RE: Forwarding

Blackberry Enterprise software takes about 10min to get setup and running, or he could install it on his own system. If its on his system, it will only work when it is on, which makes it a bad idea in my book. Have fun Jeff -Original Message- From: Wolf, Alan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] S

RE: Forwarding

You would create a custom recipient for his blackberry "mailbox". Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Wolf,

RE: Exchange 5.5 rules

Yea.me too! -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 5:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 rules Just checked and you're right; I'm really not a client guy. - Original Message - From: "Andy

RE: Forwarding

The Blackberry has it's own redirector software. Either Enterprise or...whatever they call the "Personal" version. You don't need to do any forwarding; just install and configure the redirector and it will take care of it. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Serv

RE: A Little Exchange and ISA problem

No but that is what I would like the system to do. Set up ISA so port 25 goes in and out line 1 and port 80 and 443 comes in on line 2 Is this the way to go though? -Original Message- From: Sakti Chakravarty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 7 February 2002 12:46 PM To: Exchan

RE: Forwarding

I should have been more explicit. We are running Exchange 5.5 sp4 on NT4 SP6. One of my colleagues wants to forward mail to a Blackberry supposedly, however that works and wants the mail sent off of the Exchange box as I understand it. Alan L. Wolf MCSE, MCP, MCP + I PO Box B Bldg 458 Frederick,

RE: Browsing an AD Win2K Domain + Scanmail for E2k

Scanmail doesn't touch anything but Exchange mail data. If you were referring to a file-based AV product, well I'd agree that it could do just about anything. I think it's a red herring. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PS

RE: Trend Micro eManager 5.1 for E2K

I've used it but I would hope that we would talk "online" so that everyone on the list could benefit. What would you like to know? Terry -Original Message- From: Steve Iadarola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 5:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Trend

RE: A Little Exchange and ISA problem

Your MX record SHOULD be pointing at the permanent IP of line 1 -- that way the mail always gets sent to that address, which is where you say you want it. Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.

RE: Browsing an AD Win2K Domain + Scanmail for E2k

Supposedly, having some server-based antivirus programs can cause browsing not to function properly. I don't know but I'm going to shut down my mail servers in the wee hours of the am & start the services slowly to see what happens. I just know I'm sick of this & need it working. T -Orig

Off Topic --> Ms Proxy 2.0 and WinSock security

Hi All, In MS proxy, you can select the Winsock properties and under security, set the domain that users are / are not allowed to visit... I want to know where this information is stored once entered EG winset.txt or ini or in the registry? I have

RE: A Little Exchange and ISA problem

Have you set up ISA server rules for the second IP address (interface)? -Original Message- From: Roger Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 7 February 2002 12:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A Little Exchange and ISA problem No MX record is pointing to the permanent

RE: A Little Exchange and ISA problem

No MX record is pointing to the permanent IP -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 7 February 2002 12:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A Little Exchange and ISA problem I suspect your ISP is pointing the DNS address of the server to th

RE: NDR Report new one for me.

That's probably what happened. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Wednesday, February 06,

RE: OT - BlackBerry Enterprise Server

No problem here either... Gerald -Original Message- From: WAISEL, HAROLD B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 4:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT - BlackBerry Enterprise Server Has anyone installed the BES 2.1 Service Pack 2 for Exchange, and did yo

NDR Report new one for me.

I got this report this evening. Never saw it before. Guessing someone from an AOL account was trying to relay off me or spam.Note: The sender was <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> TIA This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. [EMA

RE: A Little Exchange and ISA problem

I suspect your ISP is pointing the DNS address of the server to the other line when it dials up. I believe you'll have to get your ISP to deal with this. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Ori

RE: A Little Exchange and ISA problem

No It just queues and is delivered when line 2 is disconnected, but that can but up to 4 hours -Original Message- From: Sakti Chakravarty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 7 February 2002 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A Little Exchange and ISA problem When a me

