I'll throw in an estimate of approximately $200-235. I recently bought one
for one of my photographers from KEH in ex+ condition and the price was $250
with the grip extender and handstrap.
hth
~shan
> I've got two Canon EOS 10s bodies I'm thinking of selling. I'm
> wondering if any of you ha
"Skip Middleton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote/replied to:
>> Get a speedlite and bounce it.
>>
>>
>Isn't that kind of hard on the case?
>Skip Middleton
Hehehe took me a sec to get that...
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including
If this has already been posted, I apologize for the redundancy.
I had signed up on the B&H website to be notified by email as soon as they
got the 24-70L in stock.
Tonight I was sitting in front of my computer when the email arrived saying
they had it in stock. The message contained a link to th
If this has already been posted, I apologize for the redundancy.
I had signed up on the B&H website to be notified by email as soon as they
got the 24-70L in stock.
Tonight I was sitting in front of my computer when the email arrived saying
they had it in stock. The message contained a link to th
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 8:41 PM
Subject: Re: Re: EOS Canon Price?
> "Gary Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote/replied to:
>
> >That's a good point. I never thought of that as I was mainly thinking of
>
"Gary Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote/replied to:
>That's a good point. I never thought of that as I was mainly thinking of
>the light. See, I don't like the hard look from the flash. Sometimes it's
>hard especially he's moving so quickly and short daylight of winter doesn't
>help either. :( An
Hi Bob:
That's a good point. I never thought of that as I was mainly thinking of
the light. See, I don't like the hard look from the flash. Sometimes it's
hard especially he's moving so quickly and short daylight of winter doesn't
help either. :( Any suggestion?
Gary
- Original Message -
Bob Talbot cited:
> http://medfmt.8k.com/third/af.html
Correct me if I'm wrong, but if the cited article (in October 1995 Pop
Photo) is the one that I recall (and it's been a while ...), manual
focusing was done by using a loupe on a ground glass placed on the film
rails ... I never could figure
"Shifrin, Eugene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote/replied to:
>I have purchased the Kenko Teleplus Pro 300 1.4 TC and it does not transmit
>the data between a lens and a body: the aperture setting displayed is 00 and
>the camera locks up, when the shutter is pressed (blinking battery symbol).
>I'm usin
> I've got two Canon EOS 10s bodies I'm thinking of selling. I'm
> wondering if any of you have advice on what is a fair asking price.
> They both work wonderfully and are in great shape. I realize that for
> infrared users and astrophotographers these bodies are highly
> desireable..
Hi David,
On ebay, really nice ones go for about $125-$200,
usually with some accessory such as the barcode
reader. $150 seems to be the mean. Some seller try
to get more than $200, but they don't move.
John Lovda
--- David Piercey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got two Canon EOS 10s bodies I'm thinkin
I've got two Canon EOS 10s bodies I'm thinking of selling. I'm
wondering if any of you have advice on what is a fair asking price.
They both work wonderfully and are in great shape. I realize that for
infrared users and astrophotographers these bodies are highly
desireable..
Thanks for your advi
I have a link to some tests on this - I'll post
> them if I remeber where I filed them
OK
For what it is worth ...
http://medfmt.8k.com/third/af.html
I've found exactly the same in home-brew tests.
By eye, if I focus manually the focus ring lens ends up in precisely
the same position.
By AF,
--- Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have an old EF 35-105 push pull zoom that's a
> great lens, but has
> one surface inside slightly cloudy it seems. Rather
> than throw it out,
> I'd love to be able to open it up enough to clean
> that lens surface.
>
> Does anyone know any more about
- Original Message -
From: David Wheeless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 6:28 PM
Subject: EOS Canon value
> In the past I've been a fairly hardcore Nikon bigot but I've recently opened
> my eyes and mind to the fact that other companies really
On Monday, December 16, 2002, at 10:28 AM, David Wheeless wrote:
In considering the purchase of a new $1000 35mm body, when I compare
the
two, Canon simply seems to offer more functionality for the dollar.
Something about this makes it hard for me to get excited about staying
with
Nikon when
In the past I've been a fairly hardcore Nikon bigot but I've recently opened
my eyes and mind to the fact that other companies really do produce high
quality photographic equipment. It is because of this that I've noticed
that Canon seems to offer a better value (price, performance, and
technology
On Monday, December 16, 2002, at 06:54 AM, Javier Perez wrote:
Thanks everyone for the responses. I got into AF
because I figured it would be more accurate than my
lousy eyesight. I guess I was wrong!
I don't know about that. I'm sure that, yes, AF systems are going to
have a margin of erro
Maybe you are not wrong. MF may be more accurate as others posted but with
MF it depends on the ability/vision of the photographer to manual focus. So,
if your eyesight is not great then AF (of a good camera) may provide better
results. Also, for tracking moving subjects AF may be better (for most
Thanks everyone for the responses. I got into AF
because I figured it would be more accurate than my
lousy eyesight. I guess I was wrong!
Javier
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
*
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Javier Perez
>
>Hi Everyone
>for awhile I've been noticing that when I set my AF
>lenses to MF on any of my OESes there is a small range
>in terms of barrel turning where the confirm light
>stays on. Yet t
- Original Message -
From: Javier Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 5:10 AM
Subject: EOS AF or MF confirm accuracy Vs manual focus accuracy
> Hi Everyone
> for awhile I've been noticing that when I set my AF
> lenses to MF on any of my OESes
> Hi Everyone
> for awhile I've been noticing that when I set my AF
> lenses to MF on any of my OESes there is a small range
> in terms of barrel turning where the confirm light
> stays on. Yet the split image can narrow it down far
> more. It's only 2 degrees or so with MF confirm but
> far less
23 matches
Mail list logo
