Moose Peterson is sponsored by Nikon...
Unless you are a beginner, you should be able of getting the same results
with any camera, as far as metering is regarded.
Light passes through the lens to hit the film, not through the meter. So,
basing the choice on the meter (and in no way Nikon outperfo
Whenever I am unhappy with my shots I usually find that I am unhappy
over 95% of the time because they are not sharp(here I would have liked
to have IS) -(I use non-IS L lenses/tripod/mlu/release, sometimes with
a 1.4X) and only less than 5% of the time because of the exposure.
suresh
""
tom
Alex wrote:
>
> >The heaviest, sturdiest
> > tripod in the world won't help you if what you've set your tripod on is
> > moving!
>
> Hey now, whippersnapper, you're obviously not pushing down on the tripod
> hard enough! In my day...;)
>
> --Alex
Y'know, I'm 6', 250 lbs, and if it needs more
-Original Message-
From: Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Moose Peterson is a famous Nikon photographer. I stumbled onto his site
>and was reading his tips...
>But the interesting part of the tip is that Moose
> basically states that people who go to Canon because of IS are losing out
beca
By the way, as a counterpoint to this pro-Nikon website, there was a great
site with some really candid, brutal reviews of Nikon and Canon equipment by
a railroad photo enthusiast...it was called Grumpy's Photo Reviews or
something, but it doesn't seem to be there anymore:
http://home.neb.rr.com/
>The heaviest, sturdiest
> tripod in the world won't help you if what you've set your tripod on is
> moving!
Hey now, whippersnapper, you're obviously not pushing down on the tripod
hard enough! In my day...;)
--Alex
*
***
***
*
Tom DelRosario wrote:
>
> http://www.moose395.net/tips/2000.html
>
> Moose Peterson is a famous Nikon photographer. I stumbled onto his site and was
>reading his tips. In one of the tips on the above page, Moose really pans IS,
>stating that it is not necessary if you use correct technique (
Terry Danks wrote:
>
> > From: "Tom DelRosario" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Thus, IS really isn't handy. (I agree with regards to the 600 IS, who the heck
>is going to hand-hold that,
>
> As the user of the EF600/4L IS, I can assure that, while I don't hand hold it, IS is
>very useful on thi
> http://www.moose395.net/tips/2000.html
>
> Moose Peterson is a famous Nikon photographer. I stumbled onto his site
and was reading his tips. In one of the tips on the above page, Moose
really pans IS, stating that it is not necessary if you use correct
technique (I believe it was writtern befo
> From: "Tom DelRosario" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Thus, IS really isn't handy. (I agree with regards to the 600 IS, who the heck is
>going to hand-hold that,
As the user of the EF600/4L IS, I can assure that, while I don't hand hold it, IS is
very useful on this lens. It is often used poked ou
- Original Message -
> But the interesting part of the tip is that Moose basically states that
people who go to Canon because of IS are losing out because the metering on
the Nikon F5 is so much superior. I am curious if anyone here has done a
comparison between Nikon and Canon metering
Tom DelRosario wrote (edited):
But the interesting part of the tip is that Moose basically states that
people who go to Canon because of IS are losing out because the metering on
the Nikon F5 is so much superior. I am curious if anyone here has done a
comparison between Nikon and Canon metering.
12 matches
Mail list logo
