Re: [Evolution] Copy from mail message

Tony Earnshaw said: > man, 2002-11-04 kl. 18:23 skrev David Sterratt: > >> clicked on the subject. There is no "Copy" item in the edit menu. > > All of the above definitely does not apply to *my* RH 7.2, Gnome 1.4 > and Evo 1.0.8-99 desktop. > > The only things in which CTRL-C, CTRL-X and CTR

Re: [Evolution] I can't see the emails : No Sender, no body no subject

Hamid Ghadyani said: > I have attached to screen shots of the Evolution in preview mode and > also when I hit the reply button. Also at the end of this email you can > find the email that can not be displayed in the preview mode. 2nd one work around - click REPLY, highlight the line, and choose "

Re: [Evolution] Why evolution only use the 'Sent' folder under 'local folder'?

Rodrigo Moya said: > On Mon, 2002-11-04 at 12:05, Calvin Liu wrote: >> It seems that the "Sent" folder under each mail account has no use, >> why? Is it a known bug or not? >> > it has, it stores the messages you sent, at least for POP and local > accounts. I don't know about IMAP though, but for

Re: [Evolution] Evolution vs Mutt

Jeffrey Stedfast said: > On Mon, 2002-09-23 at 07:51, Jose Celestino wrote: >> Words by Alessio Bragadini [Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 02:23:33PM +0300]: >> > On Mon, 2002-09-23 at 14:16, Cecil Westerhoff wrote: >> > >> > > What also would be nice to empty the deleted messages from one >> folder only. I

Re: [Evolution] Evolution 1.1.0.9

Lloyd D Budd said: > On Wed, 2002-09-11 at 06:38, Michael Leone may have wrote: > >> > If Hans has given it his best effort, which suggests that his >> intention+ is to assist development of evo, then he is missing a lot >> of details in his posting. >> >&

Re: [Evolution] Evolution 1.1.0.9

Lloyd D Budd said: > On Tue, 2002-09-10 at 20:54, Mike Leone may have wrote: >> * Lloyd D Budd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote this on 09 10, 02 at >> 20:54: >> > I am not a evo developer. >> > >> > I do find it strange when seeing msgs from ppl using devel snapshots >> requesting help in such a way th

Re: [Evolution] Filtering for one folder?

Oliver Sturm said: > I'd think Exchange users would say the same, wouldn't they? I don't know > much about Exchange, but I'm sure it has server-side filtering, doesn't > it? Yes, it does. -- PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF Member, LEAF Project

Re: VIRUS!! RE: [Evolution] Look,my beautiful girl friend VIRUS

Richard Holland said: > Another thought - as you use the ORDB for open relays, why not use I use maps_rbl_domains = relays.ordb.org, inputs.orbz.org, socks.relays.osirusoft.com, relays.osirusoft.com actually. > sbl.spamhaus.org as an additional host in the maps_rbl_domains, as it is > a real

Re: VIRUS!! RE: [Evolution] Look,my beautiful girl friend VIRUS

Rob Brown-Bayliss said: > On Tue, 2002-08-20 at 03:43, Michael Leone wrote: > >> And there's the beauty of blocking executable attachments/running virus scans on your own mail server. I had no idea there was such a message to the list, since my MTA rejected it before I ever saw

Re: VIRUS!! RE: [Evolution] Look,my beautiful girl friend VIRUS

Mark Boylan said: > Greetings > > watch out for the virus in that message! And there's the beauty of blocking executable attachments/running virus scans on your own mail server. I had no idea there was such a message to the list, since my MTA rejected it before I ever saw it. :-) -- PGP Finger

Re: [Evolution] How to access Outlook NetFolders with Evolution?

Dan Winship said: >> Did we just misunderstand the feature list? My colleagues and me >> interpreted 'It supports peer-to-peer calendaring ...' and 'It >> supports a flexible calendar with multiple calendar views and allows >> users to create and confirm group meetings online, even with Microsoft

Re: [Evolution] evolution bug [MINOR] part 2

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12 Jul 2002 at 18:56, Enver ALTIN wrote: > On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 18:41, Alessio Dessi wrote: > > now I have noticed that there are 12 evolution-mail running just now > > is this normal, maybe the problem is this multiple instances > > Try this:

Re: [Evolution] OT: Setting up a local mail server

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 3 Jun 2002 at 23:46, Dan Hensley wrote: > The reason I'm asking on this list is that I know there are some who > have mentioned previously doing this. I've been researching for a > while now, and I still have a lot of questions, so I was wonder

Re: [Evolution] will there be a Windows port?

