Hello,
Am 21. April um 13:35 schrieb Günter Hammer:
>> Is the alias set in the eeprom? -> ethercat sii_r -v, word 4
>
> No, the alias is not set in the eeprom.
If it is not stored, then there's no chance to use it. Was the eeprom
overwritten after setting the alias?
>> It could be a problem wit
Am 21.04.2010 12:17, schrieb Florian Pose:
Hello,
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:05:40AM +0200, Günter Hammer wrote:
The Pdo registration failed because the aliases are not set, as you can
see here.
# ethercat sl
0 0:0 PREOP + cEA70A EBus-Adapter (2A E-Bus)
1 0:1 PREOP + cDI73A
Hello,
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:05:40AM +0200, Günter Hammer wrote:
> The Pdo registration failed because the aliases are not set, as you can
> see here.
> # ethercat sl
> 0 0:0 PREOP + cEA70A EBus-Adapter (2A E-Bus)
> 1 0:1 PREOP + cDI73A 8K. Dig. Eingang 24V, 3ms
> 2 0:2 PRE
Am 31.03.2010 17:41, schrieb Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Florian Pose:
Am 31. März um 17:22 schrieb Günter Hammer:
Thank you for your quick answer.
It seems to work with the alias adressing.
But there is a strange behaviour with the command line tool.
If I call "ethercat config", i got the output i ex
Am 31. März um 17:22 schrieb Günter Hammer:
> Thank you for your quick answer.
>
> It seems to work with the alias adressing.
> But there is a strange behaviour with the command line tool.
>
> If I call "ethercat config", i got the output i expected:
> # ethercat config
> 0:1 0x12ad/0x03f03052
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 02:52:36PM +0200, Günter Hammer wrote:
> Is there any way to find out, what the removed cards are ?
You could use alias addressing to identify the slaves.
See the docs of the ecrt_master_slave_config() method and 'ethercat
alias -h'.
--
Best regards,
Florian Pose
http:/
Problem with disconnecting an Ethercat Segment
I have an Ethercat device with 3 segments.
1) An Ethercat Master Device with an Ebus Adapter, 2 IO-Cards and a
Bus-Extender
2) Segment1 (Bus-Coupler, 2 IO-Cards, Bus-Extender) Slave-Index 4 - 7
3) Segment2 (Bus-Coupler, 2 IO-Cards) Slave-Index 8
