Actually the card view type doesn't permit customization of this sort.
It was probably planned but never implemented.
Chris
On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 09:43, Lonnie Borntreger wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 04:15, Armin Irger wrote:
> > how can i define my own card view ?
> > With birtday and so on.
I have a self signed cert as well, and when I use mozilla I get the
"Website Certified by Unknown Authority" window.. Things work from
evolution though, without any warnings/errors.. I'd really like to add
that mozilla dialog's functionality into the evolution addressbook but
I'm not sure it's ev
Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> fre, 2003-01-10 kl. 19:27 skrev Chris Toshok:
>
> > Are you connecting to port 389 and doing STARTTLS or connecting to 636?
> >
> > Here's my server output (with my latest patch):
>
> Hmmm ... what (Openldap?) version is that, and what
I do here. Well, I just fixed a post-1.2.1 regression that was keeping
it from working, but 1.2.1 should work..
Are you connecting to port 389 and doing STARTTLS or connecting to 636?
Here's my server output (with my latest patch):
connection_read(9): checking for input on id=0
TLS trace: SSL_a
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 10:16, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 13:04, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> > fre, 2003-01-10 kl. 15:50 skrev Thomas J. Baker:
> >
> > > Does anyone have ldaps working?
> >
> > Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't (Openldap 2.1.10/Berkeley
> > 4.1.24 backend)
On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 05:46, Lane P. Lester wrote:
> > Actually, I can very much see the utility of what you suggest, but the
> > addition of an extra "parked" flag is something they're even less likely
> > to implement than the extension of "follow-up" or "important" flags for
> > a similar purpos
On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 05:16, Lane P. Lester wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 19:52, Chris Toshok wrote:
> > There's actually already a fix for this very issue in the HEAD version
> > (not the 1.2 branch). The gconf key is:
> >
> > /apps/evolution/addressbook
On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 07:38, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> tor, 2003-01-09 kl. 00:54 skrev Chris Toshok:
>
> > The only present issue with just using lachman/laser (or rather what the
> > example in the lachman/laser draft shows) is that the mailGroup
> > definition contains &
ng all the gains we made over 1.0.8 in terms of performance),
and there will be lots more work done on it in the future :)
Chris
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 17:30, Andrew Cowie wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 11:50, Chris Toshok wrote:
> > > A more intuitive response is to press comma &#
The only present issue with just using lachman/laser is that mailGroup
contains "MUST (cn $ mail )".. Not sure what to do wrt the 'mail'
attribute when creating a mailing list.
We
Chris
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 14:39, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> ons, 2003-01-08 kl. 21:46 skrev C
Chris
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 16:09, Chris Toshok wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 06:27, guenther wrote:
> > cheers();
> >
> > > > If the category column isn't there, select Add a Column... from the
> > > > popup (just right click on any heade
There's actually already a fix for this very issue in the HEAD version
(not the 1.2 branch). The gconf key is:
/apps/evolution/addressbook/completion/minimum_query_length
which defaults to 3. There's no UI for it at present, and it's a global
setting (not per folder).
Chris
On Wed, 2003-01-08
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 16:13, Andrew Cowie wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 06:44, Lane P. Lester wrote:
> > The smart completion of contacts when entering the To: field of an
> > email has changed from presenting options after a single character to
> > the need to type 3 characters before you see any
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 06:27, guenther wrote:
> cheers();
>
> > > If the category column isn't there, select Add a Column... from the
> > > popup (just right click on any header) and drag it into the header row,
> > > then do the Group by this field stuff.
> >
> > Category is not in the list of c
DESC 'MUA Friendly Mail Group'
MUST ( cn )
MAY ( mgrpRFC822MailMember ) )
That can be used in conjunction with mailGroups.. Not sure yet.
Chris
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 15:46, Chris Toshok wrote:
> The only present issue with just using lachman/laser is that mailGroup
> conta
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 09:48, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
>
> P.s., Chris: Where's the mailing list schema? I told you how to do it,
> and Adam Williams backed me up.
Oh, therefore it must be done that way? :) I've been working on it in
my copious spare time, I have something that will show lists using t
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 18:25, Lonnie Borntreger wrote:
> Am I missing something obvious, or is it not possible to view contacts
> grouped by category?
Grouping is sorta non-obvious. If you've got the category field
displayed in the list view, right click on the header and select "Group
by this fie
olution did it.
Simple workaround in the meantime - put your cursor in the full name
field and insert then delete a space :) just something to change the
field so evo will reparse it.
