http://www.infradig.com/postie/index.shtml
From the site :
The ultimate command-line mailer! Send and receive mail form the
command-line or execute from within virtually any program. Supports NNTP,
SMTP, ESMTP, MIME, BASE64 and UUENCODE for posting, and POP3, IMAP4, HTTP
protocols for receiving.
I second this. We have been running Postfix with SpamAssassin for months.
It works great.
John
-Original Message-
From: Schlarb, Henry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 2:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: how does everyone fight this spam?
Use
/s/perl/vbscript
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 1:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT :: Other Discussion List
Sorry, can't help ya there, I use perl.
-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua
I have been using spam assassin on a linux platform since February with much
success. It is easy to configure and works very well. I recently upgraded
to the newest version which adds functionality to preserve the original
message. This is a big plus when dealing with false positives. Some of
Not to be too redundant here, but I have been running Postfix on a Slackware
box as a corporate SMTP gateway. I would highly recommend Postfix for such
an application. The benefits of such a system are RBL checks on incoming
mail, low overhead, and with rrd one can produce pretty little
Umm yeah that would be cool, but if you have Visual Basic that maybe a good
route. It would be easy to parse the text file and then write it out to a
csv file. A csv file will open in Excel and look fine. Then compile exe
and schedule to run at any time. As a matter of fact you could probably
Never listen to sales schmucks anyways...
RBL = Real Boston Lager...
-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:bobs;LEAWOOD.ORG]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
OH! So we are talking about what's stuck in Chris' beard! Now I
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;Q191687;
Looks like you had better check your PIX rules. Can you telnet to port 25
from the outside of the DMZ..?
John
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Dubyn [mailto:jdubyn;optonline.net]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002
Are you kiding me. All those kids that show up to buy the latest issue of
2600. You bet they are scewing up the public kiosks!
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:alex.gonzalez;handleman.com]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Comp
Exchange IM, who needs any stinkin' Exchange IM. Use Jabber (jabber.org).
Open, Free, Function. Can't ask for much more. Clients are totally cross
platform. You can add transports on the server for AIM, Yahoo, MSN. Chat
with everyone on an open IM network. Jabber is all XML based. Pretty
net time \\timeserver /set /yes This is in a batch file called from logon
script.
Use this (Free)program to sync TimeServer's time with Atomic Clock
http://www.winsite.com/bin/Info?100034325
I do believe that the Atomic Clock is accurate within 0.3 seconds..
Good luck,
~John
hmmm, a mad server eh..
Maybe you should stop giving the server absente...
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 8:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Smtp connector gone mad?
OK. Make it so.
I have like 30 domains that we
I have been conducting all my interviews wrong..!!!
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 10:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cerification question
This may sound odd but there is one golden question that will tell
2001 A Space Odyssey
Clockwork Orange
Full Metal Jacket
Does that mean that I should only work for a dysfunctional company...?
-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Cerification
Ctr
-Original Message-
From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 1:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cerification question
2001 A Space Odyssey
Clockwork Orange
Full Metal Jacket
Does that mean that I should only work for a dysfunctional company
question
I just caught it last week, and was blown away. After watching it, I
immediately played it again with the director's commentary. Who knew Bubble
Boy could act?
-Original Message-
From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 1:15 PM
To: Exchange
Message-
From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 1:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cerification question
2001 A Space Odyssey
Clockwork Orange
Full Metal Jacket
Does that mean that I should only work for a dysfunctional company...?
-Original Message
You mean like BSOD..?
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 2:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
Which still doesn't do half what Exchange does.
Nmap gives it a good score..
As long as you are keeping your SSH protocal up to date, looks good..
Uptime 35.809 days (since Tue Mar 19 18:58:40 2002)
TCP Sequence Prediction: Class=random positive increments
Difficulty=3677580 (Good luck!)
IPID Sequence Generation: All
Actually you could patch a running Linux kernel, well kind of.. If you
follow the virtual Linux server stuff. It gets confusing, but you can run
many 'virtual' servers on top of a real server. Each virtual server, is
considered it's own node..
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
Patching a
Hello all,
I have a question for the Exchange experts. MS Exchange 5.5 NT 4 SP 6a.. I
recently went live with a Postfix mail gateway. So now email comes in
through our firewall (PIX) and directly to the Postfix mail gateway.
Postfix determines what mail to relay to the internal MS Ex box.
Never mind, it seems to be NDRs.. Sorry for my stupidly and time wasting...
~John
-Original Message-
From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 1:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IMS queue oddities
Hello all,
I have a question
Hello all,
I am stuck trying to figure out an email solution for a company that we
have acquired. I have until the end of today to do this..! This is a
temporary fix until the T1 at the new facility can be put in place. This is
the deal,
There will be 15 users that need to access email
?
