A few quotes below to dualism from Max Velmans.
Evgenii
http://blog.rudnyi.ru/2012/05/quantum-dualist-interactionism.html
In Chapter 2, Conscious Souls, Brains and Quantum Mechanics there is a
nice section Quantum Dualist Interactionism (p. 17 – 21) where Max
Velmans describes works that pres
Below there is a message from Facebook where his author briefly
describes a book with papers about Libet's experiment. I guess that this
should be useful for discussions about free will.
Evgenii
---
Review :Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet
The editors of this
On 08.05.2012 21:48 meekerdb said the following:
On 5/8/2012 11:09 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
For the development of science, it is necessary to have a believe that
equations discovered by a human mind could be used for the whole
history of Universe. At that time, this belief came from
On 09.05.2012 08:47 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 08 May 2012, at 21:41, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/8/2012 12:04 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On May 8, 2:17 pm, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 07.05.2012 22:21 Craig Weinberg said the following:
On May 7, 3:37 pm, meekerdb wrote:
...
Sure
On 07.05.2012 22:21 Craig Weinberg said the following:
On May 7, 3:37 pm, meekerdb wrote:
...
Sure science grew out of Christianity, out of the decay and fragmentation of
Christianity.
When Christianity was strong and in control is what we call "The Dark Ages".
Now that it
is no longer in
On 07.05.2012 21:49 meekerdb said the following:
On 5/7/2012 12:09 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 07.05.2012 19:52 John Clark said the following:
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
> To me the logic of trinity is perverse in the same extent as quantum
mechanics.
Perve
On 07.05.2012 22:19 meekerdb said the following:
On 5/7/2012 12:29 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 07.05.2012 20:11 meekerdb said the following:
On 5/7/2012 10:42 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 07.05.2012 04:17 meekerdb said the following:
On 5/6/2012 5:47 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On May 6, 4
On 07.05.2012 20:11 meekerdb said the following:
On 5/7/2012 10:42 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 07.05.2012 04:17 meekerdb said the following:
On 5/6/2012 5:47 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On May 6, 4:06 pm, meekerdb wrote:
Newton, Boyle, Tyndall, Descarte, Laplace,
Kepler,...none of them were
On 07.05.2012 20:01 meekerdb said the following:
On 5/7/2012 10:35 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
It must have had its causes, but I note that it coincided with the
reformation and the fragmentation of the Church's power. Science
developed most in England where Henry VIII had divorce
On 07.05.2012 19:52 John Clark said the following:
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
> To me the logic of trinity is perverse in the same extent as quantum
mechanics.
Perverse it may be but it's not my business to judge what quantum mechanics
does in priv
On 07.05.2012 04:17 meekerdb said the following:
On 5/6/2012 5:47 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On May 6, 4:06 pm, meekerdb wrote:
Newton, Boyle, Tyndall, Descarte, Laplace,
Kepler,...none of them were from the universities, which were
dominated by theology.
All of them were still theological thi
On 06.05.2012 22:06 meekerdb said the following:
On 5/6/2012 10:51 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 05.05.2012 23:34 meekerdb said the following:
...
I would agree with that. Rome fell for other, more material reasons. But
its fall created a power vacuum which was filled by organized
On 06.05.2012 20:04 Stephen P. King said the following:
...
[Side note: This is where we start to see that our words can be such to
sometimes have only other words as referents and sometimes have actual
objects (not words) as referents. (I wish we could get a semiotic theory
expert to join us!
On 05.05.2012 23:34 meekerdb said the following:
On 5/5/2012 1:07 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
According to Prof Hoenen, the logic of trinity was at that time
basically in the blood. He gave several examples including even Marx.
According to Prof Hoenen, the logic in Marx's Capital i
On 05.05.2012 20:30 meekerdb said the following:
On 5/5/2012 11:05 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
According to Collingwood (as Prof Hoenen has told) one can find a
reason in Christianity. First, it is monotheism and this is quite
important to infer inexorable scientific laws. Second trinity
On 05.05.2012 18:08 meekerdb said the following:
On 5/4/2012 11:59 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 04.05.2012 23:45 meekerdb said the following:
On 5/4/2012 2:18 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
...
