that's your answer then - see
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;273263
-Original Message-
From: Andy Haigh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 December 2002 07:11
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Enabled Public Folders on Exchange 2000
No still in Mixed
Hi,
I have an urgent question. One of our customers incidentally deleted some important
mails from deleted items folder. Deleted items retention is set to 0 for private
information store, so it cannot be recovered using this feature. There is no current
backup. I know, that mails still
My vote goes with toast then..:-(. I know of no quick recovery if all those avenues
have been tried without success.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Jan Novák [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 December 2002 12:30
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: recover deleted mail items Exchange
Bit of a long shot but have they ever replied or forwarded them? Might have
them in their Sent Items if they have.
Ant.
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 December 2002 10:40
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: recover deleted mail items
Completely lost, unless those emails were replied to (and in sent items)
or also sent to another employee and can be pulled from their mailbox.
In a normal exchange database, the transactions are frequent and
plentiful. There may not even be any whitespace where there was 5
minutes ago.
I'd
First: Jeff, thanks for your reply.
Outlook.exe /resetfolders didn't work. Maybe because the inbox is stil there
and working just fine, the only problem is that is isn't on the right spot.
It seems that i can't get it out of the deleted items folder.
If there are any other suggestions...
We've experienced sporatic issues with most of the DSL router/firewall combo
units on the market with VPN connectivity to the office. More often than
not, forcing the client MTU to =1400 and ensuring the latest BIOS on the
router has fixed it.
No. View | Current View and select something different than is currently
selected.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Smith Thomas
Of course you did.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 12:50
script that shuts down the db does the snapshot and then
restarts the db
all done in less than a minute. Yo
I don't know about you, but shutting down my Exchange databases takes
significantly longer than a minute. Granted, they're still predominantly
Ex5.5, but its not a one minute process.
I also have this problem and have not been able to fix it, even after trying
to change the published date rangeI am baffled, we have ex5.5 sp4. Have
checked clocks, date settings etc. Cannot put anything in a calendar except
things that are happening now!
Any ideas anyone,
thanks
Vanessa
We are running Exchange 2000 SP3 on two servers in the same organisation. The second
one has only been added recently, and only has one mailbox on it so far. We set up the
original server's SMTP virtual server to use a smarthost which is a UNIX server, as it
isn't accessible from the Internet,
Two choices:
1. Do a Disaster Recovery to a standby server. Extract the necessary data to
a PST. Admonish the user that important mail doesn't go in the Deleted Items
folder.
2. Tell the customer he's toast and show him some best practices.
-Original Message-
From: Jan Novák
We had an issue with Comcast cable blocking PPTP for one of my techs in
Detroit. Don't know about BellSouth. Have you called them and asked? What
I've seen is that some DSL/cable ISP's will block VPN unless you have their
business level service.
Saw a webinar on the Borderware Mxtreme box. With this box and using their
Borderpost Mail interface this looks like a way to (a) have an alternative to
OWA and it's associated headaches (IIS Lockdown, URLScan) thus (b) close port
80 on our server so that 25 is the only open port. Am I missing
Do you have Norton Antivirus installed? I had this very same problem when I had NAV
installed.
Todd Boynton[EMAIL PROTECTED]
== Communications Specialist
== UNET Technology Services, Network Operations
==
Never heard of it. Do you have a specific set of requirements related to
document retention?
On 12/17/02 20:48, Johnson, Richard (NY Int) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi All,
Anyone out here using their offline email vault product? If so what
are your thoughts?
Richard
Does this person work off multiple workstations? For instance using a laptop (using
.ost files) and then using a desktop as well? One thing you might want to check out
is Q article Q276248. My users have multiple workstations and can't understand why
they keep getting duplicates and missing
Yes, it's quite possible. Fishing lesson for the day...
FAQ | Outlook? | Slipstick! | Search? | header | joy
--
Chris Scharff, MVP-Exchange
MessageOne
Exchange Monitoring Reporting:http://www.messageone.com/MV.asp
Free Custom OWA Screens:
http://www.messageone.com/m1owa/index.asp
On
Well, the cost of 'fr4ee' is sometimes much higher than one might think.
There may be other solutions out there as well... The folks at Amrein at
least have a long track record in the Exchange space.
--
Chris Scharff, MVP-Exchange
MessageOne
Emergency Messaging System:
Indeed. I believe that things like things can be caused by scanning the M: drive
(there's a tech article from MS somewhere).