Chris
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 17:22, Joaquim Fellmann wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 01:41, Chris Toshok wrote:
>
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 16:40, Joaquim Fellmann wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 01:05, Chris Toshok wrote:
>
> > > Why Evolution couldn't add the missing objectClass and attribute is
> > > beyond me.
> >
> > It does add the missing objectClasses (that's
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 14:39, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> tir, 2003-01-07 kl. 20:57 skrev Chris Toshok:
>
> > Hm, you can run wombat in a separate terminal and it'll spew out a more
> > detailed ldap error message when you modify the entry. Also, are you
> > loading
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 14:33, Joaquim Fellmann wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 23:01, Chris Toshok wrote:
>
> >
> > Hm, were you trying to replace the existing objectClasses with person?
> > There shouldn't be a conflict between person and account that I can see.
On my little test server here I had the entry:
# Chris Toshok, xtoph, org
dn: cn=Chris Toshok,dc=xtoph,dc=org
cn: Chris Toshok
sn: Toshok
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
objectClass: top
objectClass: person
objectClass
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 13:19, Joaquim Fellmann wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 20:57, Chris Toshok wrote:
> > Hm, you can run wombat in a separate terminal and it'll spew out a more
> > detailed ldap error message when you modify the entry. Also, are you
> > loading the
Hm, you can run wombat in a separate terminal and it'll spew out a more
detailed ldap error message when you modify the entry. Also, are you
loading the inetorgperson.schema file?
Chris
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 11:09, Joaquim Fellmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have an openldap server used to authentic
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 08:39, Mika Liljeberg wrote:
> > I can't speak to what 2.5.x's output is for this program, but i bet it's
> > the same. If it's not it must be a bug in my code :P
>
> According to Joaquim, and I can confirm this, Linux 2.5 returns the
> following:
>
> sock1's peer = '/tmp/s
'\0';
> > else
> > ((char *) &fn_cnx->u.usock)[n] = '\0';
> >
> > or, to be safer... perhaps zero the struct using memset before calling
> > getpeername?
> >
> > either way Ron's fix is wrong as it negates the sun_path
On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 18:36, David Frager wrote:
> I have attempted to configure my companies ldap server (Exchange 5.5),
> however, when
> I create an email and press the "to" button, evolution-addressbook
> crashes.
>
> Any ideas what I can check?
A stack trace would be wonderful. Please file
I must be missing something, but what on earth is this fix supposed to
accomplish? It actually fixes something?
I can see doing something like:
if (getpeername (GIOP_CONNECTION_GET_FD(fd_cnx),
(struct sockaddr *)&fd_cnx->u.usock, &n)) < 0)
fn_cnx->u.usock.sun_path[0] = '
for the authenticate via email address stuff to work, you have to be
able to perform the query for the email address to begin with (while not
authenticated). Your server probably doesn't allow this.
This may have something to do with addressbook bug #34883, but I doubt
it. You could try authenti
On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 01:48, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> back to kernel 2.4.* i can run evolution (1.2.1 on debian/woody)
> fine. Anyone has an idea what the issue with evolution and linux
> kernel 2.5 could be?
>
2.5 is broken?
chris
___
ev
did you configure autocompletion folders? more specifically, did you
add an ldap server to the list?
Chris
On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 00:47, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> debian/woody with evolzution 1.2.1 from ftp.ximian.com
>
> everything was fine yesterday.
>
> but today i can't write mail (this
just goes to show I shouldn't be writing email late at night after
driving for 2 days, heh.
The patch is actually attached here, and I repasted/finished the bit of
text in which I accidentally hit Ctrl-enter :)
anyway, off to bed.
Chris
On Mon, 2002-12-30 at 00:41, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
>
> I u
On Mon, 2002-12-30 at 00:41, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> man, 2002-12-30 kl. 06:40 skrev Bill Barnard:
>
> > I am now able to connect to an OpenLDAP v2.0.21 server running on a
> > Redhat Linux 7.2 server from another Redhat Linux 7.2 client. A few tips
> > from Kirk Strauser (thanks!) got me started.
You need to install the bonobo-devel package.
Chris
On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 21:10, Rick Friedman wrote:
> I have Mandrake 8.1 and, as such, can find no binaries for Evolution
> 1.2.1. I'm trying to build from source but having a problem with
> configure.
>
> I am running configure with the follow
LDAP_LIBS shouldn't just contain the -L flag.. It meant to contain the
-lldap -llber -l... flags.