I'm not saying that science and religion are on an equal footing, but
I think it's a just-s
I have started listening to Beginning of Infinity and joined the
discussion list for the book. Right now there is a discussion there
Free will in MWI
http://groups.google.com/group/beginning-of-infinity/t/b172f0e03d68bcc6
I am at the beginning of the book and I do not know for sure, but from
t
On 04.05.2012 23:45 meekerdb said the following:
On 5/4/2012 2:18 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
...
I'm not saying that science and religion are on an equal footing, but
I think it's a just-so-story to account for it by assuming that
religion must be easier to master and therefore more attractive
even fancy about.
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 3:10 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
If we say that everything based on models, the question is then what
physical laws are. For example, if quantum mechanics is just a model, then
its interpretation, for example MWI, in my view, does not make too much
sense.
On 28.04.2012 17:49 meekerdb said the following:
On 4/28/2012 12:10 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
If we say that everything based on models, the question is then what
physical laws are. For example, if quantum mechanics is just a model,
then its interpretation, for example MWI, in my view, does
If we say that everything based on models, the question is then what
physical laws are. For example, if quantum mechanics is just a model,
then its interpretation, for example MWI, in my view, does not make too
much sense.
Evgenii
On 28.04.2012 03:00 meekerdb said the following:
...
> Som
l AI.
Brent
On 4/27/2012 11:32 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
A link from my discussion on Linkedin
http://www.mindconstruct.com/
"MIND|CONSTRUCT is developing a 'strong-AI engine', a so called AI-mind,
that can be used in (human-like) robotics, healthcare, aerospace sciences
and every ot
A link from my discussion on Linkedin
http://www.mindconstruct.com/
"MIND|CONSTRUCT is developing a 'strong-AI engine', a so called AI-mind,
that can be used in (human-like) robotics, healthcare, aerospace
sciences and every other area where 'conscious' man-machine interaction
is of any impor
On 25.04.2012 23:25 meekerdb said the following:
On 4/25/2012 11:45 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 24.04.2012 22:22 meekerdb said the following:
...
As I've posted before, when we know how look at a brain and infer what
it's thinking and we know how to build a brain that behaves as w
On 24.04.2012 22:22 meekerdb said the following:
...
As I've posted before, when we know how look at a brain and infer what
it's thinking and we know how to build a brain that behaves as we want,
in other words when we can do consciousness engineering, the "hard
problem" will be bypassed as a m
A link from the Consciousness group on Facebook
We're closing in on consciousness in the brain
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21428605.900-were-closing-in-on-consciousness-in-the-brain.html
"Brain "observatories" may solve the puzzle of how material brains
create an intangible world of l
On 11.04.2012 08:36 meekerdb said the following:
On 4/10/2012 11:08 PM, John wrote:
http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2012/apr/10/mind-outside-head-consciousness/
It is a more extreme version of a view I have long held that
consciousness is relative to an external environment and without
e mathematics has not been yet developed?
Evgenii
On 09.04.2012 18:21 meekerdb said the following:
On 4/9/2012 7:28 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 08.04.2012 19:55 meekerdb said the following:
On 4/8/2012 5:20 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
I believe that we should consider Newton in his histor
On 09.04.2012 18:58 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 09 Apr 2012, at 16:35, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
I believe that now I understand what physicalism is. What would you
recommend to read about mechanism? Something like this SEP paper about
physicalism
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries
On 08.04.2012 21:32 Bruno Marchal said the following:
...
This is well illustrated in this (one hour) BBC broadcast, featuring
Marcus de Sautoy (who wrote a nice book on the "music of the primes").
(thanks to the salvianaut linking to this in a salvia forum)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8B
On 08.04.2012 19:55 meekerdb said the following:
On 4/8/2012 5:20 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
I believe that we should consider Newton in his historical context. As
far as I have understood, because of not quite right empirical values
(masses, etc.) and/or because of low level of
On 08.04.2012 09:04 meekerdb said the following:
On 4/7/2012 10:36 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 07.04.2012 22:16 meekerdb said the following:
On 4/7/2012 5:11 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
More to this story
http://blog.rudnyi.ru/2012/04/god-as-a-cosmic-operator.html
where there are
On 07.04.2012 22:16 meekerdb said the following:
On 4/7/2012 5:11 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 06.04.2012 19:22 meekerdb said the following:
On 4/6/2012 9:26 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
“The very possibility of applied mathematics is an expression . . . of
the Christian belief that
On 06.04.2012 19:22 meekerdb said the following:
On 4/6/2012 9:26 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
“The very possibility of applied mathematics is an expression . . . of
the Christian belief that nature is the creation of an omnipotent God.”
