RE: Public Free/Busy

I have already recreated the users outlook profile on the desktop, is that what you are referring to? Rob Weatherly -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley [MVP] Sent

RE: Public Free/Busy

No, it does not used cached mode Rob Weatherly -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject

RE: Public Free/Busy

Yes, I (and others) can see his information fine. Rob Weatherly -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bowles, John (OIG/OMP) Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 11:01 AM To

RE: Public Free/Busy

Both He cannot view the free busy data regardless of what server the other users are on (we have 3 other servers) No one else is having this issue; it is isolated to him alone. Rob Weatherly -Original Message- From

Public Free/Busy

ebusy" and I have tried to recreate the users outlook profile on the desktop. Environment Server: Windows 2000 sp3 Exchange 2000 sp3 Client: Windows XP sp1 Outlook 2003 Any suggestions -------- Rob

RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics

: Speaking of MOOT, can anyone tell me what top 10 classic rock single contains the word "MOOT"? Do you mean in the band name, song title or lyrics? Eg: Moot The Hoople - Ballad of Mott the Hoople (1973)? This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom

RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

"I cannot prove that an apple is red " - well they're not if it's a granny smith "nor that the sky is blue " - quite often isn't in Blighty! Happy Holidays - Peace and Goodwill to all men eh! ;-) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addr

WAS RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 NOW my bad - sorry

Opps sorry my bad - only just read this one. -Original Message- From: Boyd, Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 December 2003 01:03 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 The next person who wants to add something to this thread, please send your messag

RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

The problem here is that Greg's opinion is that accepting gifts "presents a real or perceived conflict of interest". The key point being the word "perceived". The statement covers all eventualities. If the CoI is not real, it remains possible for it to be "perceived" - even by only one individual

RE: Exchange DB defrag

Great, That was exactly what I was looking for Thank you for the information Rob Weatherly Handleman Company -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Winzenz Sent: Wednesday

Exchange DB defrag

question: Is it possible (has anyone done it) to move the flat file to another server and perform the defrag there, and then move it back. After dismounting the store of course. Rob _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com

RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

"player-of-the-season award" Nice analogy This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any vi

RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Oh for f**ks sake get over this. At the end of the day we are *only* IT Professionals providing a service. We're not that important in the bigger picture. Sure, some will abuse their position and that's a not too nice part of human nature - greed and nepotism. Full stop. It happens all the ti

RE: Ideal setup for exch 2003?

to listen more closely to the IT guy! Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message----- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 8:56 AM To: Exchange D

Ideal setup for exch 2003?

I've been asked to get a 'wish list' together for next years budget so I'm going all out for an upgrade from present setup: Small Business Server 2k (inc exch2k) to PDC running W2k3 on present box but will need a new box for Exch2k3 What would be a (relatively sensible) 'ideal' setup. I've read

RE: strange headers

om: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Hackney Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 5:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: strange headers Hi, our organisation received an email yesterday and I don't quite know why it appeared the way it did. Basically, someone sen

strange headers

at is the best practice for posting headers? should I block our sensitive stuff or is it easy enough to get hold of that it is not worth the bother?) Much obliged Rob Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 Received: from gateway.mydomain.xxx.net ([xxx.xxx.xx.x]) by servername.mydomain.co.uk w

RE: Upgrade 2000 to 2003

I was intending on using IPSec for traffic from the front-end server back to the LAN. This is how we run the MIS server currently. Keeps open ports to a minimum. Regards, Rob Ellis IT Manager Samsara Group plc Tel 023 9224 7979 Mob 07974 111867 MCP BEng(hons) -Original Message

Upgrade 2000 to 2003

included in Ex2003, so we don't need MIS2002 anymore. Thanks in advance. Regards, Rob Ellis IT Manager Samsara Group plc Tel 023 9224 7979 Mob 07974 111867 MCP BEng(hons) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swin

RE: New AV Gateway Recommendations

Something from GFI? Regards, Rob Ellis IT Manager Samsara Group plc Tel 023 9224 7979 Mob 07974 111867 MCP BEng(hons) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 October 2003 16:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New AV Gateway Recommendations

