-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24-May-2002/11:19 -0500, Brad Felmey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 11:05, Dan Winship wrote:
>> CrossOver is a dead end though, unfortunately. The license of Office XP
>> explicitly says you can only run it on real Windows XP (o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24-May-2002/12:16 -0400, Andy Cedilnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Maybe just me, but what kind of world do we live in where a product
>license can tell you you cannot use it with another product... Sounds
>like Shell would say you cannot use their
On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 11:06, Anders Näslund wrote:
> The intresting thing however,is to find a reasonable good "Outlook" on
> windows platform that IS NOT Outlook.
> Consider this scenario:
> 1) Microsoft is boosting lic. prices with the new licensemodel.
> - Management says: Find a cheaper
afaik - no.
On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 21:17, Andy Cedilnik wrote:
> How about addresses automatically go to the address book?
>
> Andy
>
> On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 20:22, Not Zed wrote:
> > You just have to have addresses in the addressbook. Contacts, or
> > whatever the
On Sat, 2002-05-25 at 01:11, Andy Cedilnik wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 10:13, Not Zed wrote:
> > afaik - no.
>
> Is this not ever or just you don't like the idea or ...?
I dont much care either way, i guess its a reasonable feature.
> Mozilla does that.
You could always use that.
___
Le ven 24/05/2002 à 18:05, Dan Winship a écrit :
> > I believe, tho, that even using CX Office, Outlook doesn't run right.
> > Which doesn't mean that the next version of CX Office won't solve that
> > problem ...
>
> CrossOver is a dead end though, unfortunately. The license of Office XP
> expl
Title: RE: [Evolution] will there be a Windows port?
...it is also illegal to use Microsoft development tools to develop:
"...virus like code based on open source"
No wonder I'm not running MS products anymore
/A
-Original Message-
From: Andy Cedilnik
To: Dan Winship
Cc: Mi
Maybe he's referring to the (rather annoying) behavior of Netscape 6.x
email where it 'harvests' email addresses from incoming and outgoing
messages and can autocomplete based on those? NS 6.x does not add them
to your address book, but it caches them somewhere so it can
autocomplete based on the
Maybe just me, but what kind of world do we live in where a product
license can tell you you cannot use it with another product... Sounds
like Shell would say you cannot use their gasoline with Kia...
Andy
On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 12:05, Dan Winship wrote:
> CrossOver is a
it works for me.
you just have to have addresses in your addressbook. it won't
auto-complete an address that you don't have. duh. :-)
Jeff
On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 08:29, Jean-Eric Cuendet wrote:
> The only thing that is really SURE now:
>
> - Nobody knows how to do that...
>
> Anyone that have
On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 11:05, Dan Winship wrote:
> > I believe, tho, that even using CX Office, Outlook doesn't run right.
> > Which doesn't mean that the next version of CX Office won't solve that
> > problem ...
>
> CrossOver is a dead end though, unfortunately. The license of Office XP
> expli
The intresting thing however,is to find a reasonable good "Outlook" on
windows platform that IS NOT Outlook.
Consider this scenario:
1) Microsoft is boosting lic. prices with the new licensemodel.
- Management says: Find a cheaper solution
2) Investigating alternatives to Exchange (servers
> I believe, tho, that even using CX Office, Outlook doesn't run right.
> Which doesn't mean that the next version of CX Office won't solve that
> problem ...
CrossOver is a dead end though, unfortunately. The license of Office XP
explicitly says you can only run it on real Windows XP (or someth
I can confirm that Lookout does not run all that 'correctly' on CX
Office. It's better than nothing, if you happen to be forced into it (as
I have been), but still. I can't get our IT to either a) go to IMAP or
b) upgrade the excahnge server so I can use the Connector.
The REAL opportunity I see
On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 10:13, Not Zed wrote:
> afaik - no.
Is this not ever or just you don't like the idea or ...?
Mozilla does that.
Andy
___
evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/
On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 03:36, Jean-Eric Cuendet wrote:
>
> > past. To make Evolution for Windows would be reinventing the wheel
> > since Windows already has Outlook. If your Windows users are already
>
> Yes, Outlook is a GREAT program, but:
> - It's microsoft, so it will NEVER run on Linux...
On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 02:21, Marko Asplund wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2002, Michael Leone wrote:
>
> > > for a computer enthusiast switching to Linux or running Linux under VM
> > > ware may be an alternative but when it comes to people with not a very
> > > strong background in computers and who th
The only thing that is really SURE now:
- Nobody knows how to do that...
Anyone that have AUTOCOMPLETION *working*?
Thanks to share experiences.
-jec
PS: Autocompletion means: You have a friend called [EMAIL PROTECTED] ,
type "mik" in the address field and the rest "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" is auto
People *know* its a development version, because they *installed* it.
We haven't had it turned on while it really was an experimental
development version, and now it gets turned on when it is just about
ready for release.
On Sat, 2002-05-25 at 00:11, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-05-23
Manuel,
I can configure more sources, that's not a problem.
But if I have all my company in an LDAP database it makes more sense to
have autocomplete work against that instead of the local adressbook :-)
/A
fre 2002-05-24 klockan 17.05 skrev Manuel Borchers:
> Hi!
>
> Am Fre, 2002-05-24 um
Hi,
It was broken in a couple of versions, but I now use 1.05.
It now works fine for me from our company LDAP server.
I simply added the line
ldap://ldap.cadence.com:389/ou=people,o=cadence.com??one"/>
to the config.xmldb file as advised in the knowledge base.
The trick is knowing what the
On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 20:23, Not Zed wrote:
Ugh, why on earth was that put back?
To warn people that it's a development version.
-- Ettore
Works for me every time.
Note: the entry must be in Your local adressbook/contacts.
which leeds me to say: It would be great if one could choose to use an
external LDAP server as primary source (or even better to set a search
order = first company LDAP, if not found then local or vise versa)
/A
I have a Palm m505 which I am successfully syncing to evolution using a
serial link.
Has anyone got a USB connection for this form of Palm (which uses the
PalmOS 4 mangled netword transport format over USB rather than treating
USB as fast serial) working? Anyone got the new pilot-link (which do
On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 08:21, Marko Asplund wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2002, Michael Leone wrote:
>
> > > for a computer enthusiast switching to Linux or running Linux under VM
> > > ware may be an alternative but when it comes to people with not a very
> > > strong background in computers and who th
How about addresses automatically go to the address book?
Andy
On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 20:22, Not Zed wrote:
> You just have to have addresses in the addressbook. Contacts, or
> whatever the thing is called this week.
>
> I think connector just uses the exchange a
If you use VNC, it will only require you somebody to setup initial
thing. VNC client is a small piece of software and you can actually run
it from the network.On the other side you just make Evolution client(s)
running through VNC server(s) all the time. When it dies/exits/reboots,
the cron job wo
On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 18:32, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:
> Alt-V F (View -> Folder bar).
>
> Alternatively, you can use Control-G (Go to Folder).
Thanks, that works for me; espcially Go to Folder since the window
dissapears after selecting a folder. The Folder bar has to be removed
manually after s
On Fre, 2002-05-24 at 00:53, Zot O'Connor wrote:
> If the end user can run the same app on windows and linux, and we chip
> away at the app base for windows-only, then the switch is easier...
IMHO the most important point is that Ximian is a Unix company, and
there aren't any resources left for
> past. To make Evolution for Windows would be reinventing the wheel
> since Windows already has Outlook. If your Windows users are already
Yes, Outlook is a GREAT program, but:
- It's microsoft, so it will NEVER run on Linux...
- It's costly
> using Outlook, then what would be the difference
30 matches
Mail list logo