Of course the regularity of nature is more
Craig,
You may like this paper as well
Klemm, W. (2010). Free will debates: Simple experiments are not so
simple, Advances in Cognitive Psychology
http://versita.metapress.com/content/l820g65u22883625/fulltext.pdf
I have seen it on a Russian cite:
http://nature-wonder.livejournal.com/189090
a peculiar role of mathematics in science. If physicists accept
that Nature obeys to the laws written by mathematical equations, then
actually your position looks quite natural.
Evgenii
On 06.04.2012 10:52 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 05 Apr 2012, at 22:53, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On Arpil 11, 2-3pm Pacific Time in Second Life
http://slurl.com/secondlife/Nerice/162/69/62
I will review a book of Jeffrey A. Gray, Consciousness: Creeping up on
the Hard Problem.
Information and slides are at
http://embryogenesisexplained.com/2012/04/consciousness.html
You are welcome.
E
On 05.04.2012 21:44 meekerdb said the following:
On 4/5/2012 11:49 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Display to whom? the homunculus?
No, he creates an interesting scheme to escape the homunculus:
p. 110. “(1) the unconscious brain constructs a display in a medium,
that of conscious perception
On 05.04.2012 21:39 David Nyman said the following:
On 5 April 2012 19:56, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Yet, this does not change his hypothesis about why "consciousness display"
could be advantageous for evolution. We do not know what it is, but if is
there, it certainly can help t
On 05.04.2012 21:38 meekerdb said the following:
On 4/5/2012 11:56 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 05.04.2012 20:39 David Nyman said the following:
On 5 April 2012 17:37, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
(a) It is impossible to make a philosophical zombie as consciousness
is just a side-effect of
On 05.04.2012 20:39 David Nyman said the following:
On 5 April 2012 17:37, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
(a) It is impossible to make a philosophical zombie as consciousness
is just a side-effect of intelligent behaviour;
(b) It is possible to make a philosophical zombie but the mechanism
for
On 05.04.2012 20:10 meekerdb said the following:
On 4/5/2012 9:41 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 05.04.2012 01:43 Craig Weinberg said the following:
On Apr 4, 2:58 pm, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
The term late error detection as such could be employed without
consciousness indeed. Yet, Jeffrey Gray
On 05.04.2012 20:07 meekerdb said the following:
On 4/4/2012 11:58 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
The term late error detection as such could be employed without
consciousness indeed. Yet, Jeffrey Gray gives it some special meaning
that I will try briefly describe below.
Jeffrey Gray in his book
On 05.04.2012 01:43 Craig Weinberg said the following:
On Apr 4, 2:58 pm, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
The term late error detection as such could be employed without
consciousness indeed. Yet, Jeffrey Gray gives it some special meaning
that I will try briefly describe below.
Jeffrey Gray in his
On 05.04.2012 01:59 Stathis Papaioannou said the following:
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 5:56 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 03.04.2012 02:06 Stathis Papaioannou said the following:
Since there is no evolutionary advantage to consciousness it must be a
side-effect of the sort of behaviour that
On 05.04.2012 04:14 Stathis Papaioannou said the following:
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Your claim that it is impossible to feel in a deterministic universe
is unjustified. It's simply an idea you have taken a fancy to.
I don't claim that it is impossible to feel i
clear advantage from the Evolution viewpoint.
Evgenii
On 04.04.2012 09:31 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 03 Apr 2012, at 22:38, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Apr 3, 3:56 pm, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 03.04.2012 02:06 Stathis Papaioannou said the following:
...
Since there is no
On 03.04.2012 05:29 meekerdb said the following:
On 4/2/2012 7:28 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Apr 2, 9:02 pm, meekerdb wrote:
I like Julian Jaynes idea that it is a side-effect of using the same
parts of the brain
for cogitation as are used for perception. That would be the kind of
thing that
On 03.04.2012 02:06 Stathis Papaioannou said the following:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 6:08 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
From blindsight, synesthesia, and anosognosia we know that particular
qualia are not inevitably associated with the conditions they usually
represent for us, so it seems impossibl
the conclusion "information-to-energy conversion". It would be nice
to understand how information emerges from the movements of atoms and
molecules in the whole system including the controller.
