Re: [EVDL] confirmation on thie info please

2016-03-13 Thread Michael Ross via EV
ers. > > Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone Original message > From: K O via EV Date: 3/13/2016 12:55 AM > (GMT-06:00) To: ev@lists.evdl.org, ev-requ...@lists.evdl.org Subject: > [EVDL] confirmation on thie info please > This fellows numbers don

Re: [EVDL] confirmation on thie info please

2016-03-13 Thread dovepa via EV
. Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone Original message From: K O via EV Date: 3/13/2016 12:55 AM (GMT-06:00) To: ev@lists.evdl.org, ev-requ...@lists.evdl.org Subject: [EVDL] confirmation on thie info please This fellows numbers don't seem right to me, but I

Re: [EVDL] confirmation on thie info please

2016-03-13 Thread Michael Ross via EV
Indeed the value of refined hydrocarbons is built into the molecules themselves not the manner of their liberation. Too bad they smell so bad. Not agreeing to your numbers* per se*, the overall sentiment is correct. It is easy to light a fire, but hard to contain the smoke. On Sun, Mar 13, 2016

Re: [EVDL] confirmation on thie info please

2016-03-12 Thread EVDL Administrator via EV
On 13 Mar 2016 at 6:55, K O via EV wrote: > So replacing internal combustion engines with all-electric ones would > use 4 to 8 times as much electricity as refining petroleum Folks who oppose EVs like to make calculations like this to "prove" that EVs are actually a step backward. They simply

[EVDL] confirmation on thie info please

2016-03-12 Thread K O via EV
This fellows numbers don't seem right to me, but I don't carry stats around in my headaccurate? or not?Phil Boettge The US uses 33% of its electrical capacity for industrial purposes.  Of its industrial uses, 16% are for refining petroleum products.  So 5.3% of the US electrical capacity is used