This will do what you require, also with full auditing
http://www.rchive-it.com/
Yours,
Julian Stone
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 7:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000 internet eMail archi
Must be the other Ed. I was awake for that one. He promised 101
registry hacks and delivered 62.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PRO
Why would you expect it to be any better than it was at the conference?
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Marti
Why happens if you increase the cost of the new IMC. (Wonder why you created
it there in the first place also?)
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 10:49 PM
Subject: Custom Recipient NDR
> Hi
> We
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 10:49 PM
Subject: Custom Recipient NDR
> Hi
> We have Exchange 5.5 SP4 at mutlitple sites. A new server went in at our
> main site with a new IMC that has a lo
You know, I also did something ugly at one site where we hid the
distribution lists, and set up contacts to appear in the AD. The user
mails to the contact, which is 1 entry against their count, then the
contact forwards to the DL, which expands and delivers the mail. I
think that's how it went.
Hi
We have Exchange 5.5 SP4 at mutlitple sites. A new server went in at our
main site with a new IMC that has a lower cost then our older IMC. We
believe this has caused the following problem.
Problem: A Custom Recipient is used for forwarding emails to an ISP address
([EMAIL PROTECTED]). The CR
www.mail-resources.com | web links | server | archival I believe.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 1:49 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Exchange 2000 internet eMail archiving
>
>
> Hi
>
> My custo
'Goof' might be a bit too harsh... It's certainly a PITA and a change in
behavior, but it's a deliberate one based on the architectural changes made
(not being an apologist by any means, it certainly is frustrating). I
believe that if, instead of setting global limits, you set them on a per
user b
I build my address lists based on common attributes across all objects...
The problem you are running into I believe (I looked at the problem briefly
when you first posted) is that the LDAP query you wind up creating is a
series of 'ands'and you need an 'or' for the DL objects to be included.
Micr
First thought, your recovery server does not have the same Exchange SP
and/or hotfix level as your production .
I also prefer restores fron online backups. Much easier.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 5:29 PM
To: Exchange
I forgot to mention that the client received the messages yesterday and the
client started to receive the same messages today that he received
yesterday.
rich
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 6:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussion
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 17 October 2002 8:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Reverse DNS entry - us or ISP?
It should be configured by the person responsible for your domain's SOA
(server of authority).
- O
Why the repost?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jean-Francois
Bourdeau
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 14:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000 internet eMail archiving
Hi
My customer havee very special journaling needs.
I can give you the link
http://www.mymsevents.com/MyMSEvents/default.aspx
But you wont be able to do anything with it. You have to have a valid MEC
logon to access the content.
-Original Message-
From: Frédéric Médery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 3:16 PM
I never did get a response to this and I can't find any information on this from the
archives or Microsoft how to's... Am I to assume that it can't be done in e2k like it
could be done in 5.5?
Thank you for your time,
Eric J. Goforth
-Original Message-
From: Eric Goforth
Sent: Tuesd
This is a common request. Check archives.
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Francois Bourdeau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 1:49 PM
Subject: Exchange 2000 internet eMail archiving
> Hi
>
> My customer havee very spec
Once they leave your email server you have no control as to when the
recipient get the message. When you shut it down did you check to see the
amount of message in queue? When Exchange shuts down it waits for message to
be received before shutting down but not 100% on what happens to ones in the
Hello Martin,
Wednesday, October 16, 2002, 1:29:58 PM, you wrote:
MB> I haven't tried since Monday when it was timing out all the time.
MB> -Original Message-
MB> From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
MB> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 9:33 AM
MB> To: Exchange Discussions
It should be configured by the person responsible for your domain's SOA
(server of authority).
- Original Message -
From: "Shaun Delaney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 8:17 PM
Subject: Reverse DNS entry - us or ISP?
>
Ambiguity... the devil's volleyball...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N.
Precht
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 5:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Eventid.net $$$
Yes, William.
-Original Message-
From: [EMA
Are you sure you built the Recovery/test server exactly like the one you are
testing. Everything has to be the same in the naming too. When you restore a
store you are to try and start it first. What happens when you do that? Get
the Disaster Recovery Paper for 5.5 and follow it to the letter. Bes
So I'm trying to restore an offline backup to a lab environment... Testing
out migration from 5.5 to 2k.
I backed-up the old exchange server (5.5 SP3) using ntbackup, and restored
it onto the lab one (5.5 SP3). When I tried to run isinted -patch, it fails
with JET_errFileAccessDenied. Event log
Hi
My customer havee very special journaling needs.
