Shared folders is a common feature set in other applications, too.
But good deal on the software!
Dear Board of Directors:
Thank you for providing this new messaging and collaboration suite for
our company.
It seems, however, that our hardware is not up to the task of meeting
the messaging
I thought the exact same thing. Spend the money on the hardware instead
of the software. You might lose some features, but you might gain in
the long run.
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jorge Herrera
Sent: Wednesday, Janu
It was basically the permission problem. where default or anonymous
permission was not set
Regards
Santhosh.H
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:05
Nope. I figured it out. Our Active Directory guy rebuilt (and renamed) the global
catalog server on our subnet and we haven't rebooted the Exchange server since then.
Now I'm not saying I saw a KB article about this problem, but the timing was right and
it has been fixed since I rebooted the ser
How is CommValt now a days ?
Ryan,
-Original Message-
From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 6:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
We are planning to use Legato in this situation to bac
The budget for the software isn't an issue for us. Microsoft is on our board
of directors, and so supplies us with software at no cost. If we had to pay
for the software, it would probably be another story, but even then I would
still pull for Outlook/Exchange. I think the Outlook/Exchange combinat
I know this may be a bad forum for this, but since your box is so
outdated and you have a very limited budget, have you thought of using
Linux and sendmail/qmail/postfix etc for email and squirrelmail/imp/ etc
for webmail? This would allow you to use your current hardware with no
expense other than
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=1011&source=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sanjeev Sharma
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 18:43
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: 'Exchange Discussions'
Subject: DHCP won't renew lease
Importance:
Bummer.
What does the Windows forum say about it?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sanjeev Sharma
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: 'Exchange Discussions'
Importance: High
I am currently having an
I am currently having an issue with one of the subnets on our DHCP servers
and I could use your help. On one of the subnets DHCP won't renew the
leasing of IP address to any of the clients. The clients who already have
IP address lease to them are working normally but whichever one got rebooted
co
I think the box would perform more or less adequately. I don't like the
disk configuration, however; you should consider a RAID-1 pair for the
OS and Exchange IS and DS logs, and the rest in a RAID-5 for the
databases and MTA queues. Even better would be separate RAID-1 pairs
for the OS and for t
I honestly cant say.
However your company may want to think of this. They are spending a
considerable amount of money for the software alone. Shouldn't that same
consideration be given to the hardware?
Nobody is going to be happy with the current scenario once it is in place.
And as Ed said, sinc
I know it is well beyond end-of-life, but given our financial constraints,
is it useable? I don't have the resources to do a proper stress test to see
how response times would be under a ~30-50 user load. If it takes 45 seconds
for a user to open their inbox, then I will have a good reason to say t
See KB article 251390. According to what I've found in MSDN, you can
get the Assoc-NT-Account, or primary Windows NT account, using ADSI, but
not other accounts that might have permissions on a mailbox.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs
A SAN just looks like a set of disk drives to an Exchange server.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mitchell Mike
Sent: Wed
You're one to talk.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Christopher
Hummert
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:37 PM
To: Exc
WINS.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Darcy Adams
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subj
If you're working with Microsoft PSS, then you should heed their advice
until the problem is resolved.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Even if it was, that machine is well beyond end-of-life.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Wednesda
It'd probably be a 500 Million MB download anyway !
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: 29 January 2003 22:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange2003
Nope that is one you have to wait for on the CD. Bastards
--
Nope that is one you have to wait for on the CD. Bastards
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey
Fyodorov
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange2003
I haven't seen Outlook 11 beta availab
I haven't seen Outlook 11 beta available publicly
-Original Message-
From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange2003
I just knew the download would become available before the media would
arrive.
I just knew the download would become available before the media would
arrive. D'oh.
K.
Can you download Outlook 11 beta ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey
Fyodorov
Sent: 29 January 2003 22:21
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Ok.. Hrmm. DNS config problem? (not likely but don't see any other bonus
ideas flying around )
On 1/29/03 15:14, "Edwards, Aaron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Interesting you mention removing the IP stack. One of my coworkers told me
to try that so I did. Unfortunately it didn't work.
And yes I
Well, the Beta has recently become publicly available. It was pretty quick to install,
the installation is not much different from Exchange 2000 installation. Didn't really
have any problems with this beta.
-Original Message-
From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday,
Cool.
When did you get the Beta software, how long did it take you to get
going and what problems did you come across? I've ordered the media, but
I'm in the UK so I'm waiting for airmail :(
K
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey
Fyo
there are 2,186 queues on that server at present time, each has at least one messages
that's being sent somewhere.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange2003
That's probably because the server is
That's probably because the server is currently pumping thousands of messages. :)
And it is running on pretty crappy hardware.