Is there any particular reason you're building with static-ldap? Might
try leaving that flag off.
Chris
On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 16:18, Terrelle Shaw wrote:
> Hey all,
> Trying to compile ev
It's not usually a good idea to relocate binary packages (especially
those that contain data files, since the paths to those files are often
generated at compile time).
What happens when you run "evolution-exchange-storage" from a terminal
window. If it doesn't start up properly then something is
Yeah, at present it's not possible to sync directly to ldap (although
it's on my Giant List of Things to Do.)
Chris
On Sun, 2002-12-15 at 03:07, Pär Aronsson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ldap support if working just fine again with Evolution 1.2.1 and syncing
> Local Folders with the Palm is as smooth as ev
i missed the non-standard directory thing. Is this the same install
prefix to which evolution-1.0.5 had been installed? If not, is 1.0.5
still installed?
Make sure the following two things have been done:
1. your PATH includes $install_prefix/bin
(so oafd can find the executables)
2. one o
Try doing killev then running wombat from a terminal window, does it
start up properly?
Chris
On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 11:42, Jeff Boerio wrote:
> I built Evolution 1.2 from source last night, installing in a non-standard
> directory. Had been running Evolution 1.0.5 just fine. Was able to run
>
to do a "sub" query? Is this after you edited the ldap server
using the ui?
Chris
On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 08:29, Matt Larson wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 13:21, Chris Toshok wrote:
> > You can run wombat in its own terminal (run killev then start wombat
> > then run evo
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 11:08, Matt Larson wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 13:21, Chris Toshok wrote:
> > You can run wombat in its own terminal (run killev then start wombat
> > then run evolution as normal.) That should produce some debug output
> > (specifically the filt
You can run wombat in its own terminal (run killev then start wombat
then run evolution as normal.) That should produce some debug output
(specifically the filters used and the ldap search response.)
Chris
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 07:03, Matt Larson wrote:
> Hi, folks.
>
> My Evolution 1.2 doesn't
t need it - do normal searches on the ldap server work?
Chris
>
> On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 17:35, Chris Toshok wrote:
> > On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 12:59, Ron Smits wrote:
> > > Chris,
> > >
> > > Great, you made me very happy with that. I will check out CVS during
On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 12:59, Ron Smits wrote:
> Chris,
>
> Great, you made me very happy with that. I will check out CVS during the
> weekend and build and test it. Are there also changes in Gal and or
> Gtkhtml? Or won't have to bother with rebuilding them too.
>
almost positive there have been
in a day
or so.
Chris
>
> On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 18:43, Chris Toshok wrote:
> > On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 08:13, Etienne Tourigny wrote:
> > > You can do something. Set your default Contacts folder in
> > > Tools->Preferences->Folder Settings->Default Folders to
On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 08:13, Etienne Tourigny wrote:
> You can do something. Set your default Contacts folder in
> Tools->Preferences->Folder Settings->Default Folders to your LDAP
> server.
>
> Don't forget to stop and restart Evolution for the changes to take
> effect.
Ugh, that's broken - you
This happens when the acls are such that evolution can't get at the
subschema before the user authenticates. It's fixed in CVS and will be
in 1.2.1.
In the meantime you can work around the issue by allowing anonymous read
access to the attributes of the root DSE (dn = "") and the subschema
info (
file: /cvs/gnome/evolution/addressbook/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 1.1183.2.9
diff -u -r1.1183.2.9 ChangeLog
--- ChangeLog 28 Nov 2002 22:29:32 - 1.1183.2.9
+++ ChangeLog 1 Dec 2002 04:14:41 -
@@ -1,4 +1,13 @@
+2002-11-30 Chris Toshok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+
+ * backend/pas/
On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 11:20, Alex Polite wrote:
> I want to run a query on my contacts database from the commandline
> (well from mutt actually).
> How do I accomplish this in perl, python, bash whatever?
There's no command line tool (that I'm aware of) to do it. If your
language of choice has CO
/snapshot back into working order for
you.
Chris
> On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 23:29, Chris Toshok wrote:
> > At present evolution sets the connection to v3 when it initializes it,
> > and there's no setting to drop the protocol to v2. Which server are you
> > running?
>
At present evolution sets the connection to v3 when it initializes it,
and there's no setting to drop the protocol to v2. Which server are you
running?
The setting is mostly there because of the TLS stuff, so potentially it
could be done only in the case where use_tls != never.
