On 4/12/2017 2:34 pm, Russell Standish wrote:
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 02:11:11PM +1100, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 3/12/2017 9:03 am, Russell Standish wrote:
The point being that the uncertainty in the coin's initial position is
itself due to the amplification of quantum uncertainty by classical
c
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 02:11:11PM +1100, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> On 3/12/2017 9:03 am, Russell Standish wrote:
> > The point being that the uncertainty in the coin's initial position is
> > itself due to the amplification of quantum uncertainty by classical
> > chaos.
>
> That may happen in some c
On 12/3/2017 7:11 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
I think it is most likely that the magician knows the way the coin is
lying initially, and simply counts the number of spins, catching the
coin after the appropriate even or odd number. As you suggest, this
trick would not work if you allow the coin
On 3/12/2017 9:03 am, Russell Standish wrote:
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 11:49:06AM +1100, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 1/12/2017 8:57 am, Bruce Kellett wrote:
The coin is classical, consisting of something of the order of 10^22
atoms. Indeterminacy in position as given by the Heisenberg Uncertainty
Pr
On 12/3/2017 5:21 PM, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, December 4, 2017 at 1:11:41 AM UTC, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
On Sunday, December 3, 2017 at 6:17:18 PM UTC-6,
agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, December 3, 2017 at 7:42:30 PM UTC, Lawrence
Crowell wr
On 12/3/2017 5:11 PM, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
On Sunday, December 3, 2017 at 6:17:18 PM UTC-6, agrays...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sunday, December 3, 2017 at 7:42:30 PM UTC, Lawrence Crowell
wrote:
On Sunday, December 3, 2017 at 12:55:04 PM UTC-6, Jason wrote:
I ca
On Monday, December 4, 2017 at 1:11:41 AM UTC, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>
> On Sunday, December 3, 2017 at 6:17:18 PM UTC-6, agrays...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sunday, December 3, 2017 at 7:42:30 PM UTC, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sunday, December 3, 2017 at 12:55:04 PM UTC-6, Ja
On Sunday, December 3, 2017 at 6:17:18 PM UTC-6, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sunday, December 3, 2017 at 7:42:30 PM UTC, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>>
>> On Sunday, December 3, 2017 at 12:55:04 PM UTC-6, Jason wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I can understand how in the darwinian sense, it could makes pre
On Sunday, December 3, 2017 at 2:20:36 AM UTC, John Clark wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 12:21 AM, >
> wrote:
>
> JC> No,
>>>
>>> MMI alleges that everything that can happen does happen, in a universe
>>> with 4 spacial dimension Coulombs law would have a function of 1/ r^3
>>> , If str
On Sunday, December 3, 2017 at 2:20:36 AM UTC, John Clark wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 12:21 AM, >
> wrote:
>
> JC> No,
>
> MMI alleges that everything that can happen does happen, in a universe
> with 4 spacial dimension Coulombs law would have a function of 1/ r^3
> , If string theo
Ah! it always comes down to cyber-money ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Bruno Marchal
To: everything-list
Sent: Sun, Dec 3, 2017 9:23 am
Subject: Re: Quantum Supremacy
Bitcoin, and digital money, will need quantum encryption. Some of them can be
failed, but only in theory. Well, t
On Sunday, December 3, 2017 at 5:21:33 PM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sunday, December 3, 2017 at 2:07:17 PM UTC, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 01 Dec 2017, at 00:20, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 11:16:07 PM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com
>
On Sunday, December 3, 2017 at 7:42:30 PM UTC, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>
> On Sunday, December 3, 2017 at 12:55:04 PM UTC-6, Jason wrote:
>>
>>
>> I can understand how in the darwinian sense, it could makes predators and
>> prey less successful. But in the sense of humans, who have technologica
On Sunday, December 3, 2017 at 12:55:04 PM UTC-6, Jason wrote:
>
>
> I can understand how in the darwinian sense, it could makes predators and
> prey less successful. But in the sense of humans, who have technologically
> escaped most of the darwinian pressures, could this idea not improve life
There is post-quantum cryptography (algorithms that are believed to be
secure against quantum computers with many qubits):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-quantum_cryptography
This could serve as the basis for new TLS cipher suites, and would not
require any revision to hardware of computers n
On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> Hi Telmo, Hi Jason,
>
>
>
> On 01 Dec 2017, at 06:26, Jason Resch wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Telmo Menezes
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Jason Resch
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 5:
On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 9:23 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> Bitcoin, and digital money, will need quantum encryption.
>
There are
quantum encryption
protocols that even a quantum computer couldn't break, they would be as
secure as the laws of physics themselves, but unfortunately there
Hi Telmo, Hi Jason,
On 01 Dec 2017, at 06:26, Jason Resch wrote:
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Telmo Menezes > wrote:
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Jason Resch
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 5:03 AM, Telmo Menezes >
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> If you have some time/patience, let
On Sunday, December 3, 2017 at 2:07:17 PM UTC, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 01 Dec 2017, at 00:20, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 11:16:07 PM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 9:47:37 PM UTC, Bruce wrote:
>>>
>
On Sunday, December 3, 2017 at 8:23:42 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
>
> Bitcoin, and digital money, will need quantum encryption. Some of them can
> be failed, but only in theory. Well, the last time I readon on this, but
> the filed is exploding.
>
> I guess that *classical* teleportation
Bitcoin, and digital money, will need quantum encryption. Some of them
can be failed, but only in theory. Well, the last time I readon on
this, but the filed is exploding.
I guess that *classical* teleportation will needs quantum encryption
too, if you want avoid to be reconstituted by s
On 01 Dec 2017, at 00:20, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 11:16:07 PM UTC,
agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 9:47:37 PM UTC, Bruce wrote:
On 30/11/2017 10:59 pm, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 11:42
In general a central charge of am abelian YM gauge field has a field rule ~
1/r^{n-1} in n spatial dimensions. This is important with AdS_5 with 10 dim
SUGRA if one has YM gauge monopoles in the spacetime. The 11-dim SUGRA with
AdS_4xS^7 is likely more directly associated with the observable uni
After 37 years it fires up. And you guys think that American stuff is crap (its
all Chinese now). When it last fired, Jimmy Carter was US Prez.
-Original Message-
From: Telmo Menezes
To: everything-list
Sent: Sat, Dec 2, 2017 8:51 am
Subject: After 37 years, Voyager 1 has fired up it
24 matches
Mail list logo