-Original Message-
From: KNIGHTSLAYER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 4:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange2003
My
I don't think E2k or even W2K is recommended on a Ppro system.
-Original Message-
From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Server capacity
I am hoping that I can get some feedback on a server configurati
I am hoping that I can get some feedback on a server configuration. I have a
Compaq Proliant 6500, dual PPro 200, 256 MB ram, and 7 x 4.3GB drives in
RAID 5 with a hot spare. I want to set this system up as an Exchange 2000
server for about 30 local users, and another 20 via OWA. The email load wil
Can you open the users mailbox logged in as you ?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 January 2003 22:01
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: EXMERGE ERROR
Ie Exchange admin privs, not just domain admin.
-Original Message-
From: Morri
Ie Exchange admin privs, not just domain admin.
-Original Message-
From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: EXMERGE ERROR
Does the account you are logged into the desktop with have rights to the
use
Does the account you are logged into the desktop with have rights to the
user mailbox?
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: EXMERGE ERROR
I believe ExMerge can only be run against exc
>IIRC that includes online backups.
Oo,ooo,ooo... I'll have to call them. I didn't see that option in their
"trial" version, but maybe that's just a restriction of the trial.
-Walden
Walden H Leverich III
President
Tech Software
(516) 627-3800 x11
(208) 692-3308 eFax
[EMAIL PROTECTE
I believe ExMerge can only be run against exchsrvr locally
Tim.
x3683
-Original Message-
From: Reed, Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 4:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: EXMERGE ERROR
Anyone have an issue running the EXMERGE from thei
It shouldn't be an upgrade; it should be a service pack. Most of this
product fixes issues from the old with not much *NEW* features in
comparison.
K
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David J.
Culliton
Sent: 29 January 2003 20:23
To: Excha
Anyone have an issue running the EXMERGE from their desktop and it says
you do not have permissions on the information store but you actually do?
I found an article that mentions something about copying the mapi32.dll
file over...
Thanks,
Alex
___
Be advised that the MSDE (Sql server) that ships with BE9 is the old
unpatched vulnerable code. If you install BE9 you should immediately update
the ssnetlib.dll file that they install or you could become part of the
latest SQL virus party.
I know this because I just installed the BE9 eval and th
For anyone running the beta, does it feel like the system requirements are
going to be a lot steeper then for Exchange 2000?
I'm running Exchange 2000 on a dual PPro 200 Compaq server, and I'd love not
to have to get new hardware.
Thanks,
Erick
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Ault" <[EMA
It really looks good. I like the way the preview pane can be on the
side or bottom.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey
Fyodorov
Sent: 29 January 2003 21:17
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange2003
sure, when it comes out, p
My little test of it bombed me out after 30 seconds !
I clicked on inbox, a few messages then contacts, then BM !
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey
Fyodorov
Sent: 29 January 2003 21:17
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exch
I have a bunch of mta .dat files stuck in my mtadata folder. I have
checked Technet and am currently working with MS techs and still no
success. I have reinstalled Exchange 5.5 and applied SP4. Out of 1800
.dat files only 177 were processed. The MTA queue is at 0.
What can I do to flush the fi
I've got an odd situation with an Exchange 5.5 server (Win2K, but in an NT4 domain)
not seeing all of the trusted domains. I've checked the FAQ, the archives, and the
Microsoft KB.
Here's the situation:
Exchange 5.5 organization in TestNTDomain with three sites/five servers (one or two
server
I see you make an impression on people everywhere you go Mr. Scharff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 12:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: My apologies but I must editorialize.
No
sure, when it comes out, probably after the first few service packs :)
http://216.87.16.88/exchange/
logon as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
password is 1234
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Interesting you mention removing the IP stack. One of my coworkers told me to try that
so I did. Unfortunately it didn't work.
And yes I did install the RPC tool on a machine that's Outlook works.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, Ja
On the plus side, I don't think it is telling you that you have an AD
permissions problem. Just to check... You did install this on a workstation
that works and get a successful result correct (Want to eliminate error with
the tool). For gits and shiggles, what happens if you remove and reinstall
t
IIRC that includes online backups.
On 1/29/03 14:06, "Walden H. Leverich III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Just point it an EDB file you can go right in.
If you have an EDB file. I don't see support for "online" backups. How many
of us do regular "offline" backups?
-Walden
W
Good afternoon,
Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 SP4
Has anyone ever used EMC's SAN technology to recreate a exchange mailbox
that had been deleted? It is my understanding with scripts and things that
this is possible.
Thanks for any insight that you might have.
Regards,
Mike Mitchell
Systems eMAIL Ad
Well, I was actually looking for both...the publicdelegates worked great for finding
out who has 'send on behalf of' permissions, that is step one, now I need to know
mailboxes that have extra NT permissions.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wedn
No problem. I've added you to my kill file, so this shouldn't be a problem
for you in the future.
