um... 21.6KBps.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 11:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
I'm connected from home at a 21,600KBps dial up right now, connected to an
exchange server 3800km away.
The
So no one has tried hacking transaction logs before? :)
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 3:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Major restore problem
Importance: High
Last Friday, one of our Exchange 2000 servers had
I am having a problem with Rules in Outlook. It doesn't appear to be
related to any user or version of Outlook.
Users have rules to auto route people to specific folders. They are
seeing that other users from the GAL are just appearing in the rule.
Deleting the entry seems to take care of the
Exchange 5.5 IMAP4 Easter Egg
Rating: 5.3 of 10 (18 votes cast)
From: ajo ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Requires: telnet access to port 143
Easter Egg: 1. telnet to a 5.5 server's imap4 port (port 143 by default)
2. enter the following commands:
? IMAP4 [hit enter]
? ATE [hit enter]
? MY
Nope. No Workee. U bad Tener.
ANDY! Aren't U his Tech Buddy.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 8:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Check it out
Exchange 5.5 IMAP4 Easter Egg
Rating: 5.3 of 10 (18 votes cast)
You have two choices: the UI or command-line import of a CSV. Pick one.
Unless, of course, you want to do some custom coding using DAPI.
- Original Message -
From: Matt Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 10:31 AM
Subject:
At least someone say I don't know.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 10:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange OU
I think I asked this before, but I never had any responses. Lets try one
more time. C'mon, I
If it works don't touch it. I don't know
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Woodruff,
Michael
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 8:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange OU
At least someone say I don't know.
-Original
MAn I tried it too but it didnt work
Check this website out most of the things work on it www.eeggs.com
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 11:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Check it out
Nope. No Workee. U
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 11:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange OU
If it works don't touch it. I don't know
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
it worked for me but i had to do it twice
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 11:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Check it out
Worked for me!
Make sure you type the ?
Aaron
-Original Message-
From:
I noticed that some of the individuals on my Exchange servers have different
X.400 addresses then other individuals. As of right now my site addressing
is:
c=US;a= ;p=SWBankTX;o=Corporate;s=lastname;g=firstname
yes that is a space for the ADMD...
I have some users that have an X.400 address
Worked for me as well. Silly Silly Silly. And we wonder why the code is sooo
bloated.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
Be not afraid of growing slowly, be afraid only of standing still. --Chinese
Proverb
-Original
Reformat the hd.
--Kevinm CHFR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Farquharson,
Andrea
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 9:37 AM
To: Exchange
Could you clarify other users from the GAL are just appearing in the rule?
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: ExchDiscList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 11:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Rules Problems
I am having a problem with Rules in
Can you Delete them in groups of a few hundred?
-Original Message-
From: Farquharson, Andrea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 12:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Journal Folder
Is there an easier way of deleting over 5,000 items within a user's
Open up the mailbox with the old Exchange client and delete the entire
folder. Open it up with Outlook and the folder will be recreated empty.
Alternatively try smaller blocks, say 500-1000 at a time.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday,
Run ExMerge against the mailbox only to that folder with the archive option
and then delete the resulting PST.
Alternatively you can use Mailbox Manager.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Farquharson, Andrea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 12:37 PM
In Exchange admin highlight user's mailbox - click ToolsClean Mailbox and
select only the Journal Items. Test it first to make sure you don't clean
up too much :=)
-Original Message-
From: Farquharson, Andrea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 11:37 AM
To:
Story of your life, huh?
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 12:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Check it out
it worked for me but i had to do it twice
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett
The users have had rules defined that would route ExternalUserA and
ExternalUserB directly to Deleted Items. Somewhere along the way, mail
from InternalUserA started going to Deleted Items as well.
On some of the clients, when you first view the rule, you only see the
External Users listed. If
It's not going to create any problems. But loading Exchange System
Manager only, will change the view to the correct one. I wouldn't worry
about loading it on a DC, but perhaps on your workstation from which you are
going to be managing your AD environment. I just verified this in a test
setup
Thats exactly what I did; worked like a charm! Especially the play-wrestle
with my wife!
You cannot create experience. You must undergo it.
Albert Camus (1913-1960); French writer and philosopher
- Original Message -
From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
Thank you very much Sir. Your help is greatly appreciated.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 1:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange OU
It's not going to create any problems. But loading Exchange System
Has anyone actually timed the replication of mailbox info via the ADC to AD?
