On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 08:07, Bill Hartwell wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 13:21, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > Well, I stand corrected. Evolution is not sending a RCPT TO: command to
> > the SMTP server, however I don't see how that is possible if the message
> > contains recipients in the To: and/or
On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 18:58, jeff wrote:
> I seem to be missing the Notes function under Evo (if there is one).
> Calendar, tasks, and contacts came up beautifully. Checking the
> conduit settings reveals there's no apparent conduit. This one isn't
> me, right?
The conduit is called "MemoFile".
Bill,
That problem usually arises from an old wombat still running after an
upgrade. Close Evolution, from a terminal run killev and oaf-slay. That
should solve the problem.
On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 09:40, Bill Richards wrote:
> Hi-
>
>
> I'll try again here. I'm getting pretty frustrated with evo
Oh, I don't know anything about that. Someone else mentioned (in this
thread) something about libungif or some such, and Not Zed suggested
maybe you need to upgrade gtkhtml, but I think that's probably not the
case if you're only having trouble with .gif files. Sorry, I personally
don't know what
Through something approaching dumb luck (or good design), I got my Palm
synched.
I seem to be missing the Notes function under Evo (if there is one).
Calendar, tasks, and contacts came up beautifully. Checking the conduit
settings reveals there's no apparent conduit. This one isn't me, right?
attached is a patch.
Jeff
On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 17:30, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 16:37, Bill Hartwell wrote:
> > On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 14:10, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > > what message was the reply to? maybe you can try reproducing the
> > > problem? and/or maybe I can take
On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 15:38, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> lør, 2003-01-04 kl. 22:05 skrev Bill Hartwell:
>
> > Besides the habit part, it's also a political statement. The less any
> > government can control, the better, and since GPG means they can't
> > control a poster's privacy that's one more usef
cheers();
> > > Great idea, but according to the Kmail handbook (Kmail does have
> > > filtering on the server), you still have to download the headers in
> > > order for the filters to work. So any message that you keep for download
> > > is effectively downloaded twice - first to get the headers
lør, 2003-01-04 kl. 22:05 skrev Bill Hartwell:
> What's really sad is that I started using PGP, then switched to GPG when
> it had matured enough to replace PGP, because people were impersonating
> me on newsgroup postings.
Unbelievable (translated from Dutch: "Hoe kan dat nou?" in my head).
Mean
On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 16:45, Bill Hartwell wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 14:21, Kris Stark wrote:
> > More interestingly even - why did that one message cause a failure of
> > the entire queue? (Obvious, as it is a queue...) However, this should
> > have some sort of a system in place to allow r
On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 15:14, guenther wrote:
> cheers();
>
> > Great idea, but according to the Kmail handbook (Kmail does have
> > filtering on the server), you still have to download the headers in
> > order for the filters to work. So any message that you keep for download
> > is effectively do
On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 16:37, Bill Hartwell wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 14:10, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > what message was the reply to? maybe you can try reproducing the
> > problem? and/or maybe I can take a look to see if anything stands out
> > that may have caused the problem?
> >
> > Jeff
cheers();
> Great idea, but according to the Kmail handbook (Kmail does have
> filtering on the server), you still have to download the headers in
> order for the filters to work. So any message that you keep for download
> is effectively downloaded twice - first to get the headers for the
> filte
On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 14:21, Kris Stark wrote:
> More interestingly even - why did that one message cause a failure of
> the entire queue? (Obvious, as it is a queue...) However, this should
> have some sort of a system in place to allow recovery from errors such
> as this...
>
> Kris
>
> On Sa
On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 14:10, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> what message was the reply to? maybe you can try reproducing the
> problem? and/or maybe I can take a look to see if anything stands out
> that may have caused the problem?
>
> Jeff
>
> On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 16:11, Bill Hartwell wrote:
> > No
Hello,
> That's really wierd... anyways, glad the problem is solved now.
>
> Btw, for kicks I tried to send a message without a to/cc/bcc address and
> was unable to do so (Evolution popped up an error dialog saying I needed
> to specify at least 1 recipient). Until I did that, it wouldn't queue
what message was the reply to? maybe you can try reproducing the
problem? and/or maybe I can take a look to see if anything stands out
that may have caused the problem?
Jeff
On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 16:11, Bill Hartwell wrote:
> Now the question comes of...how did Evolution queue a message with no
>
That's really wierd... anyways, glad the problem is solved now.
Btw, for kicks I tried to send a message without a to/cc/bcc address and
was unable to do so (Evolution popped up an error dialog saying I needed
to specify at least 1 recipient). Until I did that, it wouldn't queue
the message in the
Now the question comes of...how did Evolution queue a message with no
recipients? For that matter, how did it lose the recipients when it was
nothing more than a reply to a message on the list, which should have
automatically brought the addresses over from the message it was a reply
to?
--
Bill
On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 08:51, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 14:13, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> > fre, 2003-01-03 kl. 13:12 skrev "Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > > Who would want to impersonate me?
> >
> > > Me? Just beca
On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 13:21, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> Well, I stand corrected. Evolution is not sending a RCPT TO: command to
> the SMTP server, however I don't see how that is possible if the message
> contains recipients in the To: and/or Cc: headers.
