Ok, then if 'scripting' is intented to be implemented for such reasons,
then it makes perfectly sense. Customization language for evolution will
improve it for sure. Then anybody could write it's own extensions to it.
Hey, that's great!:) You got me in for that!
cozy
PS. quite the same idea is
consensus is not a source of software excellence.
>
>--JPK
>
>On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 12:58:21AM +0200, Costin Cozan wrote:
>
>
>>that's exactly why we should vote. What is the most used ( or
>>preferred) scripting language/system for evolution users?
>>wh
Dear Jeff,
before we start ranting about OOP and programming, we should make clear
some points.
If somebody wants scripting, then we should use a scripting language,
which at most is an interpreted language, not compiled.
If somebody wants scripting, he knows what he is doing, so even Perl
wo
Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
>On Fri, 2002-08-30 at 19:27, Andrew E. Page wrote:
>
>
>>On Fri, 2002-08-30 at 13:45, Roberto Moral wrote:
>>
>>
>>>what about ruby? :)
>>>easy to learn, easy to code, OOP
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> For the record, perl does OOP as well.
>>
>>
>
>So does C
>
>
, 2002-08-30 at 14:04, Costin Cozan wrote:
>
>
>>You mean that Java like language from Microsoft? Maybe will be known as
>>name, but on Unix/Linux platform hard to guess that is really used by
>>somebodyand thus having experience
>>
>>
>
>Tha
You mean that Java like language from Microsoft? Maybe will be known as
name, but on Unix/Linux platform hard to guess that is really used by
somebodyand thus having experienceAnd i believe that any
incidental user on this platform has the minimum in Perl knowledge.
So, maybe we do a vo
#x27;Odp:' make no sense to me.
Just my oppinion.
peace,
Costin Cozan
Kenneth Rohde Christiansen wrote:
>Well, since English and many other germanic languages are heavily based
>on Old Norse (from the Anglo Saxons/Vikings time) aswell as Latin (from
>when the Normans conguered Eng
o. I used a lot, and basically to insert
something from the contents of email into a database. for example .
Is that what you want? :)
Peace,
Costin Cozan
___
evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
t;
see also my ldap backend for calendaring proposal (12 emails backwards
on the list). what do you think?
In case you can't read that i will forward it to you.
peace,
Costin Cozan
___
evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.x
Dan Winship wrote:
>On Mon, 2002-04-29 at 11:46, Costin Cozan wrote:
>
>>hi,
>>
>>did anyone of you had the idea to write a ldap backend for anything else
>>than addressbook?
>>
>>I just keep thinking of a such backend for calendar, having the data
s and solutions.
peace,
Costin Cozan
PS. cheers to Stefan and Roland ;)
___
evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
I am already reading my mail from three places. I use both POP and
IMAP, evolution, pine and mozilla-mail ( under windows) . I think
Outlook fits too. I just use POP as the final one, it simply saves the
email in a safe place. For the rest IMAP does it's best job.
peace,
Costin
PSand i al
choose how to authenticate, with email or a DN. if i have time i will explore this too.
regards,
Costin Cozan
13 matches
Mail list logo