On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 03:36, Jean-Eric Cuendet wrote: > > > past. To make Evolution for Windows would be reinventing the wheel > > since Windows already has Outlook. If your Windows users are already > > Yes, Outlook is a GREAT program, but: > - It's microsoft, so it will NEVER run on Linux...

Re: [Evolution] will there be a Windows port?

On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 02:21, Marko Asplund wrote: > On Thu, 23 May 2002, Michael Leone wrote: > > > > for a computer enthusiast switching to Linux or running Linux under VM > > > ware may be an alternative but when it comes to people with not a very > > > stron

Re: [Evolution] will there be a Windows port?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 23 May 2002 at 15:24, Marko Asplund wrote: > On 23 May 2002, Conrad O Dea wrote: > > > ... > > An alternative is to use VMwear to run a linux virtual machine on > > the Windows box, or vice versa. http://www.vmware.com/ > > for a computer enth

Re: [Evolution] will there be a Windows port?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 23 May 2002 at 13:22, Marko Asplund wrote: > On 23 May 2002, Not Zed wrote: > > > There are no plans that i'm aware of (though i'd probably be the > > last to find out, being on the 'wrong' side of the world). > > > > You could just use linux

Re: [Evolution] Feature Request: PGP key-lookup

On Sun, 2002-05-05 at 11:24, Matthias Hentges wrote: > Hello! > > It would be really nice to have a "key lookup" feature in evolution that > lets you download PGP > keys from a keyserver if a message is signed but the public key of the > sender is not in the key ring. > > Any chance that this wi

Re: [Evolution] Evolution and Linux 2.5.10

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 1 May 2002 at 14:51, Not Zed wrote: > > > I dont think we (i certainly dont) plan to spend any time on fixing > development kernel related problems. > > There is some indication (from some bugs in bugzilla) that we are > exposing kernel bugs.

Re: [Evolution] delete mail after xx days from POP3 server

On Sat, 2002-04-13 at 16:39, Brian wrote: > I don't mind replies, especially the contradictory ones, it's the dumb > replies that make me cringe as I hit the delete key. The comment was > intended as tongue-in-cheek, moron, which is why I posted *alternatives* > beneath that. Read the whole mess

Re: [Evolution] delete mail after xx days from POP3 server

On Sat, 2002-04-13 at 14:53, Brian wrote: > It's called sarcasm, Mike, look into it. Yes, I know. And I was pointing out how it wasn't funny, even as sarcasm. > I was about as glib in my > message as you were intelligent in yours. Leave it to you to reply to > the one non-serious thing in th

Re: [Evolution] delete mail after xx days from POP3 server

On Sat, 2002-04-13 at 14:03, Brian wrote: > On Sat, 2002-04-13 at 13:03, Michael Leone wrote: > > > > Tell your employer that your current choice does not fit your needs :) > > > > Then tell them goodbye when they hire somebody in your place who doesn't &g

Re: [Evolution] delete mail after xx days from POP3 server

On Sat, 2002-04-13 at 12:13, Brian wrote: > On Sat, 2002-04-13 at 11:13, Rob Walker wrote: > > > I agree that this use of POP might not be optimum. However, sometimes > > we don't get to choose which type of server we connect to, our employer > > tells us what we get to use. > > Tell your emplo

RE: [Evolution] Printing to an ascii text file

On Sun, 2002-04-07 at 23:56, Michael Rothwell wrote: > On Sun, 2002-04-07 at 21:08, Not Zed wrote: > > Could also try cut and paste. > > 'printing to a text file' is not a normal 'printing' operation. > > Or even just file... save as... "Save As" is not printing. -- PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47

