Similar things can be true of
> outsourcing e-mail services in general.
>
> Certainly outsourcing such services is not appropriate for every
> organization, but by the same token there more than a few
> shops which insist
> on doing everything in house, when all signs point to
Gonna really suck if your CEO misses an important email and needs it STAT,
and you need to go to a third party to get it back.always bad news to
take something as essential as email and put it in someone else's control.
John
> -Original Message-
> From: Douglas, Josh D. [mailto:[EM
Is the problem workstation using DNS? Is it using WINS? The DNS server
itself may not be the problem, but if that one machine isn't using it..
John
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 12:11 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
>
It didn't also happen to say "Welcome to http:// www.worm.com, did it?
Sounds like Code Red. Read this:
http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/codered.worm.html
John J. Steniger
> -Original Message-
> From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, Decemb
FYI, is appears this worm also is a p0rn spammer.
http://www.msnbc.com/news/826033.asp?0dm=C13HT
John J. Steniger
> -Original Message-
> From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:Gordon.Morrison@;Bain.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 12:59 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: virus like b
Hmm.I believe this can be done in Outlook. Instead of using the
"Import" option from the file menu, use the "Open", then "Personal Folder
File". It should open it in another folder in Outlook, but not import the
messages into your Inbox.
John J. Steniger
> -Original Message-
>
inbox) limits. I can't get the powers that be to
> even let the
> server do this via implementing a policy.
>
> Jim
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: John Steniger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 10:37 AM
> &
Why not set limits on the individual mailboxes and leave the management up
to the mailbox owners as they get full?
John J. Steniger
> -Original Message-
> From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 10:00 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Poli
You'll find that with large messages of that size, you may be fielding calls
from remote users who can't understand why, when they dial in, their email
takes a couple hours to download. Explaining to them that they have several
large attachments waiting for them usually sufficiently frustrates th
What do the emails look like (subject, body) - are they similar?
John J. Steniger
> -Original Message-
> From: Jon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 8:21 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: unknown users e-mails entering environment
>
>
> exchange 5.5,
Not to get into a war of words (as this appears to be something near and
dear to your heart), often IT is put in the position to have to:
A) Save money by not spending any, period (on Exchange or any other type of
upgrades, or disk, or what have you..)
B) Provide virtually unlimited service (unl
I agree - the situation we had here was that limits were never established
when Exchange was installed - people will convince themselves they need
everything they've ever received if they're given the chance (this applies
to file storage, as well). In our case, it was mostly a training issue -
on
p to
> stretch the amount of actual mail you can have.
>
> Sander
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John Steniger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 05 July 2002 03:40
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Unlimited Quotas
>
>
> I believe this applies to
e of days. McAfee has been
> reporting it as
> Exploit-MIME.gen.
>
> I just got something from Sophos giving it the name that John
> reported it
> as. It has been showing up quite a lot lately.
>
> Ken Powell
> Systems Administrator
> Clark County Offic
Curses. Tack an "l" onto the end of that link and it oughta work.
> -Original Message-
> From: John Steniger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:24 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Possible New Virus?
>
>
> A
Appears to be a Frethem Worm. From Norton:
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
l
John J. Steniger
Network and Security Manager
Familymeds, Inc.
Phone: 860-676-1222 X633
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.familymeds.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent:
Are you using WINS or a host file? Depending on the speed of the dialup,
I've found that the IP and name of the exchange server in the hosts file
goes a long way - regardless of whether a user can ping, often WINS
resolution just times out.
John
> -Original Message-
> From: David Mc
17 matches
Mail list logo
