Do you have multiple Exchange 2000 servers? Did you install one of them
to be the front end server for the F5 to do the SSL proxy to? If not,
it might be the case where the server is located on a different E2K
server, and hence it used the standard http://
Andrew
MCSE (w2k/nt4) + CCNA
, then you don't need to run Forestprep or
domainprep.
Andrew Chan
MCSE (W2K & NT4) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: Tom.Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Saturday, August 23, 2003 4:31 PM
Posted To: ExchangeDiscussion
Conversation: Quick question -- -domainprep and f
Yes. All you need to do is to set different remote domains under the
SMTP virtual server. Be careful, though, do NOT check the "allow
incoming mail to be relayed to this domain" for domains that you are not
receiving mail for.
Andrew
MCSE (w2k/nt4) + CCNA
> -Original Messag
onnector 2
>
> Any help as always gratefully received.
>
> Cheers
>
> Andrew
>
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the
Replace your exchange server name with "servername" and replace "the
username of the user that you are trying to get calendar info of" with
"username", and THEN put the revised URL in to your browser.
Andrew
MCSE (w2k/nt4) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: Br
Since the second storage group uses a second log files, you will have
faster recovery time for your VIPs (if they are in the separate SG) when
it comes to recovery.
Andrew
MCSE (w2k/nt4) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: Bailey, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, June 09
The the obvious choice would be re-enable the account, reset the
password, and then you don't even need to give anyone access, just log
on as the user, and export the .pst. Done!.
Andrew
MCSE (w2k/nt4) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: Pham, Tuan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Post
r
exchnage server to indicate the appropriate mx server addresses.
Either way, it's probably best to deny the access to those addresses
from your outgoing border routers to ensure that no mail went through
that way.
Andrew
MCSE (w2k/nt4) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: MSX dude [mailto:[
This might help: (link might wrap)
http://hqextsrvsft01.citrix.com/cgi-bin/webcgi.exe/,/?Session=6731822,U=
1,ST=294,N=0005,K=25163,SXI=13,Case=obj(3924)
Andrew,
CCNA + MCSE ( W2K + NT4 )
-Original Message-
From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, March 05
7;Reply-To' email address.
Is there any other way around this, short of giving our users two email boxes on the
server and telling them to switch between the two?
Any ideas gratefully appreciated, as I have to go live this weekend!
Many thanks,
Andrew Hedges
Senior Network Analyst
Un
vly, if you do come across the solution, please let me know!
Many thanks,
Andrew Hedges
Senior Network Analyst
UnumProvident
DDI: 01306 873449
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 3:41 PM
To: E
Hello all,
Does anyone happen to know if Outlook 2001 for Mac is considered an
"smart" MAPI client and will take a referral to a GC, or does act like a
pre-OL2K client and utilize the DSProxy service?
Just because 2001 > 2000 doesn't give me a lot of confidence that OL2K1 is
a "smart" client.
__
I'll join this campaign. I've seen the problem and didn't like it
either. You can change the legacy exchange DN, but this creates some
other problems...
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, January 03, 2003 5:08 PM
Posted To: SWYNK Exchange
2002 9:02 PM
Posted To: SWYNK Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: KB Article 319206 - O2K2 Use closes GC
Subject: Re: KB Article 319206 - O2K2 Use closes GC
Offhand I'd say it first checks the subnet, then response times.
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Hitchcock" &l
D]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hitchcock,
Andrew
Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 1:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: KB Article 319206 - O2K2 Use closes GC
Could you elaborate?
My understanding was that the default behavior of the DSAccess referral
process was to hand out a
sites properly, you shouldn't need to do it.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrew
Hitchcock
Sent: Monday, December
Hello all,
Has anyone had a chance to try out the "Closest GC" setting under
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Exchange\Exchange Provider
mentioned in KB Article 319206?
The article tells you how to set it, but doesn't tell you how Outlook
figures out which GC is "closest". Does anyone k
I've also seen this happen if the Public Folder Store does not have a
replica of the free/busy data for the site.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N. Precht
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 11:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Sounds like the client is falling back to NamedPipes or some protocol
other than RPC over TCP
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-97237@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 10:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ne
t to be from Domain2.com instead of domain1.com all
the time.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Hitchcock [mailto:hitchcock@;berbee.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 10:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Postmaster reply address
I'm pretty sure that the return address th
I'm pretty sure that the return address that it uses when it builds an
NDR is the Primary SMTP address in the default recipient policy. I don't
think you can customize it so that the postmaster domain changes
depending on the domain of the intended recipient.