Re: [Evolution] orthographic checking

On Fri, 2002-03-08 at 15:26, Ben FrantzDale wrote: > On Fri, 2002-03-08 at 11:32, Rodolfo Pilas wrote: > > > > Can you tell me how to avoid orthographic checking? > > Cool word. > > Orthography Or*thog"ra*phy, n. OE. ortographie, OF. >orthographie, L. orthographia, Gr. ?, fr. ? writing >

[Evolution] SSL based services using DS floppy

Hi. I want to start using some SSL based services thru my Dachstein floppy (specifically: POP3 over SSL; IMAP over SSL; SMTP over SSL). That would be port 993, 995, and 465, respectively. I need to modify EXTERN_TCP_PORTS: EXTERN_TCP_PORTS="0/0_smtp 0/0_ftp 0/0_ssh 0/0_pop-3 0/0_imap2 0/0_www 0

Re: [Evolution] Error sending SMTP via SSL

On Sun, 2002-02-24 at 00:30, Michael Leone wrote: > > And the mail never gets sent. No do I see anything in any logs on > workhorse - nothing in the mail.log; syslog; etc. So I'm not sure where > I screwed up. Now I am ... I forgot a postfix configuration option. Now it

[Evolution] Error sending SMTP via SSL

I'm playing around with using SSL for SMTP (and eventually POP3). I use postfix as my local SMTP server. I made certificates for postfix, and told postfix about (I followed a HOWTO at http://www.aet.tu-cottbus.de/personen/jaenicke/pfixtls/doc/setup.html), and it all *seemed* to go OK. I got the s

Re: [Evolution] Problems sending mail

On Sat, 2002-02-16 at 19:05, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > Try configuring Evolution to not use authentication for SMTP and odds > are it will work because your postfix server doesn't support > authentication at all. As a default, no. However, postfix can be made to support SMTP authentication. --

Re: [Evolution] Addressbook has disappeared in 1.0.2 ? - RESOLVED

I ended up syncing my Palm III into Evolution. That made the missing Evo contacts come back, along with the Palm III entries. On Fri, 2002-02-15 at 00:41, Michael Leone wrote: > I had something weird just happen. I use a POP3 account. I then added a > IMAP account (I'm testing my own

[Evolution] Addressbook has disappeared in 1.0.2 ?

I had something weird just happen. I use a POP3 account. I then added a IMAP account (I'm testing my own mailserver). It seemed to add fine. Since I was testing, I screwed something up, and got an error in the IMAP account (broken pipe, I believe it was). I then removed the IMAP account from the

Re: [Evolution] Evo pilot conduits problems

On Tue, 2002-02-12 at 21:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > It wouldn't surprise me if the machine being used to > generate the RPM has PeterW's libtool 1.4 performance patch. > This is exactly what I see if I compile Evolution with this > patch installed (which by the way cuts the compile time dow

Re: [Evolution] Evo pilot conduits problems

On Tue, 2002-02-12 at 15:56, JP Rosevear wrote: > On Tue, 2002-02-12 at 14:57, Mike Leone wrote: > > > It looks like mandrake is not packaging the conduits, atleast not in the > > > evolution package. > > > > But I'm not using Mandrake's packaging of Evolution. > > > > [turgon@minas-aran turgon]

[Evolution] Evo pilot conduits problems

Hi. I'm setting up the conduits for my Palm III (yes, it's an old one). I go into gnomecc, and define my conduits. Some of them (not all) are giving me problems. Specifically, the Evo address conduit. I get "Unable to instantiate EAddress conduit". Since I'm running gnomecc from the command line,

Re: [Evolution] Auto response function?

On Sun, 2002-02-03 at 22:25, Steven Tryon wrote: > A very fine pop3 client for OS/2 and MS Windows. OK. But I want to stay with Evo. > > On Sun, 2002-02-03 at 22:16, Michael Leone wrote: > > On Sun, 2002-02-03 at 21:39, Steven Tryon wrote: > > > PMMail has "s

Re: [Evolution] Auto response function?

On Sun, 2002-02-03 at 21:39, Steven Tryon wrote: > PMMail has "send canned reply" as a filter action. I think something > like that is what you would need. What is PMMail - a different email client? -- -- Michael J. Leone

Re: [Evolution] Auto response function?

