Looks like these messages are the HearBeat messages from Symantec
Antivirus for Exchange.
My mailbox was set there to receive those messages.
regards
Uso
- Original Message -
From: Uso [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 2:17 PM
Looking for some advice -
Exchange 2000 Sp3 running on Dell 4600 full of hard drives and memory,
all hotfixes and post sp3 applied.
Event ID 8206 Calendaring agent failed with error code 0x80070005 while
saving appointment and shows the public folder for each of the several
public folders
Can I please have comments on the following plan?
The current setup:
EX01, an Exchange 2000 Enterprise edition server sits on our LAN. In
our DMZ we have MIS01, a Mobile Information Server 2002 server. (both
these servers are member servers in the AD)
Also in our DMZ, we have a workgroup win2k
Well, if you're going to include 3rd party software:
salesforce.com's outlook edition doesn't work -- unloads itself, and their
won't-hold-you-to-it time line is 1Q04 for support. Synchronization
(intellisync-based) works fine.
Also, iHateSpam 3.x is unsupported, although I didn't have any
I am using the Blackberry desktop with outlook 2003. I am using the final
released Outlook (11.5608.5606) and Desktop Manager 3.6.0.54. I used to
have an older version of the desktop manager which did NOT work with outlook
2003.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Finnesey
Definitely third party software. Sometimes it seems like it is more
important to them that their niche software works more than Outlook.
Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS)
Vancouver, Washington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121
Background:
Running Exchange 2000 with Cisco Unity's Unified Messaging. Management
wants us to continue to use Cisco Unity to deliver voice messages left on our
IP phones to our email. However, they do not want us to backup the voice
messages. We are currently using Veritas Datacenter for
Don't know of any other than using Exmerge maybe. What I would do is make a
separate storage group for those mailboxes that contain wav files and not
back them up during you normal runs. This will save space/time which sounds
like what your trying to do
From: Steve Iadarola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problem is that the entire company is using Cisco's Unified Messaging and IP
phones. We are looking for the lowest cost solution. Obviously the zero
cost solution is to disable the unified messaging. The highest cost solution
is not to back up the stores at all. The moderately expensive option
Well I will be seeing you there then Ken, looking forward to what they're
presenting on 99.99% uptime without clustering.
Anthony L. Sollars
Technology Consultant
Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc.
480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
( 425.254.4845
)
So the goal here is to save money on backup capacity?
-Original Message-
From: Steve Iadarola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 8:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Excluding specific email message types from backups
Problem is that the entire company is
I have a mac user who is showing a event id 1132, Source:MSExchange POP3
An error (0x80070057) occurred while rendering a message for download on
mailbox
The only KB Article I can find is KB Article 187869 and all it says it to
load the latest service pack, well this server is at Exchange 5.5
Has nothing to do with saving any money on backups.
Steve Iadarola
Senior Support Specialist
Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
I am suddenly having problems with my incoming email and it seems to be a
PTR record issue.
My incoming email server was reporting the following error message in the
App log :
PTR record. 198.77.178.129 has a PTR record, but does not match HELO
string fw, accepting anyway
Ptrs =
Oops ! Never mind folks..figured it out.
It was a typo in the DNS..thanks anyway
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 12:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Hep with PTR record
Importance: High
I am suddenly having problems with
Maybe a rule to put all wav files into a PST? Not sure if what you want to
do is doable without heavy user intervention. Will sit back and see what
others have to say.
(Highest cost solution is to not back up the stores?)
From: Steve Iadarola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions
FWIW,
We are using the latest BES and the 3.6.0.54 Desktop manager, Blackberry
is great on Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003.
-Warren
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Alverson, Tom
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 6:52 AM
To: Exchange
Yea was just going to ask which one is right?
cerebus-service.aiim.org
cerberus-service.aiim.org
From: RBHATIA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Hep with PTR record
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 12:25:24 -0400
Oops
Can you give me more detail on this error? What Mac OS is the user using?
What Outlook client? Do they use Appletalk or TCPIP to connect to the
server? Are they physically connected to your network or are they VPN'ing
into it?
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
--
From: John
Running Exchange 2000 - outlook 2000, outlook-xp, etc.
Is there a way to setup a clients mailbox that will only receive mail?
We don't want to clients to be able to send from that account.
Ron Pennell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, at 11:29am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running Exchange 2000 with Cisco Unity's Unified Messaging. Management
wants us to continue to use Cisco Unity to deliver voice messages left on
our IP phones to our email. However, they do not want us to backup the
voice messages.