A possible workaround may be to all un
Any ideas how I can achieve this ??
Cheers
Andrew Pike
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://
geDSAccessCaches for Performance Library
MSExchangeDSAccess because property CacheHitsPerSec already exists
I've searched through the WMI logs, the only real error I can see is in the
wmiadap.log "CNTRegistry::GetStr() failed: 2.&quo
I will be creating a brand new domain in our organization and installing
Exchange 2000 on a fresh server within that domain. We have an old
Exchange 5.5 server that is also an NT4.0 BDC. I want to export the user
mailbox data from that server to the new Exchange 2000 server. What is
the easiest
I've done it for a few clients using ISA. It works largely as
advertised.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 11:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Proxy E2K OWA traffic?
Has anyone on the l
I am considering using Double-Take to maintain a warm standby exchange
server at our DRP site. We want the DRP server to be started manually.
Would welcome comments from anyone. Especially comments on DoubleTake
Thanks.
Andrew Leong
Hi,
I require to configure an Exchange 5.5 server to record unsuccessful
mailbox logon attempts, i.e. when a user tries to access through Webmail
and uses the wrong password.
How do I set up this sort of logging?
Thanks in advance,
Andy
In O2K2
Tools | Options | Other | Advanced Options | Reminder Options |
Probably slightly different in O97 but you get the idea
For those that do and those that don't the check boxes will probably be
different
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-ex
[EMAIL PROTECTE
I have an Exchange 5.5 server in a Windows 2000 Active Directory running
in mixed mode. I've been trying to determine the impact of switching AD
to "Native" mode instead of "Mixed" mode.
Anyone know if it is OK to switch to Native Mode, or are there issues I
need to be concerned about?
Thanks.
What you can do, however, is enable automatic replies / forwards / oof
etc. to a particular domain.
Auto Replies to the world are a bad idea in general, but particularly if
you are concerned about SPAM. Just think of an auto-reply as an
auto-confirm to the next piece of spam you receive. Spin it
I've had a lot of success with stand-alone servers in the DMZ
- throw an AV scanner on it and relay inbound mail through it
- throw ISA on it and publish OWA there; you can even terminate the SSL
connection there if you are so inclined.
- the nice thing about stand alone servers is that you don't
Is Domain B in Native Mode?
Exchange 2000 really like universal security groups...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Anelick
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public Folder Move
I am in the proc
If this is only happening on one server, I'd check the Diagnostic
Logging tab on the properties of the server in question.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of MS Exchange
Discussions
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussion
That's not a good idea. Can you not temporarily hook up a "big" drive,
and move all the logs to it, do the back up, then move the logs back?
How big do you have your logs any ways?
Andrew
MCSE (W2K & NT4) + CCNA
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Usher
I would bet that on that (4x) .pst file, you have a lots of messages
that refers to the same attachments. Exchange server will take care of
it with SIS, but .pst breaks that.
Andrew
MCSE (W2K & NT4) + CCNA
> -Original Message-
> From: Smith, Ronni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
queues are from the users on the
same Exchange server.
Andrew
MCSE (W2K & NT4) + CCNA
> -Original Message-
> From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 3:53 PM
> Posted To: ExchangeDiscussion
> Conversation: IMS Costs
> Subjec
Again, can you get one level up? There should be a "Microsoft
Information Store" on the same level with Mailboxes, along with things
like C$, D$, System State, etc...
If you don't back up the information store, the logs will not be flushed
as it will not be considered as a FULL
Are you saying that you are backing up only the mailboxes, and the
information store is not selected? If that's the case, that would
explain it why your logs are not flushed.
Andrew
MCSE (W2K & NT4) + CCNA
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Usher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
Try upgrade your BE8.5 to the latest.