RE: options

Or you could use some form of collaboration software such as Outlook Team Folders (similar to PF's but more versatility)- unsupported by MS at present but it looks good. If u can't find it I can send the pack over -it's only about 1.6mb for both files. Have a look at: http://www.slipstick.com/dev/

RE: Sloooooowwwwww OST sync over dialup

Although when back in the office, plugged into the LAN, would you not want to use RPC? Regards, Rob Ellis IT Manager Samsara Group plc Tel 023 9224 7979 Mob 07974 111867 MCP BEng(hons) -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 September 2003 14

RE: Sloooooowwwwww OST sync over dialup

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;163576 Regards, Rob Ellis IT Manager Samsara Group plc Tel 023 9224 7979 Mob 07974 111867 MCP BEng(hons) -Original Message- From: Rob Ellis Sent: 23 September 2003 14:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slooww

RE: Sloooooowwwwww OST sync over dialup

Set HKLM\software\microsoft\exchange\exchange provider\rpc_binding_order To ncacn_ip_tcp,ncalrpc,ncacn_spx,ncacn_np,netbios,ncacn_vns_spp In actual fact, yours will have 'ncalrpc' listed first. Move it along a bit. Regards, Rob Ellis IT Manager Samsara Group plc Tel 023 9224

RE: Sloooooowwwwww OST sync over dialup

RPC Binding order in the registry? Regards, Rob Ellis IT Manager Samsara Group plc Tel 023 9224 7979 Mob 07974 111867 MCP BEng(hons) -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 September 2003 13:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slooww

FW: Re-assign/ Move mailbox

give you exact directions. Check out http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=en&familyid= 9e52bafc-5c33-46b9-af14-04e4d989ef6b From: "Rob Hackney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discu

RE: Re-assign/ Move mailbox

nt to the original mailbox and then remove the old "corrupt" account from the permissions. Maybe I am missing something, but that should do it. Nate Couch EDS Messaging > -- > From: Rob Hackney > Reply To: Exchange Discussions > Sent: Monday, Septembe

Re-assign/ Move mailbox

user account to hhis new account. Is there a way of doing this within the same site other than pst? I've looked around (google/ technet/ etc) but have been unable to find an answer. Thanks Rob Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 3 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK 0117 916 1320

CAL for shared mailbox?

Probably a stupid question. Do I need an Exchange CAL for all mailboxes including shared boxes such as 'meeting room 1' 'IT Support' etc? Thanks Regards, Rob Ellis IT Manager Samsara Group plc Tel 023 9224 7979 Mob 07974

RE: Mass Mailings

Did look at Lsoft but it is too pricey for my lot! -Original Message- From: Wehner, Paul (wehnerpl) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 September 2003 19:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mass Mailings I second the LSoft recomendation. Univ. of Cinci uses it and it's amazingly fa

RE: Mass Mailings

I've been tasked with running similar stuff over the pond here. I've tried a few if the cheaper versions you can get off download.com and they were pretty rubbish. If you're looking for a decent opt-out one then I'm testing Lyris List Manager which seems to test ok so far. And it's only $500.

Smtp ports - firewall

locks. What are these attempted connections for? Thanks Regards, Rob Ellis IT Manager Samsara Group plc Tel 023 9224 7979 Mob 07974 111867 MCP BEng(hons) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.ht

RE: Setting mailbox permissions

install Outlook (run all from my computer) from the Office 2000 CD you're good to go. #2 is indeed in the SDK, I believe it is compiled though. -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney (old) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 4:57 AM Posted To: swynk Convers

Setting mailbox permissions

oceed ot should I avoid this if I have not used cdo before and just manually configure the mailboxes? Thanks Rob Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 5 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK 0117 916 1320 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to wh

RE: Quick question...

7;t anyway since they are in use. Are they of large size and maybe taking a little while to be sent? The badmail you can safely delete. -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Quick questio

RE: Internet Header Question

157.124.218.229 Regards, Rob Ellis IT Manager Samsara Group plc Tel 023 9224 7979 Mob 07974 111867 MCP BEng(hons) -Original Message- From: Jose Manzano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 August 2003 14:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Internet Header Question Hello Group

Quick question...

