On 14 Oct 2015, at 06:59, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 10/13/2015 8:50 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Brent Meeker
wrote:
On 10/13/2015 7:22 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Brent Meeker
On 14 Oct 2015, at 08:17, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 14/10/2015 4:45 pm, Jason Resch wrote:
Cochlear implants and artificial retinas give evidence toward
multiple realizability, and therefore, against mind-
brain identity theory. They show that it is functional equivalence,
On 14 Oct 2015, at 05:21, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 10/13/2015 7:22 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Brent Meeker
wrote:
On 10/13/2015 6:36 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Brent Meeker
On 14 Oct 2015, at 07:45, Jason Resch wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Brent Meeker
wrote:
On 10/13/2015 8:50 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Brent Meeker
wrote:
On 10/13/2015 7:22 PM, Jason Resch
On 14/10/2015 4:45 pm, Jason Resch wrote:
Cochlear implants and artificial retinas give evidence toward multiple
realizability, and therefore, against mind-brain identity theory. They
show that it is functional equivalence, rather than
material/compositional equivalence that matters. Since
On 10/13/2015 10:45 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Brent Meeker > wrote:
On 10/13/2015 8:50 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Brent Meeker
On 14 Oct 2015, at 00:41, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 10/13/2015 3:04 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 13/10/2015 11:43 pm, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2015-10-13 14:26 GMT+02:00 Bruce Kellett
:
...
Who said matter was the end point?
You... why do you insist on matter, if
On 14 Oct 2015, at 08:26, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 10/13/2015 10:45 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Brent Meeker
wrote:
On 10/13/2015 8:50 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Brent Meeker
On 14 Oct 2015, at 05:50, Jason Resch wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Brent Meeker
wrote:
On 10/13/2015 7:22 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Brent Meeker
wrote:
On 10/13/2015 6:36 PM, Jason Resch
On 13 Oct 2015, at 22:36, John Clark wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Jason Resch
wrote:
> Well look into Bruno's theory if you want some possible
answers.
Answers are a dime a dozen, correct answers are not. And Bruno
doesn't even know what questions
On 14 Oct 2015, at 00:24, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 14/10/2015 3:11 am, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 13 Oct 2015, at 12:40, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 13/10/2015 8:40 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 13 Oct 2015, at 07:37, Bruce Kellett wrote:
Has computationalism predicted spin? Special relativity?
On 14 Oct 2015, at 00:46, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 10/13/2015 3:36 PM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On 13 October 2015 at 21:43, Bruce Kellett
wrote:
On 13/10/2015 7:57 pm, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On 13 October 2015 at 11:48, Bruce Kellett
On 14 Oct 2015, at 04:04, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 10/13/2015 6:36 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Brent Meeker
wrote:
On 10/13/2015 3:53 PM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On 14 October 2015 at 09:46, Brent Meeker
On 13 Oct 2015, at 18:10, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 10/13/2015 1:57 AM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On 13 October 2015 at 11:48, Bruce Kellett
wrote:
On 13/10/2015 9:46 am, Jason Resch wrote:
The double-slit experiment is evidence of platonic computation
being
On 13 Oct 2015, at 18:34, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 10/13/2015 2:40 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 13 Oct 2015, at 07:37, Bruce Kellett wrote:
Has computationalism predicted spin? Special relativity? Quantum
field theory? General relativity?
Computationalism is used implicitly in the theory
On 10/14/2015 8:10 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 14 Oct 2015, at 06:59, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 10/13/2015 8:50 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Brent Meeker > wrote:
On 10/13/2015 7:22 PM, Jason Resch
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 Jason Resch wrote:
>> >>
>> Answers are a dime a dozen, correct answers are not. And Bruno doesn't
>> even know what questions to ask, like, "what does the pronoun "you" refer
>> to, or what does "free will" even mean, or does the word "God" mean
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 5:16 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> John,
> You are just doing propaganda for Aristotle theological primary matter
>
Wow, calling a guy known for disliking religion religious, never heard that
one before, at least I never heard it before I was 12.
On 15/10/2015 2:31 am, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Computationalism has an ontology on which everyone agree. Those who
claim to disagree usually add philosophical commitment which is not
used in the reasoning.
An ontology *is* a philosophical commitment, even if 'everyone' agrees
on it. If the
On 15/10/2015 2:10 am, Bruno Marchal wrote:
You talk like if I have claim knowing some truth. I do not. You are
doing philosophy of comp-theology. That belongs to the field of
philosophy of science, which is not my expertise. You cannot use
philosophy for making people doubting a logical
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 1:17 AM, Bruce Kellett
wrote:
> On 14/10/2015 4:45 pm, Jason Resch wrote:
>
> Cochlear implants and artificial retinas give evidence toward multiple
> realizability, and therefore, against mind-brain identity theory. They show
> that it is
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 1:26 AM, Brent Meeker wrote:
>
>
> On 10/13/2015 10:45 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Brent Meeker
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 10/13/2015 8:50 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
>
> Here are the alternatives to computationalism, and their problems:
>
*Interactionism (Dualism):* Postulates a non-physical soul which
> [...]
>
Which is contradicted by experiment.
In every observation a
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 4:01 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> On 14 Oct 2015, at 05:50, Jason Resch wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Brent Meeker
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 10/13/2015 7:22 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> On 14 Oct 2015, at 07:45, Jason Resch wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Brent Meeker
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 10/13/2015 8:50 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015
On 10/14/2015 6:59 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 4:01 AM, Bruno Marchal > wrote:
Actually, Robinson Arithmetic is consistent with ultrafinitism.
So, logically, ultrafinitism is not a threat for comp at the
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:17 PM, John Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 Jason Resch wrote:
>
>
>>> >>
>>> Answers are a dime a dozen, correct answers are not. And Bruno doesn't
>>> even know what questions to ask, like, "what does the pronoun
On 15/10/2015 12:07 pm, Jason Resch wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 1:17 AM, Bruce Kellett
> wrote:
On 14/10/2015 4:45 pm, Jason Resch wrote:
Cochlear implants and artificial retinas give evidence toward
multiple
28 matches
Mail list logo