RE: A Little Exchange and ISA problem

When a message is sent from the Internet, does it bounce back with an NDR? That might be useful in sorting out the issue. Or does the mail just queue up and get delivered once the original connection is restored? Sounds to me like it might be an MX record problem ... but you could post this mess

A Little Exchange and ISA problem

Hi All I have a client with the following problem. The site is running SBS 2000 (shudder, shudder, cringe, cringe) and they have a requirement for the following to happen. They have a permanent connection to the internet that has a permanent IP address. (line 1) They have a second connection that

Re: Exchange 5.5 rules

Just checked and you're right; I'm really not a client guy. - Original Message - From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 6:10 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 rules > I thought they were stored in the *.rwz fil

RE: Exchange 5.5 rules

No worries, I guess Daniel didn't either. Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, February 06

RE: Exchange 5.5 rules

Client-side they're stored in a .RWZ file. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com > -Original Message- > From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2

RE: Exchange 5.5 rules

Yes. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 2:10 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Su

RE: Exchange 5.5 rules

Oops! Sorry Ben, didnt see your reply. Memo to self: Sort by Subject. -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 5:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 rules Rules on the client side are stored in a .RWZ file

RE: Exchange 5.5 rules

I thought they were stored in the *.rwz file and the user's mailbox. No? -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 6:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 rules Server-side they are stored in the user's mai

Re: Exchange 5.5 rules

Server-side they are stored in the user's mailbox. Client-side they are stored in a PST. - Original Message - From: "Ed Esgro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 3:42 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 rules > I see, > I am gu

RE: Procomm and Exchange

Have you tried to do a restore from the snapshots yet? Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com > -Original Message- > From: Bauer, Mr. Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wedne

RE: Exchange 5.5 rules

Ok at the risk of having to flame again, I'll offer a forward looking view. Yes, 32k is the current limit. No, we don't want MS to invest in changing that code. What do we want? The rules engine should be more than just a message routing PEP (policy enforcement point). It should also be the i

RE: OT - BlackBerry Enterprise Server

We have had no problem. Ryan, -Original Message- From: WAISEL, HAROLD B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 4:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT - BlackBerry Enterprise Server Has anyone installed the BES 2.1 Service Pack 2 for Exchange, and did you

OT: Siemens

Hello, A while back, another Siemens employee from one of the other operating companies emailed me.. I was wondering if I could get back in touch with him (or any other Siemens Employee that works with email) Rex Choi Siemens Building Technologies ___

Re: Exchange 5.5 rules

Armchair coding. How quaint. - Original Message - From: "Rocky Stefano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 4:28 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 rules > That's a poor M$ excuse for improper design. Rules should be server-sid

RE: OT - BlackBerry Enterprise Server

Works like a charm. Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer

RE: Exchange 5.5 rules

That's a poor M$ excuse for improper design. Rules should be server-side not client side even if they are created on the end user side. A Notes or GroupWise system can have almost limitless rules with little or no impact. Besides it already takes 45 min for the message to get there anyways. Just

RE: Exchange 5.5 rules

And someone would still complain that there are not enough. The one thing that is bothersome is that this is kind of a secret. Nobody really knows the rules limit until they hit it. Then it's a wicked pisser. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesda

RE: Exchange 5.5 rules

I'd like to see them allow 32 terabytes of rules. "How come it takes forty-five minutes for a message to appear in my Inbox?" Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EM

RE: OT - BlackBerry Enterprise Server

No problems at all. -Original Message- From: WAISEL, HAROLD B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 4:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT - BlackBerry Enterprise Server Has anyone installed the BES 2.1 Service Pack 2 for Exchange, and did you have any pro

RE: Browsing an AD Win2K Domain + Scanmail for E2k

I'm wondering the same thing. What on earth does one have to do with the other? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 2:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Browsing an AD Win2K Domain + Scanmail for E2k Ask them why Sc

RE: Browsing an AD Win2K Domain + Scanmail for E2k

Ask them why Scanmail is the issue. That makes absolutely no sense to me. You're having a browsing problem, so maybe you have more than one master browser on the network. Start examining the event logs for Browser service errors. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Compu