Hi, Exch 2000 I have items in my badmail directory - most recent from 28/07/03 and I also have items in my mailroot\vsi1\queue folder. Can I delete these items? Nothing is showing up in my queue thru system manager Thanks Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 5 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK

RE: Internet Header Question

ce can probably explain that. Regards, Rob Ellis IT Manager Samsara Group plc Tel 023 9224 7979 Mob 07974 111867 MCP BEng(hons) -Original Message- From: Jose Manzano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 August 2003 14:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet Header Questi

Rules in error

e run mdbvu32 and removed all traces of any rules, but he still gets the error. Anything else I should be doing? Thanks Regards, Rob Ellis IT Manager Samsara Group plc Tel 023 9224 7979 Mob 07974 111867 MCP BEng(hons) _ List po

RE: Internet Email

I guess I'll install an IMS. I know the config isn't supported by MS but it has worked for years so I thought I'd see if anyone had the same problem. Thanks for your help!!! Rob _ List posting FAQ: http:

Internet Email

s and cannot find an answer that pertains to our problem. Any advice would be much appreciated!! Thanks! Rob _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cg

RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working

l the old event script first as well. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sargent, Rob Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 10:53 AM To: Excha

RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working

From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 1:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working Rob, I found it and set the permissions. I suppose it takes time to synch it up.. Mike -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [m

RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working

then reinstall the script. Rob Sargent -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 12:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working Ed, Thanks. I thought that was the case, so I deleted the AutoAccept folder o

RE: OWA and the M:

!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Hackney Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 3:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: OWA and the M: Hi, I stopped my IIS services recently on and restarting I noticed in the properties for the public

RE: OWA and the M:

and the M: you can replace that M:\blah-blah-blah with \\.\BackOfficeStorage\ -Original Message----- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 7:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA and the M: Thanks - just needed re-assuring! -Original Message

RE: OWA and the M:

Message- > From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 20. juni 2003 12:51 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: FW: OWA and the M: > > > Hi, > I stopped my IIS services recently on and restarting I noticed in the > properties for the public and exchange folder

FW: OWA and the M:

Hi, I stopped my IIS services recently on and restarting I noticed in the properties for the public and exchange folders that the directory it points to is the M:\\public folders and \mbx respectively. Is this by design as I thought the M: did not exist as such? (Sorry for another q on the m dri

Outlook team folders

ill getting the error. Does this require a reboot to get it to work? Or any other ideas? Thanks Rob Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 5 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK 0117 916 1320 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. I

Help on Q327378

st go ahead and add it, right? Thanks Rob Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 5 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK 0117 916 1320 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract be

Priv1.edb and stm

he two priv files be more than my users mailboxes if the edb + stm = information store? I'm probably missing something here as I'm still pretty new to exch2k? TIA Rob Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 5 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK 0117 916 1320 This email is confidential an

FW: Outlook prob removing old account

from there? I'm thinking either stop/ start IS or recreate account/ mailbox. Google/ Technet didn't throw up anything I could find but then that may be my search criteria. Thanks Rob Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 5 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK 0117 916 1320 This email is conf

RE: Outlook 2002 cmd line switches

Yes I think so Will this work for outlook 2002 I have not done anything with VB I have done a little with VBS For the script I am writing now I am using KiX Rob Weatherly -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto

RE: Outlook 2002 cmd line switches

have to perform a communication that I can call from the script In fact the whole script is complete with the exception of the outlook send/receive. Rob Weatherly -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Outlook 2002 cmd line switches

Thanks I really appreciate it I am looking for some right now also Rob Weatherly -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject

RE: Outlook 2002 cmd line switches

I am using Windows XP with office XP Rob Weatherly -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 9:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 cmd line

RE: Outlook 2002 cmd line switches

I can do everything except the outlook send/receive In other words I can connect and disconnect the VPN via command line (or script) Rob Weatherly -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent

RE: Outlook 2002 cmd line switches

Let me help out a bit more by saying I am trying to write a script that will: Connect to VPN Open outlook Perform send/receive Close outlook Disconnect from VPN Rob Weatherly Handleman Company (248) 362-4400 x122 -Original

RE: Outlook 2002 cmd line switches

I did state that I specifically cannot use the outlook GUI settings to perform a send/receive every time outlook opens I need to perform this from a "command line" Is this possible? -------- Rob Weatherly -Original Message