On Sun, 2002-02-03 at 21:00, Aaron Kemp wrote: > Maybe a filter action to send a message could solve this (and other) > things? There isn't such an action for filters, that I could see. That's why I asked. > > On Sun, 2002-02-03 at 19:01, Michael Leone wrote: > >

[Evolution] Auto response function?

Is there a way in Evo (i.e., not using procmail, etc) to have an autoresponse email? I use Evo's POP3 features to get my mail from my ISP, and don't want to change that. Is there any way to have a 'Your email received; I'm looking into it" response auto-generated? What would be even better is to b

Re: [Evolution] How do I tell Evolution what browser to use

On Fri, 2002-01-11 at 18:54, Michael Leone wrote: > On Fri, 2002-01-11 at 09:20, gene wrote: > > I set the default handler as follows and it works for me: > > > > defaultopera -newwindow "%s" > > Did that; mozilla still comes up. Do I need to restart th

Re: [Evolution] How do I tell Evolution what browser to use

On Fri, 2002-01-11 at 09:20, gene wrote: > I set the default handler as follows and it works for me: > > defaultopera -newwindow "%s" Did that; mozilla still comes up. Do I need to restart the Gnome program I'm clicking on the link in? > > > > On Fri, 2002-01-11 at 08:59, Mike Leo

[Evolution] Decryption problem

<20011227052118.IXUJ20715.femail25.sdc1.sfba.home.com@beethoven> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 26 Dec 2001 21:21:18 -0800 From: "Thomas Stavros" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Michael Leone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: encryption test III Date: Th

[Evolution] Header version incorrect?

I use Evolution 1.02 (the Mandrake Cooker release, dated Dec 13), and I noticed that it included the following header: X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0 (Preview Release) This is definitely a post-1.0 release. It's probably a minor glitch, but I just thought I'd mention it. -- -

Re: [Evolution] Deleting emails

On Mon, 2001-12-17 at 19:31, Neil Hodge wrote: > All: > > I can't "delete" emails (the little circle-x button is greyed out). I > can only mark for deletion, then expunge. How do I "delete" emails? Exactly as you're doing now. That's how Evo works - mark for deletion; expunge later. You could

Re: [Evolution] No new snapshots? - Solved for RC2 under Mandrake

On Thu, 2001-11-22 at 12:28, Manuel Borchers wrote: > Am Don, 2001-11-22 um 18.22 schrieb Michael Leone: > > OK. I presume that I only need the latest versions of the same 7 files > > as the snapshots - evolution, gal18, gal-devel-18, libgal18, gtkhtml16, > > gtkhtml-devel

Re: [Evolution] No new snapshots?

On Thu, 2001-11-22 at 12:28, Manuel Borchers wrote: > Am Don, 2001-11-22 um 18.22 schrieb Michael Leone: > > OK. I presume that I only need the latest versions of the same 7 files > > as the snapshots - evolution, gal18, gal-devel-18, libgal18, gtkhtml16, > > gtkhtml-devel

Re: [Evolution] No new snapshots?

On Thu, 2001-11-22 at 08:19, Manuel Borchers wrote: > Hi! > > Am Don, 2001-11-22 um 02.48 schrieb Michael Leone: > > Ah. But what about those of us who *can't* use RC. Me, for example - I > > use Mandrake 8.1, and RC doesn't support my distro. > > RC2 i

Re: [Evolution] No new snapshots?

On Wed, 2001-11-21 at 13:17, NotZed wrote: > > Nothing but RC packages are available, becuase we'd like to test them Ah. But what about those of us who *can't* use RC. Me, for example - I use Mandrake 8.1, and RC doesn't support my distro. -- --

Re: [Evolution] No new snapshots?

On Wed, 2001-11-21 at 12:44, Chris Tooley wrote: > I would imagine that bandwidth gets pretty expensive when you have > people downloading packages they already have installed, just so they > can get the "latest" snapshot. It doesn't really make any sense to keep > running rpm upgrades on package

Re: [Evolution] No new snapshots?

On Tue, 2001-11-20 at 22:08, JP Rosevear wrote: > On Tue, 2001-11-20 at 17:12, Michael Leone wrote: > > There don't seem to be any new snapshots since the 14th; that was just > > before RC2 came out. What's the scoop? I was using the snaps by > > manuallly FTPing

[Evolution] No new snapshots?

