> Install Date: Mon 20 Jul 2009 06:45:36 PM EST Build Host:
> x86-3.fedora.phx.redhat.com
> on fedora 10 X86_64.
> I can't find mapi for this evolution version. some suggest using
> brutus server. I can't find how to set up this?
> any help?
Brutus will not help you. Brutus allows you to cal
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 00:54 -0400, B. Joshua Rosen wrote:
> Evolution has been essentially unusable for almost a year. I'm still on
> Fedora 9 because it has Evolution 2.22 which is the last working
> release, they wemt to SQLite after that which completely broke the
> virtual folders.
I'm using
On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 23:12 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> Le lundi 05 octobre 2009 à 22:31 +0200, Xavier Bestel a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm using Evo 2.28 on Debian, and I just tried to setup a WebDAV server
> > to hold my contacts (apache 2.2.9 + mod_dav). My WebDAV server seems to
> > work (at
El mié, 07-10-2009 a las 09:28 +, Philipp Kubina escribió:
> I am working with Evolution for a month now (Ubuntu 9.04, Evolution
> 2.26.1) and the instability is terrible (multiple crashes every day).
> Looking at the bug reports from other users I can see that I am not the
> only one having
I hope the vfolders fix is a priority, it's a complete show stopper for
any user who has a large number of stored messages. When can we expect a
fix?
Josh
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 12:09 +0530, Chenthill wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 00:54 -0400, B. Joshua Rosen wrote:
> > Evolution has been essenti
nome.org
> > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
>
>
>
--
B. Joshua Rosen, VP
Polybus Systems Corp
23 Providence Rd
Westford, MA 01886
Phone: (978) 692-4828
Cell: (978) 828-0944
FAX: (978) 692-7557
___
E
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 07:00 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> Obviously there is, the Bonobo-free branch was just trunked. I imagine
> [don't know] that such infrastructure work consumed a fair amount of
> resources.
It did: a full year, off and on.
Also, we've suffered a significant loss of m
> > > > ___
> > > > Evolution-list mailing list
> > > > Evolution-list@gnome.org
> > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
> >
> >
> >
> --
> B. Joshua Rosen, VP
> Polybus Systems Corp
> 23 Providence Rd
> Westford,
Bug 550414 has been a problem since 2.24; and is still a problem in
2.27. It is an absolute show stopper, and it has caused me to move off
of Evolution.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=550414
I apologize for the top post. Most of the world top posts; and I could
not immediate find
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 10:07 -0400, B. Joshua Rosen wrote:
> Version 2.22 crashes once a day on Fedora 9, it's not just an Ubuntu
> problem.
[Once again: please don't top-post on this list]
Maybe you should update Fedora. You do realize that F9 is no longer
supported don't you? I use Evo 2.26.3 o
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 09:04 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 07:00 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> > Obviously there is, the Bonobo-free branch was just trunked. I imagine
> > [don't know] that such infrastructure work consumed a fair amount of
> > resources.
>
> It did: a
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 07:15 -0700, Dave Jewett wrote:
> I apologize for the top post. Most of the world top posts; and I
> could
> not immediate find the section of my email client to reconfigure it
> for
> this specific email.
The page down or arrow down button should move your cursor to the b
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 07:15, Dave Jewett wrote:
> I apologize for the top post. Most of the world top posts;
bg:
Which simply demonstrates that the world is mostly made up
of the clueless and care-less.
dave:
> and I could not immediate find the section of my email client
> to reconfigure it
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 09:28 +, Philipp Kubina wrote:
> I am working with Evolution for a month now (Ubuntu 9.04, Evolution
> 2.26.1) and the instability is terrible (multiple crashes every day).
Unfortunately Ubuntu 9.04 uses a quite old version of Evolution 2.26
(namely 2.26.1).
However t
Not sure why you state that this is not allowed
-- See remainder of post sent via Tbird at bottom.
Dave Jewett wrote:
> Thanks for your feedback.
>
> I am using Thunderbird. It has a method to configure for either top or
> bottom post on replies. But the placement of the configuration option
>
I have to say - this thread has given me more laughs than any I've
gotten from a mailing list since I used to be on the EDM one back in the
late 90s. Bravo!
-
Benjamin May
Sr. Research Analyst
+(212) 851-4772
ma...@columbia.edu
___
Evolution-list
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 07:15 -0700, Dave Jewett wrote:
> Bug 550414 has been a problem since 2.24;
I don't deny there is a problem but something specific is causing it to
manifest for you as I use 2.24 all day every day and have never seen
that error.
Ah! It is a POP3 and/or Trash bug, never mi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oh please!
Piss off!
The day that how one formats a response to an email is some measure of
the quality of the individual writing it and the value of that response
is the day I go back to a yellow pad and pencil.
Yikes!
