Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
WAN/Internet Specialist
913-339-6700 x194
-Original Message-
From: Hooks, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 7:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange locks up
Why? How does that solve the problem I have today? I
locks up
Buy Enterprise Edition.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hooks, Tim
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 1:28 PM
To: Exchange
Hello All,
Last Wednesday, one week ago, without any warning our information store stopped -
reached the 16 gig limit. What I did not know was that the 16 gigs is a total of both
the .stm file and the .edb file. I do not know if the public folders contributed to
the 16 gigs or not as ours only
Hello All,
I am nearing the 16 GB limit on my first and only storage group on an Exchange 2000
server (NOT Enterprise edition). Can I simply create another storage group on the same
server and move over half my users get the space limit down from 16 GIGS? Thanks for
your help.
Timothy J. Hooks,
This is an off topic question but I ask this group because you seem to know the most.
We are retiring a couple domain controllers (windows 2000) and replacing them with new
machines with different netbios names and different IP addresses. I need to accomplish
2 tasks -
1. Remap a couple network
Trend Office Scan does clean it. It was cleaning it early last week.
Timothy J. Hooks, MCSE
Columbus, Ohio 43215
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 12:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus heads up
ROF
. Thanks.
Tim Hooks
-Original Message-----
From: Hooks, Tim
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Security Log errors
I have security event log errors on my domain controllers ever since bringing Exchange
2000 into our enterprise. A little background - single
at
one time when your 5.5 box was online. Also is the error exactly the same
each time. If so maybe an object is being called that is no longer there?
- Original Message -
From: "Hooks, Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECT
I have security event log errors on my domain controllers ever since bringing Exchange
2000 into our enterprise. A little background - single domain, single site, win2k SP3,
native mode. Exchange 2k SP2 - moved mailboxes from an Exchange 5.5 box and followed
the steps to remove the first exchang
ick on through. This should
clean mailbox information that pertains to the other server off of the
user. Then make sure you followed the Q for removing the first serve
from a site.
-Original Message-
From: Hooks, Tim [mailto:THooks@;keglerbrown.com]
Posted At: Monday, November 04, 2002 4
I went from Exchange 5.5 to 2000 on a new box about 10 months ago. I had one user
account that did not move (let's call the account JSmith), I think he was hidden from
the GAL. At any rate I was not concerned as his mailbox was going to be disabled
anyways. I uninstalled 5.5 from the old server
I went from Exchange 5.5 to 2000 on a new box about 10 months ago. I had one user
account that did not move (let's call the account JSmith), I think he was hidden from
the GAL. At any rate I was not concerned as his mailbox was going to be disabled
anyways. I uninstalled 5.5 from the old server
Anybody have moderated folders quit working correctly after adding SP3? One of our
moderated folders (meaning posted items are forwarded first to a moderator, auto
message generated for the sender, previewed, and then OK'ed for the public folder) no
longer works. The moderator does not get the
Does anyone out there have a list they would be willing to post of domains or email
addresses you block to keep out spam? Thanks in advance.
Timothy J. Hooks, MCSE
KBHR
Columbus, Ohio
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/
o
C:\Programs\Trend\Smex\Alert\hoba3c51d2f32.bat_.
Warning to sender. ScanMail has detected a virus in an email you sent.
-Original Message-
From: Hooks, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 4:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fix from Trend for Exchange
hange here as well.
S.
-Original Message-
From: Hooks, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 3:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Fix from Trend for Exchange 2000 Attachment blocking
Just got off the phone with Trend. I noticed .bat files were not being
blocked
From: Hooks, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 3:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Fix from Trend for Exchange 2000 Attachment blocking
Just got off the phone with Trend. I noticed .bat files were not being
blocked even though they were on my list of attachmen
Just got off the phone with Trend. I noticed .bat files were not being blocked even
though they were on my list of attachments to block by file extension. Trend indicates
that blocking by file extension interprets by "true file type," meaning a .bat is a
.txt file! The fix is to put in the "Att
Make sure you turn off the 5.5 server first, without doing all the removal procedures,
and test everything, especially Public Folders. I was sure I had moved the Public
Folders and did not test, but some did not replicate and I had to do a restore, and
export to PST's then import to Public Fold
Hello,
I am wondering if someone can contact me off the list who is running Exchange 2000 SP2
and try sending an email to a particular Exchange 5.5 box in Luxembourg. I can
successfully communicate with this box with a hotmail account and through a manual
telnet session, but fails with Exch2k.
"Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?" "I think so, Brain, but what
if the hippopotamus won't wear the beach thong?"