Chris
On Mon, 20
marketplace, I hope that future releases of Evo and
> other great Gnome (Ximian and otherwise) tools will become defect-free
> enough to win some decisions to move from the MS paradigm to Open
> Source.
Well said, and I hope so too :)
Oh, and I was rather shocked when I ran outl
On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 15:33, Dick Roth wrote:
> Hi All--
>
> With hope in my heart, I tried this edit to the .xml file but with no
> joy. What to do!! I use LDAP lookups often during the day and now have
> to use gq to look up addresses and type them into my outgoing message.
>
> This function
On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 13:55, steve j. kondik wrote:
> i'm connecting to an older exchange 5.5 server for ldap contacts, and it
> no longer works with evo 1.2. it worked perfect with 1.0.8. i think it
> has something to do with the fact that its an ldap v2 server, and not a
> v3. i have no probl
That would be substantially more difficult because the other (existing)
binding types are stateless.
Chris
On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 15:29, simran wrote:
> Hi Evolution People's
>
> The message below poppup up on the vim mailing list and though it might
> be of interest here as well.
>
> Is there
On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 06:59, Cormac Long wrote:
> Got it working,
>edited evolution/addressbook-sources.xml which shows the config for
> the LDAP server
>
> I changed the
> base
>
> to sub
>
> and all worked OK.
>
> Of course if you edit this in the GUI, the drop down combo shows o
On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 01:36, Ron McKeating wrote:
> Yesterday I updated to evolution 1.2, now I have not contacts. Does
> anybody know what happend or how I cam get them back ?
http://support.ximian.com/cgi-bin/ximian.cfg/php/enduser/std_alp.php?p_search_text=&p_prod_lvl1=2
toshok
__
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 22:34, Dieter Kluenter wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Cormac Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Does anyone have evo 1.2 working with MS Exchange LDAP server?.. if so can you
> > provide details of the configuration.. bind, scope etc
> > I've monitored evo and gq using Ethereal..
>
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 19:40, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> the other option, of course, is to just throw faster hardware on the
> server :-)
>
> throwing a faster cpu and more ram at a problem is much much cheaper
> than developer time (even for the end user).
which also applies equally well to the v
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 18:15, David Brusowankin wrote:
> Sorry for the waste of time and bandwidth.
>
> How do I unsubscribe from this list ?
>
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
^-- click that
toshok
___
evolution maillist - [E
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 14:02, Brian wrote:
> Jeffrey Stedfast said:
>
> > however, I suspect the problem is not evolution at all. probably your
> > server is just slower to respond or something.
>
> It was likely his mail client, not his mail server that changed. Duh.
> Stop dismissing all quest
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 14:12, Cormac Long wrote:
> Does anyone have evo 1.2 working with MS Exchange LDAP server?.. if so
> can you provide details of the configuration.. bind, scope etc
>
> I've monitored evo and gq using Ethereal..
>
> Results from using gq (which works)
> firstly, it binds but
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 14:27, Dieter Kluenter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Chris Toshok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 06:34, Dieter Kluenter wrote:
> [...]
> > please don't compress attachments - can't expand inline if you do.
>
>
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 06:34, Dieter Kluenter wrote:
> Hi,
> I was quite unhappy with evolutionPerson.schema so I have written an new
> schema definition file. This schema combiCalendar.schema includes now
> attribute classes und object classes defined in RFC 2739 as well as for
> evolution and aboo
On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 11:26, Dr Ivan S Bishop wrote:
> I cannot get any LDAP query to work from this version of evolution
> against a 5.5 exchange server running LDAP.
>
> It does not accept anonymouse requests and as it is NOT active directory
> the authentication should be username or NTdomain\
On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 01:10, Hans-Göran Puke wrote:
> Chris Toshok wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 2002-11-13 at 07:43, Hans-Göran Puke wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I've installed Evolution 1.2 and managed to configure it to get
> >>addressing information from our LDA
On Wed, 2002-11-13 at 07:43, Hans-Göran Puke wrote:
> I've installed Evolution 1.2 and managed to configure it to get
> addressing information from our LDAP directory.
> The searches work alright, but when I send an e-mail using one of the
> selected records, the e-mail address is all wrong (it i
On Wed, 2002-11-13 at 07:57, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
> Similarly, is there a way to get it to display the email address in the
> two field rather than the name. I have clients with multiple
> addresses, and I want to be able to confirm I am using the right one at
> a glance.