There don't seem to be any new snapshots since the 14th; that was just before RC2 came out. What's the scoop? I was using the snaps by manuallly FTPing them, since Red Carpet doesn't work for my distro. And the snapshot build status web page - http://primates.ximian.com/~snapshot - haven't been up

[Evolution] 2nd snapshot of 2001.10.31 now broke worse

The 2nd snapshot - 2001.10.31.2256 - won't even start for me. I don't even get a splash screen. (using RH 7 snaps on Mdk 8.1) If I start evolution-mail in 1 xterm, and evolution in another, I get a splash screen, but nothing more. Showing processes lists many of the evo threads - alarm-notify, bo

Re: [Evolution] Multiple POP retieve locks evo snap version 16.99200110311522

On Wed, 2001-10-31 at 16:19, Scott Comboni wrote: > Is anyone else having this problem? Seems since the RC1 snaps I have > had consistent lock ups when trying to retrieve email from 2 pop > accounts. It does not really lock just stops and you cannot close the > window or cancel. Strange. Second

[Evolution] Latest snapshots still require full Mozilla?

I tried to install the latest (2001.10.27) RH 7.1 snapshots, but failed, since they seem to require Mozilla 0.9.5, and I stillhave 0.9.4 (which came with my Mandrake 8.1). I thought Evo only required the libnss, and not the whole Mozilla. I can't use this snapshot, since the Mozilla 0.9.5 rpms fr

[Evolution] Problems with last 3 snapshots

The latest snapshot for RH 7 - snapshot 2001.10.24 - has the "disappearing toolbar" problem come back. Only this time, switching to a different folder, and then back to the original folder does *not* bring back the toolbar, like it did before. Also, the previous 2 snapshots seem to have a problem

[Evolution] Sent folder still showing up as bold in 2001.10.18 snapshot

The RH 7.0 snapshot still has the issue of the Sent folder listing the total number of sent items in bold in the folder list view. There is no count when you first open Evo, but as soon as you send an email, the number shows up in bold. I thought this had been fixed, or changed back to previous d

[Evolution] RH 7.1 snapshots?

Hi. The web page says that the snapshots for Red Hat 7.1 were built, but the evolution.rpm in the ftp directory is still the 2001.09.30 snapshot. Some of the other files (libgal13, etc) *do* have a later date. What's going on? Wasn't the main evo .rpm rebuilt? -- --

Re: [Evolution] How to use latest snapshots on Mandrake 8.1

On Mon, 2001-10-01 at 14:00, Ujwal S. Sathyam wrote: > RH 7.1 RPMs will work fine. And they are. Except that this snapshot seems to freeze up sometimes, especially when I'm deleting a series of messages, one after the other. -- --

Re: [Evolution] Still problems with unread counter in Sept 19thsnapshot - Fixed!

On Thu, 2001-09-20 at 00:23, Eric Lambart wrote: > Well, I AM using the 0918 snapshot so this bug may have just been > (re?)introduced since then... And seems to be fixed in the Sept 20th snapshot. Thanks all! -- -- Michael J. Le

Re: [Evolution] Still problems with unread counter in Sept 19thsnapshot

On Wed, 2001-09-19 at 23:51, Eric Lambart wrote: > With the 0918, the number is decreasing (just tried it once) but NOT > generally accurate, and all folders are missing the (##) until I click > on them. Mine is NOT decreasing at all. I downloaded new mail from my POP server; dialog box said 2

[Evolution] Still problems with unread counter in Sept 19th snapshot

I just updated from the Sept 13th snapshot to the Sept 19th snapshot, on RedHat 6.2. I'm now getting the new mail/unread mail indicator on the folder list again (yay!), but it is NOT decreasing when I read the new mail (boo!). Ah, well. Back to the old snapshot. -- --

[Evolution] Contacts still a bit screwy in snapshot Sept 13

I have a number of contacts, that I entered back around 0.11 (back when Evo started using db 3.x to manage contacts). I can access all of them, and send email to any contact. 1. I can not modify any existing contacts - it says "Error modifying list: Card not found". 2. I *can* add new cards. I *c

