On 04 Feb 2013, at 01:14, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Sunday, February 3, 2013 9:37:42 AM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
Dear Roger,
Only 4d spacetime, matter and energy are physical. Everything else is
non-physical and therefore part of the mind. This includes comp up
thru quantum mechanics. Only 4
On Tuesday, February 5, 2013 6:50:14 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 04 Feb 2013, at 01:14, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Sunday, February 3, 2013 9:37:42 AM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
Dear Roger,
Only 4d spacetime, matter and energy are physical. Everything else is
non-physical and
On 05 Feb 2013, at 14:45, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, February 5, 2013 6:50:14 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 04 Feb 2013, at 01:14, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Sunday, February 3, 2013 9:37:42 AM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
Dear Roger,
Only 4d spacetime, matter and energy are
-
From: Richard Ruquist
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-02-03, 09:37:42
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Lessons from the Block Universe
Dear Roger,
Only 4d spacetime, matter and energy are physical. Everything else is
non-physical and therefore part of the mind. This includes comp up
thru
mind (whatever that is).
etc. as I frequently but ineffectively try to correct.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Richard Ruquist
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-02-03, 09:37:42
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Lessons from the Block Universe
Dear Roger,
Only 4d
it).
2013/2/2 Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net
Hi Alberto G. Corona
Does your version of mind actually do anything ?
- Receiving the following content -
From: Alberto G. Corona
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-02-02, 04:43:54
Subject: Re: Re: Lessons from the Block Universe
I do
content -
From: Alberto G. Corona
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-02-02, 14:14:51
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Lessons from the Block Universe
In the world of the mind, that is, in what we call reality, it causes
everithing because causality is another phenomenon introduced by the mind
(1p
-02-03, 07:19:51
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Lessons from the Block Universe
Roger,
I think the block universe (not quite accurate terminology)
is actually the 4-dimensional quantum mind and in it is written all
possible futures and pasts based on comp and quantum mechanics
as well as info on what
.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Richard Ruquist
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-02-03, 07:19:51
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Lessons from the Block Universe
Roger,
I think the block universe (not quite accurate terminology)
is actually the 4-dimensional quantum mind
On Sunday, February 3, 2013 9:37:42 AM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
Dear Roger,
Only 4d spacetime, matter and energy are physical. Everything else is
non-physical and therefore part of the mind. This includes comp up
thru quantum mechanics. Only 4 dimensions for example of the 11d
universe
of mind.
- Receiving the following content -
*From:* Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com
*Receiver:* everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
*Time:* 2013-02-02, 14:14:51
*Subject:* Re: Re: Re: Lessons from the Block Universe
In the world of the mind, that is, in what
Straw dog there is no mention of a separation
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, February 3, 2013 9:37:42 AM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
Dear Roger,
Only 4d spacetime, matter and energy are physical. Everything else is
non-physical and
Hi
2013/1/30 Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com
It is to me. I think it is very unlikely that the motions and
evolutions of star and galaxies and in my model even universes could
be strongly affected by biological consciousness
But then, what is the anthropic principle about?
--
Hi Alberto G. Corona
Does your version of mind actually do anything ?
- Receiving the following content -
From: Alberto G. Corona
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-02-02, 04:43:54
Subject: Re: Re: Lessons from the Block Universe
I do think that a block universe can contain minds
to the understanding of QM.
Brent
Lessons from the Block Universe
Ken Wharton
Department of Physics and Astronomy
San Jos State University
http://fqxi.org/data/essay-contest-files/Wharton_Wharton_Essay.pdf?phpMyAdmin=0c371ccdae9b5ff3071bae814fb4f9e9
In Liouville
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 4:18 AM, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
2013/1/30 Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com
It is to me. I think it is very unlikely that the motions and
evolutions of star and galaxies and in my model even universes could
be strongly affected by biological
Don´t limit yourself to the math of string theory . there may be argued
that any mathematical figure exist, including the ones with no interesting
structure or simetry of constants including ranndom structures, that is
with a high kolmogorov complexity. That means that everithing may exist .
Not
That everything possible may have mathematical existence is my
fundamental hypothesis. How much of this everything that can possibly
become physically existent depends on the definition of physical which
in turn depends on theory. MWI theory predicts a near infinity of
possibilities within a
logical) equations.
Bruno
- Receiving the following content -
From: Bruno Marchal
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-30, 12:45:53
Subject: Re: Lessons from the Block Universe
On 29 Jan 2013, at 15:04, Richard Ruquist wrote:
A block universe does not allow for consciousness
Time: 2013-01-30, 12:45:53
Subject: Re: Lessons from the Block Universe
On 29 Jan 2013, at 15:04, Richard Ruquist wrote:
A block universe does not allow for consciousness.
With comp consciousness does not allow any (aristotelian) universes.
There is comp block mindscape, and the universe(s
On Tuesday, January 29, 2013 10:03:04 PM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Tuesday, January 29, 2013 8:39:40 PM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Stathis Papaioannou
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, January 29, 2013 10:03:04 PM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tuesday, January 29, 2013 8:39:40 PM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
On
Hi Richard Ruquist
Consciousness is not a force that might do things.
It is what allows us to perceive and know things.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Richard Ruquist
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-29, 20:39:40
Subject: Re: Re: Lessons from the Block Universe
On Wednesday, January 30, 2013 9:13:19 AM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Tuesday, January 29, 2013 10:03:04 PM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Craig Weinberg
, 2013 at 11:18 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
wrote:
Here's an essay that is suggestive of Bruno's distinction between
what is
provable and what is true (knowable) but unprovable. Maybe this is
a place
where COMP could contribute to the understanding of QM.
Brent
Lessons from
On 30 Jan 2013, at 04:03, Richard Ruquist wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Craig Weinberg
whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, January 29, 2013 8:39:40 PM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Stathis Papaioannou
stat...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30,
, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
Here's an essay that is suggestive of Bruno's distinction between what is
provable and what is true (knowable) but unprovable. Maybe this is a place
where COMP could contribute to the understanding of QM.
Brent
Lessons from the Block Universe
Ken
, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
Here's an essay that is suggestive of Bruno's distinction between what is
provable and what is true (knowable) but unprovable. Maybe this is a place
where COMP could contribute to the understanding of QM.
Brent
Lessons from the Block Universe
Ken Wharton
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 03:46:18PM -0500, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 1/29/2013 9:04 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
A block universe does not allow for consciousness.
Indeed! How is it even possible for any part of the block to
have anything like something that is it is like to be conscious of
On 1/29/2013 4:19 PM, Russell Standish wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 03:46:18PM -0500, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 1/29/2013 9:04 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
A block universe does not allow for consciousness.
Indeed! How is it even possible for any part of the block to
have anything like
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Stathis Papaioannou stath...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:04 AM, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
A block universe does not allow for consciousness.
The fact the we all possess consciousness, so we think,
means that our universe is not
On Tuesday, January 29, 2013 8:39:40 PM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Stathis Papaioannou
stat...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:04 AM, Richard Ruquist
yan...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
A block universe does not allow for
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, January 29, 2013 8:39:40 PM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Stathis Papaioannou stat...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:04 AM, Richard Ruquist yan...@gmail.com
Here's an essay that is suggestive of Bruno's distinction between what is
provable and
what is true (knowable) but unprovable. Maybe this is a place where COMP
could
contribute to the understanding of QM.
Brent
*Lessons from the Block Universe*
*
*Ken Wharton
34 matches
Mail list logo