Re: Exchange 5.5 rules

32KB of rules is the absolute limit. I'd suggest that you send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you would like this changed. Missy Koslosky - Original Message - From: "Ed Esgro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 4:31 P

Re: Exchange 5.5 rules

It's not the number of rules that is limited, it is the space in which those rules can be saved. I can never remember if it's 32K or 64K. Simplify your existing rules as much as you can, using server-based DLs wherever possible. - Original Message - From: "Ed Esgro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> T

Trend Micro eManager 5.1 for E2K

Can someone that is farmiliar with this product please contact me off list? TIA, Steve I _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To uns

Browsing an AD Win2K Domain + Scanmail for E2k

Hi folks, Let me say up front that I wasn't sure whether to post to both groups but the issue involves Win2k & Exchange servers. So, please pardon me if it offends anyone. My team recently rebuilt our 2 multi-master, NT4 into a single AD Win2k domain. We were able to browse when we were in

RE: Exchange 5.5 rules

Rules on the client side are stored in a .RWZ file with the profile name. As usual Sue has a good article on the subject: http://www.slipstick.com/rules/serverbased.htm Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://ww

RE: ScanMail Message: Action taken by policy - AOL top 10 Spam Li st

-Original Message- From: Harris, Dot Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 2:12 PM To: SPAM CAPTURE Subject: ScanMail Message: Action taken by policy - AOL top 10 Spam List I think the 6.5 beta is now available for public download (Antigen)... it does fcontent & file filtering.

RE: Exchange 5.5 rules

HWell, you can import and export rules. I think they are in a PST on the local machine. Check out Q241325 But remember, if he switches to client side rules, he probably wont like the results. Especially if he is moving email to folders, etc. This is kind of one of those things that the us

OT - BlackBerry Enterprise Server

Has anyone installed the BES 2.1 Service Pack 2 for Exchange, and did you have any problems? Thank you, Harold B Waisel Messaging and Collaborative Computing FleetBoston Financial 617.434.4201 (w) 617.790.1253 (f) mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___

RE: Exchange 5.5 rules

Correct. You would need a separate array for the rules. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 1:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 rules That means 32 kilobytes not 32 kilorules. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet

RE: Exchange 5.5 rules

I see, I am guessing that the rules on the server end are stored in the priv.edb. On the client end do you know the name of the file that the client side rules use? Also are there any 3rd party utilities available that may enable him to add more rules? Or can he somehow tell the server side rules

RE: Archive message log

That wouldn't be the same thing as the archive log. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: We

RE: Exchange 5.5 rules

That means 32 kilobytes not 32 kilorules. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Wednes

Re: EX 5.5 or 2000: Replies to internet for specific groups

Maybe a custom group policy? Then you will have to make an emailed enabled security group. Don't know of any setting. Yes either on/off for all. - Original Message - From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 4:

RE: Exchange 5.5 rules

32k worth of server side rulesYou cant change that either. He may be able to consolidate some rules to make them smaller -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 1:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 rules Does

Re: Forwarding

Emailed enabled contacts for E2K - Original Message - From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 4:22 PM Subject: RE: Forwarding > Custom recipients? > > -Original Message- > From: Wolf, Alan [m

Exchange 5.5 rules

Does anybody know what the limitations are to the amount of rules one can have for a mailbox. I have a user that gets an error message when creating a rule. After disabling another rule, the new rule will work. It appears to me that there is a limitation to the amount of rules one mailbox can have

RE: Archive message log

If there were one, it'd be on http://www.slipstick.com. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: EX 5.5 or 2000: Replies to internet for specific groups

While anything is possible, I know of no practical way to do that. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jason

Re: Archive message log

There is a tool on the BORK. I believe it is eventlogview something - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 1:59 PM Subject: Archive message log > Is there a utility that will allow me to search the

Re: Archive message log

Do you mean the SMTP archive log? It's plain text; grep will do it as will most any other text-file search utility. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 12:59 PM Subject: Archive message log > Is

