or technique of using an emulator
— em·u·la·tive adjective
— em·u·la·tive·ly adverb
- Receiving the following content -
From: Telmo Menezes
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-02-04, 17:07:32
Subject: Re: context, comp, and multiverses
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Craig Weinberg >
rivalry
2
: ambition or endeavor to equal or excel others (as in achievement)
3
a : imitation
b : the use of or technique of using an emulator
— em·u·la·tive adjective
— em·u·la·tive·ly adverb
- Receiving the following content -
From: Telmo Menezes
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-02-04, 17:0
iam-webster.com/dictionary/simulation>
>>> www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/*simulation*
>>> a : the *imitative *representation of the functioning of one system or
>>> process by means of the functioning of another >> an industrial process>
>>>
eiving the following content -
From: Telmo Menezes
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-02-04, 17:07:32
Subject: Re: context, comp, and multiverses
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Craig Weinberg > wrote:
On Monday, February 4, 2013 9:59:09 AM UTC-5, telmo_menezes wrote:
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 a
g of another > industrial process>
>> *...*
>> **
>> Definition of *EMULATION*
>> 1
>> *obsolete* *:* ambitious or envious rivalry
>> 2
>> *:* ambition or endeavor to equal or excel others (as in achievement)
>> 3
>> *a* *:* *imitation*
ation
b : the use of or technique of using an emulator
— em·u·la·tive adjective
— em·u·la·tive·ly adverb
- Receiving the following content -
From: Telmo Menezes
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-02-04, 17:07:32
Subject: Re: context, comp, and multiverses
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at
-webster.com/dictionary/imitation>
>> *b* *:* the use of or technique of using an
>> emulator<http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/emulator>
>> — *em·u·la·tive* *adjective*
>> — *em·u·la·tive·ly* *adverb*
>>
>>
>>
>> - Receiving
.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/imitation>
> *b* *:* the use of or technique of using an
> emulator<http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/emulator>
> — *em·u·la·tive* *adjective*
> — *em·u·la·tive·ly* *adverb*
>
>
>
> - Receiving the following content -
> *From:*
From: Bruno Marchal
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-02-05, 11:18:49
Subject: Re: context, comp, and multiverses
On 05 Feb 2013, at 16:44, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
If comp is assumed, then we need not worry about consequences of
emulation,
it's a given that it works.
owing content -
From: Telmo Menezes
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-02-04, 17:07:32
Subject: Re: context, comp, and multiverses
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Craig Weinberg
wrote:
On Monday, February 4, 2013 9:59:09 AM UTC-5, telmo_menezes wrote:
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 2:31 PM, C
On 05 Feb 2013, at 13:47, Richard Ruquist wrote:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Bruno Marchal
wrote:
Hi Roger,
On 04 Feb 2013, at 16:43, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Brunio,
I agree with Craig. And I've never understood how there can be any
consequence of an emulation,
or how it can be proven
-list
Time: 2013-02-05, 11:18:49
Subject: Re: context, comp, and multiverses
On 05 Feb 2013, at 16:44, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
If comp is assumed, then we need not worry about consequences of emulation,
it's a given that it works.
Then what is the purpose of this discus
g the following content -
From: Bruno Marchal
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-02-05, 07:32:01
Subject: Re: context, comp, and multiverses
Hi Roger,
On 04 Feb 2013, at 16:43, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Brunio,
I agree with Craig. And I've never understood how there can be any
consequ
32:01
Subject: Re: context, comp, and multiverses
Hi Roger,
On 04 Feb 2013, at 16:43, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Brunio,
I agree with Craig. And I've never understood how there can be any consequence
of an emulation,
or how it can be proven or not that comp works, since no comparison can be made.
On 2/5/2013 7:47 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>Hi Roger,
>
>On 04 Feb 2013, at 16:43, Roger Clough wrote:
>
>Hi Brunio,
>
>I agree with Craig. And I've never understood how there can be any
>consequence of an emulation,
>or how it can be proven
e of using an emulator
— em·u·la·tive adjective
— em·u·la·tive·ly adverb
- Receiving the following content -
From: Telmo Menezes
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-02-04, 17:07:32
Subject: Re: context, comp, and multiverses
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Craig Weinberg wr
Plato academy. In a nutshell.
>
> Of course you have to study UDA to grasp this.
>
> Bruno
>
>
>
>
>
>
> - Receiving the following content -
> From: Telmo Menezes
> Receiver: everything-list
> Time: 2013-02-04, 09:59:09
> Subject: Re: context, comp, and
hell.
Of course you have to study UDA to grasp this.
Bruno
- Receiving the following content -
From: Telmo Menezes
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-02-04, 09:59:09
Subject: Re: context, comp, and multiverses
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Craig Weinberg
wrote:
On Monday, February 4, 2013 5:07:32 PM UTC-5, telmo_menezes wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Craig Weinberg
>
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, February 4, 2013 9:59:09 AM UTC-5, telmo_menezes wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
>
> On Monday, February 4, 2013 9:59:09 AM UTC-5, telmo_menezes wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sunday, February 3, 2013 12:11:17 PM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 01
On Monday, February 4, 2013 9:59:09 AM UTC-5, telmo_menezes wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Craig Weinberg
>
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sunday, February 3, 2013 12:11:17 PM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 01 Feb 2013, at 16:42, Roger Clough wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Bruno Mar
eiving the following content -
From: Telmo Menezes
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-02-04, 09:59:09
Subject: Re: context, comp, and multiverses
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Sunday, February 3, 2013 12:11:17 PM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 01 Fe
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
>
> On Sunday, February 3, 2013 12:11:17 PM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 01 Feb 2013, at 16:42, Roger Clough wrote:
>>
>> Hi Bruno Marchal
>>
>> I would think that each universe provides its own distinctive
>> context to any calcu
On Sunday, February 3, 2013 12:11:17 PM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 01 Feb 2013, at 16:42, Roger Clough wrote:
>
> Hi Bruno Marchal
>
> I would think that each universe provides its own distinctive
> context to any calculation, including comp.
>
>
> Comp is the assumption that we ar
On 01 Feb 2013, at 16:42, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
I would think that each universe provides its own distinctive
context to any calculation, including comp.
Comp is the assumption that we are Turing emulable.
That notion is made very solid by Church's thesis.
So I
wonder why
Hi Bruno Marchal
I would think that each universe provides its own distinctive
context to any calculation, including comp. So I
wonder why you seem to endorse (or at least don't deny) a multiverse.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Bruno Marchal
Receiver: everything-list
Time
26 matches
Mail list logo