They need eMail going outside the organisation and coming from people
outside the organisation to be archived for auditing purpose.
The Ex2K journaling is not usefull because different Manager need to
monitor different employee eMail. I mean
I remember when Exchange 2000 first came out, IM worked intermmittently.
Then it seems they made it better with service packs. I was able to make IM work most
of the time.
It works OK for a single company. It gets complicated when it comes to hosting, mainly
because different customers have al
I've seen a number of the MovieWorld viruses being caught by McAfee but
Trend doesn't seem to see it. Is it another name under Trend?
Pete Pfefferkorn
Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator
University of Cincinnati
51 Goodman Street
Cincinnati, OH 45221
Phone - (513) 556-9076
Fax - (513
You mean like GalMod from the resource kit?
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bob
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange User Details
Hi All,
At my last place of work we had some
In the glory days of Exchange 5.5 there was a reg hack one could do to limit the total
number of recipients in a message without having an adverse effect on Distribution
Lists being in the message. Now with Exchange 2000 and AD, every recipient in a DL is
counted towards the total recipient co
Good Afternoon All,
Today our servers had to be shut down due to the
noreaster on the east coast, and we were down for about 3 1/2 hours. Our dns
is hosted by our webhost which located in manhattan so we didnt lose any
messages today. So heres my problem, after we got po
In the glory days of Exchange 5.5 there was a reg hack one could do to limit the total
number of recipients in a message without having an adverse effect on Distribution
Lists being in the message. Now with Exchange 2000 and AD, every recipient in a DL is
counted towards the total recipient co
I guess they read my mind :)
Or maybe I read theirs :)
P.S. every time MS releases something it claims "industry standard" which later turns
out to be not so standard. The current RVP-based Instant Messaging was also proclaimed
an industry standard. Then I had to use my scientific poking aro
Oh !! what a timing . I finally got it working for all of my offices and learned the
hale lot about it on how to get it to work , NAT, DNS , Firewall , PROXY, Fixed ports
, Polling , really it took me a full month to get it working for all the offices
including field offices in US and Euro
I think those graphics would look like an ASCII representation of a binary
file.
Some days CJ's "graphic beard monogram" is more apropos than others.
CJ, since you're so good at this stuff, you should teach some classes on
technology and history someplace. I'm sure the kids would become heroe
I haven't tried since Monday when it was timing out all the time.
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 9:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MEC 2002 - slides off the website
Anyone having problems downloading the sli
The next version will be:-
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/features/2002/Oct02/10-08realtime.asp
Yours,
Julian Stone
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 October 2002 17:26 pm
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Instant Messaging
I got i
Anyone having problems downloading the slide decks that are "available"?
I keep getting 1k files.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
I got it working. But there are many hidden obstacles that may ruin one's IM
experience. Different client version, different client OS versions, RVP records in
DNS, etc.
I think IM should be a separate product, it only gives more headaches to Exchange
admins. I wish they did not offer IM with
Why didn't you bring it with you when you left your last place of work?
-Original Message-
From: Bob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 1:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange User Details
Hi All,
At my last place of work we had some kind of template
Where is the enterprise-level RUS homed?
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 11:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recipient Updae Policy
No special address generators. And this is the only exchange box on
this
All of them
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 8:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC 2002 comments?
Which Ed?
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ahhh, maybe GALMOD32.exe, IIRC. Or there is a product called WebDir that
will allow all the Users to update their own profiles, based on which fields
you allow them access.
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: Bob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 1:29 PM
To
No special address generators. And this is the only exchange box on
this domain. I do have another exchange box it is on another domain
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:afyodorov@;innerhost.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 11:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Before I go crazy, has anyone ever gotten Instant Messaging to work with
Exchange 2000?
This is like the third time I've tried on two different emails severs
and I always get this Signing into Communications service failed try
again later.
I have restarted WWW on the server and triple checked the
Good morning all
Should the reverse DNS entry be configured on our server or from our ISP's end?
We currently do not have a R-DNS for the IP of our mail server (from dnsreport.com)
Additional info:
NT 4 SP6a
Ex 5.5 SP 4
Surprisingly(?), we haven't had any mail delivery problems yet...
Thank
Hi All,
At my last place of work we had some kind of template that users could use
and it allowed them to change their exchange details.
Does anyone know where I could get hold of this utility or even what it is ?
Thanks in advance
Bob
Which Ed?
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 8:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC 2002 comments?
Best nap Ed ever had.
