Trivial Awareness = Invariance (comparison (variance, invariance))
aka Pattern Matching
Machine, computer program, inorganic molecules. Detection of
difference.
Trivial Intelligence = Any quantifiable consequence of recursive
enumeration.
Intelligence = Significant qualitative augmentation of
On 20 Jan 2012, at 07:17, Joseph Knight wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
Stephen, Ronald,
The paper is very interesting, on physics, but succumbs directly
from the argument that any digital physics is bound to be
unsuccessful on the
On Jan 19, 5:40 pm, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 1/19/2012 2:05 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
How is one any form of information more or less likely to be causally
effective than any other form?
Would you rather have an instruction manual in English or Urdu?
Since I tend to put
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
How do you know that rocks fail the Turing Test?
That question most certainly does not pass the Turing Test and for the same
reason that the ancient ELIZA psychiatry program that you mentioned did
not; it very soon became
On 20 Jan 2012, at 02:34, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Jan 19, 11:33 am, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 17 Jan 2012, at 21:20, Craig Weinberg wrote:
My point is that a Turing machine is not even truly universal,
let alone infinite.
A universal Turing machine is, by definition a
On 20.01.2012 02:34 Jason Resch said the following:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Craig
Weinbergwhatsons...@gmail.comwrote:
On Jan 19, 4:56 am, Bruno Marchalmarc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Yes. Craig argue that machine cannot thinks by pointing on its
fridge.
Are you afraid to burn coal in
On 20.01.2012 18:21 John Clark said the following:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 Craig Weinbergwhatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
...
If you define the universe as deterministic from the beginning, then
[...]
I most certainly do not! We know the universe is NOT deterministic
but we also know that
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 Evgenii Rudnyi use...@rudnyi.ru wrote:
What about Big Bang?
What about Big Bang?
It has also happened for a reason?
I have no idea, but I do know it happened for a reason or it did not happen
for a reason.
John K Clark
--
You received this message because you are
On Jan 20, 12:21 pm, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
How do you know that rocks fail the Turing Test?
That question most certainly does not pass the Turing Test and for the same
reason that the ancient ELIZA
On 20.01.2012 21:28 John Clark said the following:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 Evgenii Rudnyiuse...@rudnyi.ru wrote:
What about Big Bang?
What about Big Bang?
It has also happened for a reason?
I have no idea, but I do know it happened for a reason or it did not
happen for a reason.
John
On 20 Jan 2012, at 07:17, Joseph Knight wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
Stephen, Ronald,
The paper is very interesting, on physics, but succumbs directly
from the argument that any digital physics is bound to be
unsuccessful on the
On Jan 20, 3:28 pm, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 Evgenii Rudnyi use...@rudnyi.ru wrote:
What about Big Bang?
It has also happened for a reason?
I have no idea, but I do know it happened for a reason or it did not happen
for a reason.
Why can't reason
On Jan 20, 2:03 pm, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 20 Jan 2012, at 02:34, Craig Weinberg wrote:
What machine makes the infinite tape?
Eventually the numbers themselves. It is simpler than the universal
unitary rotation of the physicist, but if you want an infinite tape,
you
On 1/20/2012 12:47 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 20.01.2012 21:28 John Clark said the following:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 Evgenii Rudnyiuse...@rudnyi.ru wrote:
What about Big Bang?
What about Big Bang?
It has also happened for a reason?
I have no idea, but I do know it happened for a
14 matches
Mail list logo