Andrew
MCSE (W2K & NT4) + CCNA
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Usher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: Friday, June 07, 2002 1:15 PM
> Posted To: ExchangeDiscussion
> Conversation: Exchange 2000 Log Files
> Subject: E
I didn't say you change the IIS properties on ESM. Checkout Q290341.
Andrew
MCSE (W2K & NT4) + CCNA
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: Monday, June 10, 2002 9:02 AM
> Posted To: ExchangeDiscussion
> Conversa
You need to go one more level deep... Double click on the Exchange
Virtual Settings... Then go to properties of the Exchange folder and
other folders...
Q290341
Andrew
MCSE (W2K & NT4) + CCNA
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Post
Then, that is your problem... You don't change that in IIS admin,
because the settings will be overwritten. Change it in the ESM.
(Exchange System Manager)
Andrew
MCSE (W2K & NT4) + CCNA
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Check your hidden reciepients. I bet if you can't seem to find
another one in the obvious, it will be one of those.
Andrew Chan
MCSE (NT4 + W2K) + CCNA
- -Original Message-
From: Tony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Post
load in a live environment a proportion
of outbound external mail from the first SMTP connector was routed to the
internet via the 2nd SMTP connector, thus picking up the wrong banner.
Is there anyway under the current structure I can achieve the different
company requirements?
Many thanks!!!
And that product sucks!!! I just talked with their tech yesterday about
several questions I have, and even they admit that since it's a version
1.0 product, there are lots of bugs to be worked out. I wouldn't
recommend it for production use any time soon...
Andrew,
MCSE (NT &am
tID: 28674
Description: The network layer could not be initialized (Error
c0040802).
All other exchange functionailities have no problems.
Has anyone encountered any of these? Search on MS and EventID.net
showed up nothing.
Thank
Well, if you see the SMTP virtual server under Windows 2000 IIS5, you
will have the same button under the access tab that you can assign the
Cert.
Andrew,
MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Warren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, May 03, 2002 1:3
you need.
Andrew,
MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Warren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, May 03, 2002 12:55 PM
Posted To: DiscussionGroup
Conversation: Exchange 5.5/Win 2k/SSL
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5/Win 2k/SSL
I have done some intense searc
Well, the other way is to NOT disable those account, but put a VERY
difficult password on the account, (there are plenty of free tools on
the web that you can get to random generate a password for you). Then,
you can hide the account from the GAL.
Andrew,
MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA
-Orig
have you tried changing the forwarding address to another offsite email
account, and recreating the rule scenario?
(The address could be wrong, or being mangled/dropped by the mobile phone
carrier)
Wouldn't he get a no-relaying error back in his inbox?
-Original Message-
From: Tom [mail
They have a global remove request on their site.
http://www.sparklist.com/resources/remove/
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 11:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Busted
I couldn't find a way to unsubscribe e
Is it not in the users outbox still? (or did they delete it already?)
A test message to an offsite pop box dated for tomorrow is just living in my
outbox waiting for tomorrow(i guess).
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 12:
ExMerge... does that get out grapejam stains?
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 12:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How to move mbx's between orgs
ExMerge
-Original Message-
From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
I'm expecting that that's bad for security reasons to begin with...
OWA uses NT authentication as well (by default, anyway) so, wouldn't that
still be a tripup? (unless you disabled it, which I think would be bad)
-Original Message-
From: Tim Kerrigan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tue
Haven't seen any activities today.
Andrew,
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROT
After you add the key, you need to create a security template. Get the
admin pack and follow the instruction to the letter. Create the
template, then you can look at the Programmatic settings in the template
to solve your problem.
Andrew,
MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA
-Original Mes
Personally, I think the Legato Networker Client is not a good addition
on the box. I bet you will experience less of the problem if you
uninstall it. Of course, you then have to think of some other way of
backing up your Exchange. H Decisions, decisions...
Andrew,
MCSE (NT &
Do you have a preferred tool for monitoring bandwidth usage?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 12:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Min Bandwidth requirements for E5.5 Clients
My rule of
Can't you just go in to the ESM, and under the servers/protocols/http/
and disable the Exchange Virtual Server?
Andrew,
MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 10:51 AM
Posted To: Discus
Apparanly, you CAN'T do the reading part. Your error message says...