I have about 1,000 users.. So far in 2 hrs. I've replicated the Dist. List
and custom recipents and about 20 mailbox'sRunning this in my test
lab. So no big deal - but - trying to get some timing numbers so
Hail to the King! It worked. Thanks. My day is getting better and
better:)
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 1:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange OU
It's not going to create any problems. But loading
YES
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 2:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Replication via ADC
Is this the first replication?
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
They aren't I can hear you at all. I even turned my speakers up all the
way. I'm going to call AOL and see if the problem is on their end
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Newsgroups
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 12:19 PM
To: Exchange
Receiving you five and five.
We don't ration sh@t here.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
Be not afraid of growing slowly, be afraid only of standing still. --Chinese
Proverb
-Original Message-
From: Newsgroups
-- We don't ration sh@t here. -- Nope, you're given as much as you need,
and then some.
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 2:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can you hear me now?
Receiving you five and five.
Just a question on the upgrade version of Exchange 2000. We own only the
upgrade Exchange 2000 license and I have used this cd to install several
servers without problems. However, I'm planning on going native Exchange
2000 soon and I'm just wondering if I will be able to use the upgrade cd to
not directly..
But with Upgrade55 I used to just load say the OL books for prev. then the
55 disk ran OK.
OR if you have the MS site license ..etc stuff you could order the CD
media... for e2k and etc
bill
-Original Message-
From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
:-) Thanks everyone! At least I know this is working!
-Original Message-
From: WILLIAMS,JESSICA D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, April 04, 2002 12:45 PM
Posted To: Exchange Newsgroups
Conversation: Can you hear me now?
Subject: RE: Can you hear me now?
-- We don't
..says the mystery man/woman/rabbit that lurks in the shadows and hides
his/her/its identity..
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Newsgroups [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 3:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can you hear me now?
:-) Thanks
There are some sizing and deployment calculators and white papers here:
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/planning/2000/default.asp
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
I have a user in Florida on her own server. Am I actually running a
brick-level backup then?
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 1:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: how many users per server
That's for Exchange
Yes, but what was the question?
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 11:16 AM
To:
We hand it out in big heaping loads.
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 12:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can you hear me now?
Receiving you five and five.
We don't ration sh@t here.
John Matteson; Exchange
I have frozen sewer rats to go with those heaps.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 4:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can you hear me now?
We hand it out in big heaping loads.
-Original
10
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 1:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: how many users per server
does anybody know if there are any specs as to how many users can go on a
server? I know it all depends on
No no it's 3.14159
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 1:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: how many users per server
10
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was talking about Enterprise version.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 1:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: how many users per server
No no it's 3.14159
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Any idea what it will be for the .net version?
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 5:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: how many users per server
For exchange 5.5 its 5 1/2
and for exchange 2000 its 2000
I guess he likes..PI :-)
Gary
At 01:58 PM 4/4/02 -0800, you wrote:
No no it's 3.14159
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 1:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: how many
Well I figure it this way. Take the Net part and assign a number to each
letter according to it's place in the alphabet so Net corresponds to
14-5-20. Now multiply that 14*5*20 and you get 1400 so as you can see
.net will be a step down from what were used to. Probably due to more
bloat.
nyet
Mario Fernandez
Network Administrator
DataSynapse
632 Broadway 5th Floor
New York, NY 10012
tel. (212) 842-8849
fax. (212) 842-8843
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here:
e-mail disclaimer
How many of us here don't? Not that there's anything wrong with that
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gary Jackson
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 2:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: how many users per server
I guess he
Running Exch55, Sp4, NT4, Sp5 with IS located on SAN Shark (Compaq Fiber
Card). Running TrendServerProtect and TrendScanMail. A certain user
is getting a lot of latency/delays (requesting data from Microsoft
Exchange dialog box, etc) when accessing his mailbox in Outlook (XP).
Not a network
I moved 650+ mailboxes in a weekend. Our limit is 75MB per mailbox, and
most people hover between 50MB and 70MB. I just dialed in, started a remote
session to one server, selected 100 mailboxes started the move and closed
the session. About once an hour I would dial back in and check on it.
I
I have 4,982 on one 5.5 server. how did I get more then 10?
