On Sat, 2022-10-15 at 18:49 +0200, Francesco Porro via evolution-list
wrote:
> I don't know if it's worth to file a bug because that only happened
> with yahoo imap and mail filters I set up for my malinglist.
Hi,
reproducibility is crucial. Without it bugs like this one are not that
Il giorno lun, 10/10/2022 alle 22.36 +0200, Francesco Porro via
evolution-list ha scritto:
> And now the problem *seems* gone.
>
> I'll wait some days before saying my last word. Finger crossed. 爛️
Well, after a week or so, it really seems the bug is gone and Evolution
is working well with my
Il giorno lun, 10/10/2022 alle 10.04 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-
list ha scritto:
> On Sat, 2022-10-08 at 00:28 +0200, Francesco Porro via evolution-list
> wrote:
> > but instead it could depend to the Imap implementation made by Yahoo
> >
>
> Hey,
> I have a Yahoo account, a very
On Fri, 2022-10-07 at 23:32 +0200, Dan Kortschak via evolution-list
wrote:
> This has been with the Proton IMAP bridge and I suspect that this is
> a a problem with that causing confusion.
Hi,
Proton Mail Bridge does have such problem, unfortunately:
On Sat, 2022-10-08 at 00:28 +0200, Francesco Porro via evolution-list
wrote:
> but instead it could depend to the Imap implementation made by Yahoo
>
Hey,
I have a Yahoo account, a very low traffic, and I did not notice any
such problem with them. I use server-side filtering with them,
Il giorno sab, 08/10/2022 alle 00.28 +0200, Francesco Porro via
evolution-list ha scritto:
> 4) I have the suspect that this bug is not dependent to the
> distribution of Evolution mail (native vs flatpak) but instead it
> could
> depend to the Imap implementation made by Yahoo which, I guess, is
On Sat, 2022-10-08 at 15:57 +0200, Jaroslaw Rafa via evolution-list wrote:
> Dnia 8.10.2022 o godz. 02:31:32 Steve Litt pisze:
> >
> > Or you could do what I do and install Dovecot IMAP server on your computer,
> > and
> > use
> > fetchmail to grab from Yahoo and procmail to drop each message
On Fri, 2022-10-07 at 17:16 -0500, Anonymous Japhering wrote:
> The flatpak version ( 3.46.0 by Flathub.org ) is currently so unstable
> on Linux Mint 20.3 Una - that it is basically unusable. I'm blessed if
> I get 5 minutes of work before it segfaults and shuts down. So far, I've
> logged 6
Dnia 8.10.2022 o godz. 02:31:32 Steve Litt pisze:
>
> Or you could do what I do and install Dovecot IMAP server on your computer,
> and use
> fetchmail to grab from Yahoo and procmail to drop each message into the proper
> Dovecot IMAP Maildir folder. All your filters would be in procmail
Il giorno sab, 08/10/2022 alle 01.40 +0100, Pete Biggs ha scritto:
> I think you should still put the number of concurrent connections to
> '1' - some IMAP server implementations seem to not like multiple
> connections. It looks like each connection can retrieve different
> things as if there is
On Sat, 2022-10-08 at 00:28 +0200, Francesco Porro via evolution-list wrote:
> 4) I have the suspect that this bug is not dependent to the
> distribution of Evolution mail (native vs flatpak) but instead it could
> depend to the Imap implementation made by Yahoo which, I guess, is not
> strictly
>
> 4) I have the suspect that this bug is not dependent to the
> distribution of Evolution mail (native vs flatpak) but instead it could
> depend to the Imap implementation made by Yahoo which, I guess, is not
> strictly RFC compliant. But I'd need to move to another mail provider
> to prove
Thanks to all the participants. Replying in random order:
1) Changing server type (imap > POP) is simply out of discussion.
Thunderbird works generally well but it displays some kind of weird
behavior under some circumstances with Gmail (i.e. not able to dl
attachments), but nothing like this
On 10/7/22 16:08, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Fri, 2022-10-07 at 18:31 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
IIUC you are asking for an option to rebuild the folder tree, hence
I
suspect you are using IMAP accounts. It's one of the reasons for me
to
stay with POP accounts, since those are completely free
On Fri, 2022-10-07 at 22:08 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Agreed. I too have a number of IMAP-based accounts and several
> clients
> for them on different devices and platforms, including Evolution. I
> have never seen an issue such as the OP describes. My guess would be
> that there is some
On Fri, 2022-10-07 at 18:31 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > IIUC you are asking for an option to rebuild the folder tree, hence
> > I
> > suspect you are using IMAP accounts. It's one of the reasons for me
> > to
> > stay with POP accounts, since those are completely free from such
> > maintenance
On Fri, 2022-10-07 at 18:31 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
>
> I think that's tremendously unfair. I've used IMAP based accounts for
> many, many years and never had any issues with them. They are
> infinitely more workable when you use more than one client - I
> currently have something like 10
>
> IIUC you are asking for an option to rebuild the folder tree, hence I
> suspect you are using IMAP accounts. It's one of the reasons for me to
> stay with POP accounts, since those are completely free from such
> maintenance work on almost all MUAs, while there isn't a day without
> similar
Hi,
IIUC you are asking for an option to rebuild the folder tree, hence I
suspect you are using IMAP accounts. It's one of the reasons for me to
stay with POP accounts, since those are completely free from such
maintenance work on almost all MUAs, while there isn't a day without
similar IMAP
I'm using Evolution again after years and I'm noticing a strange bug.
First, I have to say that I (manually, sob) set up several filters for
my mailinglist. They are working as aspected. Evolution moves mails
following the filter rules (I use to match the "list-id" header) to a
specific folder on
20 matches
Mail list logo