RE: Forwarding

Yes, custom recipients. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Wednesday, February 06,

RE: Forwarding

Custom recipients? -Original Message- From: Wolf, Alan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Forwarding Is there a way to forward messages in Exchange, similar to the .forward file in the Unix world? Thanks. Alan L. Wo

Forwarding

Is there a way to forward messages in Exchange, similar to the .forward file in the Unix world? Thanks. Alan L. Wolf MCSE, MCP, MCP + I PO Box B Bldg 458 Frederick, Maryland 21702 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 301-846-5479 (V) 301-846-6886 (F)

Archive message log

Is there a utility that will allow me to search the content of messages in the archival log file in 5.5? Is there a way to search on past postings in this list? Thanks Dan Shallbetter _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/

EX 5.5 or 2000: Replies to internet for specific groups

Is it possible to enable out of office replies to the internet for specific groups or persons? I know there is a setting in 5.5 and 2000 that changes the setting globally. Unfortunately, its either on or off for everyone. We currently have it disabled but our sales staff wants it enabled. I've

RE: Spam/Content filtering

Only at home. :) -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 11:16 AM > To: Exchang

RE: Spam/Content filtering

You mean you haven't set it as your home page yet?! Now where did I put that sTiCk[tm]? > -Original Message- > From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 3:15 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Spam/Content filtering > > > Hard to keep up

RE: Spam/Content filtering

Hard to keep up without a program. That'll teach me to skip my daily visit to mail-resources.com! ;-) Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com > -Original Message- > From: Chris Sc

RE: Spam/Content filtering

The Content Technologies (http://www.mimesweeper.com/) unit was recently purchased by Clearswift (http://www.clearswift.com/). At a considerable loss for Baltimore... Pending stockholder approval of course. http://www.mail-resources.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&; sid=119 Chr

RE: SMTP Error

The best way to try to figure this one out is to enable protocol logging. I suspect what's happening is that you're communicating with an e-mail server that's advertising protocol capabilities that it doesn't support. In short, this is almost certainly the other domain's problem. An example of

RE: Spam/Content filtering

It is available. Has anyone tried it yet? Or should I wait a little longer? Thanks Nancy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 3:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Spam/Content filtering I think the 6.5 beta i

RE: Spam/Content filtering

We use MailSweeper for SMTP. Reduces (but doesn't eliminate) spam and can be configured to block pornography (however you define it) and attachments. http://www.baltimore.com Be forewarned that content filtering is a process - you're going to have to check and clear out the filters on a regular

SMTP Error

Hi Everyone. I am new to exchange and I have come across an error that is stumping me, which being new to exchange it doesn't take much. I am running Exchange 2000. There is one domain that I get and undeliverable message when I try to send mail to it. I can send mail to that domain several

RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon?

Ummm I predict . Lot's of user complaining -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 3:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon? Must be those calls you've been making to Miss Cl

RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon?

Must be those calls you've been making to Miss Cleo, the discount psychic. You'll be savin' big! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Exchange 2000 Software Question

That URL comes up 404. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom Meunier Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 12

RE: Exchange 2000 Software Question

We have a "Select Customer Licensing " with Microsoft and get all our software with monthly updates on a regular basis. This is interesting, I will be out for a little bit, be back soon. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 20

RE: DS hangs with event 1186

Not having much more to go on, I would expect that your problem is caused by network and/or name resolution issues like brief interruptions in service. RPC really likes to have uninterrupted network availability. If you can't get a satisfactory resolution to this and it's repeatable or reproduce

RE: text messages are trunkcated

Open the message with a client that will give you the entire unadulterated contents. I suspect the message is malformed. If it isn't, you probably have found a bug in either Exchange or Outlook (presuming that's what you're using). Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Comp

RE: mmc.exe wont close

I've seen that too. It's intermittent. I just kill it. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of bill brummett S

RE: Spam/Content filtering

I think the 6.5 beta is now available for public download (Antigen)... it does fcontent & file filtering. ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com "One man's ceiling is another

RE: Exchange 2000 Software Question

Well in that case you're fine. "What is the OS" is what I meant when I asked if you were installing it to a workstation. We're going in circles. More info please. Are you trying to install it from your workstation to your server? This won't work; go put the disk in your server's CD. Or do yo

RE: Spam/Content filtering

www.messagelabs.com can do what you are looking for. Diane Diane Boehm SC Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 1:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Spam/Content filtering Hi there..

