Re: the "God" hypothesis

2012-11-17 Thread Stephen P. King
On 11/17/2012 7:15 AM, Roger Clough wrote: Hi Stephen P. King Now I see that there is a remote hint of what you say in Leibniz's metaphysics. Each monad perceives only the phenomenol world, the world from his own perspective. The actual object is only truly perceived if "perceived" by all perceiv

Re: Re: the "God" hypothesis

2012-11-17 Thread Roger Clough
Stephen P. King Receiver: everything-list Time: 2012-11-17, 06:41:52 Subject: Re: the "God" hypothesis On 11/17/2012 6:33 AM, Roger Clough wrote: Hi Bruno Marchal My concept of the infinite regress problem is the one that pops up in materialistic theories of perception. Is there a homuncu

Re: the "God" hypothesis

2012-11-17 Thread Stephen P. King
On 11/17/2012 6:33 AM, Roger Clough wrote: Hi Bruno Marchal My concept of the infinite regress problem is the one that pops up in materialistic theories of perception. Is there a homunculus in the brain to experience what the eye sees? And if so, does the homunculus have a homunculus inside him t

Re: Re: the "God" hypothesis

2012-11-17 Thread Roger Clough
izon.net] 11/17/2012 "Forever is a long time, especially near the end." -Woody Allen - Receiving the following content - From: Bruno Marchal Receiver: everything-list Time: 2012-11-16, 11:27:09 Subject: Re: the "God" hypothesis On 15 Nov 2012, at 16:52, Roger Clou

Re: the "God" hypothesis

2012-11-16 Thread Bruno Marchal
and uncreated. Bruno [Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net] 11/15/2012 "Forever is a long time, especially near the end." -Woody Allen - Receiving the following content - From: Richard Ruquist Receiver: everything-list Time: 2012-11-12, 11:46:34 Subject: Re: the "God&

Re: the "God" hypothesis

2012-11-15 Thread John Clark
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Roger Clough wrote: > Leibniz thought that everything needs a sufficient reason to exist as it > does. And we now know that Leibniz was DEAD WRONG about that, we now know that some things happen for no reason whatsoever. And in general that's the trouble with mo

Re: Re: Re: the "God" hypothesis

2012-11-15 Thread Roger Clough
following content - From: Richard Ruquist Receiver: everything-list Time: 2012-11-15, 08:54:54 Subject: Re: Re: the "God" hypothesis Hi Roger Clough, As you have been told, quantum gravity is contained within each string theory monad. No one knows where that came from, certai

Re: Re: the "God" hypothesis

2012-11-15 Thread Roger Clough
ng content - From: Richard Ruquist Receiver: everything-list Time: 2012-11-12, 11:46:34 Subject: Re: the "God" hypothesis On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > On 12 Nov 2012, at 15:55, Richard Ruquist wrote: > >> Hi Roger Clough, >> >&

Re: Re: the "God" hypothesis

2012-11-15 Thread Roger Clough
ar the end." -Woody Allen - Receiving the following content - From: Richard Ruquist Receiver: everything-list,Swines,zoo_no_facts Time: 2012-11-12, 08:55:09 Subject: Re: the "God" hypothesis Hi Roger Clough, Actually the action of mathematical physics gives "everything" the

Re: Re: the "God" hypothesis

2012-11-15 Thread Richard Ruquist
damage. > > > [Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net] > 11/15/2012 > "Forever is a long time, especially near the end." -Woody Allen > > > - Receiving the following content - > From: Bruno Marchal > Receiver: everything-list > Time: 2012-11-12, 10:

Re: Re: the "God" hypothesis

2012-11-15 Thread Roger Clough
damage. [Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net] 11/15/2012 "Forever is a long time, especially near the end." -Woody Allen - Receiving the following content - From: Bruno Marchal Receiver: everything-list Time: 2012-11-12, 10:56:40 Subject: Re: the "God" hypothe

Re: the "God" hypothesis

2012-11-12 Thread Richard Ruquist
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > On 12 Nov 2012, at 15:55, Richard Ruquist wrote: > >> Hi Roger Clough, >> >> Actually the action of mathematical physics gives "everything" the >> reason to live. >> As Hawking says, there is "no need for god if you got quantum gravity". >

Re: the "God" hypothesis

2012-11-12 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 12 Nov 2012, at 15:55, Richard Ruquist wrote: Hi Roger Clough, Actually the action of mathematical physics gives "everything" the reason to live. As Hawking says, there is "no need for god if you got quantum gravity". I confess to giving cosmic consciousness a reason to live. http://vix

Re: the "God" hypothesis

2012-11-12 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 12 Nov 2012, at 13:29, Roger Clough wrote: Hi Stephen P. King Leibniz thought that everything needs a sufficient reason to exist as it does. Thus all of the parts of the universe have a sufficient reason to be (as they are). I don't know how to explain that by anything other than the the "

Re: the "God" hypothesis

2012-11-12 Thread Richard Ruquist
Hi Roger Clough, Actually the action of mathematical physics gives "everything" the reason to live. As Hawking says, there is "no need for god if you got quantum gravity". I confess to giving cosmic consciousness a reason to live. http://vixra.org/pdf/1101.0044v1.pdf Hopefully, a benevolent, und

Re: the "God" hypothesis

2012-11-12 Thread Stephen P. King
On 11/12/2012 7:29 AM, Roger Clough wrote: Hi Stephen P. King Leibniz thought that everything needs a sufficient reason to exist as it does. Thus all of the parts of the universe have a sufficient reason to be (as they are). I don't know how to explain that by anything other than the the "God"