Outlook 2002 cmd line switches

. Rob Weatherly _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto

RE: Quick question re backup

from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Hackney Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 2:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Quick question re backup Using exch 2000 sp3 with backupexec 8.6 for sbs2000: If I am

Quick question re backup

Using exch 2000 sp3 with backupexec 8.6 for sbs2000: If I am backing up the but not or the drive then there is no point in backing up is there? Or should I still backup the directory but deselect the mdb data directory? I thought I had set up the backup procedure so that I wasn't doing BLB'

Meeting request delegates

han User A removing delegation, (which relies on user A doing as we tell him), or me logging into mailbox of User A and doing it myself, is there any way around this? Regards, Rob Ellis Network Manager Profectus IT Tel 023 9224 7979 Mob 07

RE: Serbian premier assassinated

Er yes geology being the study of the history of the earth and its life especially as recorded in rocks whereas geography deals with the description, distribution, and interaction of the diverse physical, biological, and cultural features of the earth's surface Or did I miss the joke ;-) --

RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects

Wow, 116 ish posts on this crock of sh1t. Anyway, Mr Muir deserves some compensation for having to work in Luton [1] [1] UK joke... Rob MCSE + a, b, c thru to I MVPE A+ CNNE BA (hons) A-levels GCSE's This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to

BE 9

Anyone upgrading to Backup Exec 9.0 It looks like it has some real good advantages and I am just looking for some opinions Rob Weatherly _ List posting FAQ

RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN

Does NTBackup backup exchange faster than BE would I am just curious because I am looking for a way to improve our exchange backups (E2K, W2K, and BE 8.6) Rob Weatherly -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto

RE: .eml attachments

NIMDA NIMDA NIMDA Rob Weatherly -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 4:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: .eml attachments Can anyone advise me as to why .eml

RE: Icy grip on the US

Why? It is so much fun Rob Weatherly -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 12:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Icy grip on the US Stop running

RE: Icy grip on the US

Well now we know who has kids Rob Weatherly -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 4:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Icy grip on the US Welcome to

RE: Icy grip on the US

That's good But I will tell you my skin sure cares how windy it is ---- Rob Weatherly -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 3:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Su

RE: Icy grip on the US

A consulting company I will say nothing more about them Rob Weatherly -Original Message- From: Jacob Jeong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 1:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Icy grip

RE: Icy grip on the US

I don't know about the rest of you But here in Detroit we haven't seen above freezing in over 3 weeks Hell we are lucky if the real temp is above 20 F Let alone the wind chills I believe the wind chills for this morning we -14 F -------- Rob

RE: Strange attachment problem

, the recipient doesn't get attachment. I've checked all the mailbox restrictions and they are all set as default. Rob -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 January 2003 14:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange attachment proble

Strange attachment problem

. Is it a problem at our end or could it be the recipients problem? I'm a bit puzzled... Thanks Rob Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 5 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK 0117 916 1320 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed

RE: Strange NDRs

Are the users using 'suggest names when completing to, cc, bcc fields'? I've seen it suggest and fill in names with addresses like this before. Regards, Rob Ellis Network Manager Profectus IT Tel 023 9224 7960 Mob 07974 111867 -Original Message- From: Kevin Cobb

RE: Veritas BE Question

If the backup of the file completes the flag should be reset It is not be dependant on the "successful" completion of a job -------- Rob Weatherly -Original Message- From: Johnny Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:

RE: Strange Incoming Mail Problem

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rob Hackney Sent: 29 November 2002 16:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Incoming Mail Problem Hey Simon, you didn't go to Southampton did you? -Original Message- From: Simon Bond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: Strange Incoming Mail Problem

Hey Simon, you didn't go to Southampton did you? -Original Message- From: Simon Bond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 November 2002 13:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Incoming Mail Problem Turns out BTOpenworld have decided to block port 25 for all home plug and go s

RE: attachments+virus

That's a file that doesn't have a clue about how the system operates but wants to open everything and just gets larger and larger over time without any discernible output while taking up a huge amount of resources. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent

