RE: AVAPI virus-scan preventing Brick-level backups

2001-12-12 Thread Andy David
You're new here arent ya? Exchange Nirvana: 1. Check FAQ and Archives for reams of info. 2. Full Online Exch aware backups. 3. Have a recovery server at the ready. 4. Suitable DIR for your situation. 5. NTBACKUP. (The price is right) 6. Beers with Missy. Andy -Original Message- Fr

RE: NT 4.0 Exchange Server with Win2000 PDC & Active Directory

2001-12-12 Thread Devin Heese
No we tested it twice in a completely replicated/separate domain and had 0 problems. When we did it on the real domain we ran into the problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Neil Hobson Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 6:43 AM To: E

RE: AVAPI virus-scan preventing Brick-level backups

2001-12-12 Thread Chris Scharff
The archives and FAQs cover that more extensively than Mr. David could ever hope to in a single post. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! > -Original Message- > From: Devin Heese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday,

RE: AVAPI virus-scan preventing Brick-level backups

2001-12-12 Thread Ludwig, Mark
I absolutely agree with you and I've suggested the Ed Crowley Never Restore method. However I work for a small company and the owners name is on the building and he wants to be able to get back one piece of mail that someone deleted six months ago if they decide they want it back. We are talking a

RE: AVAPI virus-scan preventing Brick-level backups

2001-12-12 Thread Devin Heese
Don't give us half the story, tell us what would be better than BLB's and ArcServe... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AVAPI virus-scan preventing

RE: extension smtp cannot be loaded

2001-12-12 Thread Hansen, Eric
Is groupshield involved in this setup? -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 7:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: extension smtp cannot be loaded Have you applied SP4 to your workstation as well? -Origina

RE: Exchange Backup

2001-12-12 Thread Chris Hyche
The variable is because we wanted the backup date in the label. This problem was occurring before it was ever added. The running is intermittent, some days it works some days it don't. Audio International Chris Hyche MIS Technician Phone: (501) 801-0457 Fax: (501) 801-0421 www.audiointl.com --

RE: OWA Crashing...know cause!!!

2001-12-12 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
I'm running ScanMail 3.02. I have it set to delete the attachment if it's infected. I don't see an option to delete the actual message. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE:

Microsoft Exchange Setup Editor

2001-12-12 Thread Marc
Does anybody know where I can get Microsoft Exchange Setup Editor? It is not on my 5.5 CD. Marc _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp

RE: extension smtp cannot be loaded

2001-12-12 Thread Soysal, Serdar
Have you applied SP4 to your workstation as well? -Original Message- From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 5:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: extension smtp cannot be loaded Hoping someone has run into this before. I am receiving "ex

RE: AVAPI virus-scan preventing Brick-level backups

2001-12-12 Thread Soysal, Serdar
Well, the real solution to your problem is 1. Stop doing brick level backups 2. Get rid of ArghServe 3. Buy CommVault Galaxy to do backups. Their product provides real item level recovery and also supports restores 4. Upgrade ScanMail to 3.6 and use ESE scanning. If this is too much to do right

RE: AVAPI virus-scan preventing Brick-level backups

2001-12-12 Thread Andy David
1. Dont do BLBs. 2. Dump Arcserve. 3. Pat yourself on the back afterwards. Andy -Original Message- From: Ludwig, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AVAPI virus-scan preventing Brick-level backups Hi all, I am

RE: OWA Crashing...know cause!!!

2001-12-12 Thread Martin Blackstone
Ummm, how about deleting the message? -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 7:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Crashing...know cause!!! Exchange 5.5 SP4 I finally figured out what is causing our I

OWA Crashing...know cause!!!

2001-12-12 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Exchange 5.5 SP4 I finally figured out what is causing our IIS to stop on our OWA servers. I had a user that received a message that was infected with the "WORM_BADTRANS.B" virus (attachment "HAMSTER.DOC.pif"). ScanMail caught the virus and deleted the attachment. Now if the user gets into OWA

AVAPI virus-scan preventing Brick-level backups

2001-12-12 Thread Ludwig, Mark
Hi all, I am having a problem that includes several apps and I hope someone has seen a similar issue. The list of products involved: NT Server 4.0 Cluster Server SP 6a Exchange Server 5.5 SP 4 ArcServeIT 6.61 SP 2a Trend ScanMail for Exchange 3.52 Problem: Since switching ScanMail to run in A

RE: Calender sync

2001-12-12 Thread Chris Scharff
Set NoOST=3 in the registry. -Original Message- From: Kiran, Murat To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 12/12/2001 7:35 AM Subject: Calender sync Folks, Another interesting problem. Calender Sync btw client (notebook) and server is not going good. The other users who has access to these calen

Encrypted Emails - XP?