On 1/29/03 10:40, "Todd Bentley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In response to the author of this particular reply; Yes, I did find your
answer and it was as helpful and condescending as the one you
I tried putting an entry in the lmhosts file. Still no dice.
I'm not real familiar with RPC ping. I downloaded it from Microsoft and tried to ping
the Exchange server with the protocol sequence tcp/ip and the endpoint Rping. It gives
me these errors:
RPC Call raised exception 0x6ba
The server i
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/evaluation/ti/topten.asp
Anyone hankerin' to upgrade?
Tim.
x3683
-Original Message-
From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 2:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: calendar, tasks and contacts
Hi,
I have a r
It turned out to be a corruption in the mail profile on a particular desktop machine.
Unique circumstances none the less.
Thanks for the pointer though...
MP
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 29 January 2003 3:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Its called Octel Unified Messenger, and is currently sold by Avaya, who has
the old Lucent (and before that AT&T) PBX hardware business.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
I am using it now. It shaved about 20% off our typical enterprise
backup times. I like the ability to modify the order in which my
machines are backup up. If 8.6 had it - I never found it... I also
like the interface better.
-Original Message-
From: Weatherly, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
Is this an AD network? Are there firewalls inbetween the clients and
the Exchange box or multiple subnets? The odds are it's still DNS; try
troubleshooting it by putting an entry in the hosts file on the client.
-Original Message-
From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: W
did you try the RPC ping?
Dave Stevens
-IT Network Support-
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Profile Creation Problem
I can ping the
>Just point it an EDB file you can go right in.
If you have an EDB file. I don't see support for "online" backups. How many
of us do regular "offline" backups?
-Walden
Walden H Leverich III
President
Tech Software
(516) 627-3800 x11
(208) 692-3308 eFax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.T
First name basis probably. Don't do it! You have been warned!
Brian Narkinsky
System Manager
Department of Environmental Protection
MS 6520
2600 Blairstone RD
Tallahassee, FL 32399
phone (850)245-8314
fax (850)412-0400
-Original Message-
From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
I can ping the exchange server and get to every other server on the network. It won't
check name against the IP of the server either. So I doubt whether it's a DNS/WINS
issue.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:40 AM
http://snurl.com/oe8
We used to disable the button through a reg edit.
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=288119
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Clemens, Rick
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussi
you'll get to know your PSS people and TAM very well.
-Original Message-
From: Walbert, Bryan (Bryan) % [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
Well the Microsoft Enginee
I saw something similar that worked with Outlook (not OWA), developed by a
third party for Expanets, who took over the sales end of Lucent
Technologies. You might want to check with Expanets about that. I can't
remember the company who developed it now, but when I called them directly
they refered
Its pretty cool. I have tried it and it works as advertised. Just point it
an EDB file you can go right in.
-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Ontrack Powercontrols
Has anyone look
Please excuse my ignorance on this topic but about 2 years ago I went to a
Hands-on Lab for Exchange 2000 and in OWA they had this media tool that
played voice messages on the web page itself. You just clicked a button to
download and install.
I currently have Exchange 2000 running and I cannot
Has anyone looked at this product in detail? Looks too good to be true.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: ma
DNS/WINS/connectivity. Check to see if you can see/ping the Exchange
box from these workstations.
-Original Message-
From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook Profile Creation Problem
Hi,
We ha
Hi,
We have an Exchange 2000 server with about 800 mailboxes. The server has dual Xions,
3GB of RAM, and is on gigabit ethernet. All users have Outlook 2000 clients. I have a
weird profile problem.
If a user tries to create and check name a profile to a mailbox they have permissions
to, they
Well the Microsoft Engineers seem to think it will work quite well. I will
let you know how it works out.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on a
By the way, does America West airlines use any of your products? Just
wondering.
- Original Message -
From: "Tony Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:58 PM
Subject: RE: OWA
> Do I need to set anything for OWA t
I did everything that was on your list except I use SP3 not 4 for Exch55OWA.
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA
Ok tony Im not genius with this stuff
But have you:
1.) Is
Another issue with my Exchange 2000 relays that send out all mail from our Imail
servers.
These Exchange servers have been working fine for last few months. However recently
they have been getting swamped. They still receive and send messages fine, however the
average number of messages in the
Ok tony Im not genius with this stuff
But have you:
1.) Is it on a Server and NOT workstation? (remember server only)
2.) Is the server part of the same domain as your exch server (did you join
it to the NT domain - I seem to remember you are Exch55)
3.) Did you load the server with IIS at time of
Do I need to set anything for OWA to work? I got pass the first problem and
at the OWA logon screen. When I try to logon I get "OWA was unable to get to
your inbox." Do I need to set any permission on my Exchange server?