---------
-Original Message-
From: Hooks, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
-
No Matter how Great and Destructive your Problems May Seem Now, Remember,
You've Probably only Seen the Tip of Them
---------
-Original Message-
From: Hooks, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:50 AM
To: Excha
on for a
federal anti-smoking campaign
-----
-----Original Message-
From: Hooks, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: 5.5.0 DNR
I am getting the message below back from an email server in Luxembourg after
about 5 mi
I am getting the message below back from an email server in Luxembourg after about 5
minutes. I am sending from Exchange 2000, SP2. I am able to communicate with this
address from a hotmail account. Perhaps unrelated, but I noticed their website seems
to be a Netscape server. Our internet mail
Hi Everyone,
Thanks in advance for your help. I have recently added an exch 2000 server to a 5.5
site, moved over all the folders and mailboxes, removed the 5.5 server (according to
technet) and cut over to Exchange 2000 Native mode. I am still having three problems,
that have been with me sin
riginal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hooks, Tim
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 9:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Restore Help Needed!
Wow did I mess up...
I cut all of our users over to a new Exchange 2000 server from 5.5 last
week.
That went f
Wow did I mess up...
I cut all of our users over to a new Exchange 2000 server from 5.5 last week. That
went fine. I followed all the instructions for shutting down the 5.5 server once and
for all and did so today. I should have tested a bit more - once I deleted the 5.5
server from the organi
Also it appears that you are blocking mail with a null sender. While
Exchange certainly supports this option, it's a. a stupid option and b.
non-RFC compliant.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
> -Origina
Hi Everyone,
I recently added an Exchange 2000 server to my site and moved over all my users,
Public folders, and created a new SMTP connector. I am now getting about 200 NDR
messages a day. They are mostly spam sent old addresses. The last lines read
The e-mail account does not exist at th
r 01, 2001 9:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - Off Topic - Server Protect
What process was hogging the cpu?
-Original Message-----
From: Hooks, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 12:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Trend - Off Topic - Serv
Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
> -Original Message-----
> From: Hooks, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 12:10 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: DNS Record?
>
>
> I have just joined a 2000 exchan
lient, do you see the GAL?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hooks, Tim
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 5:36 AM
To:
Try going to the Ex2k box, System manager, and "rebuilding" both the
policies in the "recipient update service." Good luck - this worked for me.
tjh
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 1:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subj
Microsoft clued me in yesterday as to why one of our domain controllers CPU
kept going to 100% and locking up the network. The problem was intermittent
over the last couple of months and we were having no luck solving it. While
on the phone with PSS it happened again and Chuck asked about Server P
you want to use the ADMT instead of upgrading a PDC?
Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hooks, Tim
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 10:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Move to Exchange 2000 Plan
We
making changes to the policy in the initial solution.
tjh
-Original Message-
From: Hooks, Tim
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 8:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 5.5 Move to E2k - SORTOF RESOLVED Big Problem
Thanks for your help on this. I did call Microsoft. There solution
I have just joined a 2000 exchange server to an existing org. I moved my own
mailbox to the new server. Now I cannot send mail to anyone inside the org
even though their names resolve correctly. We have two internal DNS machines
(win2k) which have never had mx records on them. Do I need to add an
We are planning on moving our Exchange
5.5 users over to an Exchange 2000 box soon. Here is my
plan - did I miss anything big? Thanks for your help.
1. Set up Exchange 2000 SP1 on Win2kSp2 new server, joining existing
organization
2. Move users over using Active Directory Users and Computers (pla
Hello,
I have just added a Exch2K server to an existing 5.5 Organization. I moved
my own mailbox to it a couple days ago - no one else has been moved. Now
when I try to send email inside the org I get an NDR - text below. I can
receive from inside and out, and send outside the org. Anybody encoun
he
rights stay. Where you able to at least mount the priv or public stores
when the policytest said that the rights were good?
-Original Message-----
From: Hooks, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 3:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 5.5 Move to E2k - Big P
TEST. I think it is in
support\utils\i386 folder on your exchange 2000 CD. At a CMD prompt, go to
the directory and run it on the domain controller.
If it doesn't report that the Rights are Set, then I think you need to rerun
SETUP /DOMAINPREP.
-Original Message-----
From: Hooks, Tim [mail
Hi List,
I am hoping some of you have some insight on a problem I am having. The
scenario is as follows:
The network is win2k native mode, sp2, with two domain controllers.
I currently have Exchange 5.5, SP4 on a Win2k domain controller (was also a
GC until last weekend) with 150 users.
I hav
42 matches
Mail list logo