2001-12-12 Thread Hansen, Eric
Hi I had a Dev group get XP OS and Outlook XP on their systems and they seem to have lost the ability to send encrypted emails through the KMserver on our exchange site(not sending external). Anyone running XP? Any ideas? I'm not entirely convinced that it's a Outlook problem, I had to disabl

RE: [Exchange2000] Exchange management service

2001-12-12 Thread Ian Moran
Discussed in the Release Notes. Ian Moran Konnexion Ltd > -Original Message- > From: George Vijay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 12 December 2001 14:38 > To: Exchange Discussions (E-mail); Exchange2000 (E-mail) > Subject: [Exchange2000] Exchange management service > > > Hi All, >

RE: firewall problem

2001-12-12 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
there is a KB about that i think, have a search > > Hi, > Does anyone know about the original question which was why > exchange on Win2K > changes its ports and how it can be stopped? > many thanks > Vanessa > > -Original Message- > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > S

RE: firewall problem

2001-12-12 Thread Watkins V
Hi, Does anyone know about the original question which was why exchange on Win2K changes its ports and how it can be stopped? many thanks Vanessa -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 December 2001 13:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: firewall pro

Calender sync

2001-12-12 Thread Kiran, Murat
Folks, Another interesting problem. Calender Sync btw client (notebook) and server is not going good. The other users who has access to these calenders see only dark higlighted days but when they try to see what is planned , it is empty. Replacing .ost file, recreating new profile or mailbox dont

RE: firewall problem

2001-12-12 Thread Couch, Nate
What about monitoring of those servers in the DMZ? Do you use PerfMon to check queues or critical processes? If so, what ports are needed there if your monitoring workstation is on the other side of the DMZ? Or do you simply use some kind of paging system when it reaches a threshold? Nate Couc

RE: OWA 5.5 - W2K

2001-12-12 Thread Wohlgemuth, Mike
Thanks, I will keep this in mind ... when it happens again ... I ended up removing (physically and uninstalling) the exchng/webdata folder ... reinstalling ... and everything works fine ... Mike >-Original Message- >From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, Dec

RE: NDR for Calender meeting

2001-12-12 Thread Kiran, Murat
Soory for my late reaction. I think we are about to solve this problem. When i made a second mailbox for the same user and tested it then i dont recieve any NDR. Now the Q is what will happen when i remove it again. I ll see it tonight. And after i remove it i ll try inconsistency check, DS/IS i

RE: Mail Gateway antivirus for serveral domains (MX)

2001-12-12 Thread Cook, David A.
MailMarshal is also easily capable of this. Dave -Original Message- From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 3:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mail Gateway antivirus for serveral domains (MX) Hi My customer need a antivirus gate

RE: firewall problem

2001-12-12 Thread Brent Hudson
Too risky IMHO.. 80 25 & 110 only over here I'm afraid.. B --Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 December 2001 02:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: firewall problem you mean if they spoofed the IP address? well our PIX takes care of that, to

RE: firewall problem

2001-12-12 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
thanks for the information > -Original Message- > From: Olds, Dominic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 12 December 2001 11:55 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: firewall problem > > > Any open port is a potential security risk. This risk > increases with the > amount you

RE: firewall problem

2001-12-12 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
you mean if they spoofed the IP address? well our PIX takes care of that, to a point > -Original Message- > From: Brent Hudson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 12 December 2001 12:00 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: firewall problem > > > How would you know if the hosts

RE: NT 4.0 Exchange Server with Win2000 PDC & Active Directory

2001-12-12 Thread Neil Hobson
And then: now-we-are-for-it.com -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 12 December 2001 12:32 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: NT 4.0 Exchange Server with Win2000 PDC & Active Directory Subject: RE: NT 4.0 Exchange Server with Win2000 PDC

RE: NT 4.0 Exchange Server with Win2000 PDC & Active Directory

2001-12-12 Thread Andy David
Please note new name change: We-Were-It.com. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 11:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NT 4.0 Exchange Server with Win2000 PDC & Active Directory So you just went and did this without

RE: firewall problem

2001-12-12 Thread Brent Hudson
How would you know if the hosts attached (seeming to be specified) are actually the hosts you specified? .. you would not. B -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 December 2001 01:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: firewall problem i'd like

RE: firewall problem

2001-12-12 Thread Olds, Dominic
Any open port is a potential security risk. This risk increases with the amount you "open up" on your firewall. Personally, I would only ever allow SMTP traffic to an (relay protected) exchange box inside a firewall. Anything else and I would relay from a box sitting in the DMZ (for smtp, OWA etc

RE: firewall problem

2001-12-12 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
i'd like to open our exchange server through the firewall, but my boss thinks this is a 'massive security risk'. i think if i open it just to specified hosts, then that would be ok. what does anyone else think? dan. > -Original Message- > From: Watkins V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Se

firewall problem

2001-12-12 Thread Watkins V
Dear all, I have several exchange servers which work fine through a firewall except one, using the TechNet recommended ports for DS and IS of 1300 and 1301 respectively. The one that doesn't work is one which is running Win2K. The others run NT4. I have set the ports to 1300 and 1301 in the re

RE: Upgrade to Exchange 2000

2001-12-12 Thread Neil Hobson
The ADC is hard-coded to convert DLs to UDGs, which are upgraded as needed by the store.exe process to USGs. The USGs can't exist in a mixed mode domain. A problem if you use DLs for public folder permissions! Neil -Original Message- From: Amit Zinman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted

RE: extension smtp cannot be loaded

2001-12-12 Thread Joyce, Louis
The version conflict that it talks about is after you have migrated to a new server. Seeings as though you don't say you have migrated, and it has 'just started' it more likely seems as though it could be something else. If a reboot doesn't help, remove the IMS and install it again. Obviously thi

RE: Upgrade to Exchange 2000

2001-12-12 Thread Amit Zinman
It can be done in mixed mode. There are some limitation with distribution list permission. Do you have Technet or Internet access? Amit Zinman Project Manager and Systems Consultant Professional Services Group Getronics (Israel) Tel: +972-3-5127306 Mobile: +972-53-570139 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<    1   2   3