Re: [Evolution] RedHat 6.2 snapshots not pushed to ftp / RedCarpet

On Sun, 2001-09-16 at 18:24, Richard Bellavance wrote: > It seems that even though theRedHat 6.2 snapshots build ok, they don't > get to the FTP server or Red Carpet. The RH7 and Debian snapshots do > get there, though... > > Any idea what's wrong and when/if it will be fixed ? The RH 6.2 snaps

Re: [Evolution] Shortcuts and Folders List Not Showing Number ofNew Messages

On Sat, 2001-09-15 at 17:31, Eric Lambart wrote: > Please forgive me when I ask, who cares? Me, for one. :-) > Those numbers have NEVER been accurate anyway. Mine have always been accurate. But then, I don't use IMAP. -- --

Re: [Evolution] prefs all gone after latest snapshot

On 07 Jul 2001 11:21:34 -0400, Scott Leerssen wrote: > Shoot... sorry for the duplication of info. Is there a searchable > archive of this mailing list? http://lists.ximian.com, I believe. here's the email from July 3, announcing the change. -- We've ju

Re: [Evolution] prefs all gone after latest snapshot

On 07 Jul 2001 09:35:43 -0400, Scott Leerssen wrote: > I just loaded the latest snapshot from Red Carpet and it whacked all my > preferences (including mail server config!). It was announced on the list that this would happen, once the new snapshots started using the bonobo-conf (?) method of co

Re: [Evolution] Re: Wah! 200107060152 snapshot segfaults on startup.

> > That can't be right, can it ? (Looks on spidermonkey..). No definitely > not right... > > (some rpm-ing later) > > Much better. I guess a warning to us red-carpet folks is in order. Or > maybe my setup's just hosed... Makes me glad I manually install the snapshots via FTP, and not Red Carpet.

Re: [Evolution] delete mail should move to trash

> On 03 Jul 2001 08:44:28 -0400, Michael Leone wrote: > > > Check 'hide deleted mail' if you want this behaviour. > > > > Doesn't this still leave the deleted mail in the folder it was deleted from, > > taking up space there instead of a separate "

Re: [Evolution] delete mail should move to trash

- Original Message - From: "Mark Neill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 9:03 AM Subject: Re: [Evolution] delete mail should move to trash > > > > > Check 'hide deleted mail' if you want this behaviour. > > > > Doesn't this still leave the deleted

Re: [Evolution] delete mail should move to trash

> Check 'hide deleted mail' if you want this behaviour. Doesn't this still leave the deleted mail in the folder it was deleted from, taking up space there instead of a separate "Trash" folder? Since deleted mail seems not to go into the "Trash" folder, what is the "Trash" folder used for? (curre

Re: [Evolution] .IBEX file? UPDATE

On 16 Jun 2001 11:53:50 -0400, Michael Leone wrote: > Why would the index be close to twice as large as the file it's > indexing? I deleted/expunged many mails from this folder, and the mbox > size went from 3.3M down to the 2.59M you see above. Yet the .ibex file > size staye

Re: [Evolution] .IBEX file?

On 16 Jun 2001 01:25:38 -0400, Duncan Mak wrote: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 10:46:18PM -0400, Michael Leone wrote: > > Howdy all. > > > > What, exactly, is the .ibex file? I have (at least) one that's large > > than the mbox file. Is it some kind of index file

[Evolution] .IBEX file?

Howdy all. What, exactly, is the .ibex file? I have (at least) one that's large than the mbox file. Is it some kind of index file? -- -- Michael J. Leone Registered Linux user #201348

Re: [Evolution] Features

- Original Message - From: "Kjartan Maraas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Assuming they all have the same subject line. And I'd have to set up many > > vfolders, one for each person I'm corresponding with, to get this effect. > > > > While powerful, I don't think vfolders would be very well su

Re: [Evolution] Features

From: "Kjartan Maraas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Which really looks to be the same as a vfolder on subject. It just lists > all messages in all folders with the same subject. Assuming they all have the same subject line. And I'd have to set up many vfolders, one for each person I'm corresponding with

Re: [Evolution] Features

> On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 12:24:38PM +0200, thus said Marcel Schulte: > > >2. an option like "save replies together with received mail" > > You mean "threading"? That is an existing feature, it is toggled via the I wouldn't think that what he means. Suppose I filter mail from you to a folder