Chuck...
bg wrote:
> On Thu
> The way most emailers default in the reply edit mode is to position
> your cursor at the top of the original. The reason this is done
> is apparently, unaccountably, non-obvious to millions of the
> NetNewbies of the past several years. The reason it positions that
> way is to encourage the user
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 09:22 -0600, Charles J Killian wrote:
> Oh please!
>
> Piss off!
>
> The day that how one formats a response to an email is some measure of
> the quality of the individual writing it and the value of that
> response
> is the day I go back to a yellow pad and pencil.
>
> Yik
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 11:28 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 09:22 -0600, Charles J Killian wrote:
> > Oh please!
> > Piss off!
> > The day that how one formats a response to an email is some measure of
> > the quality of the individual writing it and the value of that
> > respon
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 8:28 AM, Reid Thompson wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 09:22 -0600, Charles J Killian wrote:
>> The day that how one formats a response to an email is some measure of
>> the quality of the individual writing it and the value of that
>> response
>> is the day I go back to a ye
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 08:42:57AM -0700, David L wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 8:28 AM, Reid Thompson wrote:
> > yellow pads are not acceptable, only white or off-white will be
> > considered valid forms of communication.
>
> evolution's yellow-pad-connector crashes too frequently.
> That probl
> > yellow pads are not acceptable, only white or off-white will be
> > considered valid forms of communication.
> evolution's yellow-pad-connector crashes too frequently.
Oh, Oh Tomboy integration! Sweet.
I'm not worried, it will never crash for me. For whatever reason
[seriously] my syste
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 08:12, Ben May wrote:
> I have to say - this thread has given me more laughs than any I've
> gotten from a mailing list since I used to be on the EDM one back in the
> late 90s. Bravo!
bg:
Likewise. I can't believe there are so many people who think you
have to "reconfigure"
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 08:22, Charles J Killian wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Oh please!
>
> Piss off!
>
> The day that how one formats a response to an email is some measure of
> the quality of the individual writing it and the value of that response
> is the day I
Brewster Gillett:
> > The way most emailers default in the reply edit mode is to position
> > your cursor at the top of the original. The reason this is done
> > is apparently, unaccountably, non-obvious to millions of the
> > NetNewbies of the past several years. The reason it positions that
> >
Hi Charles,
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 09:22 -0600, Charles J Killian wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Oh please!
>
> Piss off!
>
> The day that how one formats a response to an email is some measure of
> the quality of the individual writing it and the value of that resp
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 9:08 AM, bg wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 08:12, Ben May wrote:
>
> Likewise. I can't believe there are so many people who think you
> have to "reconfigure" an email program in order to move the cursor
> anywhere you want :-)
In all seriousness though, in the last year or s
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 09:48, David L wrote:
> This only happens with
> certain emails... these emails get a little dotted box around
> the text of the original message whenever I click anywhere
> in the message. Any ideas?
bg:
I wish I knew an answer to that, but I doubt there is one.
As near as
>
> In all seriousness though, in the last year or so, evolution
> won't let me position the cursor in the middle of a
> reply and hit return without making it look like my
> inserted text is part of the original message... ie, it adds
> a ">" at the beginning of each line so I can't interleave
>
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 09:48 -0700, David L wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 9:08 AM, bg wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 08:12, Ben May wrote:
> > Likewise. I can't believe there are so many people who think you
> > have to "reconfigure" an email program in order to move the cursor
> > anywhere you
> I believe there is new composer in the pipeline for Evo - but I don't
> know if it will be any better at dealing with HTML. The answer is, of
> course for no one to use HTML in emails - but then people wouldn't be
> able to have their cutesy little pictures and oh so clever formatting.
Most peo
Hell List,
I have tried to setup a Webdav group calendar and use it with Apache -
fails.
I also tried to setup/create a Caldav calendar on the same server - not
using Apache - fails.
Does anyone have a setup for a group calendar using Apache or other
application that evolution can R/W to and sh
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 10:02 -0700, bg wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 09:48, David L wrote:
> > This only happens with
> > certain emails... these emails get a little dotted box around
> > the text of the original message whenever I click anywhere
> > in the message. Any ideas?
>
> bg:
>
> I wish
> > On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 09:48, David L wrote:
> > > This only happens with
> > > certain emails... these emails get a little dotted box around
> > > the text of the original message whenever I click anywhere
> > > in the message. Any ideas?
> >
> > bg:
> >
> > I wish I knew an answer to that,
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 18:09 -0700, bg wrote:
>
> Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
>
> > I've found that for multi-part messages, if instead of clicking
> > 'Reply' (or 'Reply to all'), you select the text of the message and then
> > click the appropriate button, it replies properly to the text, meaning
> > no do
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 03:48:55PM -0400, Steven Sprague wrote:
> I have tried to setup a Webdav group calendar and use it with Apache -
> fails.
> I also tried to setup/create a Caldav calendar on the same server - not
> using Apache - fails.
>
> Does anyone have a setup for a group calendar usi
38 matches
Mail list logo
