ricked Backups!T
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Steve Molkentin
> Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 3:56 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 backups
>
> PST's can have pa
; > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 backups
> > >
> > >
> > > This seems to be a popular axiom, buy why are they
> considered bad ?
> > >
> > > How else can I give users access to emai
han useless. ;)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted
> At: Thursday, January 08, 2004 5:56 PM Posted To: swynk
> Conversation: Exchange 2003 backups
> Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 backups
>
> PST's can have passwords put on
003 backups
>
>
>
> This seems to be a popular axiom, buy why are they considered bad ?
>
> How else can I give users access to email from 2 years ago ?
> yes, they do need to access these.
>
> What do other organisations do ?
>
> Matt
>
>
> --
>
>
>
PST = Bad.
themolk.
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, 9 January 2004 9:21 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Exchange 2003 backups
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I have just moved from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2003.
> It is a single server set
> One approach you might want to consider is educating your
> users about the use of Personal Folders.
Then, educate yourself about all the problems you will have with
PST's... Remember, PST = bad.
themolk.
_
List posting FAQ:
ger drives! Not sure why you want to
> run eseutil.
> How much space are you going to reclaim if you do?
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 7:34 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Sub
All advice appreciated...
We have recently introduced Outlook 2K3 into our Exchange 2000
environment. Our laptop users we have configured to run Outlook in
"cached exchange mode".
In the same time frame, our *.stm has exploded from about 1.5 GB to
approx 9GB. The *.edb file has not grown (apart f
Larry = pst = bad.
themolk.
P.S. I wish he was the M:\ drive...
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, 17 October 2003 7:41 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: FW: RE: Just Released - Digital Cable Descrambler 3899
>
> UNLOCK Digital Cable - F
I'm a big fan of the fact that it is an "EXTREMELY BUSINESS
TRANSACTION". ;)
themolk.
> -Original Message-
> From: jerry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, 26 September 2003 10:08 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: forward for a transaction
>
>
> FROM DESK OF:MR.JERRY JO
Matt,
What does this have to do with the thread in place? Perhaps if you want
help you need to send a new e-mail so that a new thread starts (or
continue the thread this started on)??
I know those that will want to help will find it easier if this is the
case.
My $0.02 (inc GST).
themolk.
> -
Ditto from an Aussie...
themolk.
> -Original Message-
> From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 22 September 2003 8:08 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: A CHALLENGE to the List
>
>
> I see the 10 to 12 looks like its gone, but I would be happy
> to
Tony,
If you agree with Andy, then why not do something about it and CHANGE
THE SUBJECT?!
themolk.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, 16 September 2003 9:16 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!?
>
>
Eric,
Single mailbox, or whole server?
If the latter, the FAQ has _THE_ method (EdC method).
If the former, ExMerge is the goods - however note you will lose your
SIS capabilities on the mailbox you move.
themolk.
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Holtzclaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
That's absolutely right - to quote the Great Ed...
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioural problems"
A length of 2x4 is hardly technological, and supremely satisfying
wielded in the hands of a frustrated IT admin. Win - Win!
themolk.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mi
Jamie,
As I understand it, Forestprep is only meant to be run on a Windows 2000
domain...
I am happy to be wrong, however.
themolk.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jamie Domingue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, 1 August 2003 2:28 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
>
> Greetings,
Ditto... Particularly if this is the integration of Entourage to use an
Exchange server properly!
themolk.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Holstrom, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 31 July 2003 1:04 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
>
> I'd be interested in hearing about it
t; To: Exchange Discussions
>
> LOL. I think it's hysterical.
> - Original Message -
> From: "Steve Molkentin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 6:16 PM
> Subject: FW:
??
I am just angry...
themolk.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 22 July 2003 8:14 AM
To: Steve Molkentin
Subject: Re: EMail Stamp Request for {RE: Help -- Login Scripts !!!}
I use EMail Stamps to curb the flow of unwanted junk e-mail
Gurus,
Ex2K - Native mode
I have a mail enabled public folder (calendar) for a meeting room that I
can e-mail when booking a meeting to ensure it is booked. This works,
however it only tentatively accepts the meeting request.
Some questions:
- Can (and how, if so) can I get it to auto accept mee
Nope - that's just Andy. Up there with Martin & Ed as far as I am
concerned when it comes to knowing their stuff.
themolk.
> -Original Message-
> From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 3 July 2003 8:29 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 inv
> can try telling my users that and see if they buy it. :)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 5:12 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
>
> Carmila,
>
> It's the international dateline - every tim
Carmila,
It's the international dateline - every time you send an e-mail to a
group across it, it attaches the winmail.dat file so that when it is
opened, it is read in the local time zone (and reflects that).[1]
themolk.
[1] Complete BS - but I couldn't help but throw it out there.
> -Or
You forgot one... Tupperware = 100%
themolk.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, 27 June 2003 1:34 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: how to cut down on spam
>
>
> Death and Taxes = 100%
>
> -Original Message-
> From:
Peter,
That said, the latest on the Spammunition website is to suggest he is
changing the logic so that there is no need to manually rescan.
