On 11/17/2012 7:15 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
Now I see that there is a remote hint of what you say in Leibniz's
metaphysics. Each monad perceives only the phenomenol world,
the world from his own perspective. The actual object is only
truly perceived if "perceived" by all perceiv
Stephen P. King
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-11-17, 06:41:52
Subject: Re: the "God" hypothesis
On 11/17/2012 6:33 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
My concept of the infinite regress problem
is the one that pops up in materialistic theories of
perception. Is there a homuncu
On 11/17/2012 6:33 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
My concept of the infinite regress problem
is the one that pops up in materialistic theories of
perception. Is there a homunculus in the brain to
experience what the eye sees? And if so, does the homunculus
have a homunculus inside him t
izon.net]
11/17/2012
"Forever is a long time, especially near the end." -Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Bruno Marchal
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-11-16, 11:27:09
Subject: Re: the "God" hypothesis
On 15 Nov 2012, at 16:52, Roger Clou
and uncreated.
Bruno
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
11/15/2012
"Forever is a long time, especially near the end." -Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Richard Ruquist
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-11-12, 11:46:34
Subject: Re: the "God&
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
> Leibniz thought that everything needs a sufficient reason to exist as it
> does.
And we now know that Leibniz was DEAD WRONG about that, we now know that
some things happen for no reason whatsoever. And in general that's the
trouble with mo
following content -
From: Richard Ruquist
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-11-15, 08:54:54
Subject: Re: Re: the "God" hypothesis
Hi Roger Clough,
As you have been told, quantum gravity is contained within each string
theory monad.
No one knows where that came from, certai
ng content -
From: Richard Ruquist
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-11-12, 11:46:34
Subject: Re: the "God" hypothesis
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> On 12 Nov 2012, at 15:55, Richard Ruquist wrote:
>
>> Hi Roger Clough,
>>
>&
ar the end." -Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Richard Ruquist
Receiver: everything-list,Swines,zoo_no_facts
Time: 2012-11-12, 08:55:09
Subject: Re: the "God" hypothesis
Hi Roger Clough,
Actually the action of mathematical physics gives "everything" the
damage.
>
>
> [Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
> 11/15/2012
> "Forever is a long time, especially near the end." -Woody Allen
>
>
> - Receiving the following content -
> From: Bruno Marchal
> Receiver: everything-list
> Time: 2012-11-12, 10:
damage.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
11/15/2012
"Forever is a long time, especially near the end." -Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Bruno Marchal
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-11-12, 10:56:40
Subject: Re: the "God" hypothe
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> On 12 Nov 2012, at 15:55, Richard Ruquist wrote:
>
>> Hi Roger Clough,
>>
>> Actually the action of mathematical physics gives "everything" the
>> reason to live.
>> As Hawking says, there is "no need for god if you got quantum gravity".
>
On 12 Nov 2012, at 15:55, Richard Ruquist wrote:
Hi Roger Clough,
Actually the action of mathematical physics gives "everything" the
reason to live.
As Hawking says, there is "no need for god if you got quantum
gravity".
I confess to giving cosmic consciousness a reason to live.
http://vix
On 12 Nov 2012, at 13:29, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
Leibniz thought that everything needs a sufficient reason to
exist as it does. Thus all of the parts of the universe have
a sufficient reason to be (as they are). I don't know how to
explain that by anything other than the the "
Hi Roger Clough,
Actually the action of mathematical physics gives "everything" the
reason to live.
As Hawking says, there is "no need for god if you got quantum gravity".
I confess to giving cosmic consciousness a reason to live.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1101.0044v1.pdf
Hopefully, a benevolent, und
On 11/12/2012 7:29 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
Leibniz thought that everything needs a sufficient reason to
exist as it does. Thus all of the parts of the universe have
a sufficient reason to be (as they are). I don't know how to
explain that by anything other than the the "God"
16 matches
Mail list logo