We are also having a problem that the Microsoft CRM Client is also
unsupported.
Ryan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Walden H.
Leverich III
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 9:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.
You have BES running on Exchange 2003? I met with Blackberry last week
and they told me it was unsupported and they do not have any ETA on
support.
Ryan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Warren Cundy
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003
I didn't talk to Blackberry support myself, but a colleague here went up
a few levels of tech support with them and confirmed that it worked. We
tested, and it did.
We aren't on native 2003 yet. I'll be checking back with them before
that.
-Warren
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
We are on native 2003 now and I have talked with two people to day at
Blackberry one tells me it will work and the other tells me it will not
work. We are going to do some testing this weekend.
Ryan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
The MAC is on OS 10.2 and is using the latest Outlook for MAC 2001. They
are connected to our lan via tcpip. He has 2 macs running outlook, 1 a
desktop and 1 a laptop.
This error shows up at odd times sometimes its 4 times a second then its
then it skips 2 or 3 seconds..
john
-Original
I have seen this error on our Exchange Server for several (all Mac, I think) clients
as well and what I have read says that the Outlook client is set as both a POP3 and a
MAPI client - check the users settings to see if he has it set up both ways. It says
to go back through setting up the
Um,
We have 4 domain controllers and the system doesnt fail over until the
next iteraqtion of the dsquery. This was moved from 5 minutes (SP2) to 15
minutes (in SP3). Thus my problem.
I have found the solution for the issue to to hack the ds query time in
the registry. This is an issue
Hi There,
I have a wierd issue and if anyone has any possibly explanation by all
means feel free to post.
We have 4 AD serviers in our environment to date. All of the are Running
SP3 on them and we have many Exchange 2000 servers as well. Sometimes (not
on regular intervals, just randomly)
I don't like putting a front-end server in a DMZ because of the number of
ports you must open.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
You can prevent them from sending mail to the Internet by the use of the
Delivery Restrictions tab in the SMTP Connector properties.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It kind of negates the whole reason for putting it there in the first place.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 1:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Upgrade 2000 to 2003
I don't like putting a front-end server in
Give users two mailboxes on two separate databases, one for voice mail and
one for e-mail. Don't back up the voice-mail store and set it to use
circular logging. Heaven help you if there's a failure on that database.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world
Are all those domain controllers in the same site as the Exchange server?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Timothy Schilbach
DNS or possible Binding order
From: Timothy Schilbach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Exchange Stops Responding to Clients?
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 13:05:44 -0700
Hi There,
I have a wierd issue and if anyone
1 server = Exchange 2000
1 server = Exchange 2003
I have installed the ADC for Exchange 2003 on the Exchange 2000 server and
when I open the Exchange system manager on the 2003 server I can view the
contents of the Exchange 2000 information store just fine.
My question is how do I force the
Hi There,
I checked DNS and all server IP's are correctly registered and I checked
all the _msdcs directories and they are all registered correctly.
Can you elaborate on what I should look for in binding order or dns?
-Timothy
DNS or possible Binding order
From: Timothy Schilbach
EK2K, SP3 Outlook 2K
I have a user that cannot access properties of a public folder via
Outlook. When the user right clicks on any public folder and selects
properties, nothing happens. The user must be able to access the Summary
tab on properties in order to see who the folder contacts are.
Check the TCP binding order. Search MS for topics. Here is one.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;163576
From: Timothy Schilbach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Exchange Stops
Does anyone know of some good remote/local applications that allow one to test SMTP
connections? Something where I could put in an email, and SMTP server, and it would
show me the trace of the communications between the two.
In the past, I would telnet, but for some reason, the Telnet in Win2k
telnet host port
for example: telnet localhost 25
This will connect to the host at port 25. This works fine on my W2K box.
Guy Swartwood
-Original Message-
From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 4:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SMTP
Ah, it does still work that way.
It turns out the my Spam catcher was messing things up, and preventing a connection.
That should teach me to assume that it's the tools, and not the system.
Thanks,
Erick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Hi all,
1 forest, 1tree, multiple childdomains
W2KAD
I am planning to run exchange2003 /forestprep at the forestroot of our AD, the root
will have 1 exchange2003 server (just 50 users, 1 storage group) but the childomains
will have their own exchange2003 servers (some of them 10 databases).
Xwall 3.28 does allow for GAL checking ... Although I haven't tried it
yet
mike
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2003 5:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help! Mail Queue is all blocked up...
Since Xwall has no
44 matches
Mail list logo
