Andrew J. Buehler wrote:
> Not as far as I'm aware. What I would recommend instead is to install
> Firefox ESR, which does get minor-release updates after the release of
> new versions (for roughly a year); if I've read the discussions
> correctly, Mozilla has sort-of promis
On 1/15/2016 9:49 AM, Eric Periard wrote:
> You'll sacrifice security? Really now...
In favor of user choice/freedom? Yes I will.
'Those willing to give up essential liberty for fake security (which is
what this is, as demonstrated by Dan Stillman) deserve neither liberty
nor security'
Hello,
As a result of the decision by Mozilla to deny users the ability to make
their own decisions with respect to installing unsigned Addons, I'd like
to just stay on version 43 until this decision is reversed.
I'd like to continue to get minor updates automatically, but no updates
to 44+.
Is
30 matches
Mail list logo