Re: [Evolution] Contact list missing - resolved

> I've just installed the new Evo 0.10 RPM from Red Carpet, and it is now > linked to DB 2. This looks like it should fix everyones Contact > problems! Is Evo going to stay with this version of DB from now on? Please God, let's hope so! Seems odd - I installed db3; had to re-enter all my cont

Re: [Evolution] Still no Contacts - gave up

On 20 May 2001 22:08:48 +0200, Kjartan Maraas wrote: > Den 20 May 2001 12:44:42 -0400, skrev Michael Leone: > > On 20 May 2001 10:48:14 -0400, Michael Leone wrote: > > > > > > If you're willing to wait a little while, CVS evolution will soon > > > &g

[Evolution] Still no Contacts

On 19 May 2001 08:40:34 -0400, Christopher James Lahey wrote: > Other than this, you should be fine to upgrade. I in fact discovered a > simpler way than has been described before. Try this: > > killev > cd ~/evolution/local/Contacts/ > cp addressbook.db addressbook.db.backup > db_upgrade ad

Re: [Evolution] Calendar and Contact problems

On 19 May 2001 10:56:33 -0700, Ujwal Sathyam wrote: > >Do I really need to upgrade glibc, which every program needs, in order > >to see my contacts? > > > > How about downloading and compiling the source for db3-utils? I have > found that in many cases, some newer RPM packages demand glibc2.2,

Re: [Evolution] Calendar and Contact problems

> > When I click on Contacts none of my existing contacts are visible. I > > believe this is a libdb problem. > > If you are using Evolution from CVS, there is a FAQ in it now. Please > check out the Troubleshooting section; it has an explanation of how to > upgrade your contacts db if it's ver

Re: [Evolution] Evolution 0.10 "Tasmanian Devil" is out

> > > The new package should be linked with the newer db library, so the > > > contacts should be visible again... > > > > I disagree with this - or we have different meanings to "newer". > > [snip] > > >From this evidence Evo 0.10 is using DB 1.85, which cannot read 2.x > > version files. > > I

Re: [Evolution] Cannot initialize the Evolution shell bug

On 14 May 2001 23:32:50 -0400, Wayne F Davis wrote: > > On 14 May 2001 21:27:33 -0400, Wayne F Davis wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'm running the latest gal, gtkhtml, evolution from anoncvs. I have > > > orbit-stable-0-5 from anoncvs. > > > > > > When starting evolution, i get a dialog box that s

Re: [Evolution] Cannot initialize the Evolution shell bug

On 14 May 2001 21:27:33 -0400, Wayne F Davis wrote: > Hi, > > I'm running the latest gal, gtkhtml, evolution from anoncvs. I have > orbit-stable-0-5 from anoncvs. > > When starting evolution, i get a dialog box that says: Cannot initialize > the Evolution shell. If i delete ~/evolution and sta

Re: [Evolution] very slow composition window creation

> I used to have this problem every now and again with Evolution until > some guys told me that it's an oafd problem. They suggested using the > following commands - "killev; killall oafd" when Evo is NOT loaded, then > reloading it. Evo works fine afterwards. > > What I do these days is to load

Re: [Evolution] inbox crash while checking mail

> Subject: inbox crash > > This is the stability problem that I reported earlier today. Evo simply > crashes while updating mail from the IMAP server. I don't have any debugging info, but my Evo has been crashing for a couple weeks, when it applies filters, after getting new POP mail. Not on e

[Evolution] When will there be new snapshots?

There haven't been any new snapshots for over a week. Any idea when they will start up again? I haven't been able to access my contacts in over a week, because of that incorrect db version linking issue. Auto-complete of addresses (since it can't access the database) also doesn't work. Nor can I

Re: [Evolution] Can't send mail: "could not parse URL 'druidwindow'"

On 02 May 2001 04:07:53 +0500, Dan Winship wrote: > > I'm using the snapshot of Evo from today (although I think this snapshot is a > > few days old?). > > Can you check the build date? (It's part of the version string that > appears in the title bar of the main evolution window.) Hmmm. Mine (fr

