On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 Craig Weinberg wrote:
>The problem is that the logic of comp doesn't seem to have a reason to
> invent a revulsion response associated with increasing fidelity of
> simulation when the whole point of comp is interchangeability and
> simulation.
>
Evolution has given us a ve
On Dec 31 2011, 11:46 pm, John Clark wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
> > a bar of gold discovered in a dream is not bankable when you wake up.
>
> Sure, but that's because a gold bar is a noun and I'm talking about
> adjectives, in fact one of the definitions of
On 31.12.2011 22:57 meekerdb said the following:
On 12/31/2011 1:33 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 31.12.2011 22:00 meekerdb said the following:
...
Completely!? How do you know that? The Mars Rover doesn't just
record a sensor value in its computer, it also remember the value
and at a later t
Steve Grand's latest project, an artificial-life game called Grandroids,
does just that. The bottom layer (substitution level) is an artificial
chemistry and biology, including analogues to dna, metabolism, cells
(including neurons of course), hormones, and so on. He's concentrating on
building a
On Jan 1, 3:03 am, John Clark wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
> >The problem is that the logic of comp doesn't seem to have a reason to
> > invent a revulsion response associated with increasing fidelity of
> > simulation when the whole point of comp is interchangeability a
On Jan 1, 8:29 am, Terren Suydam wrote:
> Steve Grand's latest project, an artificial-life game called Grandroids,
> does just that. The bottom layer (substitution level) is an artificial
> chemistry and biology, including analogues to dna, metabolism, cells
> (including neurons of course), hormon
Craig, you said earlier "I don't really see how different levels could
exist in comp." My reply was not to say that Steve will be successful
(even if fwiw I believe he will), rather just to point out how
different levels could exist in comp. Are you saying you can't even
conceive of how Steve coul
On 1 January 2012 02:04, meekerdb wrote:
>>> Not to wish to pre-empt Bruno's reply, but I think you're mixing up 1-
>>> p and 3-p. From 3-p, all branches are conscious, but I only experience
>>> myself on one branch at a time, probabilistically according to the
>>> measure of computations. There'
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 Craig Weinberg wrote:
> But if I dream of something very valuable, I don't get to keep that
> valuable in real life.
If you dream about a very valuable idea you do get to keep it, you just
can't keep nouns. After years working on it the chemist August Kekule made
by far the
Hi,
Does Steve Grand's game include self-modeling?
Onward!
Stephen
On 1/1/2012 10:32 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Jan 1, 8:29 am, Terren Suydam wrote:
Steve Grand's latest project, an artificial-life game called Grandroids,
does just that. The bottom layer (substitution level) is an art
As far as I understand it, if grandroids are capable of self-modeling, it
would not be programmed in beforehand but rather emerge somehow. But I'm
not sure, I'll ask.
On Jan 1, 2012 2:30 PM, "Stephen P. King" wrote:
> Hi,
>
>Does Steve Grand's game include self-modeling?
>
> Onward!
>
> Steph
>>> Not to wish to pre-empt Bruno's reply, but I think you're mixing up 1- >>>
>>> p and 3-p. From 3-p, all branches are conscious, but I only experience >>>
>>> myself on one branch at a time, probabilistically according to the >>>
>>> measure of computations. There's no individual soul, just i
On 1/1/2012 9:35 AM, David Nyman wrote:
On 1 January 2012 02:04, meekerdb wrote:
Not to wish to pre-empt Bruno's reply, but I think you're mixing up 1-
p and 3-p. From 3-p, all branches are conscious, but I only experience
myself on one branch at a time, probabilistically according to the
meas
On 1/1/2012 4:59 PM, Pierz wrote:
Not to wish to pre-empt Bruno's reply, but I think you're mixing up 1->>> p and 3-p. From 3-p, all branches are conscious, but I only experience>>> myself on one
branch at a time, probabilistically according to the>>> measure of computations. There's no indiv
14 matches
Mail list logo