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Boynton, Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 18 December 2002 15:30
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation:
In general, the vast majority of Exchange customers don't need to do
anything with Exchange virtual servers or smtp connectors. The definition of
domains is handled in the recipient policies and you'll need a policy for
each domain being handled... Which will result in multiple e-mail addresses
There are plenty of alternatives to OWA... Are you talking about using their
mail client, or their 'proxy services' for OWA access? If it's the latter,
do you know of any technical differences between their approach and that
used by Whale communications? And.. Are those features compelling over
Don't know but thanks for pointinng out some things I should look at.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Borderware Mxtreme
There are plenty of alternatives to OWA...
Argh.
I *did* check cdolive and slipstick, but still missed it. And found it, now.
Thanks
Heiko Herold
--
-- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073
-- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907472
-- ITALY
-Original Message-
Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the
f^ckedcompany.com newsletter. Besides the domain name there is other
profanity in the newsletter. So do I follow company policy or let it slide?
My gut reaction is to ask the person if they are subscribed and then politely
CHECK THE FAQ's
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Herold Heiko
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 8:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Add custom smtp header ?
Argh.
I *did* check cdolive and slipstick, but still missed it. And
No you should let it go. It's a pretty good news letter. Check out the
site and see what I mean, they basically talk about how screwed up some
company policies are and they have good stories on them. Thus the name
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
No problem... Somewhere around here, I think I have an overview whitepaper
on the subject. If I can find it, I'll mail it to you offline.
On 12/18/02 10:09, James Liddil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't know but thanks for pointinng out some things I should look at.
Jim
-Original
Ah.. If you'd shown your work, I would have just passed on the slipstick
URL. ;)
On 12/18/02 10:09, Herold Heiko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Argh.
I *did* check cdolive and slipstick, but still missed it. And found it, now.
Thanks
Heiko Herold
Do you tell your employees to not curse while talking on the phone?
Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit
-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18,
You could also argue that the content on that website leads to better
business decisions within your own company, by pointing out the
stupidity of others
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002
I agree but what about when the mail contains phrases like @ss-raped? Sure
it is a fine line.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter
Do you tell
Check with HR. Put the ball in their court.
- Original Message -
From: James Liddil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 12:23 PM
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter
I agree but what about when the mail contains phrases like
If they forward that email, and someone gets offended, it's a different
issue. But simply subscribing to it?
Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit
-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL
I just figure out whether I like the person or not, and base it on my personal
opinion. It's good to be king!
;-)
Alex
- Original Message -
From: Drew Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 09:43
Subject: RE:
Jim,
Phytoceutica is a big company that makes really complex medicine-thingies. You have
access to brilliant lawyers. WTF are you talking to a bunch of techno-weenies for?
Print out your AUP and go walk into your general counsel's office.
-tom
-Original Message-
From: James Liddil
Hi,
When any of our users add holidays in Outlook 2000, it adds them just fine for 2002
but not 2003. It's like they aren't reoccurring. We are running Exchange 2000 and have
about 750 users. I have tried changing the computer clock to 2003 and then adding
holidays but they still only populate
Upgrade to Outlook 2002 and you will be good to go until 2005.
- Original Message -
From: Edwards, Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:16 PM
Subject: Holidays in Outlook 2000 Problem
Hi,
When any of our users add
Office 2000 does not include holidays past 2002. You will need to create or
find a new outlook.txt file with future holidays in it. If you search Google
or the archives you can find some links to new holiday files.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Find your outlook.txt file and manually add the missing holidays. Then,
go back to outlook and re-add holidays.
-Original Message-
From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Holidays in Outlook 2000 Problem
Here's a couple links describing this issue.
Those arent links, thats the whole pig.
- Original Message -
From: Boynton, Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:51 PM
Subject: RE: Disappearing Calendar Appointments
Here's a couple links describing this issue.
From my point of view:
If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, what are you
doing browsing someone else' mail?
Its bad form, and can get you fired.
If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is normally enforced.
Don't ask the end user. They will talk
Forums.somethingawful.com come join us in FYAD..you'll love it there
:)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rachel Pickens
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter
From my
Management knows I run scanmail with emanager and have the filter to catch
profanity among other things. When a message meets the criteria it is
archived and I look at the messages only then. I have already made the
decision to make no exceptions and expect everyone to follow the AUP.
Jim
I was some surprised when I pasted it. Sorry it was so long
Todd Boynton[EMAIL PROTECTED]
== Communications Specialist
== UNET Technology Services, Network Operations
== Maine School and
I have been away for awhile today but yes we do have NAV CE installed.
How did you fix it if that was it.
Thank you,
Alex Gonzalez
Senior Systems Administrator
Handleman Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914
-Original Message-
From: Boynton, Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Rachel: As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's
mail. That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in
there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing. Remember --
the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc. It is THEIRS.
Well, that opens an entirely different discussion. We drafted a consent form that
every employee must sign, giving us access to
any and all information coming in or out of the company's communications avenues, and
it's kept in the employee's file.