> > mail01-ens.domain.com #5.5.0 smtp;552 sorry, that message size
> > exceeds
my
> > databytes limit (#5.3.4)>
So this mail01-ens.domain.com's SMTP server/connector/relay program,
etc. is c
My management has decided that we must filter all mail (not just incoming
SMTP) for objectionable content.
If a message matches a word list, it is forwarded to a security mailbox.
Any recommendations?
I am already downloading the demo of Mimesweeper.
Thanks
Andrew
The better way is to use Outlook to create a profile for that mailbox,
and sign in there. Then go to Tools -> options -> Calendar Options.
Click on the Resource schedule button. Check on the following link.
http://support.microsoft.com/search/preview.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q291617
Andre
Have you set the client read timeout to a high figure?
Andrew Toon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 March 2002 14:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Netbackup Datacentre v3.41
Stop wasting your time.
http
Are you saying that you don't have enough $$ to spend on bigger storage?
What kind box is this? The 60Gig IDE drives are only $70...
Andrew,
MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, March 18, 2002 10:48
Agreed, but if he CAN authenticate the test users, then the job of
locating the DC is fulfilled. There is no more ties of WINS to Password
any more. I guess I wasn't clear when I made that second comment.
Andrew,
MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielsta
Are you saying that your Exchange server in the DMZ are in the same
domain as your corporate?
Also, I am a little baffled. Since when does WINS have anything to do
with Password change?
Andrew,
MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [ma
That's LANMANWORKSTATION and LANManServer. The text are wrapped...
So what did you interpret TOR.RPCS? ;)
Andrew,
MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, March 14, 2002 11:16 AM
Posted To: Discus
Are you running out of space on your server?
Andrew,
MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, March 14, 2002 10:08 AM
Posted To: DiscussionGroup
Conversation: Exchange down
Subject: Exchange down
Everyone
the recovery server name?
Andrew,
MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA
P.s. this can be done with his current setup on the same network,
whether it SHOULD be done this way is a different issue.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, Mar
He said same site, same org, DIFFERENT name...
Andrew,
MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, March 14, 2002 9:25 AM
Posted To: DiscussionGroup
Conversation: Exchange getting bounced
Subject: Re: Exchange get
Can you try to set on your IMS that for these domains that you are
having problems with, not to deliver directly from your own DNS, but
pass it ont to your ISP's relay server. And see if it can get there?
Just a thought.
Andrew,
MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA
-Original Message-
Fr
5.43.129.25
> 65.43.129.25
Server: ns1.mindspring.com
Address: 207.69.188.185
Name:durr-usa.com
Address: 65.43.129.25
Andrew,
MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: Joe Pochedley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 10:16 AM
Posted To: Discussion
It seems that you are using the Exchange to deliver mail directly using
DNS lookup. Have you tried to reconfigure that to send to say your
ISP's relay server, and see if that gets sent to this particular
address. If it sends fine that way, the you know for sure it's a
Exchange issu
something.
Andrew,
MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 8:49 AM
Posted To: DiscussionGroup
Conversation: Network Error During Host Resolution
Subject: RE: Network Error During Host Resolution
Thanks, sorry for all the repeats.
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Woodrick, Ed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 4:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2k & Clustering Active/Active
Don't do Active/Active, do Active/Passive and everybody&#x
virtual server?
Proposed hardware: 2 quad processor, 2GB systems connected to SAN via
fibre channel. 100MB NIC connections. Roughly 4k users.
Searching the archives now...
Thanks,
Andrew
_
List posting FAQ: http
clients per virtual server?
Proposed hardware: 2 quad processor, 2GB systems connected to SAN via fibre
channel. 100MB NIC connections.
Roughly 4k users.
Thanks,
Andrew
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource
Is there still a limit on the number of mailboxes/clients a virtual server
can hold?
I thought it was 1000 users per virtual server but I thought I heard that
SP2 removed that limitation.
Thanks
Andrew
_
List posting FAQ
-boo again. However, we
also saw errors from DSAccess complaining it couldn't see any domain
controllers and you're not...
Andrew
> --
> From: Christopher Hummert[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: Exchange Discussions
> Sent: 11 March 2002 19
11 March 2002 17:38
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Service Pack 2 Problem
>
> Could you walk me though how you did this?