Re: [Evolution] Nightly snapshots for .10

Well, there hasn't been a new snapshot in 4 or 5 days - see http://primates.ximian.com/~snapshot/ - so even if you had the channel, you wouldn't have gotten a snapshot. You don't say what OS you're using; the nightly snapshots only show up for RH 6.2, RH 7.0 and debian. For me, since I run Mandra

Re: [Evolution] Pilot Conduits in Evolution 0.10

This won't activate the pilot coinduits, will it? I was under the impression thatthere's some command line parameter that must be passed to the compiler. This simply rebuilds the normal (i.e., non-conduit-enabled) version of Evolution, doesn't it? - Original Message - From: m

Re: [Evolution] Getting Evolution via RedCarpet - Mandrake 7.2?

On 27 Apr 2001 05:09:42 -0500, Aaron Zuercher wrote: > Hi Michael, > I just joined the Evo list, and caught the tail of this thread about > tricking Red-carpet to allow Mandrake to download Evo. I am running > Mandrake and would like more information on how to do this. Could you > please s

Re: [Evolution] Dep Error during install

Me not. :-) My Nautilus wouldn't install, because of the ORBit problem - I had 0.5.6, and RC didn't want to force an update to 0.5.7 (said my 0.5.6 was newer than the 0.5.7; goodness knows why, unless there was a bug in building one of those 2 packages). Anyway, I manually downloaded the new ORB

[Evolution] Snapshot question

I was looking at the Snapshot status page (http://primates.ximian.com/~snapshot/) and it seems very different - much fewer dependencies and builds (i.e., no bonobo, etc). Why is that? Also, does this mean that from now on, the snapshots will only work with Ximian Gnome 1.4, or will they continue

Re: [Evolution] Exchange Support?

> They have turned it off, and say that they will not turn it on. They > tell me that running POP3 and IMAP makes Exchange unstable... > I told them that installing Exchange makes it unstable they weren't > amused. So, back to my original question. Heh. Actually, I run both POP3 and IMAP o

Re: [Evolution] Snapshot Status

> On 19 Apr 2001 14:19:19 -0700, Miles Lane wrote: > > Will snapshots be made available for Mandrake-7? > > Not in the very short term. However, the RedHat 6.2 snapshots work and install fine on Mandrake 7.2. ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [Evolution] rebuild RC faild

> Hi ! > > As I miss redcarpet, I tried to rebuild it from the SRPM from > ftp.ximian.com. > However it didn't work: Mine did work this way. HOWEVER, the difference is that I manually uninstalled Red Carpet (rpm -e red-carpet), installed the latest Evo snapshot, THEN rebuilt Red Carpet from the S

Re: [Evolution] red carpet?

> On 18 Apr 2001 23:26:51 -0400, Michael Leone wrote: > > On 18 Apr 2001 19:17:32 -0700, Florin Andrei wrote: > > > > > > Is there any sensible explanation for the fact that the latest Evolution > > > build doesn't like Red Carpet? :-/ > > > >

Re: [Evolution] Exchange Support?

Evolutionsupports POP3and IMAP now. And POP (and, I believe, IMAP) support is on,by default, in a standard Exchange installation. So, assuming that they haven't turned off all POP3 and IMAP,or haven't turned it off on a user-by-user basis, you could probably use Evolution to connect to Excha

Re: [Evolution] howto run Evolution from other programs

> Hi there!! > > I was thinking of configuring Opera so that I could send email with > evolution when clicking on an email link on a webpage, I tried with > evolution (started a new evolution session) and evolution-mail (nothing > happened). Anyone know how to start evolution to get only a compose

Re: [Evolution] (no subject)

On 18 Apr 2001 22:27:12 -0500, Weiqi Gao wrote: > Having been downloading and using Evolution using Red Carpet for the > last three three months, I'm surprised today when updating to today's > Evolution update necessitates the removal of "red-carpet" itself. Red Carpet requires libgtkhtml.so.7, b

Re: [Evolution] 4.17 snapshot, can't compose

On 18 Apr 2001 22:38:53 -0400, Ettore Perazzoli wrote: > > JP has been working on fixing the snapshot builds... The current > snapshots *should* be working. (I have no way of testing this myself, > but the issues with the GtkHTML and GAL versions should be solved and > consequently the compos

  1   2   >