-Origina
YEAH It was a great time. Even if they did not let me in the door..
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Blunt, James H
(Jim)
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Best nap Ed ever had.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 10:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC 2002 comments?
If I had to guess, it was because I was a major speaker at that one.
-Original Message
Do you have any special address generators that use %s or %g variables?
A long time ago my recipient policies were not running because of a conflict between a
straight policy and the one using variables.
Also check to see if your RUSes are OK. Do you have multiple Exchange 2000 servers?
Maybe
Hey, I know you :)
I will be glad to tell you the thong story next time.
-Original Message-
From: ExchangeAdminList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 10:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC 2002 comments?
Jim - I couldn't agree more! This was my
Paitence grasshopper. How long are you waiting to allow it to run?
> -Original Message-
> From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 9:49 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Recipient Updae Policy
>
>
> I just finished setting up a new Ex
Aliassweet
thanks!
bill
-Original Message-
From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 11:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 55 error user trying to login
Check the users alias in Exchange Admin; also Q173470 might help.
-Orig
If I had to guess, it was because I was a major speaker at that one.
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 7:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC 2002 comments?
What did you like best about it?
-Original Me
Check the users alias in Exchange Admin; also Q173470 might help.
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 10:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA 55 error user trying to login
Q'
I changed a users User ID: say from:
Jsp
Jim - I couldn't agree more! This was my first time at MEC, liked the food,
the list party (did not get to the bottom of the "thong" story), enjoyed
the roller coaster ride and even managed to learn more about Exchange.
"regardless of their sometimes cynical comments online..." - that's th
I just finished setting up a new Exchange 2000 server with SP3.
My initial tests are going well. I am able to send and receive mail
(internally) just fine.
My first problem is that when I add a new account, the update service
doesn't seem to run. I have to do an Update Now.
As far as I can tell
Q'
I changed a users User ID: say from:
Jsparticus
to...
Jspartic
I reassigned the exchange account to the new user ID and it is OK when the
user log's in from a regular workstation...
but OWA gives "OWA was unable to get to your inbox."
any ideas?
The new user ID is in all the same groups as the
Yeah, I understand a timeout when the destination domain has MX records but the remote
server is not answering because it may be temporarily down. But when the remote domain
does not even exist in DNS that should be a different story.
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL
Well apparently it didn't do its job on the desktops if a virus was let
loose from one.
That's the exact reason we dumped it here. I spent my first week at this
company cleaning up its mess.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16,
Don't forget to exclude the Trend directory as well (Scanmail).
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 October 2002 14:14
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Scanning
That's what I am thinking... it's like giving me a grace period to fix my DNS servers
:)
But it is a real pain when one gets spammed and then there are a lot of messages
sitting in the queues for 2 days targeting bogus domains.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
That brings up the larger question of if McAfee belongs installed on
anything, but I won't go there.
Yes - that setup will work fine.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
I have FE/BE config with the generic FE/BE virtual directories, plus I have a few
customers for whom I created their "dedicated" OWA virtual directories.
I did the generic ones by following the whitepaper. I did the "dedicated" using the
method of scientific poking around :)
This is what I hav
Probably because the message is waiting to hit the expiration timeout
value set in the SMTP VS.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 16 October 2002 14:31
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: a wish
Subject: SMTP retry queues
Hey
Waiting for a time out perhaps?
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 October 2002 03:31
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SMTP retry queues
Hey all. I am looking for someone who is smarter than me :) to explain
to me why Exchange 2000 is k
Any chance of using Trend's Server Protect instead of McCrappy? That would
be my only concern. The cure might be worse than the symptom with Mcafee.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 9:28 AM
To: Exchange Di
Exchange is hoping that the DNS server is just down.. It is obeying the
retry settings you have for the SMTP virtual server.
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov
Sent: Wednesday,
Hey all. I am looking for someone who is smarter than me :) to explain to me why
Exchange 2000 is keeping messages in the retry queues if there are no DNS records for
the messages' destination domains?