Evgenii
On 27.03.2012 22:50 meekerdb said the following:
On 3/27/2012 11:26 AM, Evgen
ations and symmetry breaking
could happen along the way that you have described.
Evgenii
On 25.03.2012 23:11 Stephen P. King said the following:
On 3/25/2012 2:46 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 3/25/2012 2:43 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Let us take Benard cells for example. It is a good idea. I gue
an perform work or produce heat when
it goes from one state to another. Hence the statement above as such is
just sloppy.
Evgenii
On 26.03.2012 00:44 meekerdb said the following:
On 3/25/2012 6:44 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 14.03.2012 19:58 meekerdb said the following:
On 3/14/201
On 15.03.2012 22:58 Russell Standish said the following:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 07:25:01PM +0100, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 14.03.2012 23:34 Russell Standish said the following:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 07:51:13PM +0100, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Then the thermodynamic entropy is subjective. Try
On 14.03.2012 19:58 meekerdb said the following:
On 3/14/2012 11:51 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
Then the thermodynamic entropy is subjective. Try to convince in this
engineers who develop engines, or chemists who compute equilibria, and
see what happens.
It is relative not just to the
I have found Logistic Map
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LogisticMap.html
Here the system has very different outcomes depending from initial
conditions (now I understand your use of statistics). Yet, each
trajectory is deterministic.
Hence, this was not my question. Sorry for being unclear. Bi
good, many not so good. I'm sure you should be able to find
something appropriate - maybe the appearance of Benard cells for
instance.
Cheers
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 10:05:00PM +0100, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Hi Stephen,
I am not sure if I completely understand you. My question was rather
good to consider this on a simple example.
Say, I do not understand how do you apply statistics in this case.
Either it is unclear to me how infinite computational power will help.
Evgenii
On 23.03.2012 22:27 Stephen P. King said the following:
On 3/23/2012 3:08 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
In
In physics there are bifurcations and symmetry breaking. What happens
then if I solve some transient problem for a system where a bifurcation
or symmetry breaking happens. How the choice will be made?
Evgenii
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everyt
On 14.03.2012 23:34 Russell Standish said the following:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 07:51:13PM +0100, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Then the thermodynamic entropy is subjective. Try to convince in
this engineers who develop engines, or chemists who compute
equilibria, and see what happens.
I take
On 13.03.2012 20:59 meekerdb said the following:
On 3/13/2012 12:44 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 13.03.2012 20:32 meekerdb said the following:
On 3/13/2012 12:26 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
In my collection I have this quote for example
http://blog.rudnyi.ru/2012/01/information.html
On 13.03.2012 20:32 meekerdb said the following:
On 3/13/2012 12:26 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 13.03.2012 20:09 meekerdb said the following:
On 3/13/2012 10:28 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
Could you please give one example from physics (yet please not a
thought experiment) where
On 13.03.2012 20:09 meekerdb said the following:
On 3/13/2012 10:28 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
Could you please give one example from physics (yet please not a
thought experiment) where information allows us to reduce entropy?
http://www.nature.com/news/2010/101114/full/news.2010.606
On 13.03.2012 18:20 meekerdb said the following:
On 3/13/2012 6:48 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 13 Mar 2012, at 01:43, Russell Standish wrote:
http://www.nature.com/news/the-unavoidable-cost-of-computation-revealed-1.10186
This about experimentally testing Landauer's principle that
computati
Russell,
Thanks for the link. Yet, it is unclear to me what is exactly
information and computation in this experiment. To be more precise, let
us take physicalism:
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/physicalism/
This is probably in what I believe right now, although as I have
described recen
On 06.03.2012 14:21 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 06 Mar 2012, at 12:22, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Stephen,
The life is full of paradoxes. My point was that while philosophers
cannot solve apparently simple problems (well, these problems happen
not to be simple), engineers continue doing
ave enjoyed my dinner. Whether wine, bread, cheese, salad
and pepperoni have enjoyed it too, I do not know. I would not mind, if
they did.
Evgenii
On 05.03.2012 06:33 Craig Weinberg said the following:
On Mar 4, 3:07 pm, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
I personally still at the position that the
seems that engineers successfully fills it. Ask them, how they do it.
