Yeah, that's a known bug, having to do with how evo deals with messages
that have not yet been loaded. It will probably not be fixed until 1.1,
as it will require some structural reworking to handle. I do not
remember the bug number offhand but you are welcome to attach your
thoughts and this imag
On 2 Nov 2001, George Farris wrote:
> This is just plain wrong. Gnome-print should show the queues that are
> on your machine so one can print with. One should almost never have to
> type a queue name in. Many home users have more than one printer.
>
> This small attention to detail is the stuf
I'd politely suggest that while I agree with you completely, George,
this is neither the time nor the place to kvetch about the limitations
of gnome-print in specific or unix printing in general.
Luis
On Fri, 2001-11-02 at 05:00, George Farris wrote:
> This is just plain wrong. Gnome-print shoul
Ah... so this is before the message itself loads?
Luis
On Fri, 2001-11-02 at 12:00, Mike Strock wrote:
> Chris brings up a good point here. Sorry for the confusion.
>
> To reproduce what I am seeing with the 'Add to Sender', I am on the main
> Evo window. I have the Folder pane shown, and no
On Fri, 2001-11-02 at 11:52, Mark Neill wrote:
> If a user is savvy enough to have set up multiple usable print queues, I
> expect they are savvy enough to append -Pqueuename to the lpr command to
> print to the non-default printer. But that's just my assumption
FWIW, there is a separate bug (ta
> Except that multiple queues is a good way to have multiple printer
> configurations (single- or double sided printing, color or B/W, and so
> on).
Agreed. But again, if a user has set up multiple queues, they know enough
to put -Pthis_printer_does_2up.
lpr to the default queue is sufficient
On Fri, 2001-11-02 at 09:10, Chris Tooley wrote:
> On Fri, 2001-11-02 at 11:00, Mike Strock wrote:
> > Chris brings up a good point here. Sorry for the confusion.
> >
> > To reproduce what I am seeing with the 'Add to Sender', I am on the main
> > Evo window. I have the Folder pane shown, and
This is just plain wrong. Gnome-print should show the queues that are
on your machine so one can print with. One should almost never have to
type a queue name in. Many home users have more than one printer.
This small attention to detail is the stuff that makes the desktop nice
to use for aver
On Fri, 2001-11-02 at 17:52, Mark Neill wrote:
> > o File...Print shows 'lpr' but doesn't show any of the queue names I've
> > set up using PrintTool. Shouldn't it, for consistency sake? For new
> > users, this would be confusing I believe. I want to print to my queue
> > LJ4, but all that is s
I tried to reproduce this as well, and couldn't get it to perform
badly. Could you send platform specifics? OS, if linux, which distro
...
Chris Tooley
On Fri, 2001-11-02 at 11:00, Mike Strock wrote:
> Chris brings up a good point here. Sorry for the confusion.
>
> To reproduce what I am s
> o File...Print shows 'lpr' but doesn't show any of the queue names I've
> set up using PrintTool. Shouldn't it, for consistency sake? For new
> users, this would be confusing I believe. I want to print to my queue
> LJ4, but all that is shown is 'lpr'. If I print to the 'lpr', it *does*
> pr
Chris brings up a good point here. Sorry for the confusion.
To reproduce what I am seeing with the 'Add to Sender', I am on the main
Evo window. I have the Folder pane shown, and no messages currently
open. I right click on one of the messages in the list, and one of the
menu selections is '
On Fri, 2001-11-02 at 10:34, Mike Strock wrote:
>
> o Right click on a message, say 'Add Sender to Address Book' - Doesn't
> add anything to the address book or Contacts
>
I right clicked on your name to test this and it brought up a window for
a quick second and then dumped it back behind the ma
13 matches
Mail list logo