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Here are two KB articles that I managed to find:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;234022
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;218445
It is a ridiculous process and I recommend doing it on a test server first.
I'm sure their are better walkthroughs writte
I was talking about NT permissions. Of course, this would apply to
client permissions, which I now realize is what you were probably asking
about.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From:
I was thinking of VBScript using ADSI. You need to also call a routine
from another API that converts those cryptic SIDs into text names.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL P
After you posted, of course.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:25 AM
To: E
Thank I found something on technet
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: OWA
Hey that turbine blew out on takeoff.
Did I forget a bolt?
Try looking in Technet for 0x800A01A8 and see
Tony
PSS ID Number: Q248718
Article Last Modified on 06-22-2001
The information in this article applies to:
Microsoft Outlook Web Access 5.5 Service Packs 1, 2, 3
Microsoft Exchange Server 5.5
--
Hey that turbine blew out on takeoff.
Did I forget a bolt?
Try looking in Technet for 0x800A01A8 and see if you can find something.
- Original Message -
From: "Tony Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:12 PM
Subj
g... machine crashed and strangely it sent this mail.
The attribute is 'publicDelegates'... I use perl and Net::LDAP... but
I'm sure there are many other ways get this.
jeff e.
___
hrm... if you already have AD in place.. I believe this info is in AD.
The attribute is
-Original
I have just install OWA on W2K and when I try to open OWA I get
Microsoft VBScript runtime (0x800A01A8)
Object required: 'Application(...)'
/exchange/USA/logon.asp, line 12
Can someone where to start? Did I miss a service pack?
Tony
_
Eventually, they will be custom coded, and I am sure one of our guys can whip
something up if I know where to look. We have 6 orgs and the first two are manual
migrations with PF and DL sync tools that are being coded as we speak so they can
coexist at first.
The delegate access mailboxes is
I wonder if one of the migration tools out there could indicate that.
Are you using one of them or strictly using MS tools/techniques.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bendall, Paul
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:02 PM
To: Exchange Dis
Have you had a look at MBInfo?
Regards,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 January 2003 17:56
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes
Scripted how? As in .csv, dir export or what?
-Origi
Scripted how? As in .csv, dir export or what?
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes
That can be scripted by someo
That can be scripted by someone who knows how. It's a little tricky in
my experience, though.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Beha
Does anyone know of a way to automate a way to extract a list of mailboxes that
multiple users have access to. We are in the process of migrating Ex55 to 2000 and I
have been asked to identify all mailboxes that more than one user accesses. Any
suggestions would be appreciated.
_
It's nice to know that I am not the only one who thinks it doesn't make
sense... 8)
Thanks.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disable forward
That doesn't make any more sense to me than it does to you!
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brian Ko
Sent: Wednesday, Jan
Hello.
Exchange 5.5 SP4 with Outlook 2000 and 2002 users environment.
I understand that there's an option to disable automatic replies and
autofowarding in IMS. However, does anyone know if there's an option to
allow users to send new emails to other SMTP servers, but do not allow
forwarding (ma
Are you using Veritas NetBackup version 4.5?
There is a known problem with the installation of Version 4.5 replacing the
MS runtime DLLs with incompatible verions.
Steve Smith
Common IT Services
Ministry of Management Services
Province of British Columbia
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (250)
we originally installed rightfax ver. 7.0 and have since upgraded to 8.0
It has been one of the easiest things to install/maintain and we are running
exch. 5.5
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 12:08 PM
To: Exchange Discu
Mark,
Good to know about Message Manager moving over the images to a network share. I wrote
a script on the exchange server so that once it came in it would move the image to a
network share based on the fax number it was sent to.
Brett
-Original Message-
From: Mark Arnold [mailto:[EM
Faxination's a great one for the Enterprise level.
Another good one is Message Manager from www.syssol.com.au which we've
just implemented. It's does everything faxination does and also delivers
inbound faxes to a network share, which was the reason we chose one over
the other (we've got a requirem
I have used Fenestrae's Faxination and it worked great.
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Fax
Anybody using a faxing product with there Exchange Server?
I'm reviewing Captari
Anybody using a faxing product with there Exchange Server?
I'm reviewing Captaris Right Fax and GFI FAXMaker. Anybody have
any positive/negative feedback on either of these products?
Thanks.
Robert
_
List posting FAQ: http:/
Browser security should be medium only, perhaps Norton sets it to high or the
equivalent?
Harriet
-Original Message-
From: Walden H. Leverich III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 January 2003 16:55
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA 5.5 and Norton Internet Security
I had a user c
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