Evgenii
On 05.03.2012 14:34 Stephen P. King said the following:
On 3/5/2012 7:01 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
John,
It is not that bad to say that we do not know something. Yet, it might
be even better to specify more accurately
On 05.03.2012 18:29 meekerdb said the following:
On 3/5/2012 3:23 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
The experiment takes an operational approach to what Pi means.
During the initial stage of the experiment mathematicians prove the
existence of Pi.
When mathematicians 'prove the existenc
John,
It is not that bad to say that we do not know something. Yet, it might
be even better to specify more accurately what exactly we do not know.
Think of your younger colleagues that do chemistry research right now.
Chemists have been quite successful and the story continues. The
concepts
hal said the following:
On 04 Mar 2012, at 17:12, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Bruno,
Actually it is not a joke. I guess it is my first step toward
Platonia. As I am a chemist by background, the problem might be not
mathematically correct indeed. Yet, if you could help, we could
improve it in this respect.
jects will not exist any less if humanity were to go extinct.
However, arguing that is like arguing for a particular answer to a
koan.
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi
wrote:
Yet, according to my current view, mathematics has been created by
the mankind.
--
You received th
.
Evgenii
On 04.03.2012 14:39 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 04 Mar 2012, at 13:27, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
An experiment to perform in order to prove experimentally whether
Pi exists independently from the mind
The idea came during discussion on embryophysics list
http
An experiment to perform in order to prove experimentally whether Pi
exists independently from the mind
The idea came during discussion on embryophysics list
http://groups.google.com/group/embryophysics/t/419d3c1fec30e3b5
Below there is a description of the experiment that one could think of
, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
How would you define "compute" in the sentence "a bacteria computes"? Is
this similar to what happens within a computer?
Evgenii
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To pos
e water and
nutrient resources and outgrown those that do not. Without a
predictable linear environment, computation and thus evolution and
life is impossible.
Alberto
On 28 feb, 21:31, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Alberto,
I am thermodynamicist and I do not know exactly what is information and
computati
Alberto,
I am thermodynamicist and I do not know exactly what is information and
computation. You have written that living beings perform computations.
Several questions in this respect.
Are computations are limited to living beings only?
Does a bacteria perform computations as well?
If yes
ishes,
Evgenii
On 27.02.2012 20:43 meekerdb said the following:
On 2/27/2012 10:59 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 27.02.2012 00:13 meekerdb said the following:
On 2/26/2012 5:58 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
I have written a summary for the discussion in the subject:
http://blog.rudnyi.ru/2012/02/entrop
On 27.02.2012 00:13 meekerdb said the following:
On 2/26/2012 5:58 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
I have written a summary for the discussion in the subject:
http://blog.rudnyi.ru/2012/02/entropy-and-information.html
No doubt, this is my personal viewpoint. If you see that I have
missed something
On 27.02.2012 17:47 John Clark said the following:
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Craig
Weinbergwrote:
There is no simulation of red. Red is only red.
But red itself is a simulation. Electromagnetic waves a length of
700 nanometers can produce the quale "red" in the minds of most (but
not
I have written a summary for the discussion in the subject:
http://blog.rudnyi.ru/2012/02/entropy-and-information.html
No doubt, this is my personal viewpoint. If you see that I have missed
something, please let me know.
Evgenii
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
On 20.02.2012 19:54 meekerdb said the following:
...
I'm beginning to think you have never taken a class in statistical
mechanics. There's a good online course here:
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/sm1/lectures/lectures.html
Those particularly relevant to this thread start at
http://fa
On 20.02.2012 21:20 meekerdb said the following:
On 2/20/2012 12:02 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
I am ready to learn the meaning of information in thermodynamics.
Please just explain it by means of practical examples.