In this day and age, with human rights
Damn liberals keep screwing everything up
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Alexander Wall
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Blocking a newsletter
Well, that opens an entirely different
block it all...
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter
Damn liberals keep screwing everything up
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Damn Hummerts keep posting.
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:58 PM
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter
Damn liberals keep screwing everything up
-Original Message-
No need to shout.
Yes he has the right, but it should be excercised with caution and the boss backing
you 100%.
But the way it the original message read to me ( and that perception has been cleared
up) He could have been randomly sampling for his own amusement. He wasn't. I have
known very
We just went through the same thing pertaining strictly to emails. No
personal emails that you wouldn't want the Company to see and access at all
times to anyone's mailbox. In this day and age, too many lawsuits are
swayed by emails that documented an employee or employer's actions.
While I agree the mail belongs to the company and the company has the right to review
anyone's email, has that responsiblitiy been passed down simply because I am an
Exchange Administrator? I don't think so. The company has that privlege, but unless
they transfer that responsibility to you, I
Our company is proposing that we allow the Ouut Oof Offfice feature to be
turned on for Internet Mail in Exchange 5.5. I have seen comments on this
newsgroup discussing many security reasons for not doing this! I have
looked in the PDF file but am have diffculty locating this discussion. I
I hate those guys
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 12:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Blocking a newsletter
Damn Hummerts keep posting.
- Original Message -
From:
I disagree with you. As an Exchange Administrator, it is part of your job
to look at other people's mailboxes, whether to troubleshoot a problem, or
if asked to by their manager/supervisor. As any Mail Administrator should
tell you, you are entrusted with being trusted.
Gèoff...
My gut reaction would be to take a hit of diet pepsi and ask myself why I felt so
threatened by this newsletter. If i still felt this way after i finished the whole
can, I'd probably go and ask them why, and if it were not for work purposes I'd ask
them to consider unsubbing.
But then by
that's not necessarily true. Unless he's been told to do it (which it appears he
has), he doesn't have some sort of implicit right to do it. He has to be tasked with
it.
Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit
No, no they don't.
In fact, I know of multiple occasions in which people (including coworkers
of mine) were fired for accessing someone else's mailbox without prior
approval.
Yes, the email is the company's property. That does not imply, however, that
the admins can look through it at their
This might help:
http://www.equiinet.com/press/pressreleases/24_06_2002.htm
-Original Message-
From: Archie Call [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk
Our company is proposing
That's not true. As an Mail Administrator/Engineer, whatever you want to
call yourself, there is implicit trust that you will not abuse your power to
be able to view EVERYONE's email, due to the confidentiality of, oh say, the
CEO or CFO. You have the power to view payroll and accounting
My gut reaction to taking a hit of Diet Pepsi would be to hurl.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL
I disagree with you. As an Exchange Administrator, granted specific
permissions, I have that ability.
I for one, NEVER access users' mailboxes. Ever. Should there be such a
need the manager of the person requesting access is granted access.
Such access is not a 'right'.
William Lefkovics
Of course they know... they made the decision to run it, right?
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of James Liddil
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Management knows I run scanmail with
there is implicit trust
That 'implicit trust' would have to be in writing in policy, or I am not
touching it.
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dale Geoffrey
Edwards
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 12:37 PM
To: Exchange
Um, no. Even though I am the Lan Manager for my company, I have not been given
permission to go rifling through the payroll documents or the CEO's email. I have the
ability to recover docs when necessary, and look at stuff when told to, but being made
an Admin does NOT give me ANY implicit
Like I said, in some companies they do, in others, they realize that the
Mail Administrator has access to everything on the Network, and knows there
has to be a certain amount of trust to go along with that title. As far as
accessing other people's mailboxes, how do you troubleshoot what problems
This is from Symantec document:2002090916040948
Solution:
Symantec AV only protects the file system on an Exchange server and not
Exchange server itself. The protection of the Exchange server is the
role of a product like Symantec AntiVirus/Filtering for Microsoft
Exchange (SAVFMSE). Certain
That's what I said in the beginning. You may the rights to do it, but
that doesn't mean you should. I don't go anywhere that a manager or
supervisor tells me to. We get User requests all the time asking for access
to a User's mailbox that has left the Company. We bounce it back to them
and
I think you need to check the Dictionary.com site again.
As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's mail.
That implies not only the ability, but the sanction.
Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Funny. My dictionary doesn't have the word Exchange Administrator in it.
Oh well, guess everything I said before you can forget. LOL
Gèoff...
-Original Message-
From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Very true.
FWIW:
XCON: When to Create SMTP Connectors in Exchange 2000
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;en-us;q294736
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 8:01
Cut and cross posted from another list - some good ones to think about
Tom Meunier
I'm not in, but you have hit and now verified a live address. Please
put me on your A list for resale to other spammers.