--Kevinm CHFR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Thursday,
Thief you better have bought 4,972 more licenses or I am going to turn you
in.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 4:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: how many users per server
I have 4,982 on one 5.5 server. how did
Im sure it just one mailbox and everybody shares..
world peace... ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 5:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: how many users per server
Thief you better have bought 4,972 more
Ahh, but there's the rub. Exchange is license per client access device, not
per mailbox. He could have 4,972 mailboxes, but only if the 4,972 users all
share the same *computer* to run Outlook would his licensing be legal. I'd
hate to see the amount of gunk in that PC's mouse.
-Original
You must have the enterprise version. ;-)
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 12:48
93 gig priv. I sure hope it is enterprise.. I dont think the standard
could handle that much mouse toe jam
--Kevinm CHFR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
mouse ...what about the keyboard...
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Malayter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 6:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: how many users per server
Ahh, but there's the rub. Exchange is license per client access device, not
per
Or the amount of sneeze offal on the monitor...
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 5:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: how many users per server
mouse ...what about the keyboard...
-Original Message-
Good Day dear. ;-
Take care
Cheers
Carine
We attend to your needs by offering superior customer service
with our call centre business continuity planning services.
Check it out at http://www.onecall.com.my
Waiting for the recall message to come in...
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Carine Lim, Sr.SystEng, SCSM/NSB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 16:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: hello
Good Day dear. ;-
Take care
Cheers
Carine
Carine Lim, Sr.SystEng, SCSM/NSB would like to recall the message, hello.
We attend to your needs by offering superior customer service
with our call centre business continuity planning services.
Check it out at
Ok it will cost you a dollar though.don't worry cause you can't buy
nothing for a dollar anymore
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Carine Lim,
Sr.SystEng, SCSM/NSB
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 4:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
This is more a case of sh!t happens than anything else...
- Original Message -
From: Jim Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 5:32 PM
Subject: Requesting Data errors with SAN and Large Mailboxs
Running Exch55, Sp4, NT4, Sp5
Yes you can! With 1010220 all call up to 20 minutes are just 0.99!
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, April 04, 2002 4:35 PM
Posted To: Exchange Newsgroups
Conversation: Recall: hello
Subject: RE: Recall: hello
Ok it will cost
You are 100% right, there is nothing wrong with it ! :-)
Gary
At 02:30 PM 4/4/2002 -0800, Christopher Hummert said:
How many of us here don't? Not that there's anything wrong with that
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gary
Okay, Pink, settle down.
- Original Message -
From: Newsgroups [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 6:50 PM
Subject: RE: Recall: hello
Yes you can! With 1010220 all call up to 20 minutes are just 0.99!
-Original Message-
I'm betting these users have tons of folders or, just as bad, a small number
of folders with lots of messages in them.
When a user accesses the root of his mailbox the folders in the root level
are enumerated by the server and passed back to the client. As each folder
is accessed (either by
Thanks for the insight/understanding. I'll give perfmon a shot, and
check slipstick for some possible solutions.
One thing ... if this started happening right after we switched to the
SAN, then I must conclude that SAN technology may not be able handle
large mailbox enumerations, etc ...
I have a strange problem. I installed Exchange Server on a Windows 2000
Server with Active Directory. When anyone uses the the Web Access they can
use their login name and see any email box they want.
Any suggestions on where to look? The bosses are having a fit that anyone
can see their
I am trying to change my email server from I-Mail to Exchange 2000 ,,can any
body tell me how to export my domains with there user's form I-Mail without
losing passwords.
_
List posting FAQ:
By the way, when moving a mailbox, do any of you ever check first to see
whether the user is logged in ?? I always do (which greatly slows the
moving of mailboxes) because in the past I've noticed that users that get
moved, while being logged in, leave bad records in the database so that they
I guess that qualifies as a BLB .. unless you use ArcServe 2000.
If you use that to back the server up .. what software do you use to restore
it?
--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
www.sharepointserver.com
--
Perfmon should also reveal whether the SAN is somehow slowing things down. I
know a SAN is supposed to be faster but that can depend on how it was
configured in the first place. I've seen a SAN being demoed that was
significantly slower than it should have been. After tuning the block sizes
to
How true! I notice the eeggs.com site didn't have the NNTP easter egg.
Telnet to port 119 and type
Make (enter)
Money (enter)
Fast (enter)
You get the same type of stuff. It's pretty sad really, isn't it? :-)
Neil
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
73 matches
Mail list logo