I agree the errors are frustrating - but the product is not bad for free
for a client.
themolk.
> -Original Message-
> From: Durkee, Peter [mailto
Raji,
>From my memory, the outlook bar shortcuts are stored in the user's
profile (in application data > local settings (I think)). To specify a
folder to start up in, go to: Tools > Options > Other > Advanced options
- but I think it only allows to specify the big 7 (inbox, calendar,
etc).
I hop
For those interested souls...
http://www.thecouriermail.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5936,6619047%2
55E8362,00.html
(link may wrap - but I hope not).
themolk.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
w how many people they actually get
> prosecuted under this law.
>
> Aloha,
>
> -Ben-
> Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4
> Director of Information Services
> Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
> http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
>
>
> > -Original Message
rd that anyone should accept
> the burden of responsibility
> for receiving an electronic message that was sent to them by
> mistake. And
> those disclaimers that try to shift the burden of
> responiblity from the shoulders of the sender to the reciever
> are a sad attempt at just that.
What about Klingon and Elvish? Google is available in both, so people
must speak it. Should we not then make disclaimers available in these
languages too?
themolk.
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 19 June 2003 12:13 AM
> To: Excha
Why not put a link as the disclaimer? E.g.:
Steve Molkentin
BSES
Phone, fax,etc
http://www.bses.org.au/legal.html (there is no link here, just an
example)
I just thought this might save 50 lines of crap in an e-mail... The
person has been made aware of the legality of the document through the
Fioon,
Considering what you are proposing, you would benefit from at the very
least reading up on Windows 2000 Server. It is vastly different from a
management perspective from NT, and the introduction of AD will
additionally complicate things for what you are proposing if you do not
have an under
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Steve Molkentin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:53 PM
> Subject: RE: MS Purchase
>
>
> > Ex2K3 sp1
> >
> > ;)
> >
Ex2K3 sp1
;)
themolk.
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 12 June 2003 8:51 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: OT: MS Purchase
>
>
> totally unrelated but MS just bought RAV anti virus . . .
> Any predicitions on how long until we see
Chris,
As much as I appreciate your POV, I will have to ring Ed's mantra in on
this:
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioural problems".
We must encourage (or train ourselves) all these kinds of users that we
know that the Internet is not a "safe" place. E-mail cannot be tak
Has the list died? Where is everyone?
mailto:themolk@;flc.qld.edu.au
+---+
| Steve Molkentin |
| IT Trainer/HelpDesk |
| D/Dial - 07 3372 0819 |
| Mobile - 0410 680 018 |
+---+-+
| Forest Lake College |
| http
James,
You have posted this 3 times. No one has replied. This can only mean one of
five things:
1) those that can help are busy on other things
2) those that can help are busy trying to think up a helpful solution
3) those that can help are sick of you posting this message, and are
refusing to h
from my post, btw...
>
> (:=
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Steve Molkentin
> Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 10:17 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: backup failure
>
>
> I'
I'm a non-existent cabal...
themolk.
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, 4 September 2002 1:09 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: backup failure
>
>
> I can think of a number of non existent cabals
>
> -Origina
That's getting a bit harsh...
themolk.
> -Original Message-
> From: Leo Ballester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, 4 September 2002 11:14 am
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: backup failure
>
>
> I see... The problem is not the backup software. The problem
> is si
All,
In my experience, there are two ways to set up an OOO reply.
(a) Use the 'Out of Office Assistant' - Tools > Out of Office Assistant.
This will only send one reply per instance of the OOO Assistant per person
e-mailing. If you turn it off, then on again, you'll get another message
from the
Bradbury win gold
at Olympics in Utah
He come last and win
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Gowen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 10:08 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Haiku Monday :-(
>
>
>
> I must work Monday
> Britain has no president
> Prime M
1 admin
1 junior admin (me)
5 servers across 3 sites
1200 users, 180 GAL entries/users
We're a high school that hasn't let our students have their own e-mail
addresses (that we control) yet.
There is NEVER enough time to get anything done - it's mostly all patchwork
and responding to knee-jerks.
ns Tab for the user and add his
> secretary with "user permissions". On the secretary's profile add her
> boss's mailbox. The secretary gets more than just this one
> folder but in my
> experience, they usually request the others later...
>
> Scott
>
> --
lp is
appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
\\themolk.
[Steve Molkentin]
[IT Trainer/HelpDesk]
[Forest Lake College & The Springfield College]
[D/Dial - 07 3372 0819]
[Mobile - 0410 680 018]
Visit our Colleges on the Internet:
http://www.forestlakecollege.com.au
http://www.thespringfieldcollege.co
.
[Steve Molkentin]
[IT Trainer/HelpDesk]
[Forest Lake College & The Springfield College]
[D/Dial - 07 3372 0819]
[Mobile - 0410 680 018]
Visit our Colleges on the Internet:
http://www.forestlakecollege.com.au
http://www.thespringfieldcollege.com.au
http://www.extraordinarykids.co
You really don't know what you are starting with this Doug - test at your
peril...
themolk.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mehringer, Doug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 7:42 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: test
>
>
>
> Douglass W. Mehringer
>
47 matches
Mail list logo