I'm the president of the company, and obviously wealthy. Since I've
just told you I'm away
IANAL, but I do know that the legality of accessing mail in a mailbox varies
greatly depending on the jurisdiction. And since IANAL, I know better than
to try and figure out whether it may or may not be legal for myself or
someone else to do so. I leave that determination to the blood sucking
That Tom is that rare jewel... a wise Texan.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Friese, Casey
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cut and cross posted from another list - some good ones to think about
Gee I never thought that what I thought was a simply query would go this far.
As much as I think the f^ckedcompnay.com and internalmemos.com are eye
opening one still needs to keep in mind that ones job is to enforce the
policy. Management easily forgets what they agreed to until some employee
Exchange 5.5. NT 4.0.
Anybody seen this error message? Our log is full of them from beginning to
end.
I checked TechNet, but didn't see anything matching the error message.
Event ID: 1174
Source: MSExchangeDS
Type: Information
Category: Security
Description: An unauthenticated logon was
Got to love his wit. I have quite a bit of yours archieved as well
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 4:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk
That Tom is that rare
Did you turn up logging on the DS?
This is exactly what it says. You could probably see complimentary
entries in the security event log as well.
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of McCready,
Robert
Sent: Wednesday, December
'Archieved' is a good place for them.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Friese, Casey
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Got to love his wit. I have quite a bit of yours archieved as well
Yea true the local paper just had a story about some thieves that were
sending what appeared to be spam messages to companies in the area. From
there they would get the out of office replies and then go rob those
people blind knowing exactly how long they were going to be gone.
-Original
Well, in Finland working for a telecommunications operator (little known
fact :) and asp, just starting to look at logs, who sent what to whom would
get me jailed up for up to 3 years without the appropriate permissions from
the people involved :-P . It's like you were tapping somebodys phone
Yea but the question is the word f^uck really something that violates
a company policy? I know here that in that case it wouldn't be. But if
it was used in a violent or s^xual context then it would be.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Did you check 279509.
Gèoff...
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 4:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Event ID: 1174
Exchange 5.5. NT 4.0.
Anybody seen this error message? Our log is full of them from
I saw that one, but it said it was a problem with 2000, which we aren't
running. Perhaps it pertains to NT 4.0 also.
-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 4:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Event ID: 1174
It's not up to you to tell what is or is not against a company policy.
You don't have to understand it..
--B.
There is no better way to exercise the imagination than the study of the law.
No artist ever interpreted nature as freely as a lawyer interprets the truth.
-- Jean Giradoux
Looks like the security was set to Maximum on the DS. I turned it off.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 4:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Event ID: 1174
Did you turn up logging on the DS?
This is
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/2540307.stm
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk
Yea true the local paper just had a
Is there any way to audit use of System Manager and/or Cluster Administrator? I have
checked security settings in ESM itself: when I right-click on the Org and go to
Properties, then select Security | Advanced | Auditing, I see an auditing entry that
applies to All. All the access items
Hi all. I ahve recently retired this Administrative Group that only had one Exchange
2000 server in it. The server got un-installed without any problems. But now I have
this Schedule+ Free Busy system folder that used to belong to that administrative
group and it is refusing to go away. It
Well, uh... an unauthenticated logon was attempted. What part of this is
mysterious?
- Original Message -
From: McCready, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:22 PM
Subject: Event ID: 1174
Exchange 5.5. NT 4.0.
On a technical list I'm on that concerns Exchange (among other things)
someone forwarded to the list someone's OOF from a major company. From his
name and location the person found his address on the web. Since his OOF
said he'd be gone for two weeks, out of town on vacation, he essentially is
Thanks for that
-Original Message-
From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 18 December 2002 9:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Enabled Public Folders on Exchange 2000
that's your answer then - see
Hello,
I was just perusing some threads, and caught some particular threads
regarding defragging the message store. The one that hit me hard, was the
person that found out that doom was eminent - because of a specific error
code, found in the Event Viewer regarding the Exchange Message Store.
The message store manages itself and does its own nightly maintenance. It
should be all you ever need.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 7:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Defragging (important???)
Hello,
I
Michael, there is an online process that performs this function by
default on a nightly basis.
It is beneficial (note: not even necessary, only beneficial) when:
- you move a large amount of data from the store
- you delete a large amount of data from the store
In other words, don't worry
If it violates policy, let HR send out the order to block the specific word
in emails. If someone's mailbox needs to be browsed and ripped through, let
the C*O do it and the IT guy stay out of the way.
In other words, there is no technical solution. It's up to a given company
to determine what it
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