You can right cli
On Mon, 2002-11-11 at 22:44, Chris Toshok wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-11-11 at 09:21, Bob Haddleton wrote:
>
> > So it looks like the fileAs is what is causing the problem.
> >
>
> hmm, i suppose this makes sense - it's definitely not building an index
> for tha
On Mon, 2002-11-11 at 09:21, Bob Haddleton wrote:
> So it looks like the fileAs is what is causing the problem.
>
hmm, i suppose this makes sense - it's definitely not building an index
for that field (if it's not even in the server's schema), so the set of
candidate entries is probably the set
On Mon, 2002-11-11 at 19:38, Barrett Cervenka wrote:
> I'm using RH8 and I just upgraded to 1.2 from 1.0.8. My Contacts have
> disappeared from Evolution. Are they gone for good or just hiding in a
> file somewhere that wasn't upgraded properly?
You need to exit evolution, run killev, then restar
Yeah, wombat was probably still running from a previous run of the old
evolution. When upgrading you need to exit evolution and run killev
before running the new version (reboot works too :)
Chris
On Mon, 2002-11-11 at 10:50, Muralidhar Ganga wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Running Redhat 8.0, udated Evolutio
mess with (fileAs=had*) in certain instances (where sn is already in the query.)
Chris
On Fri, 2002-11-08 at 08:49, Bob Haddleton wrote:
On Thu, 2002-11-07 at 17:59, Chris Toshok wrote:
> If you do killev, then run wombat from a terminal and watch it's output
> you'll see the quer
Raphael and I have been bouncing mail back and forth privately on this,
but I figured I'd respond to the list with the solution I just found.
The trouble is that evolution only queries the RootDSE when it opens the
connection, and some ldap servers are configured such that you need to
be authentic
On Fri, 2002-11-08 at 03:17, Raphael Vallazza wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have a problem with my LDAP addressbook. I connot add nor edit
> entries, because the fields are greyed out. The strange thing is that if
> i click on the "Full Name" button of the Contact Editor i can enter the
> name of the person,
On Thu, 2002-11-07 at 14:57, Bob Haddleton wrote:
> I'm using the Release Candidate and having trouble with LDAP queries of
> our corporate people database. This used to work on 1.0.8 and several
> (many?) snapshots ago. Now I just get no results for every query.
>
> Is there a way to collect de
On Thu, 2002-11-07 at 13:53, Hamid wrote:
> Thanks for the reply.
> I am using 1.0.8-10 (the one shipped with RH8.0).I am doing exactly what
> you described but it ain't working, the contact icon just bounces back
> to its original position.
> Can you please also take a look at 2nd part of my quest
On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 17:58, Hamid wrote:
> Hi
> 1-When creating a mailing list from existing contacts, it say either
> enter the email address or drag and drop a contact. The latter seems
> that doesn't work and when I drag a contact from the contacts and drop
> it in the List winodw, it return ba
lists,
> LDAP-based mailing lists don't work at all with Evo. (Actually, by
> creating and maintaing them with GQ you can work around this, but don't
> tell Chris Toshok, he's supposed to be "working on this.")
It's not like creating them and maintaining them
I seem to recall seeing this request before but I'm not sure if there's
a bug about it in bugzilla. Could you please file one?
Chris
On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 14:14, Sean Millichamp wrote:
> When I am editing a contact in Evolution 1.0.8 it doesn't seem to store
> my preferences for the phone number
On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 07:30, Calvin Liu wrote:
> I built a trunk and make install it. Then I can't start evolution any
> more. Why?
>
> Here is the error message:
> "(Cannot access Bonobo/ConfigDatabase, not upgrading configuration.)
> IDL:OAF/GeneralError:1.0
>
> evolution-shel
On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 13:10, Subramani, GnanaShekar (MED, TCS) wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I specified the name of exchange server and specified port as 389 @
> "Tools --> Addressbook sources" in ximian evolution. But I am unable to
> query users in the address book while composing a mail, nor I am able
On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 10:55, Peter O'Shea wrote:
> As I understand it, syncing calendars and address books between
> computers (such as home and work) is a feature not-yet-implemented.
>
> I've discovered you can import a evolution calendar file into your
> current calendar folder, and this works
Category searching was effectively broken until the 1.2 betas, as we
stored it as a single, comma delimited string (much like the file
backend does) which rendered it unsearchable using an ldap query.
The "categories" attribute in the evolutionPerson schema has been
deprecated in favor of the new
ddressbook and
gal) and probably won't happen before > 1.4.