For example if I send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], I can see a retry
queue for boguscrapd
So I can run McAfee for the file scanning, and run ScanMail for the mailbox
scanning on the same server as long as I exclude the Exchange data files.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 9:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subj
Cool, thanks for all the advice
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 October 2002 13:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure design
You are correct - it will be one bad morning. After that, it's the best way
to run thing
I am setting up our Front-end/Back-end config for our org. I have
installed a FE server (Enterprise:-)). I don't understand Microsofts
whitepaper on this. I want to create virtual directories to avoid all
the SSL certificates. When a virtual directory is created for a certain
domain, do I need
Actually, you only need to exclude the \exchsrvr\*data folders - that way
the exe's still get scanned.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
> -Original Message-
>
Exclude either:
*:\exchsrvr
Or for a little more precise scanning, exclude:
*:\exchsrvr\*data
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
> -Original Message-
> From: Pfe
I know of a number of places that do this w/o issue.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 9:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Scanning Exchange Server for Viruses
Exchange 5.5
Simple question I thin
Its up for argument. However, if you must, you will need to exclude the
\Exchsrvr folders
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 6:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Scanning Exchange Server for Viruses
Ex
Exchange 5.5
Simple question I think. We need to start scanning the files on our
Exchange Servers. We had a trojan get through which may have originated
from one of our workstations. We have ScanMail running on the Servers for
Exchange. We have a site license with MCafee and could get the se
Like I said - be careful
-Original Message-
From: Simon Bond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 4:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Removing Old Servers From Exchange 2K
Just the tonic! Thank you very much. I did look through ADSI edit initially,
thou
They had Coke instead of Pepsi?
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 5:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC 2002 comments?
What did you like best about it?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[m
You can also get thumbnail views of all graphics attachments.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Moir
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 7:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: viewer of PST
Sensitivity: Private
I find draw
When he walked into Cheers, everyone said "Ed!!"
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 8:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC 2002 comments?
What did you like best about it?
-Original Message-
From
Yes, William.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William
Lefkovics
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 01:23
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Eventid.net $$$
What? Being a pain in the but (sic)?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAI
What did you like best about it?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 00:31
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC 2002 comments?
I think I liked Boston the best. It's nice to have a MEC in a
You are correct - it will be one bad morning. After that, it's the best way
to run things
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
> -Original Message-
> From: Niki Bl
Tools | Services | Exchange | Manually Control Connection and set the
default to work offline.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
> -Original Message-
> From: N
No - you'd need DS/IS for that.
But for an issue with one or two delegates, cleansweep is the way to go.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
> -Original Message-
I find drawing a big red circle around each really important item is a
big time saver when I come to search that file again in 6 months time.
> -Original Message-
> From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 16 October 2002 12:54
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: R
You can also open PST files with photoshop, but you have to rename them with
a .PSD extension. Once you do that, you can manipulate the files with the
graphics tools in that program. I just love applying a mosaic filter to my
Sent Items folder...
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTE
True...
I guess it depends on how large the mailboxes are as to how big a hassle
it's going to be.
MS
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 October 2002 12:48
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure design
I'll d
I'll do one site at a time, and will indeed use this method as I have
successfully in the past (actually by logging on as said user and exporting
to PST via outlook)
What concerned me though was, although this is fine for relocating the
mailboxes back to head office, when the users carry out the
Niki,
If they're large, you're right it'll take ages. However, why not just
EXMerge them to .PSTs on each of the servers, copy onto CDs and carry or
post.
Regards,
Mike Scott
EPS Ltd
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 October 2002 10:
That's great, thanks Mark
I think this will work well for us performance wise, and returning everyone
to a single server will certainly cut down on a lot of headaches, whilst
raising one or two more such as our backup capabilities
Thanks all for the help, now have a long weekend of moving mailbo
And not only that but if you have a Premier Support Agreement I suspect it
doesn't include the extra information often available from the PSS website
KB search. Google also has a (free) Microsoft-specific search engine -
http://www.google.co.uk/microsoft.html
Even better get MOM to do the work fo
I've had these on all my Win2k and XP machines at home
Its titled WEBPOPUP but is actually the messenger service dialog, as if a
net send command was received
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 October 2002 15:30
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Just the tonic! Thank you very much. I did look through ADSI edit initially,
though I must concede I am a novice in that area. It is something I will pay
more attention to in future.
Thanks again
Simon
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 October 200
Niki,
Take a look at the outlook performance document at
http://www.microsoft.com/office/outlook/evaluation/performance.asp
This gives some good tips on tuning for slow links/dialup/etc.
cheers
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 1
How is it possible to force a client to work offline?
Our laptop users have OST files configured, but will automatically work
online if they can find the exchange server, i.e if they're plugged into the
LAN or connected via VPN
thanks
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EM
oops sorry misread question.
apologies
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 October 2002 16:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange server migration
If your in Native mode you could move the server in Site B to Site A. If
your in mixed you c
97 matches
Mail list logo