RE: attachments

R the first. And since virtually any Exchange based AV will do this for you, why not take advantage of such a great feature? -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: attachments What versi

RE: attachments

What version of exchange/ outlook are you using? If youre using exh2k and outlook 2002 then most attachments are blocked by default - I'm not sure about earlier versions of outlook. The blocked attachments are referred as level one. Have a look at Q290497 -Original Message- From: Kim Sch

RE: Sending email from different companies.

mailbox for these users, set the mail address as above, assign it to the relevant users and create a new profile for outlook on their pc's. They can then chose to go into either account (by setting up the 'prompt for user' in outlook). You could also go further and set delegate permi

RE: Move Exch2k to a new server

What type of server is the advanced server (ie pdc/ member)? SBS is a pdc so if you've set up the new server as that also, I don't think it's possible. You could put the 2 servers on different network segments and exmerge - or exmerge and copy to backup tape. You can use the csvde or ldifde to cre

RE: Comp Time Question

Over here in the uk working for a small co (salaried), got it written into my contract that I get overtime for 'special circumstance'. Eg if a server goes down or an upgrade goes wrong and I'm here till 3 in the morning then I'd get time and a half but if I stay till 7pm instead of 5.30 pm then I

RE: Exchange White PAper???

1. Buy a book or look on m$security/ win2000/ permissions/ company policies and procedures 2. event viewer... -Original Message- From: Carlos Magalhaes [mailto:CarlosM@;trencor.net] Sent: 29 October 2002 08:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange White PAper??? Importa

RE: client connection question

OWA on one and normal client on t'other? -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:afyodorov@;innerhost.com] Sent: 24 October 2002 14:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: client connection question MAPI to one, POP3 to the other one :) -Original Message- From: Hatley

RE: SP3

Before you get shot down in flames by someone else ;-), sp3 is cumulative I believe so no need to install the others. Rob -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:schotanus@;intas.be] Sent: 24 October 2002 10:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SP3 Does SP 3 for E2K replace 1

RE: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing)

se a days email, and the business is probably prepared to accept that. I will do some digging on it. Cheers Greg -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:Rob.Hackney@;tkcsales.co.uk] Sent: 22 October 2002 15:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick disaster recovery questi

RE: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing)

so. disadvantage was that it lost the days emails tho... Rob -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:brian@;summit-technical.com] Sent: 21 October 2002 17:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing) What if you kept a DR server

RE: viewer of PST

sounds like he already has -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 October 2002 17:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: viewer of PST Sensitivity: Private I think those graphics would look like an ASCII representation of a binary file. Some

RE: Exchange server migration

oops sorry misread question. apologies -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 October 2002 16:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange server migration If your in Native mode you could move the server in Site B to Site A. If your in mixed you c

RE: Exchange server migration

much cr*p out of their mailboxes. I've got some notes if you'd like me to pmail them to you? Rob -Original Message- From: Albert Charron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 October 2002 15:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange server migration Hi. I need an advice o

RE: NDR From Field

sorry, i think you are misunderstanding me. I'm bemoaning the fact that it appears that i could see who it was from / to on an exch5.5 system but now after an upgrade migration to exch2k I cannot see who it was from - can see who it is To ok after I click the 'send again'. Rob

RE: NDR From Field

to have null <> sender addresses. > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > Atlanta, GA > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Rob Hackne

RE: OT - Web Mail hosting

shops nationwide and we sell skateboards/ inline blades/ bmx's and clothing/ accessories. Thanks to the other suggestions - I'll look into them. Rob -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:Rob.Hackney@;tkcsales.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions

FW: [sbs list] OT - Web Mail hosting

e are plenty about but a personal recommendation would be nice thanks Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addr

OT - Web Mail hosting

hanks Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract betwee

OWA and Apache

application If anyone knows of any articles or websites that explain how to do this (If possible) that would be great. Rob Weatherly _ List posting FAQ: http

RE: win2k sp2 smtp server error 5.0.0

Our problem has been resolved by a colleague. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q249104 explains it, although initially we were just getting the 5.0.0 errors, we got a few mentioning DNS. Rob Ellis Network Manager Profectus IT Tel 023 9224 7960 Mob 07974 111867

  1   2   3   >