> -Chris
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Maclaren,
> Andrew
&
I had a pretty similar thing and re-doing setup /domainprep solved the
problem. Some of the permissions needed by the server had mysteriously gone
missing after the sp2 install.
Andrew
> --
> From: Christopher Hummert[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: Exchange Di
Use domainname\username to log in.
Andrew,
MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, March 11, 2002 8:56 AM
Posted To: DiscussionGroup
Conversation: OWA and IE6
Subject: OWA and IE6
I'm having a pro
You probably can try this. Create a special group that is denied to
access to all the mailboxes. Then, when you are about to do the
maintenance, put all those 293 users into this deny group. Take them
out of the group afterwards.
Andrew,
MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA
-Original Mes
y, or whereever.
Andrew,
MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 3:04 PM
Posted To: DiscussionGroup
Conversation: Burning PST files.
Subject: RE: Burning PST files.
Take a look at th
I would say the easiest way to do this is to set up another SMTP relay
server behind the new T-1 and relay all mails to your Exchange box,
until you are sure that all the DNS record has been propagated.
Andrew,
MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ma
miss that old logon page, I think there are third party
solutions.
Andrew,
MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 8:11 AM
Posted To: DiscussionGroup
Conversation: OWA 2k
Subject: RE: OWA 2k
Extern
Why do you have to have one?
Andrew,
MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 7:57 AM
Posted To: DiscussionGroup
Conversation: OWA 2k
Subject: OWA 2k
Why isn't there a login screen
Out of office assistant should not cause any mail loops, since it will
only fire up once per unique email address.
Andrew,
MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 2:44 PM
Posted To: DiscussionG
Since you are using the term "Storage Group", I am assuming that you are
talking about Exchange 2000. If that's the case, you have to restore to
a server that is on a complete different AD Forest. So, NO, your set up
will not allow you to test the restore.
Andrew,
MCSE (N
every time.
Andrew,
MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: Exchange Newsgroups [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 12:13 PM
Posted To: DiscussionGroup
Conversation: Webs
Subject: RE: Webs
It's a feature?
That's funny!
Saul
-Origina
ork changes
at your "site"? What OS/SP level, etc. are involved? The possibilities
are endless...
Andrew,
MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: Carine Lim, Sr.SystEng, SCSM/NSB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, February 22, 2002 12:30 AM
Posted
Did you set up the Connection Agreement (CA) on ADC for both ways? Or
just one way only?
Andrew,
MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: ToddMicro, Inc. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, February 21, 2002 8:44 AM
Posted To: DiscussionGroup
Conversation: Ho
Agreed... I was merely anwsering the question "can" it work. Let's hope
that he's got a smaller environment and just want "some" Exchange
functionalities. :)
Andrew,
MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: Stidley, Joel [mailto:[EMAIL
out between domains.)
Andrew,
MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: Sanborn, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 2:49 PM
Posted To: DiscussionGroup
Conversation: Exch 2k servicing a trusted NT4 network?
Subject: Exch 2k servicing a tru
Restarting SMTP service?
Andrew,
MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: Saul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 11:08 AM
Posted To: DiscussionGroup
Conversation: Filter List
Subject: Filter List
I have 2 questions;
1) When you enter a do
The error message in the Internet Service Manager can be ignored. If
you just restart the Default web, those errors will go away. It's got
something to do with the order that IIS starts before another service.
Andrew,
MCSE (NT +ACY- W2K) +- CCNA
-Original Message-
From: Ed Cr
Google's a reasonable alternative to search the knowledge base, type in
whatever you want to search for and stick in
site:support.microsoft.com
to restrict where it looks.
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Saul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 February 2002 20:21
To: Exc
ortly afterwards the
M: drive appears so when you look at it later you can browse the files and
folders.
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 08 February 2002 12:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ex 5.5 <--> ex 2000 ... install problems
Hi .
Hi all,
Does anybody know where I can get my hands on DSAdiag now
www.exinternals.com is no more.
Regards
Andrew Pike
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs
We may have to change the award from "stupid question" to "stupid
questioner" of the year, in which case the winner is a
no-brainer...(no pun intended)
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 5:46 PM
To: Exchange Discuss
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