>
> Does it? Did you specify any recipients
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 15:42, Not Zed wrote:
> Its been suggested before ...
>
> You could just use an external app, and link it in the same way the
> spamassasin stuff is normally linked in.
>
> I still think doing it at the server end is the way to go though,
> otherwise you have to waste time d
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 21:17, Bill Richards wrote:
> Hello-
>
> I'm a newbie and hate to post a question that's probably already been
> re-hashed here a number of times. I did check the archive and saw some
> related posts, but still have no resolution. I'm using RH8.0 and
> installed the 1.0.8 ver
Well, I stand corrected. Evolution is not sending a RCPT TO: command to
the SMTP server, however I don't see how that is possible if the message
contains recipients in the To: and/or Cc: headers.
Does it? Did you specify any recipients?
Can you paste the header(s) of the messages you are trying t
On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 15:07, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> lør, 2003-01-04 kl. 18:40 skrev Jeffrey Stedfast:
>
> > Well, if I was to hazard a guess based on a similar complaint in the
> > past... I'd say that your server doesn't like it when Evolution
> > re-EHLO's the SMTP server after a successful SASL
Regarding Aaron's questions:
The only firewall running on my system is the default firewall installed by
Red Hat. The only changes I've made since installing Evolution 1.2.1 (to
replace the 1.0.8 version that Red Hat installed with RH8.0) are the ones
that came from running Up2Date immediately
lør, 2003-01-04 kl. 18:40 skrev Jeffrey Stedfast:
> Well, if I was to hazard a guess based on a similar complaint in the
> past... I'd say that your server doesn't like it when Evolution
> re-EHLO's the SMTP server after a successful SASL authentication
> sequence. In other words... your server is
i have used following settings, and there where no errors with
executing, but i have still errors at weather function in the Summary,
and so forth.
gconftool-1 --type=bool --set /system/gnome-vfs/use-http-proxy "TRUE"
gconftool-1 --type=string --set /system/gnome-vfs/http-proxy-host
"proxy.pandora
Yo!
I use filtering on the server (procmail), but some filters are in
evolution (and need to be). Is there a way to have the filter apply
automatically to all new messages? There's only a 'apply filter to new
msgs in INBOX' checkbox in evo (1.2.1).
thanks
-- vbi
--
this email is protected by a
Well, if I was to hazard a guess based on a similar complaint in the past... I'd say that your server doesn't like it when Evolution re-EHLO's the SMTP server after a successful SASL authentication sequence. In other words... your server is a hunk of crap and is not rfc compliant (see http://ww
On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 04:46, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> Ximian is considering implementing a bayesian spam filter within
> Evolution itself. Management is pushing for it to be implemented for
> Evolution 1.4 but I seriously doubt Michael and I will have the time to
> do it in so short an amount of t
lør, 2003-01-04 kl. 11:09 skrev Bill Hartwell:
> Unfortunately, it appears that the SSL connection is not the solution to the
> problem, either. I reset my connection to never use SSL, killed and restarted
> Evolution, and got the exact same error:
>
> Data response error: Need Rcpt command
>
Il sab, 2003-01-04 alle 16:28, Massimiliano Bini ha scritto:
> Unfortunately it's happening to me *everytime* :-(
Yep, it happens very very often...Che palle ;) It's annoying when you
have more than just 2 accounts to check...
I understand it's a problem related to a bad response from the pop
ser
Il sab, 2003-01-04 alle 16:28, Massimiliano Bini ha scritto:
> Unfortunately it's happening to me *everytime* :-(
Yep, it happens very very often...Che palle ;) It's annoying when you
have more than just 2 accounts to check...
I understand it's a problem related to a bad response from the pop
ser
Title: Evolution 1.2.1 on RH8.0...
Hi-
I'll try
again here. I'm getting pretty frustrated with evo- I have yet to get
a fully working version of this program on my machine at home. I tried
1.0.8 which cam with my RH8.0 distribution. I could read mail fine,
but not compose, so that was usel
Il ven, 2003-01-03 alle 14:41, Jason Frisvold ha scritto:
> I have a similar problem ... It seems that closing and reopening
> Evolution will sometimes lose all the settings I had since I opened it
> the first time... ie, all changes I make to the settings are lost when
> I close evolution...
>
On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 23:53, Trey Sizemore wrote:
> Has anyone successfully installed Evolution 1.2.1 on Debian 3.0? I have
> tried to install 1.2.0 from unstable but have had library problems
> (primarily with libgtkhtml1.1). I am using 1.2.1 on Red Hat now (thanks
> to Red Carpet), but would li
On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 23:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I used to have problems too. It seemed to depend on the client used write the
> email you were receiving and whether it constructed the message using an
> "INLINE" method or "Multipart MIME". I never did find a solution. =(
>
> I think it wo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Unfortunately, it appears that the SSL connection is not the solution to the
problem, either. I reset my connection to never use SSL, killed and restarted
Evolution, and got the exact same error:
Data response error: Need Rcpt command
This, after r
On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 00:34, Trey Sizemore wrote:
> Unstable has 1.2.0 and not 1.2.1 when I tried it last...is there a
> different source to obtain the 1.2.1 version?
1.2.1 has been uploaded to unstable a few days ago. However, it is not
currently buildable, and so probably isn't available on all
40 matches
Mail list logo