-Original Message-
From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 7:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Remote Site Question
Hello all,
I am stuck trying to figure out an email solution for a company that we
have acquired. I have until the end of today to do
previously?
- Original Message -
From: King, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 9:20 AM
Subject: Remote Site Question
Hello all,
I am stuck trying to figure out an email solution for a company that we
have acquired. I have until
nc.exe is really the win32 port of the infamous NetCat *nix program by
Hobbit. This program can be used to get a remote command prompt. Most
likely that is what cmd1.exe was used for. As for the third file, maybe an
ftp server binary..? Have you shut down the server..? Do you log TCP/IP
Does that site run slashcode...
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 10:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: FREE HOT XXX EMAIL ADMINS!!! ADULTS ONLY!!!
Hi! My name is Chris and I want to tell you all about what I've got
Message-
From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA firewall access?
443 for SSL connections only.. If you run IIS with Secure Sockets layer
then sure 443 and it will work fine, but otherwise use 80. SSL would
443 for SSL connections only.. If you run IIS with Secure Sockets layer
then sure 443 and it will work fine, but otherwise use 80. SSL would be the
best though..
~John
-Original Message-
From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:52
Hello all,
Ok this problem is starting to really drive me nuts, so I figured I would
toss it to the list. This is the deal, the Exchange server I manage is 5.5
sp4 on winNT 4 sp6a. No trouble with the server.. I have recently migrated
to a new workstation. I have the Exchange 5.5 admin
at it.
-Original Message-
From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 10:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 admin troubles
Hello all,
Ok this problem is starting to really drive me nuts, so I figured I would
toss it to the list. This is the deal
SlipStick is da bomb..!
-Original Message-
From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 11:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 - Outlook 2000 attachment filtering is driving
m e nu ts!
GOT IT - Thanks
The SlipStick
You must need the Outlook security update over-ride..! What you need to do
is download the admin pack for Exchange 5.5, set it up. After that it
creates an Outlook Security Settings public folder. Then you(if u r da
admin) will need to navigate to this folder and post using the default form.
Maybe you should just talk with him and save yourself some work. If he
shouldn't be using it, then let him know. If that doesn't work, then why
the hell is he still employed with you.. If you restrict access and he just
comes into work one day to find it won't work any more, then he will be
Just don't give your damn support group the root password..
-Original Message-
From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 12:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Restricting use of MSN Messenger
Maybe you should just talk with him and save
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Seagate offers a reporting tool, ah uh Seagate analysis I do believe
that it is called. I have not used it since a few revs back, but
when I did use it I was able to generate reports from Exchange server
data. It was actually pretty slick. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Use tcpdump if u got a *nix box.. I am assuming windows only, so
there are some other options.. There is the tcpdump port for
windows, windump (requires a raw packet driver).. A must have dl it
@
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have no experience with Surfcontrol's E-mail filter, but I can tell
that there Superscout webfilter product has some serious issues.. It
can be bypassed with easily.. This bug was brought to their
attention, released to the Bugtraq comunity and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have a Pix 515 that I run 6.1 on.. I thought they only shipper
with 32mb as a minimum.. You should be able to download IOS versions
with a valid cco, regardless of what PIX model you have..
~John
- -Original Message-
From:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Maybe this link may help... http://www.slipstick.com/exs/relay.htm
I seems like u need to stop anonymous relay.! Do u route incoming
smtp mail..? If so impliment proper routing
restictions.. To check the anonymous realy, from an outside source
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
careful u don't end up here relays.mail-abuse.org hehe
- -Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Outbound Messages (Postmaster)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I am new to this list so please bear with me. I have already
searched the archive and found nothing on this issue.. I have
deployed the Outlook security update to my users here. Sales runs a
custom app that uses MAPI functions, which
Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Security update over ride and Citrix terminal
server
What version of Outlook, TSE and MetaFrame (SP level as well) are you
using?
Also, how did you Originally install Outlook? Do you use roaming
profiles?
- -Original Message-
From: King, John [mailto
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Security update over ride and Citrix terminal
server
Does it work if you logon as administrator to the TSE server and then
open
Outlook?
- -Original Message-
From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 9:36 AM
user accesses Outlook directly, but not if they attempt to
access it
via the sales app's conduit?
Of course, the easiest workaround may be to simply install Outlook
w/o the
security update on the TSE...
- -Original Message-
From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I am new to this list so please bear with me. I have already
searched the archive and found nothing on this issue.. I have
deployed the Outlook security update to my users here. Sales runs a
custom app that uses MAPI functions, which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I am new to this list so please bear with me. I have already
searched the archive and found nothing on this issue.. I have
deployed the Outlook security update to my users here. Sales runs a
custom app that uses MAPI functions, which
47 matches
Mail list logo