Chris
>
> On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 12:00, Chris Toshok wrote:
> > On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 11:49, Zot O'Connor wrote:
> > > evolution-1.1.1.99-snap.ximian.200209270601
> > >
> >
&
On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 17:03, Peter Reilly wrote:
> Re: Other Contacts
>
> Is there a way to make a connection to an LDAP server that requires
> SSL? The server can accept on 389, but redirects to 636, and requires
> SSL, and a username (Email address is ok) and password.
Yup, the 1.1 snaps supp
Are other things showing up in the completion view but not
the ones that should match a nickname?
Chris
>
> On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 11:38, Chris Toshok wrote:
> > On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 16:52, Zot O'Connor wrote:
> > > So I have notices, that the address field (like To:)
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 16:52, Zot O'Connor wrote:
> So I have notices, that the address field (like To:) will not look up
> nicknames any more?
>
> Is this known?
Which version are you running? works fine for me in the current 1.1
beta.
Chris
___
evo
On Sat, 2002-09-28 at 13:26, D. D. Brierton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using Evolution 1.1.1 on Mandrake 8.2. I just created a new contact
> list with 10 addresses in it. I can save it and open it and edit it: all
> the addresses are in there. However, if I try and send a message to it
> only the first
On Thu, 2002-09-05 at 07:07, Eddie wrote:
> I find it some what annoying that if the wrong password is typed in when
> accessing the LDAP server then Evolution has to be closed down and
> re-started.
Fixed this tonight (in 1.1.x). I went through and looked for a bug that
might have been filed on
On Sun, 2002-08-18 at 06:39, Tom wrote:
> AHHH! all my contacts are gone.
>
> :( .. not sure when the were lost ... had to be over the last weeks
> snap shots ...
>
gone how? is the addressbook.db file still around? if you run "strings
~/evolution/local/Contacts/addressbook.db" do you see th
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 09:23, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> ons, 2002-08-14 kl. 12:40 skrev Tong Eng Chiah:
>
> > i'm using it.
> > works fine.
>
> No it doesn't! Even if people do as you say.
It has always worked fine for me when doing normal port 389 non-TLS
stuff... Are you saying that isn't worki
On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 07:14, Sean M Alderman wrote:
> Speaking of Shell Scripting for LDAP pasting into a To/CC field, I had
> mentioned this a long time ago...pre 1.0 days, that a nice feature
> enhancement would be to allow for external address sources like shell
> scripts to be incorporated. P
On Tue, 2002-06-04 at 13:29, Dan Winship wrote:
> (toshok: read the end at least)
> Now, having said all that, it seems that there's a bug in the code right
> now... if you set Search scope to "Sub", it gets saved as "Base"
> instead, and so it doesn't work. But if you quit evolution and edit
> ~
On Fri, 2002-05-31 at 12:07, Paul Legato wrote:
>
> Thing is, the form works fine over here when editing a local contact.
> The back end is there, it's just being disabled for some reason when
> editing an LDAP based contact. My guess is that the LDAP module in
> Evolution thinks that it doesn
On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 08:16, Mark Foster wrote:
> Been seeing this for quite awhile now. I thought it must be a unfinished
> feature set or a misconfiguration of the ACL on my OpenLDAP server. Now
> I think not. I have had some luck editing and creating new (LDAP-based)
> contacts by either creati
On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 13:23, Amith Varghese wrote:
> The error message that the dialog box comes up with is pretty useless,
> but starting wombat in a console after running killev helped me see what
> the problem was. I'm using a custom object to store my addressbook info
> and i forgot that in t
On Tue, 2002-04-02 at 13:25, Chris Toshok wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-04-01 at 06:34, JP Rosevear wrote:
> > On Mon, 2002-04-01 at 01:11, Martin C. Messer wrote:
> > > JP, sorry, should have been more specific.
> > >
> > > If I want to store the FBURL in a
On Mon, 2002-04-01 at 06:34, JP Rosevear wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-04-01 at 01:11, Martin C. Messer wrote:
> > JP, sorry, should have been more specific.
> >
> > If I want to store the FBURL in an LDAP entry for a contact (an entry
> > that is not local to my addressbook), where should I store it? Pu
On Wed, 2002-03-27 at 12:52, Sergey V. Udaltsov wrote:
> > > > 2. You need anonymous read access to the subschemas of ldap. this can be
> > > > done by the following entry in /etc/openldap/slapd.conf
> > > > access to dn="cn=subschema" by * read
> Sorry, where is this cite from? I think many reade
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