RE: Exchange 2000 Software Question

W2K Server sp2 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 1:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Software Question Yea, but what is the OS? Workstation or Server? -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier

RE: Exchange 2000 Software Question

Oopsie-Doopsie!! Sorry for wasting everyone's time :-( -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 1:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Software Question Silly bear. -Original Message- From: Pillai, R

RE: Exchange 2000 Software Question

Yea, but what is the OS? Workstation or Server? -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 2:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Software Question Silly bear. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [m

RE: Exchange 2000 Software Question

Silly bear. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 1:51 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Exchange 2000 Software Question Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Software Question Yes I am !! I am setting up a test e

RE: Exchange 2000 Software Question

ForestPrep needs to be run on a W2K server I believe. > -Original Message- > From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 1:51 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Software Question > > > Yes I am !! > I am setting up a test ex

RE: Exchange 2000 Software Question

Yes I am !! I am setting up a test exchange box in our test domain. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 1:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Software Question You wouldn't be um, installing this on a

RE: Exchange 2000 Software Question

Me thinks you either mis-typing or not putting that space in there after "setup". -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 2:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Software Question Yes,command line. The only

RE: Spam/Content filtering

www.mail-resources.com weblinks | server | content filtering ... Vote for your favorite. ;) I personally use the delete key. > -Original Message- > From: Exchange Discussions > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 1:42 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject:

RE: Exchange 2000 Software Question

You wouldn't be um, installing this on a workstation, would you? -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 1:41 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Exchange 2000 Software Question Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Sof

RE: Exchange 2000 Software Question

Yes,command line. The only option with GUI is to install Exchange components. Thanks -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 1:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Software Question You are running this fr

Spam/Content filtering

Hi there... I have noticed over the last few months that our spam has increased to our users. I was wondering what solutions people are using. Also, I was wondering if there was one that blocked porn related content. I'm also looking (not in the same product necessarily) for a HTTP monitoring/f

RE: Experience poll 20,000 users

I actually do work in a small shop. 250 notes plus 20 servers and around 300 users. There's only seven of us in the department, including the director and supervisor. So, I get to wear many hats: email admin, network admin and, sometimes, hardware support. I tend to try to gravitate towards th

RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon?

Thanks Jim. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 12:25 PM To: Doug Eubank; 'Exchange Discussions ' Subject: RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon? Doug, Well...after looking at the Internet Headers and g

RE: Exchange 2000 Software Question

You have a version of Exchange that isn't any shipping version I've ever seen, then. Would you please answer, what is it you DO get when you type %path%\setup.exe /? (note the SPACE, I keep seeing it missing in posts) Perhaps you could also say, I've got setup.exe which is 123,456kb, dated 4/1/

Re: Exchange 2000 Software Question

You are missing something. It's a command-line switch to be passed to the setup program. - Original Message - From: "Pillai, Raj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 1:27 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Software Question >

Re: Exchange 2000 Software Question

RC is a particular level of beta software. Run setup; the options should show. - Original Message - From: "Pillai, Raj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 12:51 PM Subject: Exchange 2000 Software Question > > I am tryin

Re: MailingList

I'm not too sure what directions you were given to follow but to create a mailing list, called a DL in Exchange, you go into the admin program and it's under the file menu. - Original Message - From: "Piotr Szymański" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent

RE: Exchange 2000 Software Question

I am logging in using the Administrator account which has the domain, enterprise and schema admin capability. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Software Question

  1   2   3   >