Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Layout options in latest versions of FF

On 16 February 2018 at 23:31, Emma Humphries wrote: > https://mozilla.github.io/extension-finder/ is a searchable list of > popular add-ons, and their suggested replacements if they > haven't migrated to WebExtensions yet. [OT] It'd be nice if that page would work when

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Layout options in latest versions of FF

Hi John, https://mozilla.github.io/extension-finder/ is a searchable list of popular add-ons, and their suggested replacements if they haven't migrated to WebExtensions yet. As for your other two questions, I'd need to hunt down if there are enhancement requests under discussion about that.

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Layout options in latest versions of FF

James Pearson wrote: > > There was a thread on this list last month that mentioned a possible > 'replacement' for Classic Theme Restorer see: > >https://mail.mozilla.org/private/enterprise/2018-January/008360.html > > That post stated: > >> Apparently, the way forward is to alter the user

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Layout options in latest versions of FF

John R. Sweet wrote: > > 1.  We want text buttons in the toolbar.  Everyone here reads and > understands English.  We do not want inscrutable little icons when > simple English words will serve better.  This is an option in all > versions up to 56 but not in 57. > > 2.  The tab bar belongs

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Layout options in latest versions of FF

I agree *totally* with point #1 and #2! Text labels on the toolbar are much more understandable than cryptic icons. Also, the multi-language problem has long since been solved. Tabs should not be forced to be on top! I am convinced that Google did this in Chrome to de-emphasize the general

[Mozilla Enterprise] Layout options in latest versions of FF

Greetings Folks, We are holding firm with v. 52.5.3esr and not allowing any updates until some of the issues are resolved. We have at least one important add-on in the old format. I am talking with its developer, hoping that it will be brought up to the new standard. I'm not sure about a