Bob Sull wrote:
>
> Thomas Bantel wrote:
>
> > Didn't try that yet. With the 1.4x (Tamron) it works quite well.
> >
> > Thomas Bantel
>
> Thomas,
>
> Thanks for waking me up.
>
> I have both, the 28-70 and the Tamron 1.4X SPAF but never thought of
> using them together.
I didn't think about
Does anyone know if the EOS-D30 is sensitive into IR and if it works
with the Hoya R72
infrared filter or something similar?
Scott
Scott Sandeman-Allen - Edmonton, Alberta. Canada.
http://www.rscorp.ab.ca and http://www.pixite.net
*
***
Phil Greenspun has done a pretty thorough review of this lins on
http://photo.net.
There are several very high resolution photographs taken with this lens on
the site.
Do a search for "EF 35-350"
Cheers,
Shashvat
~-Original Message-
~From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On B
Am planning on buying an Elan 7, mostly for macro work. Have already
decided on the new Canon USM 100mm, but not sure about a choice for a 50mm.
The manual focus on the Canon 50 mm felt a little sloppy to me. Of course
that's compared to the FD lenses that I'm accustomed to . The Sigma 50
mm EX ha
>I'm with Skip on this. I have both lenses and this is the reason why, the
>28-135 is a really useful travel/muck around lens. The extra focal length
I agree, I think 28-135 is more interesting as THE travel lens. But I'd like it to
be 24-120 (for
example, but it should have similar optical q
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Can anyone share any expierence with this lens and the 1.4TC. I would be
> using it on a EOS 3. Tracking birds, wildlife, children.
Lee
The 100-400 on its own is a bit slower focusing than, for example the
70-200/2.8. With the 1.4x it i
- Original Message -
From: "Celeste & Kenny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I am new to the list. I subbed to the list specifically to find out any
> information about my mode dial breaking on Saturday. I went to the
archives
> and got some information on how to get it fixed but was wondering if
Kwan Choi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there any word on the digital, D30?
>
> Kwan
Yes. It's been available in the US since November, 2000.
Ray Amos
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.n
Hi,
Is there any word on the digital, D30?
Kwan
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***
> > Gerry Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked:
> > >I started wondering whether there was a single lens that would be
> > >convenient for travel, and the one that came to mind was the 28-70 L...
Skip replied;
> I'd have to vote for the 28-135 IS as the ideal travel lens, if you're
> only going to pic
On Sun, 27 May 2001, Ken Lin wrote:
> Horizon Electronics has received a ton of endorsement on this user group for
> their repair on the A2/A2E models, they can also load new firmware into the
> camera to make it an EOS-5 with better exposure compensation indicator in
> the view finder and automa
>From: Rien Stoop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Hi everyone,
>
> I am new to this list and as a long time Canon user interested
>in what's going on out there. Starting in the 70's with an FT-b via an
>AE1-program, an EOS650 (which I still have) I now use an EOS 5
> My main interests are peopl
Chris Valentine wrote:
>
> Gerry Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked:
> >I started wondering whether there was a single lens that would be
> >convenient for travel, and the one that came to mind was the 28-70 L...
>
> You really need to try it to appreciate how big a lens it really is.
> Plus you'v
Camera Wiz and Horizon Electronics.
> Just wondering if there was a new solution to this obvious manufacturers
> defect?
Some have reported that Canon now uses a more robust component(s) to make
the repair.
Horizon Electronics has received a ton of endorsement on this user group for
their repair
Hello,
I am new to the list. I subbed to the list specifically to find out any
information about my mode dial breaking on Saturday. I went to the archives
and got some information on how to get it fixed but was wondering if there
was any new information since this seems to be a recurring proble
I love mine. I have taken it all over the world, and it takes
magnificent photos. It is pretty heavy, but I find that coming back
with the best possible photos is more important than an occasional
neck ache. :-)
The 28-70L isn't compatible with either of Canon's converters, and I
would caut
JimD wrote:
>
> Ken's perspective has me thinking that the 28-70 is enough
> better than the 28-105 that the 28-70 may be the right step
> to take at this time.
> The comparison on Ian Porteous' site still gives me
> pause though.
> http://www.geocities.com/Yosemite/Falls/6122/test/test2/lens.htm
Gerry Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked:
>I started wondering whether there was a single lens that would be
>convenient for travel, and the one that came to mind was the 28-70 L...
You really need to try it to appreciate how big a lens it really is.
Plus you've got to pay for 77mm diameter filter
On 26 May 01 at 9:56, Bob Sull wrote:
> "Icoz, Evrim" wrote:
> >
> > I am thinking of using Kodak High Speed Infrared film, and i have an elan
> > iie. I heard conflicting reports regarding the use of this film with this
> > camera, like it fogs the very outer sides, so it is not a problem etc.
Thomas Bantel wrote:
> Didn't try that yet. With the 1.4x (Tamron) it works quite well.
>
> Thomas Bantel
Thomas,
Thanks for waking me up.
I have both, the 28-70 and the Tamron 1.4X SPAF but never thought of
using them together.
Bob
--
//
( 0 0 )
Rien Stoop wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am new to this list and as a long time Canon user interested
> in what's going on out there. Starting in the 70's with an FT-b via an
> AE1-program, an EOS650 (which I still have) I now use an EOS 5
> My main interests are people, portrait
Gerry Morgan wrote:
>
> Is anyone else using the 28-70 L with a 2x converter? How about diopters?
>
Didn't try that yet. With the 1.4x (Tamron) it works quite well.
Thomas Bantel
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsu
JimD wrote:
>
> I planning on adding a lens and am pondering what to choose.
>
> I'm currently using the Canon 28-105 f3.5 and Canon 17-35 2.8L.
> I know the the 28-70 2.8 L is superior to the 28-105 but am
> getting acceptable results with the 28-105. the Canon 100mm
> Macro would allow me to
> From: "Doug Johnston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I've read that when the 70-200mm f/4L lens is combined with a 2X extender,
> you lose AF, except on the EOS-3 using center focusing. I was just
> wondering if this setup would also work on the Elan 7
Doug,
Only the EOS 3 and EOS 1V will autofocus
I went travelling recently, and took with me a 24mm and a 50mm macro (Sigma
EX) lens. I took some close-up shots, especially while hiking in the
mountains, so the macro lens was useful. So was the wide-angle, especially
in cities. But I could have used a lens that was a little longer. I started
Hi everyone,
I am new to this list and as a long time Canon user interested
in what's going on out there. Starting in the 70's with an FT-b via an
AE1-program, an EOS650 (which I still have) I now use an EOS 5
My main interests are people, portraits and fashion/model
photography.
26 matches
Mail list logo