The link I sent below works out the entropy of an ideal gas using
On 20.02.2012 22:43 Russell Standish said the following:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 07:33:13PM +0100, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
I have nothing against Adami's book as such. His description of
his software avida and his experiments with it are okay. My point
was about his claim that his wor
On 20.02.2012 19:54 meekerdb said the following:
On 2/20/2012 10:33 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 19.02.2012 22:13 Russell Standish said the following:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 11:21:01AM -0500, John Clark wrote:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Evgenii
Rudnyi wrote:
If one well defines a
On 19.02.2012 22:13 Russell Standish said the following:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 11:21:01AM -0500, John Clark wrote:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi
wrote:
If one well defines a thought experiment with the Maxwell's
demon, then
it is quite clear that such thing doe
On 19.02.2012 17:21 John Clark said the following:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi
wrote:
If one well defines a thought experiment with the Maxwell's
demon, then
it is quite clear that such thing does not exist. Why then to spend
on it so much time?
Maxwell'
On 19.02.2012 15:52 Bruno Marchal said the following:
...
Both Cantor and Gödel used the word theology
...
Could you please cite these works?
By the way, recently I have listened to the course Theorien der Wahrheit
(Theories of truth) by Prof Hoenen. Among other works he has discussed
Logisc
On 18.02.2012 23:37 Russell Standish said the following:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 04:49:44PM +0100, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 09.02.2012 07:49 meekerdb said the following:
There's an interesting paper by Bennett that I ran across, which
discusses the relation of Shannon entropy, thermody
On 09.02.2012 07:49 meekerdb said the following:
> There's an interesting paper by Bennett that I ran across, which
> discusses the relation of Shannon entropy, thermodynamic entropy, and
> algorithmic entropy in the context of DNA and RNA replication:
>
>
http://qi.ethz.ch/edu/qisemFS10/papers
On 11.02.2012 04:27 Russell Standish said the following:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 09:39:50PM +0100, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Let me ask you the same question that I have recently asked Brent.
Could you please tell me, the thermodynamic entropy of what is
discussed in Jason's example
On 09.02.2012 07:49 meekerdb said the following:
...
There's an interesting paper by Bennett that I ran across, which
discusses the relation of Shannon entropy, thermodynamic entropy, and
algorithmic entropy in the context of DNA and RNA replication:
http://qi.ethz.ch/edu/qisemFS10/papers/81
On 08.02.2012 22:44 Russell Standish said the following:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 08:32:16PM +0100, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
What I observe personally is that there is information in
informatics and information in physics (if we say that the
thermodynamic entropy is the information). If you
On 09.02.2012 00:44 1Z said the following:
On Feb 7, 7:04 pm, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Let us take a closed vessel with oxygen and hydrogen at room
temperature. Then we open a platinum catalyst in the vessel and
the reaction starts. Will then the information in the vessel be
conserved
On 07.02.2012 23:06 Russell Standish said the following:
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 08:15:10PM +0100, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Russell,
This is circular - temperature is usually defined in terms of
entropy:
T^{-1} = dS/dE
This is wrong. The temperature is defined according to the Zeroth
Law. The
On 06.02.2012 21:10 meekerdb said the following:
On 2/6/2012 11:18 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 05.02.2012 22:33 Russell Standish said the following:
On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 07:28:47PM +0100, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
The most funny it looks in the conclusion
p. 28(142) "First, all notio
effects
you derive an exact equation that will connect the information capacity
of the carrier with the thermodynamic entropy? If yes, could you please
give such an equation?
Evgenii
On 06.02.2012 22:17 Russell Standish said the following:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 08:36:44PM +0100, Evgenii
On 06.02.2012 22:19 Russell Standish said the following:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 08:20:53PM +0100, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 05.02.2012 22:46 Russell Standish said the following:
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 08:56:10PM +0100, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
In this respect your question is actually nice, as
On 06.02.2012 20:42 meekerdb said the following:
On 2/6/2012 9:03 AM, 1Z wrote:
There is also a "conservation" of information. It is
apparently industrictable.
Is there? if there is , it is a phsycial law, and AFAIK it is
hotly debated.
It's the same as the question of wave-function collaps
. If you need
help, please just let me know.
———–
On Feb 5, 2012, at 12:28 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi
wrote:
On 05.02.2012 17:16 Evgenii Rudnyi said the following:
On 24.01.2012 22:56 meekerdb said the following:
In thinking about how to answer this I came across an
excellent paper by
On 05.02.2012 23:05 Russell Standish said the following:
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 08:50:40PM +0100, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
I guess that you have never done a lab in experimental
thermodynamics. There are classical experiment where people
measure heat of combustion, heat capacity, equilibrium
301 - 400 of 651 matches
Mail list logo
